Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)

Sustainable valorisation of Palmyra shell waste into carbon dots and graphene oxide for seed nano-priming under drought stress

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14135
Submitted
17 February 2026
Published
19-06-2026 — Updated on 01-07-2026
Versions

Abstract

The agricultural sector produces around 140 billion metric tonnes of biomass annually; however, region-specific wastes such as palmyra shells remains underutilised despite their potential as precursor for carbon nanomaterials (CNMs) synthesis. drought severely limits rice cultivation and can reduce grain yield by up to 50 % under severe moisture stress. Despite increasing significance of biomass-derived CNMs, research gaps exist in conversion of shell waste into CNMs, development of synthesis-property correlations and experimental evidence of their biological efficacy in alleviating drought stress. The research gap was addressed by synthesising carbon dots (CDs) and graphene oxide (GO) from shell waste and evaluating their seed priming effectiveness subjected to polyethylene glycol (PEG) -induced stress. The main hypothesis was to produce stable CNMs for improving seed germination, antioxidant regulation and early growth under drought. The objectives of the study were to optimise the synthesis of CDs and GO using response surface methodology, characterise their physicochemical properties and evaluate their seed priming effects on rice under PEG-induced drought stress using concentrations ranging from 5 to 100 ppm. Optimised conditions produced 26.8 % CDs at 600 °C pyrolysis temperature /120 min pyrolysis time/10 min ultrasonication time and 6.2 % GO at KMnO₄ : C ratio of 3 : 1, oxidation temperature of 35 °C for oxidation time at 3 hr. CDs (2.26–4.01 nm) and GO (11.5–18.9 nm) exhibited uniform morphology, π–π and n–π ultra violet–visible                     (UV–Vis) transitions, quantum confinement driven photoluminescence, zeta of -36.2 mV (CDs) and -36.98 mV (GO), oxygenated surface functionalities (FT-IR), defect-associated Raman signatures (ID/IG = 1.2 for CDs and 1.16 for GO) and amorphous carbon structures. Seed priming with CDs at 75 ppm increased germination to 98 %, enhanced seedling vigour (2608), increased antioxidant activities (25–38 %) and reduced malondialdehyde (MDA)  by 57.8 %. The enhanced drought tolerance was associated with improved antioxidant defense and reduced oxidative membrane damage under PEG-induced osmotic stress, while higher doses caused phytotoxic effects. This work establishes circular, waste-derived nano-priming strategy with strong potential for early drought mitigation and field translation, supporting SDGs 1, 12 and 13. The study addresses existing research gaps related to biomass-to-CNMs conversion, synthesis–property Optimisation and biological validation of Palmyra shell-derived nanomaterials under drought stress.

References

  1. 1. Seah CC, Tan CH, Arifin NA, Hafriz RS, Salmiaton A, Nomanbhay S, et al. Co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic: Circularity of wastes and comprehensive review of synergistic mechanism. Results Eng. 2023;17:100989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100989
  2. 2. Manickaraj K, Thirumalaisamy R, Palanisamy S, Ayrilmis N, Massoud EE, Palaniappan M, et al. Value-added utilization of agricultural wastes in biocomposite production: Characteristics and applications. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025;1549(1):72–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15368
  3. 3. Tripathi N, Hills CD, Singh RS, Atkinson CJ. Biomass waste utilisation in low-carbon products: Harnessing a major potential resource. NPJ Clim Atmos Sci. 2019;2(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0093-5
  4. 4. Ajien A, Idris J, Md Sofwan N, Husen R, Seli H. Coconut shell and husk biochar: A review of production and activation technology, economic, financial aspect and application. Waste Manag Res. 2023;41(1):37–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X221127167
  5. 5. Vengaiah PC, Prasad KR, Murthy GN, Sumitha S, Jerard B. Palmyrah (Borassus flabellifer L.) tuber in India: Present status and scope. Asian J Curr Res. 2024;9(2):73–80. https://doi.org/10.56557/ajocr/2024/v9i28596
  6. 6. Rahman MA, Ndiaye M, Weclawski B. Palmyra palm shell (Borassus flabellifer) properties part 1: Insights into its physical and chemical properties. Eng Rep. 2025;7(4):e70066. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70066
  7. 7. Chauhan P, Dogra S, Chaudhary S, Kumar R. Usage of coconut coir for sustainable production of high-valued carbon dots with discriminatory sensing aptitude toward metal ions. Mater Today Chem. 2020;16:100247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100247
  8. 8. Leng G, Hall J. Crop yield sensitivity of global major agricultural countries to droughts and the projected changes in the future. Sci Total Environ. 2019;654:811–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.434
  9. 9. Kim KH, Lee BM. Effects of climate change and drought tolerance on maize growth. Plants. 2023;12(20):3548. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12203548
  10. 10. Mohan VR, MacDonald MT, Abbey L. Impact of water deficit stress on brassica crops: Growth and yield, physiological and biochemical responses. Plants. 2025;14(13):1942. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14131942
  11. 11. Shelar A, Singh AV, Chaure N, Jagtap P, Chaudhari P, Shinde M, et al. Nanoprimers in sustainable seed treatment: Molecular insights into abiotic-biotic stress tolerance mechanisms for enhancing germination and improved crop productivity. Sci Total Environ. 2024;951:175118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175118
  12. 12. Jirimali H, Singh J, Boddula R, Lee JK, Singh V. Nano-structured carbon: Its synthesis from renewable agricultural sources and important applications. Materials. 2022;15(11):3969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113969
  13. 13. García JR, Sedran U, Zaini MA, Zakaria ZA. Preparation, characterization and dye removal study of activated carbon prepared from palm kernel shell. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25(6):5076–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8975-8
  14. 14. Falciani R, Novaro E, Marchesini M, Gucciardi M. Multi-element analysis of soil and sediment by ICP-MS after a microwave assisted digestion method. J Anal At Spectrom. 2000;15(5):561–5. https://doi.org/10.1039/b000742k
  15. 15. Rajkishore SK, Devadharshini KP, Sathya Moorthy P, Reddy Kiran Kalyan VS, Sunitha R, Prasanthrajan M, et al. Novel synthesis of carbon dots from coconut wastes and its potential as water disinfectant. Sustainability. 2023;15:10924. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410924
  16. 16. Mishra N, Jiang C, Chen L, Paul A, Chatterjee A, Shen G. Achieving abiotic stress tolerance in plants through antioxidative defense mechanisms. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1110622. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1110622
  17. 17. Allen E, Alvarez S. International rules for seed testing 2020. Bassersdorf: International Seed Testing Association; 2020.
  18. 18. ISTA. Method validation reports on rules proposals for the International Rules for Seed Testing 2015. Bassersdorf: International Seed Testing Association; 2014.
  19. 19. Abdul-Baki AA , Anderson JD. Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci. 1973;13(6):630–3. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060013x
  20. 20. Aebi H, Wyss SR, Scherz B, Skvaril F. Heterogeneity of erythrocyte catalase II: Isolation and characterization of normal and variant erythrocyte catalase and their subunits. Eur J Biochem. 1974;48(1):137–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03751.x
  21. 21. Beauchamp C, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1971;44(1):276–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8
  22. 22. Dhindsa RS, Plumb-Dhindsa PA, Thorpe TA. Leaf senescence: Correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J Exp Bot. 1981;32(1):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/32.1.93
  23. 23. Ramakrishna V, Singh AK, Bayen GK, Masto RE, Meena RK, Singh PK, et al. Torrefaction of agro-wastes (palmyra palm shell and redgram stalk): Characterization of the physicochemical properties and mechanical strength of binderless pellets. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2023;13(8):6953–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01720-6
  24. 24. Wijitkosum S. Biochar derived from agricultural wastes and wood residues for sustainable agricultural and environmental applications. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. 2022;10(2):335–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.09.006
  25. 25. El-Sayed SA. Chemical products yielded from different pyrolysis processes of rice waste residues: A comprehensive review. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2025;15(14):20615–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-025-06624-3.
  26. 26. Nasir S, Hussein MZ, Yusof NA, Zainal Z. Oil palm waste-based precursors as a renewable and economical carbon sources for the preparation of reduced graphene oxide from graphene oxide. Nanomaterials. 2017;7(7):182. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7070182
  27. 27. Zhao Y, Jing S, Peng X, Chen Z, Hu Y, Zhuo H, et al. Synthesizing green carbon dots with exceptionally high yield from biomass hydrothermal carbon. Cellulose. 2020;27(1):415–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02807-0
  28. 28. Huskić M, Kepić D, Kleut D, Mozetič M, Vesel A, Anžlovar A, et al. The influence of reaction conditions on the properties of graphene oxide. Nanomaterials. 2024;14(3):281. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14030281
  29. 29. González-González RB, González LT, Madou M, Leyva-Porras C, Martinez-Chapa SO, Mendoza A. Synthesis, purification and characterization of carbon dots from non-activated and activated pyrolytic carbon black. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(3):298. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12030298
  30. 30. Shan F, Fu L, Chen X, Xie X, Liao C, Zhu Y, et al. Waste-to-wealth: Functional biomass carbon dots based on bee pollen waste and application. Chin Chem Lett. 2022;33(6):2942–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.094
  31. 31. Guo Z, Ahmad HA, Tian Y, Zhao Q, Zeng M, Wu N, et al. Extensive data analysis and kinetic modelling of dosage and temperature dependent role of graphene oxides on anammox. Chemosphere. 2022;308:136307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136307
  32. 32. Wang B, Lu S. The light of carbon dots: From mechanism to applications. Matter. 2022;5(1):110–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2021.10.016.
  33. 33. Costinas C, Salagean CA, Cotet LC, Baia M, Todea M, Magyari K, et al. Insights into the stability of graphene oxide aqueous dispersions. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(24):4489. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244489
  34. 34. Panyathip R, Sucharitakul S, Phaduangdhitidhada S, Ngamjarurojana A, Kumnorkaew P, Choopun S. Surface enhanced Raman scattering in graphene quantum dots grown via electrochemical process. Molecules. 2021;26(18):5484. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185484
  35. 35. Liu X, Choi J, Xu Z, Grey CP, Fleischmann S, Forse AC. Raman spectroscopy measurements support disorder-driven capacitance in nanoporous carbons. J Am Chem Soc. 2024;146(45):30748–52. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c10214
  36. 36. Mohammed SJ, Omer KM, Hawaiz FE. Deep insights to explain the mechanism of carbon dot formation at various reaction times using the hydrothermal technique: FT-IR, 13C-NMR, 1H-NMR and UV-visible spectroscopic approaches. RSC Adv. 2023;13(21):14340–9. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra01646c
  37. 37. Gedda G, Sankaranarayanan SA, Putta CL, Gudimella KK, Rengan AK, Girma WM. Green synthesis of multi-functional carbon dots from medicinal plant leaves for antimicrobial, antioxidant and bioimaging applications. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6371. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33652-8
  38. 38. Pope EM. Evaluation of upland rice response to water stress using polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) at germination and early seedling stage. 2024. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcs/2024/v9i1244
  39. 39. Sujiono EH, Zabrian D, Dahlan MY, Amin BD, Agus J. Graphene oxide based coconut shell waste: Synthesis by modified Hummers method and characterization. Heliyon. 2020;6(8):e04568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04568.
  40. 40. Liang L, Wong SC, Lisak G. Effects of plastic-derived carbon dots on germination and growth of pea (Pisum sativum) via seed nano-priming. Chemosphere. 2023;316:137868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137868
  41. 41. Liang L, Veksha A, Lisak G. Nanopriming using plastic-derived carbon nanomaterials: Boosting growth and salt tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.). ACS Agric Sci Technol. 2023;3(11):1081–91. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00351
  42. 42. Kou E, Li W, Zhang H, Yang X, Kang Y, Zheng M, et al. Nitrogen and sulfur co-doped carbon dots enhance drought resistance in tomato and mung beans. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2021;4(8):6093–102. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c00427
  43. 43. Li Y, Gao J, Xu X, Wu Y, Zhuang J, Zhang X, et al. Carbon dots as a protective agent alleviating abiotic stress on rice (Oryza sativa L.) through promoting nutrition assimilation and the defense system. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(30):33575–85. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c11724
  44. 44. Zhang P, Guo Z, Luo W, Monikh FA, Xie C, Valsami-Jones E, et al. Graphene oxide-induced pH alteration, iron overload and subsequent oxidative damage in rice (Oryza sativa L.): A new mechanism of nanomaterial phytotoxicity. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(6):3181–90. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05794
  45. 45. Sharma A, Kothari SL, Kachhwaha S. Impacts of multi-walled carbon-nanotubes on the growth of pearl millet. J Appl Biol Biotechnol. 2023;11(4):170–7. https://doi.org/10.7324/jabb.2023.11513
  46. 46. Li Y, Sheng Y, Shu J, Hao S, Wang J, Huang Q, et al. Effects of nano-silica and multi-walled carbon nanotubes on grape seedlings under salt stress. Agronomy. 2024;14(3):622. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030622
  47. 47. Vukmirović A, Škvorc Ž, Bogdan S, Krstonošić D, Bogdan IK, Karažija T, et al. The role of phosphorus fertilization in antioxidant responses of drought-stressed common beech and sessile oak provenances. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(7):3053. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073053

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.