Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp7 (2026): International Conference on Agricultural Sustainability

Interactive effects of bamboo root-derived plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and pruning intensity on mini hybrid cucumber productivity

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14365
Submitted
4 March 2026
Published
15-09-2026

Abstract

The mini cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) variety was characterised by a crunchy texture and low seed content, making it well-suited for lowland cultivation. Mini cucumbers typically produce short, capsule-shaped fruits. This study investigated the effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) dosage and different pruning strategies on the growth and yield of mini hybrid cucumbers. The experiment was arranged in a factorial randomised complete block design (RCBD) with 2 factors. The first factor consisted of four PGPR dosages derived from bamboo roots, namely 0, 20, 40 and 60 mL L-1. The second factor comprised four pruning treatments: no pruning, main stem pruning, pruning of three lateral branches and pruning of five lateral branches. The results demonstrated that both PGPR application and pruning significantly affected vegetative and generative growth parameters of mini hybrid cucumbers. Application of PGPR at 60 mL L-1 significantly increased plant height by 26.11 %, leaf number by 30.00 % and fruit weight per plant by 44.04 % compared to the control. Meanwhile, pruning of three lateral branches significantly increased plant height by 24.90 %, fruit diameter by 13.22 %, fruit length by 28.50 % and total fruit yield per hectare by 47.36 % relative to the control. These findings indicate that appropriate PGPR application combined with strategic pruning practices can substantially enhance the growth and productivity of mini hybrid cucumbers.

References

  1. 1. Kartikasari ON, Koesriharti. Response of three varieties of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) to the application of the growth regulator gibberellin (GA3). J Prod Tan. 2016;4(6):425–30.
  2. 2. Badan Pusat Statistik. Produksi tanaman sayuran. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik; 2024.
  3. 3. Coskun N, Pırlak L. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on branching and growing of apple sapling. Erwerbs Obstbau. 2017;59:309–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-017-0326-x
  4. 4. Windiastuti E, Ramadhan MH, Manik VT, Kurniati F, Sunarya Y. Response of Cucumis sativus L. growth and harvest to variations in soaking time and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria concentration. J Biol Trop. 2023;23(3):164–72.
  5. 5. Mulyawan R, Indriyati LT, Widiastuti H, Sabiham S. Testing the activity of laccase and cellulase on peat lignocellulose with various moisture contents. J Ilmu Pertan Indo. 2019;24(1):20–7. https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.24.1.20
  6. 6. Amalia S, Faizah. Application of ethephon to improve flower and fruit formation in cucumbers (Cucumis sativus L.) [thesis]. Bogor: IPB University; 2014.
  7. 7. Hidayatullah R, Munandar DE, Usmadi, Khozin MN. The effect of pruning time and gibberellin hormone (GA3) concentration on cucumber growth and productivity (Cucumis sativus L.). Agrium. 2024;27(2):191–200.
  8. 8. Zhang Q, Wang Y, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Chen M, Zou J, et al. Effects of pruning on growth, rhizosphere soil physicochemical indexes and bacterial community structure of tea tree and their interaction. Agriculture. 2023;13:1972. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101972
  9. 9. Sukri MZ, Rohman HF, Firgiyanto R. The effect of biofertilizer application and shoot pruning on the production of chili plants on sandy media. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2022;980:012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/980/1/012012
  10. 10. Flores CAR, Siringan MAT, San Diego MACVR. Multiple plant growth-promoting activities exhibited by root-associated bacteria isolated from bamboo and corn. Int J Microbiol. 2025;2025:6374935. https://doi.org/10.1155/ijm/6374935
  11. 11. Srirejeki DI, Maghfoer MD, Herlina N. PGPR and Dekamon applications and topping to increase bean plant productivity (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) upright type. J Prod Tan. 2015;3(4):302–10.
  12. 12. Sitawati, Sintawati MB, Fajriani S. Effectiveness of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and NPK fertilizer on the growth and flowering of aster ericoides (Symphyotrichum ericoides). J Hort Indo. 2022;13(2):64–71. https://doi.org/10.29244/jhi.13.2.64-71
  13. 13. Nie J, Li Z, Zhang Y, Zhang D, Xu S, He N, et al. Plant pruning affects photosynthesis and photoassimilate partitioning in relation to the yield formation of field-grown cotton. Ind Crops Prod. 2021;173:114087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114087
  14. 14. Baid RS, Ilahude Z, Purnomo SH. The effect of coconut water liquid organic fertilizer and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from bamboo roots on the growth of cocoa seedlings (Theobroma cacao L.). J Agroteknotropika. 2022;11(1):33–41.
  15. 15. Xu C, Li R, Song W, Wu T, Sun S, Han T, et al. High density and uniform plant distribution improve soybean yield by regulating population uniformity and canopy light interception. Agronomy. 2021;11(9):1880. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091880
  16. 16. Gosai S, Adhikari S, Khanai S, Poudel PB. Effects of plant growth regulators on growth, flowering, fruiting and fruit yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.): A review. Arch Agric Environ Sci. 2020;5(3):268–74. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2020.050306
  17. 17. El-Saadony MT, Saad AM, Mohammed DM, Fahmy MA, Elesawi IE, Ahmed AE, et al. Drought-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria alleviate drought stress and enhance soil health for sustainable agriculture: A comprehensive review. Plant Stress. 2024;14:100632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2024.100632
  18. 18. Chieb M, Gachomo EW. The role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in plant drought stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04403-8
  19. 19. Giri BR, Chattaraj S, Rath S, Pattnaik MM, Mitra D, Thatoi H. Unveiling the molecular mechanism of Azospirillum in plant growth promotion. Bacteria. 2025;4:36. https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria4030036
  20. 20. Gomasta J, Sarker BC, Haque MA, Anwari A, Mondal S, Uddin MS. Pruning techniques affect flowering, fruiting, yield and fruit biochemical traits in guava under transitory sub-tropical conditions. Heliyon. 2024;10(9):e30064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30064
  21. 21. Santika M, Bintoro M. The effect of foliar fertilizer application and shoot pruning on cucumber seed production and quality (Cucumis sativus L.). Agropross Nat Conf Proc Agric. 2022;6:563–71. https://doi.org/10.25047/agropross.2022.327
  22. 22. Wee WC, Lai KS, Kong CL, Yap WS. Impact of within-row plant spacing and fixed fruit setting on yield and quality of rockmelon fruit cultivated by drip irrigation in a greenhouse. Hortic Sci Technol. 2017;36(2):172–82. https://doi.org/10.12972/kjhst.20180018

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.