Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research communications

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Evaluation of mycelium foam packaging for quality preservation of Jasminum sambac (L.) Aiton during long-distance transport

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13853
Submitted
27 January 2026
Published
20-04-2026

Abstract

The floriculture industry faces increasing pressure to adopt sustainable packaging solutions while maintaining product quality during long-distance transportation. This study evaluated 4 packaging materials-expanded polystyrene (EPS), mycelium foam, coir-lined carton and aluminium foil-lined carton-for preserving Jasminum sambac (L.) Aiton flowers under ice gel conditions (4-6 °C) over 48 hr. Visual, physiological and biochemical parameters were assessed using a completely randomized design (CRD) with 5 replications. Mycelium foam packaging demonstrated consistently higher performance across all quality metrics: highest freshness retention (71.54 % at 48 hr vs. 63.43 % for EPS), colour preservation (77.82 % vs. 68.71 %), extended shelf life (4.12 vs. 3.83 days) and superior moisture retention (49.91 % vs. 40.43 %). Physiological parameters confirmed mycelium superiority with minimum physiological loss in weight (3.59 % vs. 4.65 % for EPS). Biochemical analysis revealed maximum total carbohydrate retention (63.50 mg/g vs. 58.54 mg/g in EPS) and phenolic content (39.94 mg/g vs. 28.26 mg/g in EPS) at 48 hr, indicating suppressed respiration and enhanced antioxidant capacity. The porous hygroscopic structure of mycelium foam provided optimal humidity regulation and thermal buffering (0.04 W/m·K) while offering complete biodegradability within 30-45 days. This study demonstrates that mycelium foam can serve as an effective bio-based alternative to conventional EPS packaging for jasmine flower export, simultaneously enhancing post-harvest quality and environmental sustainability.

References

  1. 1. Silalahi M. Jasmine (Jasminum sambac (L.) Aiton): potential utilization and bioactivity. Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry. 2023;9(2):28–36.
  2. 2. Welfare MoAaF. Horticulture statistics at a glance 2024–2025. Statistical report. New Delhi: Government of India; 2025. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajraf/2023/v9i2198
  3. 3. Nirmala L, Brindha I. Global perspectives on socio-economic dynamics, marketing practices and challenges in jasmine trade: evidence from a prominent Indian flower market. 2025. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6262
  4. 4. Ffadhilah A, Chitra R, Ganga M, Prasanthrajan M, Djanaguiraman M. Chitosan-based biodegradable packaging: enhancing the shelf life and quality of Jasminum sambac L. flowers. Plant Science. 2024;11. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5438
  5. 5. D’Almeida AP, de Albuquerque TL. Innovations in food packaging: from bio-based materials to smart packaging systems. Processes. 2024;12(10):2085. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12102085
  6. 6. Silva G, Oliveira M, Rangel B, Lino J. A brief review on sustainable packaging materials. Wastes: Solutions, Treatments and Opportunities III. 2019:463–9. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429289798-73
  7. 7. Sinha S. An overview of biopolymer-derived packaging material. Polymers from Renewable Resources. 2024;15(2):193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/20412479241226884
  8. 8. Kumar M, Kumar R, Motla R, Sharma M, Shukla D, Kaushik K, et al. Innovative eco-friendly approaches to enhance the vase life of cut flowers: a comprehensive review. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology. 2024;27(12):36–45. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i121753
  9. 9. van Doorn WG, Stead AD. Abscission of flowers and floral parts. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1997;48(4):821–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/48.4.821
  10. 10. Choudhary S, Das JN, Mohanty CR, Das AK, Mishra A. Packaging technology for extending shelf-life of jasmine (Jasminum sambac cv. Gundumulli) flowers. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2019;8(9):1724–32. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.809.199
  11. 11. Luksta I, Vamža I, Blumberga D, editors. Mycelium thermal insulation material. CONECT International Scientific Conference of Environmental and Climate Technologies; 2025. https://doi.org/10.7250/CONECT.2025.032
  12. 12. Kitirojapn P, Teeravarunyou S, Kamolwit K, Pattanachan P. Development of sustainable packaging cushions from coconut waste using 3D printing techniques. Environment and Natural Resources Journal. 2025;23(2):132–41. https://doi.org/10.32526/ennrj/23/20240224
  13. 13. Čekon M, Struhala K, Slávik R. Cardboard-based packaging materials as renewable thermal insulation of buildings: thermal and life-cycle performance. Journal of Renewable Materials. 2017;5(1):84–93. https://doi.org/10.7569/JRM.2017.634135
  14. 14. Jawaharlal M, Thamaraiselvi S, Ganga M. Packaging technology for export of jasmine (Jasminum sambac Ait.) flowers. Journal of Horticultural Science. 2012;7(2):180–9. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v7i2.372
  15. 15. Sivaprasad S, Byju SK, Prajith C, Shaju J, Rejeesh CR. Development of a novel mycelium bio-composite material to substitute for polystyrene in packaging applications. Materials Today Proceedings. 2021;47:5038–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.622
  16. 16. Madhu G. Studies on the effect of different packaging materials and chemicals on the post-harvest life of jasmine flowers. M Sc (Ag) thesis. Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu; 1999.
  17. 17. Barrs H, Weatherley P. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences. 1962;15(3):413–28. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413
  18. 18. Je H. Determination of reducing sugars and carbohydrates. Methods of Carbohydrate Chemistry. 1962;1:380–94.
  19. 19. Malick CC, Singh MB. Estimation of phenol content. In: Plant enzymology and histoenzymology. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers; 1980. p. 286.
  20. 20. Sukhatme P. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research; 1957.
  21. 21. Jose J, Uvais K, Sreenadh T, Deepak AV, Rejeesh C. Investigations into the development of a mycelium biocomposite to substitute polystyrene in packaging applications. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2021;46(3):2975–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05247-2
  22. 22. Alemu D, Tafesse M, Mondal AK. Mycelium-based composite: the future sustainable biomaterial. International Journal of Biomaterials. 2022;2022:8401528. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8401528
  23. 23. Pohan JN, Kusumawati YA, Radhitanti A. Mushroom mycelium-based biodegradable packaging material: a promising sustainable solution for food industry. E3S Web of Conferences. 2023;426:02128. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602128
  24. 24. Serrano M, Amorós A, Pretel MT, Martínez-Madrid MC, Romojaro F. Preservative solutions containing boric acid delay senescence of carnation flowers. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2001;23(2):133–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00108-9
  25. 25. Chand N, Hashmi SA. Mechanical properties of sisal fibre at elevated temperatures. Journal of Materials Science. 1993;28(24):6724–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00356422
  26. 26. Enarevba DR, Haapala KR. A comparative life cycle assessment of expanded polystyrene and mycelium packaging box inserts. Procedia CIRP. 2023;116:654–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.110
  27. 27. Sharma V. Biochemical changes accompanying petal development in Rosa damascena. MSc thesis.1981.
  28. 28. Mishra SD, Gaur BK, Bhattacharya VW, Bhattacharya BB. Isolation, identification and significance of free radical in senescing leaves. Plant Cell Physiology. 1976;17(4):725–30.
  29. 29. Abhijith R, Ashok A, Rejeesh C. Sustainable packaging applications from mycelium to substitute polystyrene: a review. Materials today: proceedings. 2018;5(1):2139–45.
  30. 30. Appels FV, Camere S, Montalti M, Karana E, Jansen KM, Dijksterhuis J, et al. Fabrication factors influencing mechanical, moisture- and water-related properties of mycelium-based composites. Materials & Design. 2019;161:64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.027
  31. 31. Holt GA, Mcintyre G, Flagg D, Bayer E, Wanjura JD, Pelletier MG. Fungal mycelium and cotton plant materials in the manufacture of biodegradable molded packaging material: evaluation study of select blends of cotton byproducts. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy. 2012;6(4):431–9. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2012.1241
  32. 32. Joshi K, Meher MK, Poluri KM. Fabrication and characterization of bioblocks from agricultural waste using fungal mycelium for renewable and sustainable applications. ACS Applied Bio Materials. 2020;3(4):1884–92. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b01047
  33. 33. JL S, Gopalsamy S, N B, Sundarapandian M, Balasubramanian S. Harnessing mycelium bio-composite panels for improved acoustic and flame-retardant properties for architectural applications: a comprehensive review. Frontiers in Advanced Materials Research. 2025.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.