Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)

Effect of drying methods on the biochemical and functional qualities of ready-to-mix sweet pumpkin powder (Cucurbitaceae)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14409
Submitted
5 March 2026
Published
12-05-2026 — Updated on 06-07-2026
Versions

Abstract

With their convenient packaging and nutrient density, vegetable-based products are increasingly popular in contemporary convenience-focused diets. This study evaluated the physicochemical, proximate, functional and colour characteristics of sweet pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duchesne) powder for ready-to-mix applications, using three different drying techniques: tray drying (TD), freeze drying (FD) and vacuum drying (VD). Freshly made pumpkin puree (PP) was subjected to each drying method at the Department of Food Technology, School of Engineering, Avinashilingam Institute, Coimbatore. The resulting powders, as well as the original wet PP, were analysed for moisture content, protein, fat, fibre, ash, carbohydrate, pH, water activity, viscosity, titratable acidity and colour (L*, a* and b*) using standard AOAC methods. The results indicate that each drying method significantly altered the proximate composition of the PP compared to its wet-cured state (85.2 % moisture). Freeze-dried pumpkin powder exhibited the highest L* (74.82) and b* (30.00) values. It retained a higher percentage of carbohydrate (73.82 %) and dietary fibre (8.91 %), along with favourable carotenoid-associated colour attributes, indicating minimal thermal degradation. Vacuum-dried pumpkin powder showed the lowest water activity (0.298), suggesting increased microbial stability and shelf life.

 

References

  1. 1. Tonon RV, Brabet C, Hubinger MD. Influence of process conditions on the physicochemical properties of açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) powder produced by spray drying. J Food Eng. 2008;88:411–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.02.029
  2. 2. Türkmen N, Sari F, Velioglu Y. The effect of cooking methods on total phenolics and antioxidant activity of selected green vegetables. Food Chem. 2005;93:713–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.12.038
  3. 3. Ahmed J, Ramaswamy HS. Dynamic modelling of colour changes in food systems. Food Chem. 2006;71:399–406.
  4. 4. Maskan M. Kinetics of colour change of kiwifruit during hot air and microwave drying. J Food Eng. 2001;48:169–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00154-0
  5. 5. Sruthi NU, Rao DV. Influence of moisture content on shelf-life stability of fruit and vegetable powders. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2015;4:45–52.
  6. 6. Krokida MK, Marinos-Kouris D. Rehydration kinetics of dehydrated products. J Food Eng. 2003;57:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00214-5
  7. 7. Mujumdar AS, editor. Handbook of Industrial Drying. 4th ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17243
  8. 8. Ciurzyńska A, Lenart A. Freeze-drying - application in food processing and biotechnology. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2011;10:203–14.
  9. 9. Ratti C. Hot air and freeze-drying of high-value foods: a review. J Food Eng. 2001;49:311–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00228-4
  10. 10. AOAC. Official method 942.15 - acidity (titratable) of foods. In: Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. 2000.
  11. 11. AOAC. Official method 981.12 - pH of acid foods. In: Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. 2000.
  12. 12. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Gaithersburg (MD): Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2005.
  13. 13. Langyan S, Bhardwaj R, Radhamani J, Yadav R, Gautam RK, Kalia S, et al. A quick analysis method for protein quantification in oilseed crops: a comparison with standard protocol. Front Nutr. 2022;9:892695. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.892695
  14. 14. Lima-Pereira Y, de Souza EM, dos Reis DS, Barcellos-Silva IG, Miki KS, Veiga-Júnior VF, et al. Current perspectives on the extraction, isolation and identification of fats and fatty acids using conventional and green methods. Separations. 2024;12:160. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12060160
  15. 15. McCleary BV. Measurement of dietary fibre: which AOAC official method of analysis to use? J AOAC Int. 2023;106:917-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsad051
  16. 16. Ramachandran RP, Nadimi M, Cenkowski S, Paliwal J. Advancement and innovations in drying of biopharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals and functional foods. Food Eng Rev. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-024-09381-7
  17. 17. Fellows PJ. Food processing technology: principles and practice. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845696341
  18. 18. Krokida MK, Maroulis ZB. Quality changes during the drying of food materials. In: Drying technology in agriculture and food sciences. 2000. p. 61–106.
  19. 19. Ranganna S. Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill; 1986.
  20. 20. Rahman MS. Handbook of food preservation. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2007.
  21. 21. Rodríguez-Amaya DB. Effects of processing and storage on food carotenoids. Sight Life. 2019;33:47–53.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.