Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Optimising wheat productivity through graded nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilisation and rice-straw biochar-farmyard manure integration in the rice-wheat system of Punjab

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14431
Submitted
6 March 2026
Published
18-05-2026

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2024–25 at Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, to evaluate graded nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium (NPK) fertiliser levels   [100 % recommended dose of fertilisers (RDF) vs. 75 % nitrogen (N) with varying phosphorus - potassium (P–K) combinations] and organic amendments [control, 5 t ha–1 rice-straw biochar, 7.5 t ha–1  farmyard manure (FYM), 50:50 biochar: FYM] on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. PBW 826) grown in nutrient-poor sandy loam [0.49 % soil organic carbon (SOC)] under rice–wheat rotation. Using a strip-plot design (3 replications) measurements included growth, physiological parameters [relative water content (RWC), membrane stability index (MSI), chlorophyll] and yield. 100 % RDF (M1) significantly outperformed deficient treatments, recording 24–35 % greater plant height (PH), 38–64 % more tillers, 32–97 % higher RWC/MSI/chlorophyll and 47 % greater grain yield (GY) (56.00 q ha–1) vs. M5 (38.21 q ha–1). Combined biochar: FYM (T4) proved superior among amendments, enhancing growth (10–17 %), physiological parameters (14–25 %) and yield (14 % over control; 50.13 q ha–1) through biochar's nutrient retention and FYM's labile N/microbial stimulation. Non-significant interactions indicated additive effects, with M1+T4 optimal. Biochar's porosity improved water retention/microbial habitats; full NPK sustained photosynthesis/remobilisation for grain filling. Potassium (K) omission caused severe penalties in vegetative/grain growth, underscoring the need for balanced nutrition. Results demonstrate that integrated 100 % RDF + 50:50 biochar: FYM optimises productivity (exceeding the Punjab average of ~45 q ha–1), valorises rice residue (mitigating stubble burning) and builds soil health in Punjab's depleted loams-offering sustainable integrated nutrient management (INM) for rice-wheat systems.

References

  1. 1. Sharma K, Sharma PK. Wheat as a nutritional powerhouse: Shaping global food security. In: Meena VS, Jaiswal JP, Jinger D, Paramesh V, editors. Triticum – The Pillar of Global Food Security. London: IntechOpen; 2025. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1009499
  2. 2. Singh SK, Beillard MJ. Grain and Feed Annual 2024 [Internet]. New Delhi: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS); 2024. Report No.: IN2024-0016.
  3. 3. Briak H, Kebede F. Wheat (Triticum aestivum) adaptability evaluation in a semi-arid region of Central Morocco using APSIM model. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):23173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02668-3
  4. 4. Dhawan V, Singh JM, Kashish. Commercialization to specialization: a scenario of Punjab agriculture. Econ Aff. 2015;60(3):433–7. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-4666.2015.00061.3
  5. 5. Ladha JK, Dawe D, Pathak H, Padre AT, Yadav RL, Singh B, et al. How extensive are yield declines in long-term rice-wheat experiments in Asia? Field Crops Res. 2003;81(2–3):159–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00219-8
  6. 6. Ghosh T, Das B, Chakraborty D, Singh VK, Das D, Aggarwal P, et al. Evaluation of soil quality frameworks in rice–wheat systems under integrated nutrient management in Indo-Gangetic plains. Sci Rep. 2025;15:37511. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21630-1
  7. 7. Saini N, Kaur S, Dhaliwal SS, Singh S, Sharma H. Assessment of soil organic carbon stocks in relation to variation in physiography under sub-mountainous Shiwalik ranges of lower Himalayas, India. Carbon Manag. 2021;12(3):265–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2021.1910901
  8. 8. Singh S, Benbi DK. Punjab-soil health and green revolution: a quantitative analysis of major soil parameters. J Crop Improv. 2016;30(3):323–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2016.1157540
  9. 9. De Oliveira Silva A, Jaenisch BR, Ciampitti IA, Lollato RP. Wheat nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur uptake dynamics under different management practices. Agron J. 2021;113(3):2752–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20637
  10. 10. An YM, Song LL, Liu YR, Shu YJ, Guo CH. De novo transcriptional analysis of alfalfa in response to saline-alkaline stress. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:931. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00931
  11. 11. Li E, Tang J, Liu J, Zhang Z, Hua B, Jiang J, et al. The roles of hormone signals involved in rhizosphere pressure response induce corm expansion in Sagittaria trifolia. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(15):12345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512345
  12. 12. Ragel P, Raddatz N, Leidi EO, Quintero FJ, Pardo JM. Regulation of K+ nutrition in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00281
  13. 13. Deng Y, Zhang Y, Lu Y, Lu K, Bai H, Ren H. Metabolomics evaluation of the in vivo toxicity of bromoacetonitriles: one class of high-risk nitrogenous disinfection byproducts. Sci Total Environ. 2017;579:107–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.003
  14. 14. Paramesh V, Mohan Kumar R, Rajanna GA, Gowda S, Nath AJ, Madival Y, et al. Integrated nutrient management for improving crop yields, soil properties, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2023;7:1173258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1173258
  15. 15. Chahal HS, Singh A, Dhillon IS, Kaur J. Farmyard manure: a boon for integrated nutrient management. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol. 2020;13(4):483–95. https://doi.org/10.30954/0974-1712.04.2020.14
  16. 16. Nguyen HT, Aviso KB, Le DQ, Kojima N, Tokai A. A linear programming input–output model for mapping low-carbon scenarios for Vietnam in 2030. Sustain Prod Consum. 2018;16:134–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.07.004
  17. 17. Khan SAR, Jian C, Zhang Y, Golpira H, Kumar A, Sharif A. Environmental, social and economic growth indicators spur logistics performance: from the perspective of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod. 2019;214:1011–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.322
  18. 18. Blanco-Canqui H. Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2017;81(4):687–711. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.01.0017
  19. 19. Zhang M, Riaz M, Zhang L, El-Desouki Z, Jiang C. Biochar induces changes to basic soil properties and bacterial communities of different soils to varying degrees at 25 mm rainfall: more effective on acidic soils. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01321
  20. 20. Giri A, Banerjee UC, Kumar M, Pant D. Intracellular carbonic anhydrase from Citrobacter freundii and its role in bio-sequestration. Bioresour Technol. 2018;267:789–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.089
  21. 21. Lohan SK, Jat HS, Yadav AK, Sidhu HS, Jat ML, Choudhary M, et al. Burning issues of paddy residue management in north-west states of India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;81(Pt 1):693–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.057
  22. 22. Richards S, Paterson E, Withers PJA, Stutter M. The contribution of household chemicals to environmental discharges via effluents: combining chemical and behavioural data. J Environ Manage. 2015;150:427–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.023
  23. 23. Zhang Z, Xie M, Dai X, Duan Z, Lu Z, Cai L, et al. The prognostic value and economic benefits of coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve-guided strategy in patients with coronary artery disease. Heliyon. 2023;9(6):e17464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17464
  24. 24. Jaswal A, Mehta CM, Singh A. Probing the impact of biochar combined with organic and inorganic amendments on soil carbon pools of rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Res Crops. 2022;23:508–15. https://doi.org/10.31830/24541761.2022.roc-861
  25. 25. Kaur H, Gill RS, Dheri GS. Response of wheat to potassium and its fractions in Punjab soils. Indian J Agric Sci. 2021;91(4):629–33. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i4.112729
  26. 26. Watson DJ. Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops: I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. Ann Bot. 1947;11(41):41–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083148
  27. 27. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949;24(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1
  28. 28. Barrs HD, Weatherley PE. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci. 1962;15(3):413–28. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413
  29. 29. Premachandra GS, Saneoka H, Ogata S. Cell membrane stability, an indicator of drought tolerance, as affected by applied nitrogen in soyabean. J Agric Sci. 1990;115(1):63–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600073925
  30. 30. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. 4th ed. New Delhi: ICAR; 1985.
  31. 31. Zeng J, Sheng H, Liu Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Kang H, et al. High nitrogen supply induces physiological responsiveness to long photoperiod in barley. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00569
  32. 32. Yang D, Cai T, Luo Y, Wang Z. Optimizing plant density and nitrogen application to manipulate tiller growth and increase grain yield and nitrogen-use efficiency in winter wheat. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6484. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6484
  33. 33. Ali A, Jabeen N, Chachar Z, Chachar S, Ahmed S, Ahmed N, et al. The role of biochar in enhancing soil health and interactions with rhizosphere properties and enzyme activities in organic fertiliser substitution. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1595208. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1595208
  34. 34. Zhai L, Xie R, Wang P, Liu G, Fan P, Li S. Impact of recent breeding history on the competitiveness of Chinese maize hybrids. Field Crops Res. 2016;191:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.017
  35. 35. Eliášová K, Vondráková Z, Gemperlová L, Neděla V, Runštuk J, Fischerová L, et al. The response of Picea abies somatic embryos to UV-B radiation depends on the phase of maturation. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01736
  36. 36. Abbas K, Javed M, Aslam S, Butt FR, Al-Ansari MM, Elshikh MS, et al. Co-application of potassium and thiourea for mitigating salinity stress in wheat seedlings. Sci Rep. 2025;15:14689. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98878-0
  37. 37. Morton SK, Rodriguez AJ, Morris DR, Bhandari AP, Moxon JV, Golledge J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of circulating biomarkers associated with failure of arteriovenous fistulae for haemodialysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159963
  38. 38. Cakmak I. The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2005;168(4):521–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200420485
  39. 39. Epstein E. Silicon. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999;50:641–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.641
  40. 40. Sala G, Pasta S, Maggio A, La Mantia T. Sambucus nigra L. (fam. Viburnaceae) in Sicily: distribution, ecology, traditional use and therapeutic properties. Plants (Basel). 2023;12(19):3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193457
  41. 41. Yang Y, Liu B, Ni X, Tao L, Yu L, Yang Y, et al. Rice productivity and profitability with slow-release urea containing organic–inorganic matrix materials. Pedosphere. 2021;31(4):511–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(21)60001-2
  42. 42. Krishnasamy K, Bell R, Ma Q. Wheat responses to sodium vary with potassium use efficiency of cultivars. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:631. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00631
  43. 43. Li C, Shi Y, Yu Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Z. Optimizing nitrogen application strategies can improve grain yield by increasing dry matter translocation, promoting grain filling, and improving harvest indices. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1565446. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1565446
  44. 44. Thornburg TE, Liu J, Li Q, Xue H, Wang G, Li L, et al. Potassium deficiency significantly affected plant growth and development as well as microRNA-mediated mechanism in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01219
  45. 45. Khan MA, Basir A, Fahad S, Adnan M, Saleem MH, Iqbal A, et al. Biochar optimizes wheat quality, yield, and nitrogen acquisition in low fertile calcareous soil treated with organic and mineral nitrogen fertilisers. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:879788. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.879788
  46. 46. Frimpong KA, Abban-Baidoo E, Marschner B. Can combined compost and biochar application improve the quality of a highly weathered coastal savanna soil? Heliyon. 2021;7(5):e06981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07089
  47. 47. Tokas D, Singh S, Yadav R, Kumar P, Sharma S, Singh AN. Wheat-paddy straw biochar: an ecological solution of stubble burning in the agroecosystems of Punjab and Haryana region, India, a synthesis. Appl Ecol Environ Sci. 2021;9(6):613–25. https://doi.org/10.12691/aees-9-6-6

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.