Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Effects of irrigation frequency and mulching on maize growth and yield in a high-altitude semi-arid environment of Daykundi, Afghanistan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14099
Submitted
14 February 2026
Published
31-07-2026
Versions

Abstract

Water scarcity is a major constraint to maize production in the high-altitude semi-arid regions of Afghanistan. This study investigated the combined effects of irrigation interval and mulch type on the growth, yield components and grain yield of the local maize cultivar Logari under high-altitude semi-arid conditions in Daikundi, Afghanistan. A split-plot randomised complete block design (RCBD) was implemented with three irrigation intervals (7, 10 and 14 days) as main plots and four mulch treatments (green plastic, transparent plastic, organic straw and no-mulch) as subplots, replicated three times (n = 36 plots). Plant growth traits, yield components and grain yield were analysed using GLM split-plot ANOVA followed by LSD mean separation. Results demonstrated that mulch type significantly influenced all measured traits (p < 0.01), whereas irrigation interval affected grain yield only (p < 0.05). Green and transparent plastic mulches produced the highest grain yield (6.46 t ha-1), approximately 40 % greater than organic mulch and no-mulch treatments (4.42–4.66 t ha-1). Maize under 7- and 10-day irrigation intervals also produced significantly higher grain yield than the 14-day interval. Although the irrigation × mulch interaction was not statistically significant, plastic mulch treatments maintained numerically higher yields under extended irrigation intervals. These findings indicate that plastic mulching can improve maize productivity and irrigation water productivity under semi-arid conditions. However, soil moisture, soil temperature and evapotranspiration were not directly measured. Further studies incorporating direct soil-water monitoring and biodegradable mulch alternatives are recommended.

References

  1. 1. Adnan M, Asif M, Khalid M, Abbas B, Hayyat MS, Raza A, et al. Role of mulches in agriculture: a review. Int J Bot Stud. 2020;5(3):309–14.
  2. 2. Qin W, Hu C, Oenema O. Soil mulching significantly enhances yields and water and nitrogen use efficiencies of maize and wheat: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16210. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16210
  3. 3. Obaidi MQ, Osmanzai M, Sharma R. Zoodras: a new high yielding maize variety for Afghanistan. Agric Econ Appl Sci. 2012;12(9):1242–45.
  4. 4. Statistical Yearbook. Kabul: Central Statistics Organization; 2022. https://archive.af/bib/821
  5. 5. Bian Q, Dong Z, Fu Y, Zhao Y, Feng Y, Wang Z. Optimizing irrigation strategies to improve yield and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated maize in Southern Xinjiang. Plants. 2024;13:2434. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13243492
  6. 6. Bhargav A, Subbaiah R. Enhancing maize productivity through mulching practices in semi-arid regions of Gujarat, India: impact on yield, water use efficiency, and economic viability. Asian Res J Agric. 2024;17(4):1208–17. https://doi.org/10.9734/arja/2024/v17i4639
  7. 7. Kara S. Water-yield relations of drip irrigated maize in arid and semi-arid regions. Anadolu J Agric Sci. 2021;36(1):9–20. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.949833
  8. 8. Eruola AO, Bello NJ, Ufoegbune GC, Makinde AA. Effect of mulching on soil temperature and moisture regime on emergence, growth and yield of white yam in a tropical wet-and-dry climate. Int J Agric For. 2012;2(1):93–100. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijaf.20120201.15
  9. 9. Iqbal R, Habib-ur-Rahman M, Aown M, Raza S, Waqas M, Ikram RM, et al. Assessing the potential of partial root zone drying and mulching for improving the productivity of cotton under arid climate. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:66223–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15259-6
  10. 10. Abera M, Dessie M, Addis HK. Modeling maize production and water productivity under deficit irrigation and mulching as sustainable agricultural water management strategies in semiarid areas. Sustainability. 2025;17:41347. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041347
  11. 11. Iqbal R, Aown M, Raza S, Valipour M, Saleem MF. Potential agricultural and environmental benefits of mulches: a review. J Plant Growth Regul. 2020;39:1271–89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-020-00290-3
  12. 12. Kaur P. Role of mulches in agriculture. Just Agriculture. 2021;1(12). https://www.justagriculture.in
  13. 13. Liu CA, Siddique KHM. Does plastic mulch improve crop yield in semiarid farmland at high altitude? Agron J. 2015;107(5):1724–32. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0052
  14. 14. Zea L, Aung ZM, Zar T. Effects of different mulching materials on yield and yield components of maize. J Adv Agric Biol. 2023;4(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.11594/jaab.04.01.01
  15. 15. Yisfa T, Grum B, Aregay G. Comparison of different mulching options for improving water productivity and maize yield in a semi-arid climate, northern Ethiopia. Discover Agriculture. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-023-00005-y
  16. 16. El-Beltagi HS, Basit A, Mohamed HI, Ali I, Ullah S, Kamel EAR, et al. Mulching as a sustainable water and soil saving practice in agriculture: a review. Agronomy. 2019;9:18.
  17. 17. Sarmin M, Ranu A, Uddin K, Islam S. Effects of mulching on soil water content, maize performance and weed growth in dryland areas. Adv Res. 2022;37(1):50–58. https://doi.org/10.9734/arrb/2022/v37i130477
  18. 18. Mollah AK, Uddin MK, Kasim S, Zaibon S, Rahman MM, Jiku MAS, et al. Potential organic mulches for sustainable agricultural production and improving soil environment. Int J Environ Sci. 2025;11(8).
  19. 19. Liza MM, Hasan MM, Khan MRH, Saha A, Tuly FH, Masum SM. Effect of irrigation intervals and mulching material on the growth and yield of maize. Bangladesh J Agric. 2025;27(2):90–95. https://doi.org/10.3329/baj.v27i2.84597
  20. 20. Qi Z, Xu C, Zhang L, Li F, Sun N, et al. Water-saving and yield-increasing strategies for maize under drip irrigation and straw mulching in semi-arid regions. Agronomy. 2025;15(9):2056. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092056
  21. 21. Hossain E, Zhang Z, Dong W, Wang S, Liu M, Liu E, et al. Plastic film mulching improved maize yield, water use efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency under dryland farming system in northeast China. Agronomy. 2022;11(13):1710. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131710
  22. 22. Khaskheli HA, Soothar RK, Wang Y, Kapri MA, Talpur MA, Soomro SA, et al. Effects of plastic film mulching on soil moisture dynamics, water loss and water use efficiency of grain maize. J Pure Appl Agric. 2022;7(4):36–45.
  23. 23. Islam MS, Alam MK, Salahin N, Alam MJ, Hussen MAM, Mondol ATMAI. Effects of tillage, mulch and irrigation on maize (Zea mays L.) yield in drought-prone area. Bangladesh J Agric. 2022;47(1):27–38. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjagri.v47i1.60591
  24. 24. National Organic Program. Allowed mulches on organic farms and the future of biodegradable mulch [Internet]. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture. Available from: USDA National Organic Program
  25. 25. Wang F, Xue J, Xie R, Ming B, Wang K, Hou P, et al. Assessing growth and water productivity for drip-irrigated maize under high plant density in arid to semi-humid climates. Agriculture. 2022;12(1):97. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010097
  26. 26. Williams A, Wells MS, Dickey DA, Hu S, Maul J, Raskin DT, et al. Establishing the relationship of soil nitrogen immobilization to cereal rye residues in a mulched system. Plant Soil. 2018;426:95–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3566-0
  27. 27. Mazuecos-Aguilera I, Salazar S, Hidalgo-Castellanos J, Ortiz-Liébana N, López-Bornay P, González-Andrés F. Combined application of N-fixing PGPB and rice straw mulch compensates N immobilization by straw, improving crop growth. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2024;11:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-024-00555-3
  28. 28. Wu Y, Huang F, Jia Z, Ren X, Cai T. Response of soil water, temperature, and maize (Zea mays L.) production to different plastic film mulching patterns in semi-arid areas of northwest China. Soil Tillage Res. 2017;166:113–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.10.012

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.