Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

A study on growth and instability in the area, production and productivity of bajra, jowar, ragi and small millets in India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14611
Submitted
19 March 2026
Published
04-06-2026

Abstract

The large-scale shift toward high-yielding wheat and rice varieties that accompanied India's Green Revolution era effectively marginalised millet crops, both in terms of farmland allocation and their role in everyday food consumption. The present research analysed long-term trends and variability in the area under cultivation, aggregate output and per-hectare yield of four commercially and nutritionally important millets, such as bajra, jowar, ragi and small millets, across India. Annual data covering seven decades (1950–51 to 2021–22) were retrieved from established government statistical repositories. Three quantitative tools were utilised: the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) to capture directional trends, the coefficient of variation (CV) to quantify dispersion and the Cuddy-Della Valle instability index (CDVI) to measure detrended variability. Area under cultivation contracted significantly for every crop studied, with CAGR values spanning -0.62 % to -3.64 %. Among the four crops, bajra alone achieved a statistically significant rise in total production (CAGR: +1.67 %, p < 0.001). Yield per hectare, by contrast, improved notably for all four crops, posting CAGR values between 0.79 % and 2.13 %. Stability assessment, adjusted for long-term trends, confirmed low levels of instability (CDVI < 15) across the area and the production and productivity dimensions for every crop examined. The main objective for this study is to understand and analyse the growth and instability in certain aspects, such as area, production, productivity of bajra, jowar, ragi and small millets.

 

References

  1. 1. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. Agricultural statistics at a glance 2021. New Delhi: Government of India; 2022. https://eands.dacnet.nic.in/
  2. 2. Chand R, Srivastava SK, Singh J. Changing structure of rural economy of India: implications for employment and growth. New Delhi: NITI Aayog; 2017. https://niti.gov.in
  3. 3. Gollin D. Agricultural productivity and economic growth. In: Pingali P, Evenson R, editors. Handbook of agricultural economics. Vol. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2010. p. 3825–3866. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(09)04073-0
  4. 4. Kumar A, Tomer V, Kaur A, Kumar V, Gupta K. Millets: a solution to agrarian and nutritional challenges. Agric Food Secur. 2018;7:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0183-3
  5. 5. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. FAOSTAT: food and agriculture organisation statistical database. Rome: FAO; 2023. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/
  6. 6. Kane-Potaka J, Anitha S, Tsusaka TW, Botha R, Budumuru M, Upadhyay S, et al. Assessing millets and sorghum consumption behaviour in urban India: a large-scale survey. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2021;5:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.680777
  7. 7. Abinaya K, Natarajan S, Ganapathy M, Arivazhagan K. Studies on intercropping in finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) under SRI principles. Mysore J Agric Sci. 2020;54(3):73–79.
  8. 8. Gowda HRC, Amrutha T, Raghavendra KJ, Kumar CS. Millets production and prospects in India: an economic overview. Green Farming. 2019;10(3):300–305.
  9. 9. Chaitra GB, Patil C, Yeledhalli RA. Attracting and retaining youth in agriculture: a case of agriclinics and agribusiness centres (ACABC) scheme in India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(2):1109–1115. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.902.130
  10. 10. Saleh SMA, Zhang Q, Chen J, Shen Q. Millet grains: nutritional quality, processing and potential health benefits. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2013;12(3):281–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12012
  11. 11. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. 4th ed. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research; 1985.
  12. 12. Cuddy JDA, Della Valle PA. Measuring the instability of time series data. Oxford Bull Econ Stat. 1978;40(1):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1978.mp40001006.x
  13. 13. Yadav OP, Bidinger FR. Dual-purpose landraces of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) as sources of high stover and grain yield for arid zone environments. Plant Genet Resour. 2008;6(2):73–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262108993084
  14. 14. Yamuna N, Kolekar DV, Rakesh N. Trend and instability analysis of area, production, productivity of millets in India. J Sci Res Rep. 2024;30(8):686–699. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i82290
  15. 15. Bhagavatula S, Rao PP, Basavaraj G, Nagaraj N. Sorghum and millet economies in Asia: facts, trends and outlook. Patancheru: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics; 2013.
  16. 16. Chaitra G, Jeyavel S. A study on the growth and instability in area, production, productivity and minimum support price of major millets in India. Mysore J Agric Sci. 2024;58(3).
  17. 17. Shobana S, Krishnaswamy K, Sudha V, Malleshi NG, Anjana RM, Palaniappan L, et al. Finger millet (Ragi, Eleusine coracana L.): a review of its nutritional properties, processing and plausible health benefits. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2013;69:1–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410540-9.00001-6
  18. 18. Padulosi S, Mal B, King OI, Gotor E. Minor millets as a central element for sustainably enhanced incomes, empowerment and nutrition in rural India. Sustainability. 2015;7(7):8904–8933. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078904
  19. 19. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.