Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp7 (2026): International Conference on Agricultural Sustainability

Cotton mutant lines derived from gamma-ray irradiation show reduced lodging risk and multiple-harvest potential

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14390
Submitted
4 March 2026
Published
07-09-2026

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is an important cash crop supplying natural fibres for the textile industry, yet the availability of cultivars combining lodging resistance and multiple-harvest capability remains limited. This study evaluated gamma-ray-induced cotton mutant lines under field conditions in Bantaeng, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Seven genotypes were tested, consisting of one wild type (NIAB 999), two national varieties (Karisma and Kanesia 15) and four mutant lines (CN 4A, CN 2A, CN 2C and CN 1A). The mutant lines were derived from tissue-cultured immature embryos of NIAB 999 irradiated with 60Co gamma rays at a dose of 20 Gy. The experiment was arranged in a randomized block design (RBD) with 4 replications. Agronomic traits were recorded at budding and boll stage. The results showed at 90 days after planting (DAP), clear genotypic differences in plant height were observed, with Kanesia 15 exhibiting the tallest stature (166 cm), followed by NIAB 999 (152 cm), whereas CN 1A was markedly shorter (94 cm). Despite continuous wind exposure, mutant lines, particularly CN 4A, combined reduced plant height, internode length and stem diameter with adequate numbers of generative branches and bolls. Moreover, mutant lines-initiated harvest earlier (115 DAP) and supported up to three sequential harvests at two-week intervals, whereas the wild-type NIAB 999 matured later (130 DAP) and lacked comparable harvest flexibility. These results demonstrate that gamma-ray irradiation successfully generated cotton mutant lines with reduced lodging risk and enhanced multiple-harvest potential.

References

  1. 1. Rehman A, Almas HI, Qayyum A, Li H, Peng Z, Qin G, et al. Mutation breeding in cotton. In: Biotechnologies and Genetics in Plant Mutation Breeding. Apple Academic Press; 2023. p. 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003305101-2
  2. 2. Waghmare VN. Cotton breeding. In: Fundamentals of Field Crop Breeding. Springer; 2022. p. 609–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9257-4_11
  3. 3. Widiarsih S, Dwimahyani I. Early development of Indonesian cotton with enhanced resilience to climate change through mutation breeding. In: IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2020;518:012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/518/1/012013
  4. 4. Indonesia. It turns out Indonesia can be self-sufficient in cotton. The Agency for Agricultural Assemblies and Modernization; 2024.
  5. 5. Kushanov FN, Komilov DJ, Turaev OS, Ernazarova DK, Amanboyeva RS, Gapparov BM, et al. Genetic analysis of mutagenesis that induces the photoperiod insensitivity of wild cotton Gossypium hirsutum subsp. purpurascens. Plants. 2022;11(22):3012. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223012
  6. 6. Nadeem S, Riaz Ahmed S, Luqman T, Tan DK, Maryum Z, Akhtar KP, et al. A comprehensive review on Gossypium hirsutum resistance against cotton leaf curl virus. Front Genet. 2024;15:1306469. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2024.1306469
  7. 7. Wang P, Abbas M, He J, Zhou L, Cheng H, Guo H. Advances in genome sequencing and artificially induced mutation provides new avenues for cotton breeding. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1400201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1400201
  8. 8. Dhole VJ, Jegadeesan S, Punniyamoorthy D. Use of gamma rays in crop improvement. In: Plant Mutagenesis: Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Landscapes. Springer; 2024. p. 135–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50729-8_11
  9. 9. Huang Q, Liu L, Li H, Wang X, Si A, He L, et al. Identification of co-expression modules of cotton plant height-related genes based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Agronomy. 2025;15(1):196. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010196
  10. 10. Lu J, Wang L, Zhang Q, Ma C, Su X, Cheng H, et al. AmCBF1 transcription factor regulates plant architecture by repressing GhPP2C1 or GhPP2C2 in Gossypium hirsutum. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:914206. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.914206
  11. 11. Wang Y, Feng A, Zhao C, Ma X, Zhang X, Li Y, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals key pathways and genes involved in lodging resistance of upland cotton. Plants. 2024;13(24):3493. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13243493
  12. 12. Li J, Liu R, Liu S, Zhigang G, Ma H, Shen Q, et al. Prioritising D-value in multivariate evaluation identifies high-yield and drought-resistant cotton genotypes. J Agron Crop Sci. 2025;211(5):e70113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.70113
  13. 13. Bista MK, Adhikari B, Sankarapillai LV, Pieralisi B, Reddy KR, Jenkins J, et al. Drought and heat stress induce differential physiological and agronomic trait responses in cotton. Ind Crops Prod. 2024;222:119540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119540
  14. 14. Yu X, Zhou M, Chen W, Wang Y, Lu H, Wang F, et al. Morphological and physiological mechanisms underlying lodging in cotton stems. J Cotton Res. 2025;8(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-025-00244-y
  15. 15. Sawan ZM. Climatic variables: Evaporation, sunshine, relative humidity, soil and air temperature and its adverse effects on cotton production. Inf Process Agric. 2018;5(1):134–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2017.09.006
  16. 16. The jamovi project. jamovi. Version 2.6 [computer software] [Internet]. 2024. https://www.jamovi.org
  17. 17. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 4.4 [computer software]. 2024.
  18. 18. Ahmad F, Perveen A, Mohammad N, Ali MA, Akhtar MN, Shahzad K, et al. Heat stress in cotton: Responses and adaptive mechanisms. In: Cotton Production and Uses: Agronomy, Crop Protection and Postharvest Technologies. Springer; 2020. p. 393–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_20
  19. 19. Abro AA, Anwar M, Javwad MU, Zhang M, Liu F, Jiménez-Ballesta R, et al. Morphological and physio-biochemical responses under heat stress in cotton: Overview. Biotechnol Rep. 2023;40:e00813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2023.e00813
  20. 20. Grundy PR, Yeates SJ, Bell KL. Cotton production during the tropical monsoon season. I. The influence of variable radiation on boll loss, compensation and yield. Field Crops Res. 2020;254:107790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107790
  21. 21. Soni M, Sheshukov AY, Aguilar J. The critical role of temperature in determining optimal planting schedule for cotton: A review. Agric For Meteorol. 2025;373:110741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110741
  22. 22. Boquet DJ, Clawson EL. Cotton planting date: Yield, seedling survival and plant growth. Agron J. 2009;101(5):1123–30. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0071
  23. 23. Najeeb U, Bange MP, Tan DK, Atwell BJ. Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses. AoB Plants. 2015;7:plv080. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv080
  24. 24. Zhang S, Liu G, Cui Q, Huang Z, Ye X, Cornelissen JH. New field wind manipulation methodology reveals adaptive responses of steppe plants to increased and reduced wind speed. Plant Methods. 2021;17(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-020-00705-2
  25. 25. Raza I, Hu D, Ahmad A, Li H, He S, Nazir MF, et al. Correlation analysis of stem hardness traits with fiber and yield-related traits in core collections of Gossypium hirsutum. J Cotton Res. 2021;4(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-021-00082-8
  26. 26. Zhang Z, He P, Jiao T, Xin H, Wang S, Wu X, et al. Overexpression of SiICE2 gene reduces plant height and increases yield in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25(1):743. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06777-3
  27. 27. Yang Z, Tang J, Yu M, Zhang Y, Abbas A, Wang S, et al. Sustainable cotton production through increased competitiveness: Analysis of comparative advantage and influencing factors of cotton production in Xinjiang, China. Agronomy. 2022;12(10):2239. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102239

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.