Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)

RNA-dependent RNA polymerase domain-based molecular characterisation and evolutionary analysis of potato virus S

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13996
Submitted
5 February 2026
Published
14-09-2026 — Updated on 30-09-2026
Versions

Abstract

Potato virus S (PVS) is a globally distributed Carlavirus that infects potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and related Solanum species. While it often causes mild symptoms, it can have a notable impact on crop productivity. This study examined the genetic diversity and phylogenetic structure of PVS isolates from India using complete genome sequences and the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) domain of the replicase gene, with the aim of assessing the suitability of RdRP as a molecular marker for evolutionary inference. A global dataset of 151 PVS sequences was analysed, along with RdRP domain sequences from 11 Indian isolates and complete genome sequences from two representative isolates. Sequence demarcation tool (SDT) analysis showed pairwise nucleotide identities ranging from 73.8–100 % for complete genomes and 82.2–100 % for RdRP domains. Using a 92 % nucleotide identity threshold, the PVS isolates were grouped into eight
intraspecific phylogenetic clades (G1–G8). Phylogenetic trees inferred from RdRP domain sequences showed high topological congruence with complete genome phylogenies, as confirmed by tanglegram analysis. In addition, these phylogenetic groups also broadly matched previously reported PVS phylogroups, including the predominant PVS-O lineage. Population genetic analyses indicated stronger host-associated structuring than geographic differentiation, while the RdRP domain exhibited low nucleotide diversity and strong purifying selection. Collectively, these findings indicate that RdRP domain-based analysis provides a reliable and efficient approach for PVS molecular characterisation, comparative evolutionary studies and the identification of divergent or putative novel PVS variants.

References

  1. 1. Kreuze JF, Souza-Dias JA, Jeevalatha A, Figueira AR, Valkonen JPT, Jones RAC. Viral diseases in potato. In: Campos H, Ortiz O, editors. The Potato Crop. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 389–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28683-5_11
  2. 2. Kumar R, Tiwari RK, Sundaresha S, Kaundal P, Raigond B. Potato viruses and their management. In: Singh BP, Raigond B, Dutt S, editors. Sustainable Management of Potato Pests and Diseases. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 309–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7695-6_12
  3. 3. Kumar R, Jeevalatha A, Baswaraj R, Sharma S, Nagesh M. A multiplex RT-PCR assay for simultaneous detection of five viruses in potato. J Plant Pathol. 2017;99:37–45.
  4. 4. Wardrop EA, Gray AB, Singh RP, Peterson JF. Aphid transmission of potato virus S. Am Potato J. 1989;66:449–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855437
  5. 5. Kostiw M. Transmission of potato virus S by Aphis nasturtii. Potato Res. 1975;18(4):641–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02365690
  6. 6. LP A, HN V. Current status of viral diseases of potato and their ecofriendly management—a critical review. Virol Res Rev. 2017;1(4). https://doi.org/10.15761/VRR.1000122
  7. 7. Goth RW, Webb RE. Lack of potato virus S transmission via true seed in Solanum tuberosum. Phytopathology. 1975;65(12):1347–9. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-65-1347
  8. 8. Lei J, Liang B, Yang H, Zhang B. Origin, evolution, dispersal and global population genetic structure of Carlavirus sigmasolani. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1667771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1667771
  9. 9. Slack SA. Identification of an isolate of the Andean strain of potato virus S in North America. Plant Dis. 1983;67(7):786–9. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-67-786
  10. 10. Foster GD, Mills PR. The 3′ nucleotide sequence of an ordinary strain of potato virus S. Virus Genes. 1992;6:213–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01702560
  11. 11. Čeřovská N, Filigarova M. Specific detection of the Andean strain of potato virus S using monoclonal antibodies. Ann Appl Biol. 1995;127(1):87–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1995.tb06653.x
  12. 12. Khurana SP. Potato viruses and their management. In: Naqvi SAMH, editor. Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables. Dordrecht: Springer; 2004. p. 389–440.
  13. 13. De Bokx JA, Waterreus HA. Electron microscopy of plant tissues infected with potato viruses A and S. Neth J Plant Pathol. 1971;77(4):106–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02000550
  14. 14. Li X, Hataya T. Construction and characterization of an infectious cDNA clone of potato virus S. Virol J. 2019;16:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-019-1124-x
  15. 15. Mackenzie DJ, Tremaine JH, Stace-Smith R. Organization and interviral homologies of the 3′ terminal portion of potato virus S RNA. J Gen Virol. 1989;70(5):1053–63. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-70-5-1053
  16. 16. Duan G, Zhan F, Du Z, Ho SYW, Gao F. Europe was a hub for the global spread of potato virus S in the 19th century. Virology. 2018;525:200–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2018.09.022
  17. 17. Santillan FW, Fribourg CE, Adams IP, Gibbs AJ, Boonham N, Kehoe MA, et al. Biology and phylogenetics of potato virus S isolates from the Andean region. Plant Dis. 2018;102(5):869–85. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-17-1414-RE
  18. 18. Topkaya Ş, Çelik A, Santosa AI, Jones RAC. Molecular analysis of the global population of potato virus S redefines its phylogeny. Viruses. 2023;15(5):1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15051104
  19. 19. Bartholomäus A, Wibberg D, Winkler A, Pühler A, Schlüter A, Varrelmann M. Deep sequencing analysis reveals the mycoviral diversity of the virome of an avirulent isolate of Rhizoctonia solani. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0165965. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165965
  20. 20. Ferrer-Orta C, Ferrero DS, Verdaguer N. RNA-dependent RNA polymerases of picornaviruses: From structure to regulatory mechanisms. Viruses. 2015;7(8):4438–60. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7082829
  21. 21. Vignuzzi M, Stone JK, Arnold JJ, Cameron CE, Andino R. Quasispecies diversity determines pathogenesis through cooperative interactions. Nature. 2006;439(7074):344–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04388
  22. 22. Wolf YI, Kazlauskas D, Iranzo J, Lucía-Sanz A, Kuhn JH, Krupovic M, et al. Origins and evolution of the global RNA virome. mBio. 2018;9(6):e02329-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02329-18
  23. 23. Farias ST, Santos Junior AP, Rêgo TG, José MV. Origin and evolution of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Front Genet. 2017;8:125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00125
  24. 24. Jácome R, Becerra A, Ponce de León S, Lazcano A. Structural analysis of monomeric RNA-dependent RNA polymerases: Evolutionary and therapeutic implications. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0139001. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139001
  25. 25. Černý J, Černá Bolfíková B, Valdes JJ, Grubhoffer L, Růžek D. Evolution of tertiary structure of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e96070. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096070
  26. 26. Colson P, Bader W, Fantini J, Dudouet P, Levasseur A, Pontarotti P. From viral democratic genomes to viral wild bunch of quasispecies. J Med Virol. 2023;95(11):e29209. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.29209
  27. 27. Domingo E, Sheldon J, Perales C. Viral quasispecies evolution. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76(2):159–216. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.05023-11
  28. 28. Lauring AS, Andino R. Quasispecies theory and the behavior of RNA viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(7):e1001005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001005

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.