Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)

Resolving the species boundaries in wild edible Astraeus mushrooms using phylogeny, morphology and elemental profiling

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13922
Submitted
31 January 2026
Published
19-08-2026 — Updated on 29-09-2026
Versions

Abstract

The work aims to investigate two regional wild edible Astraeus species, Astraeus asiaticus and Astraeus odoratus, collected from the forest of Chhattisgarh, India. The work was done through an integrated morpho-molecular and nutritional approach to resolve species boundaries and assess their nutraceutical potential. These mushrooms are traditionally harvested by local communities and used as an important component of their seasonal diets. Astraeus, an ectomycorrhizal genus widely distributed across temperate and tropical ecosystems, includes 9 identified species. Some of them have been reported from India. However, taxonomic ambiguity and morphological overlap among these species have often limited the availability of accurate identification data. These mushrooms are valued for their culinary importance and high market demand in Chhattisgarh. Morphological characterisation, combined with internal transcribed spacer-large subunit (ITS-LSU) DNA-based phylogenetic analysis, clearly differentiated the two regional species, A. asiaticus and A. odoratus, with well-resolved Bayesian posterior probabilities. The molecular results supported field-based observations and confirmed species-level distinction. Complementary nutritional assessments in this work revealed species-specific variation and Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis demonstrated a broad spectrum of macro- and trace-element concentrations. Both species were found to be rich in essential minerals
(potassium (K), sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co)), while cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) were detected at low levels. This study provides evidence-based differentiation of the two Astraeus species and documents their nutritional and mineral richness. The findings in this work enhance the biological characterisation of these mushrooms and provide a new scientific basis for their safe and informed use.

References

  1. 1. Phosri C, Martín MP, Watling R. Astraeus: Hidden dimensions. IMA Fungus. 2013;4(2):347–56. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.02.13
  2. 2. Morgan AP. North American fungi: The gasteromycetes. J Cin Soc Nat. 1889;12:8–22.
  3. 3. Hosaka K, Bates ST, Beever RE, Castellano MA, Colgan W III, Domínguez LS, et al. Molecular phylogenetics of the gomphoid-phalloid fungi with an establishment of the new subclass Phallomycetidae and two new orders. Mycologia. 2006;98(6):949–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832624
  4. 4. Das K, Ghosh A, Chakraborty D, Li J, Qiu L, Baghela A, et al. Fungal biodiversity profiles 31–40. Cryptogamie Mycologie. 2017;38(3):353–406. https://doi.org/10.7872/crym/v38.iss3.2017.353
  5. 5. Phosri C, Martín MP, Sihanonth P, Whalley AJS, Watling R. Molecular study of the genus Astraeus. Mycol Res. 2007;111(3):275–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2007.01.004
  6. 6. Verma S, Tirkey S, Shukla K. Therapeutic potential of wild mushrooms in Chhattisgarh, Central India. Adv Tradit Med. 2024;24(3):685–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13596-023-00713-2
  7. 7. Sai I, Basavaraju R, Thakur M, Lakhanpal TN. Health benefits of mushrooms: An appraisal. In: Fungal resources for sustainable economy. 2023. p. 179–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9103-5_7
  8. 8. Atri NS, Sharma YP, Kumar S, Mridu. Wild edible mushrooms of North West Himalaya. In: Microbial diversity in ecosystem sustainability. 2019. p. 533–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8487-5_20
  9. 9. Lakhanpal TN. Mushroom biodiversity in India: Prospects and potential. Environ Sci Biol. 2014:7–16.
  10. 10. Pegler DN. The polypores: Keys to world genera and British species. Bull Br Mycol Soc. 1973;7(1):3–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1528(73)80020-3
  11. 11. Curguz VG, Raicevic V, Tosic MT, Veselinovic M, Jovanovic LJ. Physiological characteristics of ectomycorrhizal fungi from Suillus genus. Minerva Biotecnol. 2010;22(1):1.
  12. 12. Fangfuk W, Okada K, Petchang R. In vitro mycorrhization of Astraeus. Mycoscience. 2010;51:234–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10267-009-0031-1
  13. 13. Guerra V, Beule L, Lehtsaar E, Liao HL, Karlovsky P. Improved DNA extraction from subsoils using phosphate buffer. Microorganisms. 2020;8(4):532. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8040532
  14. 14. Schenk JJ, Becklund LE, Carey SJ, Fabre PP. Modified CTAB protocol: Characterization and applications. Appl Plant Sci. 2023;11(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11517
  15. 15. Das SK, Mandal A, Datta AK, Gupta S, Paul R, Saha A, et al. Nucleotide sequencing and identification of wild mushrooms. Sci World J. 2013;2013:403191. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/403191
  16. 16. Li H, Wu S, Ma X, Chen W, Zhang J, Duan S, et al. Genome sequences of 90 mushrooms. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):9982. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28303-2
  17. 17. Appiah T, Agyare C, Luo Y. Molecular identification of Ghanaian mushrooms using ITS regions. Mol Biol. 2017;6:191. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9547.1000191
  18. 18. Wang SR, Zhang JP, He YR, Chang MC, Meng JL. Mitochondrial genome of Coprinellus micaceus. Mitochondrial DNA B. 2021;6(7):1979–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2021.1938717
  19. 19. Ao T, Deb CR, Rao SR. Molecular identification of wild mushrooms from Nagaland, India. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;47(1):621–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-05170-2
  20. 20. Alvarez-Manjarrez J, Garibay-Orijel R, Smith ME. Caryophyllales as hosts of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza. 2018;28(2):103–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-017-0807-7
  21. 21. Silva-Filho AG, Mombert A, Nascimento CC, Nobrega BB, Soares DM, Martins AG, et al. Eoscyphella luciurceolatagen. et sp. nov. J Fungi. 2023;9(10):1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9101004
  22. 22. Dimopoulou M, Kolonas A, Mourtakos O, Androutsos O, Gortzi O. Nutritional composition of edible mushrooms. Appl Sci. 2022;12(16):8074. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168074
  23. 23. Singh P, Varshney VK. Nutritional attributes of Astraeus hygrometricus. Int J Med Mushrooms. 2020;22(9). https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMedMushrooms.2020035884
  24. 24. Sharma SK, Gautam N. Bioactive profiling of coral fungi. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46570. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46570
  25. 25. Gezer K, Kaygusuz O, Eyupoglu V, Surucu A, Doker S. Determination by ICP/MS of trace metal content in ten edible wild mushrooms from Turkey. Oxidation Communications. 2015;38(1A):398–407.
  26. 26. Pandey K, Ghosh SK. Biodiversity and antioxidant properties of Astraeus asiaticus. Acta Mycol. 2022;57:575. https://doi.org/10.5586/am.575
  27. 27. Pavithra M, Sridhar KR, Greeshma AA. Nutritional quality of Astraeus hygrometricus. In: Current perspectives on medicinal and aromatic plants. 2018. p. 367–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0393-7_21
  28. 28. Phosri C, Watling R, Martín MP, Whalley AJS. The genus Astraeus in Thailand. Mycotaxon. 2004;89:453–63. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.418549
  29. 29. Topno KR, Srivastava AK. Molecular identification of puffball. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2021;10(4):404–7. https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2021.v10.i4e.14190
  30. 30. Vishal V, Munda SS, Singh G, Lal S. Wild edible Astraeus from Jharkhand. Indian J Appl Pure Biol. 2021;36(2):569–79.
  31. 31. Isaka M, Palasarn S, Sommai S, Veeranondha S, Srichomthong K, KongSaeree P, et al. Lanostane triterpenoids from Astraeus asiaticus. Tetrahedron. 2017;73(12):1561–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2017.01.070
  32. 32. Mortimer PE, Karunarathana SC, Li Q, Gui H, Yang X, Hyde KD. Edible Asian mushrooms: Ecology and sustainability. Fungal Divers. 2012;56(1):31–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-012-0196-3
  33. 33. Liu Y, Chen D, You Y, Zeng S, Li Y, Tang Q, et al. Nutritional composition of boletus mushrooms. Food Chem. 2016;211:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.032
  34. 34. Liu B, Huang Q, Cai H, Guo X, Wang T, Gui M. Heavy metals in edible mushrooms. Food Chem. 2015;188:294–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.05.010
  35. 35. Sarikurkcu C, Tepe B, Solak MH, Cetinkaya S. Metal concentrations in wild mushrooms. Ecol Food Nutr. 2012;51(4):346–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2012.674448
  36. 36. Mleczek M, Budka A, Siwulski M, Mleczek P, Budzynska S, Proch J, et al. Toxic elements in mushrooms. Eur Food Res Technol. 2021;247(5):1249–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-021-03706-0
  37. 37. Liu S, Liu H, Li J, Wang Y. Elements in wild edible mushrooms. J Fungi. 2022;8:964. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8090964
  38. 38. Dowlati M, Sobhi HR, Esrafili A, Farzadkia M, Yeganeh M. Heavy metals content in edible mushrooms: A systematic review, meta-analysis and health risk assessment. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;109:527–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.064
  39. 39. Senila M, Senila L, Resz MA. Chemical composition and nutritional characteristics of popular wild edible mushroom species collected from North-Western Romania. J Food Compos Anal. 2024;134:106504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106504
  40. 40. Lee JG, Lee Y, Kim CS, Han SB. Codex Alimentarius and food safety. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2021;30(9):1151–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-021-00943-7
  41. 41. Kalač P. Chemical composition and nutritional value of European species of wild-growing mushrooms: A review. Food Chem. 2009;113(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.07.077
  42. 42. Kalač P. A review of chemical composition and nutritional value of wild-growing and cultivated mushrooms. J Sci Food Agric. 2013;93(2):209–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5960
  43. 43. Falandysz J, Borovička J. Trace elements and radionuclides in mushrooms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(2):477–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4552-8
  44. 44. Falandysz J, Chudzińska M, Baralkiewicz D, Drewnowska M, Hanc A. Toxic elements in Cantharellus mushrooms. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24(12):11472–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8554-z

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.