Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Optimal window for seed physiological and harvestable maturity to maximise seed yield and quality in little millet (Panicum sumatrense Roth. ex Roem. & Schult.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14447
Submitted
7 March 2026
Published
01-08-2026

Abstract

Little millet (Panicum sumatrense Roth. ex. Roem. and Schult.) is a climate-resilient, nutrient-rich crop, yet information is limited to its seed physiological maturity and optimal harvest stage, which are the key determinants for maximising seed yield and quality. Experiments across two post-rainy seasons with three cultivars (TNAU 63, Gujarat vari 1, DHLM 36-3) examined seed development and maturation behaviour from anthesis to maturity. Seed formation commenced at 7 days after anthesis (DAA) in year 1 but varied in year 2 (7–14 DAA) across cultivars. Seeds were harvested at weekly stages up to 56–63 DAA and assessed for seed physiological and biochemical traits. Seed moisture content declined and hardness increased steadily with maturity, while test weight, seed yield, germination, vigour and storability peaked between 35–42 DAA, marking physiological maturity at 35 DAA across cultivars in year 1 and at 35 DAA (Gujarat vari 1) or 42 DAA (TNAU 63, DHLM 36-3) in year 2, reflecting temperature-driven variation. Polynomial regression analysis further validated this maturity window. At physiological maturity, little millet panicles turn straw to dark brown, while the oval seeds appear smooth, shiny and streaked in shades of greenish brown to yellow. Upon de-husking, the seeds exhibited a brownish depression at the hilar end, which serve as reliable morphological marker of physiological maturity in little millet. Early harvests produced immature, low-vigour seeds, while delayed harvests reduced seed yield and quality due to seed shattering and deterioration. The study identifies 35–42 DAA as the physiological and harvestable maturity window for high-quality seed production in little millet.

 

References

  1. 1. de Wet JM, Brink DE, Rao KP, Mengesha MH. Diversity in kodo millet, Paspalum scrobiculatum. Econ Bot. 1983;37(2):159–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858779
  2. 2. Ganapathy KN. Genetic improvement in little millet. In: Millets and sorghum: biology and genetic improvement. 2017. p. 170–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119130765.ch6
  3. 3. Prasada Rao KE, de Wet JM, Gopal Reddy V, Mengesha MH. Diversity in the small millets collection at ICRISAT. In: Riley KW, Gupta SC, Seetharam A, Mushonga JN, editors. Advances in small millets. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.; 1993.
  4. 4. Mohanan MM, Vijayakumar A, Bang-Berthelsen CH, Mudnakudu-Nagaraju KK, Shetty R. Millets: journey from an ancient crop to sustainable and healthy food. Foods. 2025;14(10):1733. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14101733
  5. 5. Saha D, Gowda MC, Arya L, Verma M, Bansal KC. Genetic and genomic resources of small millets. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2016;35(1):56–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2016.1147907
  6. 6. Nagaraja TE, Nandini C, Bhat S, Parveen SG. Artificial hybridization techniques in small millets: A review. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1112117. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1112117
  7. 7. Dwivedi SL, Upadhyaya HD, Senthilvel S, Hash CT, Fukunaga K, Diao X, et al. Millets: genetic and genomic resources. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118100509.ch5
  8. 8. Matere BS, Bhavsar VV, Mate PA, Girase VS. Genetic variability of yield and its components in little millet (Panicum sumatrense L.) local germplasm. J Agric Res Technol. 2022;47:258–63. https://doi.org/10.56228/JART.2022.47303
  9. 9. Arunachalam V, Rengalakshmi R, Kubera Raj MS. Ecological stability of genetic diversity among landraces of little millet (Panicum sumatrense) in South India. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2005;52(1):15–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-005-6693-4
  10. 10. Patil KB, Chimmad BV, Itagi S. Glycemic index and quality evaluation of little millet (Panicum miliare) flakes with enhanced shelf life. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52(9):6078–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1663-5
  11. 11. Indirani K. Review on nutritional profiles and health benefits of little millets–India. Int J Res Eng Sci. 2021;9(11):7–11.
  12. 12. Vetriventhan M, Azevedo VC, Upadhyaya HD, Nirmalakumari A, Kane-Potaka J, Anitha S, et al. Genetic and genomic resources and breeding for accelerating improvement of small millets: current status and future interventions. The Nucleus. 2020;63(3):217–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-020-00322-3
  13. 13. Asharani VT, Jayadeep A, Malleshi NG. Natural antioxidants in edible flours of selected small millets. Int J Food Prop. 2010;13(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942910802163105
  14. 14. Nambi VA, Eganathan P, Philip PM. Proximate and mineral composition analysis of little millet collected from some millet growing areas in Tamil Nadu. Indian J Plant Genet Resour. 2012;25(2):189–91.
  15. 15. Pasha VK, Ratnavathi CV, Ajani J, Raju D, Manoj Kumar S, Beedu SR. Proximate, mineral composition and antioxidant activity of traditional small millets cultivated and consumed in Rayalaseema region of South India. J Sci Food Agric. 2018;98(2):652–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8510
  16. 16. Panda D, Palita SK. Potential of underutilized wild crops in Koraput, Odisha, India for improving nutritional security and promoting climate resilience. Curr Sci. 2021;120(6):989–96. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v120/i6/989-996
  17. 17. Ekpong B, Sukprakarn S. Seed physiological maturity in dill (Anethum graveolens L.). Agric Nat Res. 2008;42(5):1–6.
  18. 18. Pollock BM, Roos EE. Seed and seedling vigor. In: Kozlowski TT, editor. Seed biology. Vol. 1. Importance, development and germination. 1972. p. 314–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-424301-9.50012-7
  19. 19. Kannababu N, Hariprasanna K, Venkateswarlu R, Sangappa C, Das IK, Tara Satyavathi C. Determining physiological maturity for optimal seed quality and reduced yield loss in foxtail millet (Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.). Plant Sci Today. 2025;12(4). https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11195
  20. 20. International Seed Testing Association. International rules for seed testing. Bassersdorf: ISTA; 2015.
  21. 21. Delouche JC, Baskin CC. Accelerated aging techniques for predicting the relative storability of seed lots. Seed Sci Technol. 1973;1:427–52.
  22. 22. Bernfeld P. Amylases, α and β. In: Colowick SP, Kaplan NO, editors. Methods in Enzymology. New York: Academic Press; 1955. p. 149–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(55)01021-5
  23. 23. Marcos-Filho J. Fisiologia de sementes de plantas cultivadas. 2nd ed. Londrina: Abrates; 2015. p. 659.
  24. 24. Leprince O, Pellizzaro A, Berriri S, Buitink J. Late seed maturation: drying without dying. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(4):827–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw363
  25. 25. Kermode AR. Regulatory mechanisms involved in the transition from seed development to germination. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 1990;9(2):155–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689009382286
  26. 26. Bewley JD, Bradford KJ, Hilhorst HWM. Seeds: physiology of development, germination and dormancy. New York: Springer; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4693-4
  27. 27. Yadav VP, Yadav S, Yadav P, Yadav AK. Increase efficiency in millets agrarian and nutritional food from bio-fortified hybrids: A review. Plant Arch. 2025;25(2):1535–44. https://doi.org/10.51470/PLANTARCHIVES.2025.v25.no.2.223
  28. 28. Groot SPC. Seed maturation and its practical implications. Seed Sci Technol. 2022;50(2):141–51. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2022.50.1.s.08
  29. 29. Reddy BV, Ramesh S, Reddy PS. Sorghum breeding research at ICRISAT: goals, strategies, methods and accomplishments. Int Sorghum Millets Newsl. 2004;45:5–12.
  30. 30. Tonapi VA, Varnavasiappan S, Navi SS, Ravinder Reddy C, Karivatharaju TV. Effect of environmental factors during seed development and maturation on seed quality in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Plant Arch. 2006;6(2):515–9.
  31. 31. Djanaguiraman M, Priyanka AS, Vaishnavi SJ, Perumal R, Ciampitti IA, Prasad PV. Impact of drought and high-temperature stresses on growth and development stages, physiological, reproductive and yield traits in pearl millet. In: Pearl millet: a resilient cereal crop for food, nutrition and climate security. 2024. p. 249–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780891184034.ch9
  32. 32. Ellis RH, Pieta Filho C. The development of seed quality in spring and winter cultivars of barley and wheat. Seed Sci Res. 1992;2(1):9–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258500001057
  33. 33. Kannababu N, Amasiddha B, Venkateswarlu R, Das IK, Prabhakar B, Tonapi VA. Determination of physiological and harvestable mass maturity of seeds during rainy and post-rainy seasons in barnyard millet (Echinochloa frumentacea (Roxb.). Range Manag Agrofor. 2023;44(1):84–94. https://doi.org/10.59515/rma.2023.v44.i1.10
  34. 34. Copeland LO, McDonald MB. Principles of seed science and technology. New York: Springer; 2012.
  35. 35. Lainufar PA, Qadir A, Suhartanto MR, Ardie SW. Harvesting criteria and drying methods to improve the quality of foxtail millet seeds (Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.). J Trop Crop Sci. 2021;8(3). https://doi.org/10.29244/jtcs.8.03.168-176
  36. 36. Kannababu N, Ganapathy KN, Venkateswarlu R, Tara Satyavathi C. Physiological and harvestable maturity of seeds in finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.). Range Manag Agrofor. 2024;45(2):290–9. https://doi.org/10.59515/rma.2024.v45.i2.14
  37. 37. Kannababu N, Deepika C, Venkateswarlu R, Hariprasanna K, Das IK. Physiological maturity of seeds in kodo millet (Paspalum scrobiculatum L.) cultivars across seasons. Plant Physiol Rep. 2023;28(2):209–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-023-00725-9
  38. 38. Gough RE. Seed quality: basic mechanisms and agricultural implications. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003075226
  39. 39. Mahanthesha M, Pahuja SK, Puneeth Raj MS, Devvart, Mor VS, Santosh Korav. Seed quality parameters assessment in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(7):2769–72.
  40. 40. Matthews S, Powell AA. Electrical conductivity vigour test: physiological basis and use. Seed Test Int. 2006;131:32–35.
  41. 41. Sharma P, Sardana V, Kandhola SS. Effect of sowing dates and harvesting dates on germination and seedling vigor of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars. Res J Seed Sci. 2013;6(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjss.2013.1.15
  42. 42. Senthil Raj R, Ahamed AS, Sujatha K, Ragupathi KP. Biochemical changes during seed development and maturation in little millet cv. CO (Samai) 4. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2021;10(1):703–6. https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2021.v10.i1j.13406
  43. 43. Ravindran P, Kumar PP. Regulation of seed germination: the involvement of multiple forces exerted via gibberellic acid signaling. Mol Plant. 2019;12(1):24–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2018.12.013
  44. 44. Dutta P, Dey P, Bhowmik A. Changes in α-amylase activity and carbohydrate metabolism during seed germination in small millets. Seed Res. 2021;49(2):103–10.
  45. 45. Fincher GB. Molecular and cellular biology associated with endosperm mobilization in germinating cereal grains. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1989;40:305–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.001513
  46. 46. Yamaguchi S. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:225–51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092804
  47. 47. Nonogaki H, Bassel GW, Bewley JD. Germination—still a mystery. Plant Sci. 2010;179(6):574–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.02.010
  48. 48. Varier A, Vijayakumar KR, Dadlani M. Changes in α-amylase and protease activities during germination and early seedling growth in maize and rice. Indian J Plant Physiol. 2010;15(2):164–70.
  49. 49. Srivastava P, Pandey R, Kumar R. Relationship between α-amylase activity, seed vigor and germination in sorghum under varying maturity levels. Seed Sci Technol. 2018;46(1):133–42.
  50. 50. Krishnan R, Shankaraiah V, Rani M. Seed maturity and α-amylase dynamics during germination in pearl millet hybrids. Indian J Plant Physiol. 2022;27(2):332–40.
  51. 51. Sasaki T, Matsumoto T, Itoh K. Regulation of hydrolytic enzyme expression during cereal seed germination. Plant Mol Biol. 2005;59(3):463–74.
  52. 52. Taiz L, Zeiger E, Møller IM, Murphy A. Plant physiology and development. 6th ed. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2015.
  53. 53. Liu Y, Hu Y, Han C. Regulation of α-amylase activity and starch degradation during seed germination: recent advances. Plant Physiol Rep. 2019;24(4):465–76. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.01533
  54. 54. Basra AS, editor. Handbook of seed science and technology. New York: Haworth Press; 2006.
  55. 55. Rajendran K, Vignesh R. Seed maturity and its relation to germination and vigor in small millets. Seed Res. 2021;49(1):11–17.
  56. 56. Somrug K, Timsuksai P, Jenweerawat S. Influence of harvesting date on yield and seed quality of indigo (Indigofera tinctoria L.). King Mongkut's Agric J. 2020;38(4):426–33.
  57. 57. Aswin C, Geetha R, Sujatha K, Vanniarajan C, Sivakumar T. Effect of harvesting time on the seed quality of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) COHM 8. Agric Sci Dig. 2023;43(5). https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.D-5748
  58. 58. Ramakrishnan V, Nirmalakumari A, Mohanasundaram T. Seed quality development in finger millet. J Cereal Res. 2017;9(1):56–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2019.1709596
  59. 59. Yadav OP, Singh DV, Gupta SC. Seed maturity and quality in pearl millet. Indian J Agric Sci. 2011;81(8):734–9.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.