Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)

Proteomic insights into ultraviolet-B stress adaptation in Mimosa pudica L. and Senna auriculata L. Roxb.

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13910
Submitted
30 January 2026
Published
04-08-2026 — Updated on 12-08-2026
Versions

Abstract

Differential proteomic responses of Mimosa pudica L. and Senna auriculata L. Roxb. under ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation were examined using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE). Under normal conditions, both species exhibited stable and comparable protein expression patterns. However, UV-B exposure induced distinct, species-specific proteomic alterations. Senna auriculata showed an early and sustained upregulation of stress-responsive proteins, indicating rapid activation of defence and protective mechanisms. In contrast, M. pudica displayed a delayed proteomic response, with changes becoming evident only at later stages of exposure. Both species exhibited a reduction in low molecular weight proteins, suggesting a metabolic shift from growth-related processes to stress adaptation. Overall, the findings highlight that S. auriculata possesses a more efficient and timely proteomic response to UV-B stress than M. pudica, providing valuable insights into the molecular basis of plant resilience under environmental stress conditions.

References

  1. 1. Jansen MAK, Gaba V, Greenberg BM. Plant responses to UV-B radiation: from molecular mechanisms to stress tolerance. Physiologia Plantarum. 2019:1–11.
  2. 2. Bandurska H, Niedziela J, Chadzinikolau T. The role of UV-B in plant responses to abiotic stress. Plant Physiology Reports. 2020;25:131–46.
  3. 3. Hideg É, Jansen MAK, Strid Å. UV-B exposure, ROS and stress: inseparable companions or loosely linked associates? Trends in Plant Science. 2013;18(2):107–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.09.003
  4. 4. Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Duan J, Liu C, Wang J, Zhai H, et al. Multi-omics analysis reveals UV-B stress tolerance mechanisms in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;12:673381.
  5. 5. Kosová K, Vítámvás P, Prášil IT. Proteomics of stress responses in wheat and barley—search for potential protein markers of stress tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2011;2:114.
  6. 6. Righetti PG, Boschetti E. The art of observing proteome changes by electrophoretic means. Journal of Proteomics. 2020;225:103845.
  7. 7. Braam J. In touch: plant responses to mechanical stimuli. New Phytologist. 2005;165:373–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01263.x
  8. 8. Fromm J, Lautner S. Electrical signals and their physiological significance in plants. Plant Cell and Environment. 2007;30:249–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01614.x
  9. 9. Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP. The World's worst weeds. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii; 1977.
  10. 10. Sharma P, Dubey RS. Oxidative stress and antioxidative defense system in plants. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2005;191:225–39.
  11. 11. Gamble JS. Flora of the presidency of Madras. London: Adlard & Son Ltd.; 1935.
  12. 12. Kumar S, Pandey AK. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids. Scientific World Journal. 2013;2013:162750. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/162750
  13. 13. Subramanian SS, Nagarajan S. Flavonoids of the leaves of Cassia auriculata. Phytochemistry. 1969;8:529–31.
  14. 14. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1951;193(1):265–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6
  15. 15. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227(5259):680–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
  16. 16. Blum H, Beier H, Gross HJ. Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis. 1987;8(2):93–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150080203
  17. 17. Chaves AL, Ferreira RS, Almeida JA. Proteomic responses of Vigna unguiculata to UV-B stress reveal alterations in cellular redox homeostasis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2019;141:44–52.
  18. 18. Yu Z, Zheng C, Chen M. Mechanisms of UV-B radiation-induced oxidative stress in plants: insights into redox signaling and defense strategies. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2020;71(14):4137–50.
  19. 19. Singh RP, Tripathi D, Pandey SP. Proteomic insights into the stress adaptation of Trigonella foenum-graecum under UV-B radiation. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2022;189:104598.
  20. 20. Hideg É, Strid Å. The effects of UV-B on photosynthesis and antioxidant defense in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2023;74:3629–42.
  21. 21. Li X, Zhang H, Liu Q, Chen F. Small heat shock proteins and glutathione S-transferases coordinate redox homeostasis under UV-B stress in plants. Plant Cell Reports. 2024;43:215–29.
  22. 22. Wu D, Zhang Y, Sun Y. Comparative proteomics analysis of Cucumis sativus under UV-B stress and the associated mechanisms. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):4508. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90633-5
  23. 23. Zhou Z, Xu Q, Liu J. Proteomic and physiological responses of Salvia miltiorrhiza to UV-B radiation: a focus on the regulation of antioxidant enzymes. BMC Plant Biology. 2023;23(1):15.
  24. 24. Wang R, Chen S, Zhou Y, Xu J. Rapid proteomic reprogramming confers UV-B tolerance in higher plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2024;15:1298743.
  25. 25. Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2023;196:107643.
  26. 26. Kosová K, Vítámvás P, Prášil IT, Renaut J. Proteomic responses to abiotic stress: timing, efficiency and adaptive significance. Journal of Proteomics. 2023;274:104789.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.