Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)

Exploring the phenotypic diversity of clove bean (Ipomoea muricata (L.) Jacq.) landraces for DUS-based morphological traits through multivariate analysis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14370
Submitted
4 March 2026
Published
07-09-2026 — Updated on 30-09-2026
Versions

Abstract

Clove bean (Ipomoea muricata (L.) Jacq.) is an underutilised vegetable crop with significant potential for strengthening sustainable agriculture and global nutritional security. The conservation and utilisation of clove bean landraces are essential for breeding advancement and global nutritional security, owing to the limited availability and characterisation of germplasm resources. The present study evaluated fifteen clove bean landraces using 26 morpho-physiological, inflorescence, pod and seed descriptors to assess the extent of genetic diversity. Significant variability was observed across all studied traits, indicating the presence of substantial morphological divergence among the landraces. Correlation analysis revealed strong positive associations among plant type, canopy cover, vine internode length, mature leaf size and pigmentation traits, suggesting coordinated genetic control and the possibility of simultaneous improvement through selection. Floral characteristics, including flower length, flower width, sepal shape and sepal apex, exhibited highly significant positive correlations. Cluster analysis grouped the landraces into four distinct clusters, reflecting varying levels of divergence and identifying unique landraces such as Im-1 and Im-11. Principal component analysis indicated that the first six principal components had eigenvalues greater than one and together explained 88.95 % of the total variation, with PC1 contributing 39.86 %. Floral dimensional traits and vegetative vigour were the primary contributors to divergence. The identified landraces provide valuable genetic resources for future breeding, conservation and crop improvement programmes in clove bean.

References

  1. 1. Abdulkadyrova MA, Dikinov AH, Tajmashanov HÈ, Shidaev LA, Shidaeva EA. Global food security problems in the modern world economy. Int J Environ Sci Educ. 2016;11(12):5320–30.
  2. 2. Ezeh AC, Bongaarts J, Mberu B. Global population trends and policy options. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):142–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60696-5
  3. 3. Cui K, Shoemaker SP. A look at food security in China. npj Sci Food. 2018;2(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-018-0012-x
  4. 4. Kovačević DB, Brdar D, Fabečić P, Barba FJ, Lorenzo JM, Putnik P. Strategies to achieve a healthy and balanced diet: Fruits and vegetables as a natural source of bioactive compounds. In: Agri-Food Industry Strategies for Healthy Diets and Sustainability. Elsevier; 2020. p. 51–88.
  5. 5. Singh S, Singh L, Singh D, Chand S, Ahmed ZS, Singh V, et al. Indigenous underutilized vegetables for food and nutritional security in an island ecosystem. Food Secur. 2018;10(5):1173–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0840-1
  6. 6. Sultanbawa Y, Sivakumar D. Enhanced nutritional and phytochemical profiles of selected underutilized fruits, vegetables and legumes. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2022;46:100853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100853
  7. 7. Rao N, Shahid M, Al Shankiti A, Elouafi I. Neglected and underutilized species for food and income security in marginal environments. Acta Hortic. 2014;1051:91–103. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1051.8
  8. 8. Mim MK, Katha JF, Islam MM, Kabir MY. Present status and problems of underutilized vegetables as perceived by the retailers and consumers of Khulna City of Bangladesh. Food Agribus Manag. 2022;3(2):34–39. https://doi.org/10.26480/fabm.02.2022.34.39
  9. 9. Ndlovu M, Scheelbeek P, Ngidi M, Mabhaudhi T. Underutilized crops for diverse, resilient and healthy agri-food systems: a systematic review of sub-Saharan Africa. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2024;8:1498402. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1498402
  10. 10. Padulosi S, Thompson J, Rudebjer P. Fighting poverty, hunger and malnutrition with neglected and underutilized species: needs, challenges and the way forward. 2013.
  11. 11. Munasinghe S, Fernando K. Factors affecting on propagation and production of clove bean [Ipomoea muricata (L.) Jacq.] an underutilized vegetable crop in Sri Lanka. AGRIEAST J Agric Sci. 2021;15(1). https://doi.org/10.4038/agrieast.v15i1.101
  12. 12. Salikutty Joseph SJ, Malsawmkimi M, George T. Correlations and path coefficient analysis in clove bean (Ipomoea muricata (L.) Jacq.). 2008.
  13. 13. Ysrael MC. Tonkin herbal drug: a multidisciplinary approach to development. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2003;29(3–4):247–51.
  14. 14. Dutfield G. Turning plant varieties into intellectual property: the UPOV Convention. In: The Future Control of Food. Routledge; 2012. p. 27–47.
  15. 15. Gopinath P, Parsad R, Joseph B, Adarsh V. GRAPES: General rshiny based analysis platform empowered by statistics. J Open Source Softw. 2021;6(63):3437. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03437
  16. 16. Pavithra P, Thangamani C, Pugalendhi L, Swarnapriya R, Meenakshi P. Studies on evaluation of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas Lam.) genotypes for high tuber yield and quality. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2022;12(11):1523–30. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2022021131135
  17. 17. Baruah R, Pathak N, Neog M, Sarma UJ. Evaluation of biofortified sweet potato varieties for their growth, yield and economic performance under Assam conditions. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol. 2024;42(5):316–22. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2024/v42i52441
  18. 18. Duran LA, Blair MW, Giraldo M, Macchiavelli R, Prophete E, Nin J, et al. Morphological and molecular characterization of common bean landraces and cultivars from the Caribbean. Crop Sci. 2005;45(4):1320–28. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0501
  19. 19. Savitha B, Ravikumar R, Shinde DG. Characterization and genetic diversity analysis in field bean [Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet] collections of Karnataka. J Food Legumes. 2012;25(1):18–24.
  20. 20. Singh B, Chaubey T, Upadhyay D, Jha AJ, Pandey S. Morphological description of French bean varieties based on DUS characters. 2014.
  21. 21. Bode D, Elezi F, Gixhari B. Morphological characterisation and interrelationships among descriptors in Phaseolus vulgaris accessions. Agric For. 2013;59(2).
  22. 22. Gurmu F, Shimelis HA, Laing MD. Correlation and path-coefficient analyses of root yield and related traits among selected sweet potato genotypes. S Afr J Plant Soil. 2018;35(3):179–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2017.1354405
  23. 23. Dash SP, Singh J, Panigrahi T, Thakur P. Correlation and path analysis in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.). Plant Arch. 2015;15(2):695–99.
  24. 24. Prasanth K, Sadashiva A, Pitchaimuthu M, Varalakshmi B. Genetic diversity, variability and correlation studies in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Indian J Plant Genet Resour. 2020;33(2):179–86. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-1926.2020.00026.1
  25. 25. Meghashree JR, Ganiger VM, Kumar JSA, Bhuvaneshwari G, Gopali JB, Evoor S, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure assessment of Indian bitter gourd accessions using nutritional content and molecular markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2024;71(4):1557–73.
  26. 26. Rodriguez-Bonilla L, Cuevas HE, Montero-Rojas M, Bird-Pico F, Luciano-Rosario D, Siritunga D. Assessment of genetic diversity of sweet potato in Puerto Rico. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e116184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116184
  27. 27. Cheng L, Ning Z, Hong Z, Shao-zhen H, Shao-pei G, Qing-chang L. Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure in sweet potato using SSR markers. J Integr Agric. 2023;22(11):3408–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2023.02.004
  28. 28. Bean F. Principal component analysis and stability of genotypes in. Legume Res. 2021;1:6. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4569
  29. 29. Singh S, Rajan S, Kumar D, Soni V. Genetic diversity assessment in dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L.) based on principal component analysis and single linkage cluster analysis. Legume Res. 2024;47(5).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.