Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Effect of seed treatments on drought tolerance, growth, yield and biochemical responses of rice under varying moisture regimes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14593
Submitted
18 March 2026
Published
30-09-2026

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted at the Instructional Farm, College of Agriculture, Vellanikkara, during late rabi 2024 to study the effect of seed treatments on drought stress management and their impact on growth, yield and biochemical characteristics. The treatments consisted of seven seed treatments, viz., S₁-designer seed, S₂-Piriformospora indica at 10 mL kg-1 of seed, S₃-plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) mix-1 at 50 g kg-1 of seed, S₄-proline at 0.1 %, S₅-calcium chloride (CaCl₂) at 2 %, S₆-hydro priming and S₇-control (without seed treatment), along with three moisture stress levels, viz., I₁-50 % field capacity (FC) at all growth stages, I₂-stress at maximum tillering (MT) and panicle initiation (PI) stages and I₃-no moisture stress. Seed treatments had a significant influence on growth, yield and biochemical parameters under different moisture levels. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria seed treatment recorded a significantly higher grain yield
(29.2 g plant-1) under 50 % FC and under moisture stress at MT and PI stages (21.4 g plant-1). Seed treatment with PGPR and CaCl₂ resulted in higher yield compared to the control treatment without seed treatment. Thus, seed treatments were found to be effective in mitigating drought stress and improving crop yield.

References

  1. 1. Khan AZ. Influence of seed hardening techniques on vigor, growth and yield of wheat under drought conditions. J Agric Stud. 2016;4(1):11–21. https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v4i3.9955
  2. 2. Mohamed NG, Ahmed M, Mohammed E, Emad B, Mohamed M, Mostafa A, et al. Seed priming enhances physiological and biochemical adaptation of food crops to abiotic and biotic stresses under global warming. Discover Plants. 2026;3(1):120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00580-6
  3. 3. Hameed A, Hussain S, Nisar F, Rasheed A, Shah SZ. Seed priming as an effective technique for enhancing salinity tolerance in plants: Mechanistic insights and prospects for saline agriculture with a special emphasis on halophytes. Seeds. 2025;4(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds4010014
  4. 4. Ozturk M, Gemici M, Yilmazer C, Ozdemir F. Alleviation of salinity stress by GA3, KIN and IAA on seed germination of Brassica campestris L. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sustainable Use of Plant Biodiversity. 2002; p. 341–6.
  5. 5. Sahoo L, Swain B, Yadav D. A review on different priming strategies to mitigate abiotic stress in plants. Discover Appl Sci. 2025;7(6):618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07009-x
  6. 6. Kerala Agricultural University. Package of practices recommendations: crops. 16th ed. Mannuthy: Directorate of Extension, KAU Press; 2024.
  7. 7. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
  8. 8. Kato M, Shimizu S. Chlorophyll metabolism in higher plants. VII. Chlorophyll degradation in senescing tobacco leaves; phenolic-dependent peroxidative degradation. Can J Bot. 1987;65:729–35. https://doi.org/10.1139/b87-097
  9. 9. Nakano Y, Asada K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981;22:867–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232
  10. 10. Foster JG, Hess JL. Responses of superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase activities in cotton leaf tissue exposed to an atmosphere enriched in oxygen. Plant Physiol. 1980;66:482–7. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.66.3.482
  11. 11. Frahry G, Schopfer P. NADH-stimulated, cyanide-resistant superoxide production in maize coleoptiles analysed with a tetrazolium-based assay. Planta. 2001;212:175–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250000376
  12. 12. Thordal-Christensen H, Zhang Z, Wei Y, Collinge DB. Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants, H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during barley powdery mildew interaction. Plant J. 1997;11:1187–94. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.11061187.x
  13. 13. Gopinath PP, Parsad R, Joseph B, S AV. grapesAgri1: Collection of shiny apps for data analysis in agriculture. J Open Source Softw. 2021;6(63):3437. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03437
  14. 14. Simon EW. Early events in germination. In: Murray DR, editor. Seed physiology. Vol. 2. Orlando: Academic Press; 1984. p. 77–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-511902-3.50008-7
  15. 15. Vessey JK. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil. 2003;255(2):571–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037216893
  16. 16. Rengel Z. The role of calcium in salt toxicity. Plant Cell Environ. 1992;15(6):625–32.
  17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb01004.x
  18. 17. Momayezi MR, Zaharah AR, Hanafi MM, Mohd Razi I. Seed germination and proline accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) as affected by salt concentrations. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci. 2009;32(2):247–59.
  19. 18. Yadav J, Verma JP, Jaiswal DK, Kumar A. Evaluation of PGPR and different concentration of phosphorus level on plant growth, yield and nutrient content of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Ecol Eng. 2014;62:123–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.10.013
  20. 19. Lavakush L, Yadav J, Verma JP. Isolation and characterization of effective plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from rice rhizosphere of Indian soil. Asian J Biol Sci. 2012;5:294–303. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajbs.2012.294.303
  21. 20. Dikilitas M, Simsek E, Roychoudhury A. Role of proline and glycine betaine in overcoming abiotic stresses. In: Protective chemical agents in the amelioration of plant abiotic stress. 2020. p. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119552154.ch1
  22. 21. Hayat S, Hayat Q, Alyemeni MN, Wani AS, Pichtel J, Ahmad A. Role of proline under changing environments: A review. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7(11):1456–66. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.21949
  23. 22. Ghosh UK, Islam MN, Siddiqui MN, Cao X, Khan MAR. Proline, a multifaceted signalling molecule in plant responses to abiotic stress: Understanding the physiological mechanisms. Plant Biol. 2022;24(2):227–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13363
  24. 23. Zulfiqar F, Ashraf M. Proline alleviates abiotic stress induced oxidative stress in plants. J Plant Growth Regul. 2023;42(8):4629–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10839-3
  25. 24. Woodard HJ, Bly A. Maize growth and yield responses to seed inoculated N2 fixing bacteria under dryland production conditions. J Plant Nutr. 2000;23(1):55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160009381997
  26. 25. Sairam RK, Srivastava GC. Water stress tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Variations in hydrogen peroxide accumulation and antioxidant activity in tolerant and susceptible genotypes. J Agron Crop Sci. 2001;186:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037x.2001.00461.x
  27. 26. Lum MS, Hanafi MM, Rafii YM, Akmar AS. Effect of drought stress on growth, proline and antioxidant enzyme activities of upland rice. J Anim Plant Sci. 2014;24(5).
  28. 27. Mannervik B. Measurement of glutathione reductase activity. Curr Protoc Toxicol. 1999;7.2.1–7.2.4. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471140856.tx0702s00

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.