Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Comparative study of silica and mycorrhiza application on growth and yield of okra under acidic soil conditions in high-rainfall areas

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13831
Submitted
25 January 2026
Published
22-09-2026

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and silica (Si) application on the growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) in the lateritic soils of the Konkan region during the rabi season of 2024–25. A factorial randomised block design comprising 18 treatment combinations with 3 replications was adopted. Treatments comprised seed, soil and drench applications of AMF and soil, foliar and seed applications of Si at three graded levels (1×, 2× and 3×) in combination with the recommended dose of fertiliser (RDF). Growth and yield attributes, including plant height, leaf number, shoot and root biomass, shoot-to-root ratio and fruit yield were recorded. Soil application of Si granules (A4) at the highest level (B3; 15 kg ha-1) recorded the maximum plant height (62.44 cm), shoot weight (28.66 g) and fruit yield (138.33 g), whereas AMF drenching and soil application (A2 and A3) improved root weight (up to 19.88 g) and root volume (up to  18.22 cm³). As the A×B interaction was statistically significant only for fruit yield, the main effects are presented for the remaining parameters. The use of Si and AMF enhanced nutrient uptake, physiological efficiency and stress tolerance. The study concludes that soil application of silica at higher doses is more effective than AMF and is a sustainable strategy for improving okra productivity in acidic, high-rainfall soils.

References

  1. 1. Zhu B, Gao T, Zhang D, Ding K, Li C, Ma F. Functions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in horticultural crops. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 2022;303:110381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.110381
  2. 2. Jiang F, Zhang L, Zhou J, George TS, Feng G. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance mineralisation of organic phosphorus by carrying bacteria along their extraradical hyphae. New Phytol. 2021;229(5):3041–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17081
  3. 3. Meena KK, Kumar P, Sorty AM, Bitla U, Pathak H. Ecology of arbuscular mycorrhizae and influence on drought tolerance in crop plants. In: Microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture. Vol. 1. 2022. p. 261–85.
  4. 4. Dastogeer KMG, Zahan MI, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Akter MA, Okazaki S. Plant salinity tolerance conferred by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and associated mechanisms: a meta-analysis. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:588550. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.588550
  5. 5. Verma KK, Song XP, Liang Q, Huang HR, Bhatt R, Xu L, et al. Unlocking the role of silicon against biotic stress in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1430804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1430804
  6. 6. Gong HJ, Chen KM, Chen GC, Wang SM, Zhang CL. Effect of silicon on growth of wheat under drought. J Plant Nutr. 2003;26(5):1055–63. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-120020075
  7. 7. Gowda DC, Manjunatha L, Lingaiah HB, Nachegowda V, Kumar SA. Effect of speciality fertilisers on growth and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Plant Arch. 2015;15(1):335–8.
  8. 8. Pati S, Pal B, Badole S, Hazra GC, Mandal B. Effect of silicon fertilisation on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of rice. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2016;47(3):284–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2015.1123728
  9. 9. Cuong TX, Ullah H, Datta A, Hanh TC. Effects of silicon-based fertiliser on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of rice in tropical zone of Vietnam. Rice Sci. 2017;24(5):283–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2017.06.002
  10. 10. Vashi JM, Saravaiya SN, Patel AI, Patel NK, Chaudhari BN. Effect of foliar application of silicon on okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(4):2477–80.
  11. 11. Mahendran PP, Gowthamraj K, Balasubramaniam P, Chandramani P, Yuvaraj M. Status and distribution of plant-available silicon in relation to some soil properties and response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to silicon nutrition in Kanyakumari district, Tamil Nadu, India. Silicon. 2022;14:1519–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00572-3
  12. 12. Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; 2008.
  13. 13. Ugwoke KI, Onyishi LE. Effects of mycorrhizae (Glomus musae), poultry manure and okra mosaic potyvirus (OkMV) on yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). Prod Agric Technol. 2009;5(2):359–69.
  14. 14. Camargo MSD, Bezerra BKL, Vitti AC, Silva MA, Oliveira AL. Silicon fertilisation reduces the deleterious effects of water deficit in sugarcane. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2017;17:99–111. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162017005000008
  15. 15. Liang Y, Nikolic M, Bélanger R, Gong H, Song A. Silicon in agriculture: from theory to practice. Dordrecht: Springer; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9978-2
  16. 16. Prakash NB, Chandrashekar N, Mahendra C, Patil SU, Thippeshappa GN, Laane HM. Effect of foliar spray of soluble silicic acid on growth and yield parameters of wetland rice. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2011;42(22):2777–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2011.620983
  17. 17. Alam SM, Ullah MA, Haider SI, Nawab NN, Aamir SS, Mahmood IA. Effect of farmyard manure and planting densities on growth, yield and quality of okra under natural farming. Int J Res Agric For. 2019;6(4):21–5.
  18. 18. Pallavi T, Prakash NB. Yield, quality and nutrient content of tomato in response to soil drenching of silicic acid. Agric Res. 2021;10:634–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-021-00525-9
  19. 19. Yin W, Pang Z, Feng X, Wang Y, Peng H, Liang Y. Comparison of the effects of silicic acid, organosilicon and nano-silicon on rice cell-wall phosphorus. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2025;198:116–27.
  20. 20. Lei Y, Liu Y, Wei J, Li W, Zhang S, Yang Z, et al. Mechanism of silicon-nutrition sensing in salt-stressed rice: is it modulated by FERONIA homologs OsFLR1/2-mediated cell-wall integrity signalling? Plant Physiol Biochem. 2025;198:92–105.
  21. 21. Islam F, Khan MSS, Ahmed S, Ikram AU, Hannan F, Jan M, et al. Dynamic interplay of silica-coated iron-oxide nanocomposite on the soil–plant system to mitigate Cd toxicity in rice. J Clean Prod. 2024;475:145612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.145612
  22. 22. Liang Y, Sun W, Zhu YG, Christie P. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of abiotic stresses in higher plants: a review. Environ Pollut. 2007;147(2):422–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2006.06.008
  23. 23. Kochian LV, Piñeros MA, Liu J, Magalhães JV. Plant adaptation to acid soils: the molecular basis for crop aluminium resistance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:571–98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-114822
  24. 24. Seguel A, Cumming JR, Klugh-Stewart K, Cornejo P, Borie F. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in decreasing aluminium phytotoxicity in acidic soils: a review. Mycorrhiza. 2013;23:167–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-013-0479-x
  25. 25. Li H, Smith SE, Holloway RE, Zhu Y, Smith FA. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi contribute to phosphorus uptake by wheat grown in a phosphorus-fixing soil even in the absence of positive growth responses. New Phytol. 2006;172(3):536–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01846.x
  26. 26. Wang H, Wang Y, He Y, Jin L, Liu M, Shen Z, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonisation regulates root traits and soil carbon economic strategies. BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25:202. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-05868-7

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.