Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Carbon credits as market-based mechanisms for climate mitigation: Opportunities, challenges and future perspectives

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13998
Submitted
5 February 2026
Published
29-09-2026

Abstract

Carbon credits are a promising market-based tool for combating climate change, biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation, three of the most pressing environmental problems currently facing the global environment. Carbon credit schemes have stimulated investments in renewable energy, forestry, sustainable agriculture, soil carbon management and decreased emissions by putting a monetary value on greater carbon sequestration and reduced emissions. The public and commercial sectors can now work together to combat climate change, facilitated by mechanisms that have helped close the gap between environmental responsibility and financial viability. There must be rigorous science, open government and sound policy frameworks for carbon credits to succeed. They have not yet reached their full potential due to ongoing issues with additionality, the permanence of sequestration, leakage risks and discrepancies in measuring, reporting and verification (MRV). Without robust regulations, carbon markets risk becoming more symbolic than practical. However, carbon credits provide a scalable and adaptable alternative that may supplement direct emission reductions and support sustainability objectives in the long term when well planned and executed. Carbon credits are an essential component of global climate policies, as they promote sustainable land-use practices and reduce atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases.

References

  1. 1. Chen WH, Biswas PP, Zhang C, Kwon EE, Chang JS. Achieving carbon credits through biomass torrefaction and hydrothermal carbonization: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2025;208:115056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115056
  2. 2. Narassimhan E, Gallagher KS, Koester S, Alejo JR. Carbon pricing in practice: A review of existing emissions trading systems. Clim Policy. 2018;18(8):967–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1467827
  3. 3. Farahmand S, Hilmi N, Duarte CM. The rise and flows of blue carbon credits advance global climate and biodiversity goals. npj Ocean Sustain. 2025;4(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-025-00141-6
  4. 4. Streck C. Who owns REDD+? Carbon markets, carbon rights and entitlements to REDD+ finance. For Policy Econ. 2021;125:102406. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202007.0288.v1
  5. 5. Green JF. Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses. Environ Res Lett. 2021;16(4):043004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9
  6. 6. West TAP, Börner J, Sills EO, Kontoleon A. Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD+ projects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(39):24188–94. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004334117
  7. 7. Blaufelder C, Levy C, Mannion P, Pinner D. A blueprint for scaling voluntary carbon markets. McKinsey Q. 2021:1–14.
  8. 8. Korsbakken JI, Peters GP. What can voluntary carbon markets deliver? Nat Clim Chang. 2023;13:1022–30.
  9. 9. Zelikova J. Ensuring high-integrity carbon offsets in voluntary markets. Front Clim. 2022;4:867–90.
  10. 10. Badgley G, Freeman J, Hamman J, Haya B. Systematic over-crediting in U.S. forest carbon offsets. Glob Change Biol. 2022;28(7):2396–410. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.28.441870
  11. 11. Paustian K, Lehmann J, Ogle S, Reay D, Robertson GP, Smith P. Climate-smart soils. Nature. 2016;532:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17174
  12. 12. Bhat AA, Elboughdiri N, Kumar A, Oza AD, Kriaa K, Maatki C, et al. Sustainable catalytic strategies for carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom (C-S, C-N, C-O, C-Se) bond formation: Green pathways to advanced molecules. Appl Catal A Gen. 2025:120714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2025.120714
  13. 13. Smith P, Soussana JF, Angers D, Schipper L, Chenu C, Rasse DP, et al. How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize climate mitigation potential. Glob Change Biol. 2020;26(1):219–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14815
  14. 14. Sanderman J, Hengl T, Fiske G. Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(36):9575–80. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706103114
  15. 15. Oldfield EE, Bradford MA, Wood SA. Global meta-analysis of soil carbon crediting practices. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2077.
  16. 16. Fanzo J, Davis C. Soil carbon markets for smallholder farmers. Nat Food. 2021;2:653–5.
  17. 17. Bossio D. The technical readiness of soil carbon MRV. Environ Sci Policy. 2021;123:156–67.
  18. 18. Tsendbazar NE. Towards operational land cover monitoring using remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ. 2020;238:111584.
  19. 19. Chen S, Mulder VL, de Bruin S. Soil spectroscopy for SOC estimation: A review. Geoderma. 2019;352:251–68.
  20. 20. Poggio L, Luis M de Sousa, Niels HB, Gerard BMH, Bas K, et al. Machine learning for global soil organic carbon mapping. Soil. 2021;7(1):217–34. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-217-2021
  21. 21. Rumpel C, Lehmann J. Digital soil carbon monitoring systems. Nat Geosci. 2020;13:278–80.
  22. 22. Robinson NP. Large-scale monitoring of soil carbon dynamics. Ecol Appl. 2019;29(1):e01834.
  23. 23. Griscom BW, Justin A, Peter W, Joseph F. Natural climate solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(44):11645–50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710465114
  24. 24. Seddon N. Promises and perils of nature-based solutions. Nat Clim Chang. 2021;11:1–13.
  25. 25. Roe S. Land-based mitigation pathways. Nat Clim Chang. 2021;11:1070–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01040-7
  26. 26. Woolf D, Lehmann J, Lee DR. Climate effects of biochar. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10512. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13160
  27. 27. Schmidt HP, Hagemann N, Kammann C. Permanent carbon sequestration via biochar. GCB Bioenergy. 2021;13(10):1647–61.
  28. 28. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12889
  29. 29. Fasihi M, Efimova O, Breyer C. Power-to-liquids and DACCS economics. J Clean Prod. 2019;237:117117.
  30. 30. Realmonte G, Drouet L, Gambhir A, Glynn J, Hawkes A, Koberle CA et al. Mitigation potential of DAC. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3277. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10842-5
  31. 31. Green JF, Hale T, Colgan JD. Strengthening climate governance through market transparency. Nat Clim Chang. 2021;11:484–90.
  32. 32. Grubb M, Drummond P, Poncia A, McDowall W. Carbon pricing: A review of experience and prospects. Energy Policy. 2021;158:112566.
  33. 33. Gupta A, Lövbrand E, Turnhout E, Vijge M. In pursuit of carbon accountability: The politics of REDD+ monitoring, reporting and verification. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2012;4(6):726–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.004
  34. 34. Hamrick K, Gallant M. Voluntary carbon market insights: State of voluntary carbon markets. Ecosyst Marketplace. 2017:1–34.
  35. 35. Haya B, Cullenward D, Strong AL, Grubert E, Heilmayr R, Sager J, et al. Managing uncertainty in carbon offsets: Insights from California's forest offset program. Carbon Balance Manag. 2020;15(1):1–14.
  36. 36. Höhne N, Kuramochi T, Röser F, Fekete H, Hagemann M. National mitigation policies and the Paris Agreement. Clim Policy. 2017;17(9):1109–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1218320
  37. 37. Hsu A, Höhne N, Kuramochi T, Roelfsema M, Weinfurter A, Xie Y, et al. A research roadmap for quantifying non-state and subnational climate mitigation action. Nat Clim Chang. 2020;10:436–47.
  38. 38. Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases. Technical support document: Social cost of carbon, methane and nitrous oxide. US Gov Rep. 2021:1–60.
  39. 39. IPCC. Climate change and land: Mitigation pathways. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report. 2019: 1–906.
  40. 40. Jackson RB, Schlesinger WH. Curbing methane emissions: How five industries can counter climate change. Sci Am. 2017;317(2):42–51.
  41. 41. Joppa L, Luoto M, Pimm S. On the effectiveness of carbon offset strategies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(33):11884–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802471105
  42. 42. Kaizen M, Nemet G. The role of carbon markets in accelerating clean energy transitions. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2021;77:102084.
  43. 43. Kerr S, Tisdell C. Why carbon markets fail and what to do about it. Ecol Econ. 2019;156:105–22.
  44. 44. Körner C. A matter of tree longevity. Science. 2017;355(6321):664–5.
  45. 45. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal2449
  46. 46. Kossoy A, Peszko G, Oppermann K, Prytz N, Durand A, Suphachalasai S, et al. State and trends of carbon pricing. World Bank Rep. 2015:1–76.
  47. 47. Krause A, Lu X, Zeng N. Multicentury carbon sequestration potential of reforestation. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2018;32(1):1–15.
  48. 48. Laing T, Sato M, Grubb M, Comberti C. The effects and side-effects of carbon pricing: Empirical evidence. Clim Policy. 2017;17(1):20–2.
  49. 49. Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Friedlingstein P, Peters GP, Canadell JG, Jackson RB. Global carbon budget. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2018;10(1):2141–94. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2141-2018
  50. 50. Lehmann J, Kleber M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature. 2015;528:60–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069
  51. 51. Liu Z, Deng Z, Davis SJ, Wei Y. Near-real-time monitoring of global CO₂ emissions. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1–10.
  52. 52. Macreadie PI, Anton A, Raven JA, Beaumont N, Connolly RM, Duarte CM. The future of blue carbon science. Nat Clim Chang. 2019;9(12):895–908. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11693-w
  53. 53. Marland G, Schlamadinger B. Forests for carbon sequestration. Science. 1997;275(5298):1601.
  54. 54. McDermott CL, Levin K, Cashore B. Land-use governance and the climate challenge. Glob Environ Change. 2011;21(3):908–17.
  55. 55. Millar RJ, Fuglestvedt JS, Friedlingstein P, Rogelj J, Grubb M, Matthews HD. Emission budgets and pathways consistent with the Paris Agreement. Nat Geosci. 2017;10(10):741–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo3031
  56. 56. Murray BC, Lubowski RN, Sohngen B. Carbon sequestration in forests as a climate solution. J For. 2017;115(2):101–10.
  57. 57. Newell RG, Pizer WA, Raimi D. Carbon markets 15 years after Kyoto. J Econ Perspect. 2013;27(1):123–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.1.123
  58. 58. Niamir L, Ivanova O, Filatova T, Voinov A, Bressers H. Climate policies and household behavior: The role of carbon pricing. Energy Econ. 2020;87:104713.
  59. 59. Nordhaus W. Climate change: The ultimate challenge for economics. Am Econ Rev. 2019;109(6):1991–2014. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.109.6.1991
  60. 60. Pachauri RK, Mayer L, editors. Climate change 2014 synthesis report. IPCC. 2015:1–151.
  61. 61. Schultz H. Soil, vine, climate change: The challenge of predicting soil carbon changes and greenhouse gas emissions in vineyards and is the 4 per 1000 goal realistic? Oeno One. 2022;56(2):251–63. https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2022.56.2.5447
  62. 62. Peters GP, Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Canadell JG, Friedlingstein P, Jackson RB. Key indicators of global CO₂ emissions. Nat Clim Chang. 2017;7:118–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3202
  63. 63. Pires JCM. Negative emissions technologies: A critical review. Sci Total Environ. 2019;672:502–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.004
  64. 64. Piris-Cabezas P, Lubowski R, Leslie G. Estimating carbon project additionality. Clim Policy. 2018;18(1):49–63.
  65. 65. Poorter L, Bongers F, Aide TM, Zambrano AMA, Balvanera P, Becknell JM, et al. Biomass recovery after tropical forest disturbance. Science. 2016;351(6272):69–72.
  66. 66. Qin Z, Dunn JB, Kwon H, Mueller S, Wander MM, Wang MQ. Soil carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions from bioenergy crops. J Environ Qual. 2016;45(1):249–58.
  67. 67. Ramaswami A, Tong K, Fang A, Lal R, Yu Z, Xue B, et al. Urban systems and carbon reduction. Nat Clim Chang. 2021;11:255–65.
  68. 68. Reinecke S, Ansari S. Taming wicked problems: The case of climate finance. Organ Stud. 2015;36(3):299–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12137
  69. 69. Richards KR, Stokes C. A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies. Clim Change. 2004;63(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000018503.10080.89
  70. 70. Ricke K, Drouet L, Caldeira K, Tavoni M. Country-level social cost of carbon. Nat Clim Chang. 2018;8:895–900. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0282-y
  71. 71. Robinson TP, Moran D, Payne RJ, Scholefield D. Carbon sequestration in grasslands. Environ Sci Policy. 2014;39:76–87.
  72. 72. Rogelj J, den Elzen M, Fransen T, Fekete H, Winkler H, Schaeffer R, et al. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost. Nature. 2016;534:631. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18307
  73. 73. Rosenstock TS, Wilkes A, Jallo C, Namoi N, Bulusu M, Ferreira S. MRV of agricultural emissions. Environ Res Lett. 2019;14(12):125007.
  74. 74. Ellis EC. Land use and ecological change: A 12,000-year history. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2021;46(1):1–33. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-010822
  75. 75. Schlesinger WH, Amundson R. Soil carbon sequestration and climate change. J Soil Water Conserv. 2019;74(5):99A–107A.
  76. 76. Schulman D, Erickson P, Lazarus M. Carbon credit quality and integrity. Stockholm Environ Inst Rep. 2020:1–38.
  77. 77. Searchinger TD, Wirsenius S, Beringer T, Dumas P. Assessing the efficiency of land-based carbon mitigation. Nature. 2018;564:249–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0757-z
  78. 78. Seddon N, Chausson A, Berry P, Girardin CAJ, Smith A, Turner B. Nature-based solutions and climate mitigation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020;375(1794):20190120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120
  79. 79. Shindell D. Climate change and health: Interactions and impacts. Nat Clim Chang. 2013;3:864–70.
  80. 80. Smith P. Soil carbon sequestration and potential in global climate policy. Nat Commun. 2016;7:1–8.
  81. 81. Smith P, Davis SJ, Creutzig F, Fuss S, Minx J, Nemet G, et al. Biophysical and economic limits of negative emissions. Nat Clim Chang. 2016;6:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2870
  82. 82. Stavins RN. The future of U.S. carbon markets. Rev Environ Econ Policy. 2019;13(1):23–42.
  83. 83. Stern N. The economics of climate change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434
  84. 84. Stocker TF. Carbon cycle and climate change. IPCC AR5 WG I Rep. 2013:1–153.
  85. 85. Streck C, Keenlyside P, von Unger M. The Paris Agreement: Advancing the global response to climate change. Carbon Clim Law Rev. 2016;10(1):5–17. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01301002
  86. 86. Tang J, Riley WJ. Technical challenges in soil carbon modeling. Biogeosciences. 2015;12(11):3725–47.
  87. 87. Thomas S, Dargusch P. Carbon offset integrity and governance. Environ Sci Policy. 2017;77:143–51.
  88. 88. Thomson AM, Izaurralde RC, Rosenberg NJ. Climate change impacts on soil carbon. Environ Model Softw. 2007;22(8):1214–23.
  89. 89. Turner PA, Field JL, Sparkman MD, Holub SM, Gelfand I. Incorporating soil carbon thresholds into carbon markets. Environ Res Lett. 2020;15(9):094078.
  90. 90. UNEP. Emissions gap report. United Nations Environment Programme. 2022:1–131.
  91. 91. Verra. Verified Carbon Standard program rules. Verra Registry Doc. 2020:1–80.
  92. 92. Vivid Economics. State of the voluntary carbon markets 2021. BloombergNEF & Vivid Economics Rep. 2021:1–56.
  93. 93. Wara M, Cullenward D. A critique of carbon offset markets. Harv Environ Law Rev. 2021;45(1):1–64.
  94. 94. Zomer RJ, Neufeldt H, Xu J, Ahrends A, Bossio D, Trabucco A, et al. Global tree cover and carbon capture potential. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29987

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.