Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Evaluating the effects of biochar and plant growth-promoting bacteria on growth parameters of mustard and rice

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14558
Submitted
16 March 2026
Published
20-07-2026

Abstract

Soil degradation is a major concern, causing a decline in crop productivity and making sustainable agricultural practices essential for humankind. Biochar and plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) are currently applied as affordable and environmentally safe alternatives. Biochar, a porous, carbon-rich by-product of biomass pyrolysis, was applied at 3 % (w/w) alone (control) and in combination with microbial inoculants, including a bacterial consortium. A 15-day pot experiment was conducted under controlled conditions to evaluate the effects of biochar and plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on plant growth. This study investigates the effects of biochar and PGPB (three Pseudomonas spp. and one Diaphorobacter spp.) on rice (Oryza sativa L.) and mustard (Brassica juncea L.) when applied individually and in combination. The results were evaluated based on plant growth-promoting criteria namely root and shoot length and chlorophyll content. It was observed that biochar had a positive impact on plant growth parameters when applied individually, however in combination with bacterial inoculants, the results were significantly improved. The consortium treatment showed higher values for root length, shoot length and chlorophyll content compared with individual treatments. This study highlights the major scope and potential of utilising plant growth promoting bacteria and biochar to achieve sustainable increases in plant growth and yield. However, some treatments showed variability in results, which could be attributed to the compatibility between biochar and microbial inoculants. This underscores the need for further optimisation studies on the interaction between biochar and bacterial inoculants.

References

  1. 1. Agegnehu G, Bird MI, Nelson PN, Bass AM. The ameliorating effects of biochar and compost on soil quality and plant growth on a Ferralsol. Soil Res. 2015;53(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR14118
  2. 2. Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil. 2010;337(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0464-5
  3. 3. Lehmann J, Joseph S, editors. Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2015. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203762264
  4. 4. Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC. A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2011;144(1):175–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015
  5. 5. Woolf D, Amonette J, Street-Perrott F, Lehmann J, Joseph S. Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun. 2010;1:56. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1053
  6. 6. Gul S, Whalen JK, Thomas BW, Sachdeva V, Deng H. Physico-chemical properties and microbial responses in biochar-amended soils: mechanisms and future directions. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2015;206:46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.015
  7. 7. Beesley L, Moreno-Jiménez E, Gomez-Eyles JL. Effects of biochar and greenwaste compost amendments on mobility, bioavailability and toxicity of inorganic and organic contaminants in a multi-element polluted soil. Environ Pollut. 2010;158(6):2282–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.003
  8. 8. Zhang Y, Li X, Wang L, Chen Y. Effects of biochar and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on plant performance and soil environmental stability. Sustainability. 2022;14(17):10922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710922
  9. 9. Huang H, Wang L, Zhang X, Wang J, Xu B, Ma X, et al. Biochar improves soil physiochemical properties and plant growth. Agric Water Manag. 2019;212:555–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.01.037
  10. 10. Sifton MA, Smith SM, Thomas SC. Biochar-biofertilizer combinations enhance growth and nutrient uptake in silver maple grown in an urban soil. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0288291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288291
  11. 11. Yan S, Zhang S, Yan P, Zhang X, Wang L, Xu Z, et al. Effect of biochar application method and amount on soil quality and maize yield in Mollisols of Northeast China. Biochar. 2022;4:56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00180-z
  12. 12. Hou X, He W, Zhang Y, Zhang N, Yan J, Chen Y. Maize-straw biochar enhances soil properties and grain yield of foxtail millet in a newly reclaimed land. Agronomy. 2024;14:2465. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112465
  13. 13. Dube R, Gupte A, Singh S. Heavy metal tolerant bacterial isolates with potential PGP from eastern states of India. Afr J Biol Life Sci. 2024;6(5):8307–25. https://doi.org/10.33472/AFJBS.6.5.2024.8307-8325
  14. 14. Dube R, Singh S, Gupte A. Characterization of multi heavy metal tolerant bacterial isolate from Middle Gangetic Plains, India. Int J Ecol Environ Sci. 2024;50:349–53. https://doi.org/10.55863/ijees.2024.0009
  15. 15. Akbari M, Akbari D, Sajedi N. Influence of sodium hypochlorite on seed germination and early seedling growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) variety Tarum. Res Crops. 2012;13(1):11–5.
  16. 16. Peng J, Ma J, Wei X, Zhang C, Jia N, Wang X, et al. Accumulation of beneficial bacteria in the rhizosphere of maize (Zea mays L.) grown in a saline soil in response to a consortium of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Ann Microbiol. 2021;71:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13213-021-01650-8
  17. 17. Khan MY, Nadeem SM, Sohaib M, Waqas MR, Alotaibi F, Ali L, et al. Potential of plant growth promoting bacterial consortium for improving the growth and yield of wheat under saline conditions. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:958522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.958522
  18. 18. Gul-Lalay, Ullah S, Shah S, et al. Combined effect of biochar and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on physiological responses of canola (Brassica napus L.) subjected to drought stress. J Plant Growth Regul. 2024;43:1814–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-11219-1
  19. 19. Betegón-Putze I, González-Melendi P, Allona I. MyROOT: A method and software for the semi-automatic measurement of plant root length. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:624. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00624
  20. 20. Rani N, Dahiya A. Effect of PGPR and FYM on chlorophyll content and yield of wheat. Int J Sci Res. 2015;4(11):1861–4.
  21. 21. Thies JE, Rillig MC, Graber ER. Biochar effects on the abundance, activity and diversity of the soil biota. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S, editors. Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2015. p. 327–89.
  22. 22. Jatuwong K, Aiduang W, Kiatsiriroat T, Kamopas W, Lumyong S. A review of biochar from biomass and its interaction with microbes: enhancing soil quality and crop yield in Brassica cultivation. Life. 2025;15(2):284. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15020284
  23. 23. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D. Biochar effects on soil biota-a review. Soil Biol Biochem. 2011;43(9):1812–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022
  24. 24. Glick BR. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica. 2012;2012:963401. https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401
  25. 25. Bhardwaj D, Ansari MW, Sahoo RK, Tuteja N. Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-66
  26. 26. Danish S, Zafar-ul-Hye M, Mohsin F, Hussain M. ACC-deaminase producing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and biochar mitigate adverse effects of drought stress on maize growth. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0230615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230615
  27. 27. Shafienaz NA, Kumar A, Aslam SN, Johansson T, Nybroe O, Karlsson M, et al. Comparative transcriptomics of Pseudomonas fluorescens SLU99 reveals environmental and nutritional signals triggering biofilm formation. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1115923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1115923
  28. 28. Waghunde RR, Sabalpara AN. Impact of Pseudomonas spp. on plant growth, lytic enzymes and secondary metabolites production. Front Agron. 2021;3:752196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.752196
  29. 29. Bai K, Wang W, Zhang J, Wang Q, Li W, Li Q, et al. Effects of phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria and biochar application on phosphorus availability and tomato growth under phosphorus stress. BMC Biol. 2024;22:211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-024-02011-y
  30. 30. Warnock DD, Lehmann J, Kuyper TW, Rillig MC. Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil—concepts and mechanisms. Plant Soil. 2007;300(1–2):9–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9391-5
  31. 31. Gao ZW, Ding J, Ali B, Nawaz M, Hassan MU, Ali A, et al. Putting biochar in action: a black gold for efficient mitigation of salinity stress in plants. Review and future directions. ACS Omega. 2024;9(29):31237–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c07921
  32. 32. Malik L, Sanaullah M, Mahmood F, Mushtaq Z, Ahmed T, Naveed M, et al. Unlocking the potential of co-applied biochar and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for sustainable agriculture under stress conditions. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2022;9:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-022-00327-x
  33. 33. Sharma K. Evaluation of fluorescent pseudomonas on in-vitro seed germination and seedling growth of soybean. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(6):2159–62. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i6k.10865
  34. 34. Shafienaz HNA, Ghadamgahi F, Ghosh S, Ortiz R, Whisson SC, Vetukuri RR, et al. Comparative transcriptome profiling provides insights into the growth promotion activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SLU99 in tomato and potato plants. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1141692. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1141692
  35. 35. Singh A, Patani A, Patel M, Vyas S, Verma RK, Amari A, et al. Tomato seed bio-priming with Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAR: a study on plant growth parameters under sodium fluoride stress. Front Microbiol. 2024;14:1330071. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1330071
  36. 36. Chen Z, Zhou W, Sui X, Xu N, Zhao T, Guo Z, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria with ACC deaminase activity enhance maternal lateral root and seedling growth in switchgrass. Front Plant Sci. 2022;12:800783. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.800783
  37. 37. Li Q, Li H, Yang Z, Cheng X, Zhao Y, Qin L, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas sp. CM11 specifically induces lateral roots. New Phytol. 2022;235(4):1575–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18199
  38. 38. Boruah H. Plant disease suppression and growth promotion by a fluorescent Pseudomonas strain. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(6):521–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02817671
  39. 39. Azeem M, Sultana R, Ahmed N, Abbasi MW, Hasan KA, Dong R, et al. Salinity stress resilience in Sorghum bicolor through Pseudomonas-mediated modulation of growth, antioxidant system and eco-physiological adaptations. ACS Omega. 2025;10(1):940–54. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c08110
  40. 40. Huang J, Liu Z, Li S, Xu B, Gong Y, Yang Y, et al. Isolation and engineering of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa for enhanced cadmium bioremediation. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2016;62(5):258–65. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.2016.04.007
  41. 41. Khan ST, Hiraishi A. Diaphorobacter nitroreducens gen. nov., sp. nov., a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-degrading denitrifying bacterium isolated from activated sludge. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2002;48(6):299–308. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.48.299
  42. 42. Wei XL, Han MS, Xia CC, Ding SL, Xu L, Lin YB, et al. Diaphorobacter ruginosibacter sp. nov., isolated from soybean root nodule and emended description of the genus Diaphorobacter. Arch Microbiol. 2015;197(5):683–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-015-1102-7
  43. 43. Khardenavis AA, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification by diverse Diaphorobacter sp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;77(2):403–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-1176-5
  44. 44. Chakravarthy SS, Pande S, Kapoor A, Nerurkar AS. Comparison of denitrification between Paracoccus sp. and Diaphorobacter sp. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011;165(1):260–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-011-9248-5
  45. 45. Qiu T, Zuo Z, Gao J, Gao M, Han M, Sun L, et al. Diaphorobacter polyhydroxybutyrativorans sp. nov., a novel poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)-degrading bacterium isolated from biofilms. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65(9):2913–8. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.000353
  46. 46. Zhao H, Gu Y, Liu X, Liu J, Waigi MG. Reducing phenanthrene contamination in Trifolium repens L. with root-associated phenanthrene-degrading bacterium Diaphorobacter sp. Phe15. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:792698. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.792698
  47. 47. Ghadamgahi F, Tarighi S, Taheri P, Saripella GV, Anzalone A, Kalyandurg PB, et al. Plant growth-promoting activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa FG106 and its ability to act as a biocontrol agent against potato, tomato and taro pathogens. Biology (Basel). 2022;11(1):140. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010140
  48. 48. Pandey S, Singh G, Kumar A, Singh M, Kumar R, Singh R. Evaluation of Pseudomonas sp. for its multifarious plant growth-promoting potential and its ability to alleviate biotic and abiotic stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants. Sci Rep. 2020;10:13966. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77850-0
  49. 49. Marathe R, Phatake Y, Shaikh A, Shinde B, Gajbhiye M. Effect of IAA produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 6a (bc4) on seed germination and plant growth of Glycine max. J Exp Biol Agric Sci. 2017;5(3):351–8. https://doi.org/10.18006/2017.5(3).351.358
  50. 50. Yan H, Cong M, Hu Y, Qiu C, Yang Z, Tang G, et al. Biochar-mediated changes in the microbial communities of rhizosphere soil alter the architecture of maize roots. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1023444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1023444
  51. 51. Nawaz F, Rafeeq R, Majeed S, et al. Biochar amendment in combination with endophytic bacteria stimulates photosynthetic activity and antioxidant enzymes to improve soybean yield under drought stress. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2023;23:746–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-01079-1
  52. 52. Rafique M, Sultan T, Ortas I, Chaudhary HJ. Enhancement of maize plant growth with inoculation of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and biochar amendment in soil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2017;63(5):460–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2017.1373599
  53. 53. Rillig MC, Wagner M, Salem M, Antunes PM, George C, Ramke H-G. Material derived from hydrothermal carbonization: effects on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhiza. Appl Soil Ecol. 2010;45(3):362–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.04.011
  54. 54. Jabborova D, Annapurna K, Paul S, Kumar S, Saad HA, Desouky S, et al. Beneficial features of biochar and arbuscular mycorrhiza for improving spinach plant growth, root morphological traits, physiological properties and soil enzymatic activities. J Fungi. 2021;7(7):571. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7070571
  55. 55. Haider FU, Coulter JA, Cheema SA, Farooq M, Wu J, Zhang R, et al. Co-application of biochar and microorganisms improves soybean performance and remediates cadmium-contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;214:112112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112112
  56. 56. Mustafa A, Saeed Q, Naveed M, Abid I, Ghafoor A, Bano F, et al. Biochar-microbe synergy enhances auxin-mediated soil-plant interactions for canola productivity in alkaline calcareous soil. RSC Adv. 2025;15:29509–27. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA03240G
  57. 57. Zhao S, Zhao S, Wang B. Combined application of biochar and plant growth-promoting bacteria on crop growth and heavy metals accumulation: a meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2025;381:126626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126626
  58. 58. An L, Zhao L, Wei A, Shi K, Li M, Dawwam GE, et al. Balancing application of plant growth-promoting bacteria and biochar in promoting selenium biofortification and remediating combined heavy metal pollution in paddy soil. Environ Geochem Health. 2025;47(3):80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-025-02386-z

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.