Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

An integrated analysis of socio-economic, communication and psychological drivers of information and communication technology utilisation among farmers

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13934
Submitted
1 February 2026
Published
30-09-2026

Abstract

The present study was conducted in Solan district, Himachal Pradesh, to examine the socio-economic, communication and psychological characteristics of farmers using information and communication technology (ICT) tools in agriculture. A total of 120 ICT-using farmers were selected from 20 Gram Panchayats in the Solan and Kandaghat blocks through multistage random sampling. Data were collected using a structured interview schedule and analysed using descriptive statistics. Results revealed that 90.83 % of ICT users were male, with 95.83 % being literate, half completed senior secondary education. The majority of respondents (57.50 %) were solely dependent on agriculture and 78.33 % belonged to above poverty line (APL) households. Marginal landholdings were common (63.30 %) and 77.50 % lived in pacca houses. Friends (98.30 %), neighbours (98.30 %) and relatives (97.50 %) were the primary sources of agricultural information, while formal sources like agriculture extension officers (6.67 %) and Gram Sevaks were underutilised. Bank managers (56.67 %) and subject matter specialists (55.83 %) were the most consulted institutional sources. Mass media exposure was high for 51.67 % of respondents, with a low CV (18.67 %), indicating consistent media use. However, 79.17 % had low extension participation, showing poor engagement with formal advisory services. Psychologically, 58.33 % had medium decision-making ability and 60 % showed moderate risk orientation. Integrated socio-economic, communication and capacity-building interventions targeting smallholder farmers are essential for enhancing effective ICT utilisation in agriculture.

References

  1. 1. Meera SN, Jhamtani A, Rao DUM. Information and communication technology in agricultural development: a comparative analysis of three projects from India. Agric Res Ext Netw. 2004;135:1–16.
  2. 2. Mittal S, Mehar M. How mobile phones contribute to growth of small farmers? Evidence from India. Q J Int Agric. 2012;51(3):227–44.
  3. 3. Zhang Y, Wang L, Duan Y. Agricultural information dissemination using ICTs: a review and analysis of information dissemination models in China. Inf Process Agric. 2016;3(1):17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2015.11.002
  4. 4. Jain R, Singh A, Rana N. Impact of socio-economic factors on ICT usage among farmers: evidence from India. Inf Technol Dev. 2020;26(2):309–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1594846
  5. 5. Chhachhar AR, Muthusamy C, Salleh KM. Information and communication technology in agricultural development. J Asian Sci Res. 2014;4(1):1–8.
  6. 6. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
  7. 7. Aker JC. Dial "A" for agriculture: a review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agric Econ. 2011;42(6):631–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00545.x
  8. 8. Donner J. Research approaches to mobile use in the developing world: a review of the literature. Inf Soc. 2008;24(3):140–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240802019970
  9. 9. Norris P. Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164887
  10. 10. Van Dijk J. The digital divide. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2020.
  11. 11. Putnam RD. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2000. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
  12. 12. Nandapurkar GG. Measurement of decision-making ability of farmers. Indian J Ext Educ. 1981;17(1-2):1–6.
  13. 13. Supe SV. Factors related to different degrees of rationality in decision-making among farmers. Indian J Ext Educ. 1969;5(1-2):1–10.
  14. 14. Food and Agriculture Organization. Digital technologies in agriculture and rural areas. Rome: FAO; 2019.
  15. 15. World Bank. ICT in agriculture: connecting smallholders to knowledge, networks and institutions. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2017.
  16. 16. Hilbert M. Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women? Womens Stud Int Forum. 2011;34(6):479–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2011.07.001
  17. 17. Anderson JR, Feder G. Agricultural extension. In: Evenson R, Pingali P, editors. Handbook of agricultural economics. Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. p. 2343–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(06)03044-1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.