Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Heat stress effects on physiological, biochemical and fruit quality traits of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes at the late fruit maturation stage

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13898
Submitted
29 January 2026
Published
30-04-2026

Abstract

Heat stress during late fruit maturation can impair physiological efficiency and fruit quality in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). The present study evaluated 12 genotypes under natural field heat stress conditions (maximum temperature 36–38 °C) during the late fruit maturation stage using a randomised complete block design (RCBD) with five replicates. Gas exchange parameters, chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm), pigment composition, membrane thermostability, proline accumulation and fruit quality attributes were quantified and analysed using ANOVA (p ≤0.05). Significant genotypic variation was observed in net photosynthetic rate (1.08–21.01 µmol m-2 s-1), Fv/Fm (0.424–0.662), electrolyte leakage (EL; 76.59–99.15 %) and carotenoid retention. Genotypes VRT 101 A, EC 538380 and EC 620438 maintained comparatively higher photosynthetic performance and membrane stability, whereas EC 620-1, INDAM 2102, EC 620568 and EC 620419 exhibited superior fruit quality retention, including higher lycopene (up to 0.522 mg 100 mL-1), β-carotene and total soluble solids (TSS). Sensitive genotypes showed reduced photosynthetic efficiency and higher membrane injury under prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures. The findings highlight genotype-dependent heat tolerance strategies and identify physiological and biochemical markers useful for selection under terminal heat stress conditions.

References

  1. 1. FAO. FAOSTAT: Crops and livestock products. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2022.
  2. 2. Naika S, de Jeude JL, de Goffau M, Hilmi M, van Dam B. Cultivation of tomato: production, processing and marketing. Wageningen: Agromisa Foundation; 2005.
  3. 3. Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR. Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007;61:199–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011
  4. 4. Lohar DP, Peat WE. Floral characteristics of heat-tolerant and heat-sensitive tomato cultivars at high temperature. Scientia Horticulturae. 1998;73:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00056-3
  5. 5. Sato S, Peet MM, Thomas JF. Physiological factors limit fruit set of tomato under chronic mild heat stress. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2000;23:719–26. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00589.x
  6. 6. Firon N, Shaked R, Peet MM, Pharr DM, Zamski E, Rosenfeld K, et al. Pollen carbohydrate retention under heat stress. Scientia Horticulturae. 2006;109:212–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.03.007
  7. 7. Hanson PM, Chen JT, Kuo G. Gene action and heritability of high-temperature fruit set in tomato. HortScience. 2002;37:172–5. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.37.1.172
  8. 8. Camejo D, Rodríguez P, Morales MA, Dell’Amico JM, Torrecillas A, Alarcón JJ. High temperature effects on photosynthetic activity of tomato. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2005;162:281–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.07.014
  9. 9. Sanchez-Rodriguez E, Rubio-Wilhelmi MM, Cervilla LM, Blasco B, Rios JJ, Rosales MA, et al. Ionome and uptake fluxes in cherry tomato under water stress. Plant and Soil. 2010;335:339–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0422-2
  10. 10. Stevens MA, Rudich J. Genetic potential for overcoming physiological limitations in tomato. HortScience. 1987;13:673–8.
  11. 11. Chen HH, Shen ZY, Li PH. Adaptability of crop plants to high temperature stress. Crop Science. 1982;22:719–25. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200040006x
  12. 12. Feller U, Crafts-Brandner SJ, Salvucci ME. Moderately high temperatures inhibit Rubisco activase. Plant Physiology. 1998;116:539–46. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.116.2.539
  13. 13. Björkman O, Demmig B. Photon yield of O₂ evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K. Planta. 1987;170:489–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402983
  14. 14. Asada K, Endo T, Mano J, Miyake C. Molecular mechanisms of photoprotection. In: Stress responses of photosynthetic organisms. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1998.
  15. 15. Papadakis IE, Dimassi KN, Bosabalidis AM, Therios IN, Patakas A, Giannakoula A, et al. Effects of boron excess on plant physiology. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2004;51:247–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2003.11.004
  16. 16. Liu X, Huang B. Heat stress-induced membrane lipid peroxidation in creeping bentgrass. Crop Science. 2000;40:503–10. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.402503x
  17. 17. Ristic Z, Williams G, Yang G, Martin B, Fullerton S, Li J, et al. Membrane damage under stress. Journal of Plant Physiology. 1996;149:424–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80144-1
  18. 18. Young AJ. The photoprotective role of carotenoids. Physiologia Plantarum. 1991;83:702–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb02490.x
  19. 19. Dumas Y, Dadomo M, Di Lucca G, Grolier P. Effects of environmental factors on antioxidant content of tomato. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2003;83:369–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1370
  20. 20. Rosales MA, Rubio-Wilhelmi MM, Castellano R, et al. Temperature effects on tomato metabolism. Scientia Horticulturae. 2007;113:244–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.03.015
  21. 21. Adegoroye AS, Jolliffe PA. Sunscald injury in tomato fruit. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 1983;108:23–8. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.108.1.23
  22. 22. Giovanelli G, Zanoni B, Lavelli V, Nani R. Antioxidant properties of dried tomato. Journal of Food Engineering. 2002;52:135–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(01)00095-4
  23. 23. Kerkhofs NS, Lister CE, Savage GP. Colour and antioxidant changes in tomato. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 2005;60:117–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-005-6839-8
  24. 24. Hamauzu Y, Miyamoto Y, Chachin K. Carotenoid changes under high temperature. Japanese Journal of Horticultural Science. 1994;63:675–84. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.63.675
  25. 25. Fridman E, Pleban T, Zamir D. QTL for tomato sugar content. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2000;97:4718–23. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4718
  26. 26. Monti LM. Breeding tomatoes for peeling quality. Acta Horticulturae. 1990;100:341–9. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1980.100.34
  27. 27. Anthon GE, LeStrange M, Barrett DM. Changes in pH and quality during vine holding. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2011;91:1175–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4312
  28. 28. Lichtenthaler HK, Buschmann C. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. In: Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. John Wiley & Sons; 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142913.faf0403s01
  29. 29. Claussen W. Proline as a measure of stress in tomato plants. Plant Science. 2005;168:241–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.07.039
  30. 30. Nagata M, Yamashita I. Simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi. 1992;39:925–8. https://doi.org/10.3136/nskkk1962.39.925
  31. 31. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 12th ed. Washington (DC): Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1970.
  32. 32. Srivastava RP, Kumar S. Fruit and vegetable preservation: principles and practices. 2nd ed. New Delhi: International Book Distributing Co.; 1993.
  33. 33. Ding Y, Shi Y, Yang S. Molecular regulation of plant responses to environmental temperatures. Molecular Plant. 2020;13:544–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.02.004
  34. 34. Ohama N, Sato H, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Transcriptional regulatory network of plant heat stress response. Trends in Plant Science. 2020;25:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.08.015
  35. 35. Qu A, Ding Y, Jiang Q, Zhu C. Molecular mechanisms of heat stress response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24:4832.
  36. 36. Sun Y, Wang C, Chen H, Ruan H. Mechanisms of thermotolerance in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23:1142.
  37. 37. Singh S, Reddy KR. Photosynthesis under heat stress conditions. Plants. 2023;12:1175.
  38. 38. Hasanuzzaman M, Bhuyan MHMB, Zulfiqar F, Raza A, Mohsin SM, Mahmud JA, et al. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense under heat stress. Antioxidants. 2020;9:681. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080681
  39. 39. Lamaoui M, Jemo M, Datla R, Bekkaoui F. Heat stress mitigation in crops. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13:801469.
  40. 40. Zandalinas SI, Mittler R. Multifactorial stress responses in plants. New Phytologist. 2022;234:1161–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18087
  41. 41. Sattar A, Sher A, Ijaz M, Ul-Allah S, Rizwan M, Ali S, et al. Heat stress in tomato. Horticulturae. 2023;9:1035.
  42. 42. Zhao C, Liu B, Piao S, Wang X, Lobell DB, Huang Y, et al. Temperature increase reduces global crop yields. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2021;118:e2012606118.
  43. 43. Raza A, Salehi H, Rahman MA, Zahid Z, Madadkar Haghjou M, Najafi-Kakavand S, et al. Heat stress tolerance in crops: recent advances. Biotechnology Advances. 2024;67:108210.
  44. 44. Balfagón D, Sengupta S, Gómez-Cadenas A, Fritschi FB, Azad RK, Mittler R, et al. Hormonal regulation of heat acclimation responses. Plant Physiology. 2021;185:1859–74.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.