Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Combining ability and genetic architecture of yield and quality traits in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14262
Submitted
26 February 2026
Published
29-08-2026

Abstract

Bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.) is an important cucurbitaceous vegetable crop widely cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions due to its high nutritional value, adaptability, consumer preference and potential for yield improvement through heterosis breeding. The genetic improvement of bottle gourd requires a clear understanding of the relative contribution of additive and non-additive gene that govern yield and quality traits. The present investigation assessed general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) in seven diverse parental lines and their 21 F₁ hybrids developed through a full diallel mating design (excluding reciprocals). The experimental material comprising seven parental lines and 21 F₁ hybrids was evaluated in a randomised complete block design (RCBD) with 3 replications for 10 agronomic and quality traits. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant GCA and SCA effects for most traits, including fruit length (83.05 and 10.80), fruit girth (20.31 and 3.79), yield (183.2 and 760.3) and total soluble solids (0.11 and 0.19), respectively, with SCA variance predominating for yield and its major components, indicating the importance of dominance and epistatic interactions. Among parents, BRBG 65 exhibited desirable GCA effects for primary branches per vine (1.06), vine length (0.27) and fruit length (3.20), while BRBG 190 showed positive GCA effects for fruit girth (1.50) and yield (21.65), identifying them as superior general combiners for yield and quality attributes. Among the hybrids, BRBG 65 × Punjab Komal recorded high positive SCA effects for yield (16.25), fruit girth (2.81) and earliness for first fruit harvest (-4.82), whereas BRBG 51-2 × BRBG 190 exhibited high and desirable SCA effects for fruit length (6.89) and yield (10.16). The hybrid BRBG 21-2 × Pusa Naveen also showed significant positive SCA effects for yield (9.75) and total soluble solids (0.71), demonstrating substantial heterotic potential. The findings of the present study indicated the predominance of non-additive gene action and suggested that hybrid breeding could be effectively utilised for yield enhancement in bottle gourd. Furthermore, the identified superior parents and promising hybrids may serve as valuable genetic resources for future hybrid development and population improvement programmes under eastern Indian agro-climatic conditions.

References

  1. 1) Bhatt R, Raghav M, Bisht YS, Kumar V, Chauhan A, Gaur A. Heterosis and combining ability for nutritional quality traits in Lagenaria siceraria. Indian J Agric Sci. 2023;93(11):1197–201. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i11.141969
  2. 2) Chaudhary B. Vegetables. 8th rev ed. New Delhi: National Book Trust; 1987. p. 195–8.
  3. 3) Singh R, Singh B, Prakash S, Kumar M, Kaushik H, Singh S, et al. Correlation and path co-efficient analysis in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria L.). Ecol Environ Conserv. 2022;28(Suppl 1):S138–43. https://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2022.v28i01s.020
  4. 4) Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Harlow: Longman Group Ltd.; 1996.
  5. 5) Lynch M, Walsh B. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 1998.
  6. 6) Comstock RE, Robinson HF. Estimation of average dominance of genes. Biometrics. 1952;8:336–45.
  7. 7) Kenga R, Alabi SO, Gupta SC. Combining ability studies in tropical sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Field Crops Res. 2004;88(2–3):251–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.002
  8. 8) Sprague GF, Tatum LA. General versus specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. Agron J. 1942;34:923–32. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1942.00021962003400100008x
  9. 9) Griffing B. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci. 1956;9:463–93. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9560463
  10. 10) Petolino JF. Advances in diallel analysis. Plant Breed Rev. 1995;13:37–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470650059.ch2
  11. 11) Hallauer AR, Carena MJ, Miranda Filho JB. Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0766-0_9
  12. 12) Dubey SK, Maurya IB. Combining ability for characters related to yield and earliness in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria). Indian J Agric Res. 2007;41(1):59–62.
  13. 13) Hadiya AM, Dhaduk LK, Vyas UM, Patel JB. Combining ability analysis for fruit yield per vine and its components in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(5):631–4.
  14. 14) Patel CJ, Patel RN, Gami RA, Gameti BA. Elucidation of combining ability and gene action in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35:375–93. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i213988
  15. 15) Yadav AK, Yadav GC, Jaiswal RC. Combining ability analysis for quantitative traits in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.). Plant Arch. 2019;19(1):805–7.
  16. 16) Mather K, Jinks JL. Biometrical genetics: the study of continuous variation. 2nd ed. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; 1971. https://doi.org/10.1002/BIMJ.19730150511
  17. 17) Singh RK, Chaudhary BD. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers; 1985.
  18. 18) AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 21st ed. Gaithersburg (MD): AOAC International; 2019.
  19. 19) Reddy SRY, Sekhar TC, Allam CR, Krishnan V. Combining ability studies in maize for yield traits using Griffing’s diallel approach. Electron J Plant Breed. 2016;7(4):1046–55. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2016.00143.5
  20. 20) Keshari D, Singh DK. Estimation of combining ability effects for hybrid breeding in bottle gourd using diallel mating design. J Exp Agric Int. 2024;46(9):376–84. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i92834
  21. 21) Rahaman MM, Hossain M, Alam N. Estimation of combining ability and heterosis in bottle gourd. Bangladesh J Bot. 2025;54(3):601–9. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v25i3.84575
  22. 22) Mishra S, Pandey S, Kumar N, Pandey VP, Singh T. Studies on combining ability and gene action in kharif season bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl.]. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019;8(1):11–18.
  23. 23) Yadav A, Yadav G, Abha R, Kumar S, Yadav L, Bhaiya R. Estimation of combining ability and nature of gene action for yield and quality traits in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.] under salt affected soil. Veg Sci. 2025;52(1):112–21. https://doi.org/10.61180/vegsci.2025.v52.i1.16
  24. 24) Bhaiya R, Yadav GC. Combining ability analysis for fruit yield in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2022;34(23):905–15. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i232501
  25. 25) Sudesh, Duhan DS, Gill V, Shubham, Mehta T, Aishwarya KR. Combining ability studies in line × tester set for quality traits in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl.]. Int J Agric Food Sci. 2025;7(6):263–7. https://doi.org/10.33545/2664844X.2025.v7.i6d.464
  26. 26) Reddy VSK, Swain D, Sahoo SP, Agarwal AK, Lenka D, Mohanty MR, et al. Combining ability and heterosis for grain yield and yield components in maize (Zea mays L.). Electron J Plant Breed. 2025;5(4):927–34. https://doi.org/10.37992/2024.1504.112
  27. 27) Kumar JS, Pandit MK. Studies on heterosis, combining ability and gene action for earliness, yield and yield components in sponge gourd. Indian J Hortic. 2020;77(1):210–14. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2020.00026.2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.