Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Assessment of combining ability and heterosis for yield and yield related traits in maize (Zea mays L.) under irrigated and partially irrigated conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14621
Submitted
20 March 2026
Published
10-09-2026

Abstract

The experimental material consisted of 12 genetically diverse maize inbred lines (ILs). A total of 66 cross combinations were developed using a half diallel mating design. These 12 parental lines, along with their 66 F1 hybrids and 2 national checks (total 80 entries) were evaluated in randomised block design (RBD) with two replications under irrigated and partially irrigated conditions across two seasons during rabi 2019–20 and kharif 2020 at the research field, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (RVSKVV), Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant differences among the genotypes for all the characters studied, indicating the presence of substantial genetic variability. Estimates of general combining ability
(GCA), specific combining ability (SCA) and heterosis were computed. The significance of heterosis was tested using the standard error of the respective check varieties. The GCA effects indicated that IL6, IL7, IL9, IL10, IL11 and IL12 were good general combiners for seed yield per plant (SYP). Among the hybrids, cross combination IL1 × IL11 exhibited the highest positive and significant SCA effect, followed by IL1 × IL7, IL3 × IL10, IL4 × IL6 and IL7 × IL8. In contrast, IL4 × IL7 showed a significant negative SCA effect, followed by IL1 × IL6, IL5 × IL7 and IL3 × IL2. For heterosis, the crosses viz., IL1 × IL10 and IL4 × IL7 exhibited desirable positive heterosis for grain yield, whereas IL7 × IL9 (heterobeltiosis) and IL2 × IL4 (standard heterosis) showed significant negative heterosis. Yield and its improvement were strongly associated with component traits such as plant height (PH), cob length (CL), number of kernel rows per cob (NKRC), number of kernels per row (NKR),
number of cobs per plant (NCP), cob girth (CG), 100-grain weight (HGW) and shelling % (SP). Therefore, hybrids exhibiting positive heterosis for these traits can be effectively utilised in breeding programmes to enhance grain yield, as positive heterosis is economically advantageous and contributes to higher productivity.

References

  1. 1. Yadav PK, Singh AK, Tripathi MK, Tiwari S, Rathore J. Morpho-physiological characterization of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes against drought. Biol Forum Int J. 2022;14(2):573–81.
  2. 2. Yadav PK, Singh AK, Tripathi MK, Tiwari S, Yadav SK, Tripathi N. Morpho-physiological and molecular characterization of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for drought tolerance. Eur J Appl Sci. 2022;10(6):65–87. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.106.13340
  3. 3. Yadav PK, Singh AK, Tripathi MK, Tiwari S, Yadav SK, Solanki RS, et al. Assessment of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes on the basis of biochemical contents in respect to drought. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(6):1996–2002.
  4. 4. Patil AR, Kamble MS, Karad SR, Gajbhiye PN, Waghmare SJ, Wagh KA, et al. Genetic diversity and trait variability in maize: A study across drought and normal environmental conditions. Int J Agric Food Sci. 2025;7(1):122–29. https://doi.org/10.33545/2664844X.2025.v7.i1b.248
  5. 5. Chen Y, Chen X, Wang H, Bao Y, Zhang W. Examination of the leaf proteome during flooding stress and the induction of programmed cell death in maize. Proteome Sci. 2014;12:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-12-33
  6. 6. Yadav PK, Tripathi MK, Tiwari S, Chauhan S, Tripathi N, Sikarwar RS, et al. Genetic components and variability assessment for grain yield and its accrediting traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(9):772–84. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i92298
  7. 7. Yadav PK, Tripathi MK, Tiwari S, Chauhan S, Tripathi N, Sikarwar RS, et al. Biochemical characterization of parental inbred lines and hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.) under different irrigation conditions. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(18):1743–62. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183455
  8. 8. Yadav PK, Tripathi MK, Tripathi N, Sikarwar RS, Yadav SK. Biochemical characterization of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes under different irrigation circumstances. Adv Biotechnol Biosci. 2024;16:133–65.
  9. 9. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. Annual report 2024–25. New Delhi: Government of India; 2025. https://www.agriwelfare.gov.in/Documents/AR_Eng_2024_25.pdf
  10. 10. Yadav PK, Tripathi MK, Yadav SK, Sikarwar RS, Tripathi N. Alteration in proline and sugar content in maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes under drought condition. Adv Biotechnol Biosci. 2024;16:179–96.
  11. 11. Yadav PK, Tripathi MK, Yadav SK, Tripathi N. Molecular and morpho-physiological characterization of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes against drought. Adv Agric Biotechnol. 2024;10(1):157–84.
  12. 12. Malhotra SK. Diversification in utilization of maize and production. In: Proceedings of Gyan Manthan Conference: Perspective of Maize Production and Value Chain. A Compendium. 2017;5:49–57.
  13. 13. Griffing B. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci. 1956;9(4):463–93. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9560463
  14. 14. Sprague GF, Tatum LA. General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. Agron J. 1942;34:923–32. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1942.00021962003400100008x
  15. 15. Gilbert D. Estimations of heritability and correlation coefficients for grain yield and its components in maize (Zea mays L.) under drought conditions in Savanna Zones of Borno State, Nigeria. J Harmonized Res Appl Sci. 1967;2(3):198–203.
  16. 16. Jinks JL, Hayman BI. The analysis of diallel crosses. Maize Genet Coop News Lett. 1954;27:48–54.
  17. 17. Singh RK, Chaudhary BD. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. New Delhi and Ludhiana: Kalyani Publishers; 1985. p. 318.
  18. 18. Shull GH. What is "heterosis"? Genetics. 1948;33:439–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/33.5.439
  19. 19. Fonseca S, Patterson FL. Hybrid vigour in seven parental diallel crosses in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Sci. 1968;8:85–8. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1968.0011183X000800010025x
  20. 20. Meredith WR, Bridge RR. Heterosis and gene action in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Crop Sci. 1972;12:304–10. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183X001200030015x
  21. 21. Derera J, Tongoona P, Vivek BS, Laing MD. Gene action controlling grain yield and secondary traits in Southern African maize hybrids under drought and non-drought environments. Euphytica. 2008;162:411–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9582-4
  22. 22. Amiruzzaman M, Islam MA, Hasan L, Kadir M, Rohman MM. Heterosis and combining ability in a diallel among elite inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.). Emir J Food Agric. 2013;25(2):132–7. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v25i2.6084
  23. 23. Elmyhun M, Liyew C, Shita A, Andualem M. Combining ability performance and heterotic grouping of maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines in test cross formation in Western Amhara, North West Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agric. 2020;6:1727625. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1727625
  24. 24. Vasal SK, Srinivasan G, Pandey S, Gonzalez FC, Crossa J, Beck DL. Heterosis and combining ability of CIMMYT's quality protein maize germplasm. I. Lowland tropical. Crop Sci. 1993;33(1):51–7. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300010007x
  25. 25. Mohammad QI, Rasul MG, Aminul Islam AKM, Khaleque Mian MA, Ivy NA, Ahmed JU. Combining ability and heterosis in maize (Zea mays L.). Am J Biosci. 2016;4(6):84–90.
  26. 26. Kanagarasu S, Nallathambi G, Kannan S, Ganesan KN. Contribution of different yield components for grain yield improvement in maize (Zea mays L.). Electron J Plant Breed. 2010;3(1):660–3.
  27. 27. Kose F, Turgut H. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of grain yield and yield-related traits in maize (Zea mays L.). J Biol Agric Healthc. 2011;5(15):44–52.
  28. 28. Reddy VR, Farzana J, Sudarsha MR, Seshagiri Rao M. Studies on genetic variability, heritability, correlation and path analysis in maize (Zea mays L.) over locations. Int J Appl Biol Pharm Technol. 2011;4(1):195–9.
  29. 29. Abrha RL, Abhirami S, Vanniarajan C, Arumugachamy S. Genetic variability studies in maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm. Plant Arch. 2013;5(1):105–8.
  30. 30. Gautam P, Gouesnard B, Dallard J, Redaelli R, Rebourg C, Charcosset A, et al. RFLP diversity and relationships among traditional European maize populations. Theor Appl Genet. 2013;105(1):91–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-0903-7
  31. 31. Kumar P, Godawat SL, Pandiya NK, Mukesh V. Effect of drought and seasons on performance and stability of maize genotypes. Ann Arid Zone. 2014;46(2):157–62.
  32. 32. Chandel SG, Yan X, Xue G. Path analysis of elite yield components of maize. J Maize Sci. 2014;10(3):33–5.
  33. 33. Motamedi M, Choukan R, Hervan E, Bihamta MR, Kajouri FD. Investigation of genetic control for yield and related traits in maize (Zea mays L.) lines derived from temperate and sub-tropical germplasm. Int J Biosci. 2014;5(12):123–9. https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/5.12.123-129
  34. 34. Singh G, Singh M, Dhiman KR. Genetic analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) in Sikkim. Indian J Agric Sci. 1995;65(4):293–4.
  35. 35. Ahmed S, Begum S, Islam MA, Ratna M, Karim MR. Combining ability estimates in maize (Zea mays L.) through line × tester analysis. Bangladesh J Agric Res. 2017;42(3):425–36. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v42i3.34501
  36. 36. Fan XM, Tan J, Yang J, Chen HM. Combining ability and heterotic grouping of ten temperate, tropical and subtropical quality protein maize inbred lines. Maydica. 2004;49(4):267–72.
  37. 37. Gissa DW, Zelleke H, Labuschagne MT, Hussien T, Singh H. Heterosis and combining ability for grain yield and its components in selected maize inbred lines. S Afr J Plant Soil. 2007;24(3):133–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2007.10634795
  38. 38. Gowda KR, Kage U, Lohithaswa HC, Shekara BG, Shobha D. Combining ability studies in maize (Zea mays L.). Mol Plant Breed. 2013;4(14):116–27. https://doi.org/10.5376/mpb.2013.04.0014
  39. 39. Ruswandi D. Determination of combining ability and heterosis of grain yield components for maize mutants based on line × tester analysis. Asian J Crop Sci. 2015;7(1):19–33. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2015.19.33
  40. 40. Tefera AA, Beyene LW, Abtew WG. Combining ability analysis of maize inbred lines in Ethiopia. Agric Food Sci Res. 2020;7(2):113–24. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.512.2020.72.113.124
  41. 41. Legesse W, Mosisa W, Berhanu T, Girum A, Wende A, Solomon A, et al. Genetic improvement of maize for mid-altitude and lowland sub-humid agro-ecologies of Ethiopia. In: Third National Maize Workshop of Ethiopia; 2011 Apr 18–20; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Mexico City (Mexico): CIMMYT; 2012. p. 24–32.
  42. 42. Chemada G, Alamerew S, Tadesse B, Menamo T. Test cross performance and combining ability of maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines at Bako, Western Ethiopia. Glob J Sci Front Res. 2015;15(6):1–24.
  43. 43. Dufera T, Bulti T, Girum A. Heterosis and combining ability analysis of quality protein maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines adapted to mid-altitude sub-humid agro-ecology of Ethiopia. Afr J Plant Sci. 2018;12(3):47–57.
  44. 44. Uddin SM, Khatun F, Ahmed S, Ali MR, Begum SA. Heterosis and combining ability in field corn (Zea mays L.). Bangladesh J Bot. 2006;35(2):109–16.
  45. 45. Uddin SM, Amiruzzaman MM, Begum SA, Hakim MA, Ali MR. Combining ability and heterosis in maize (Zea mays L.). Bangladesh J Genet Plant Breed. 2008;21(1):21–8. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjpbg.v21i1.17045
  46. 46. Atif IA, Awadalla AA, Mutasim MK, Atif EI, Abdellatif MO. Combining ability and heterosis for yield and yield components in maize (Zea maysL.). Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2012;6(10):36–41.
  47. 47. Ali Q, Ahsan M. Correlation analysis for various grain contributing traits of Zea mays. Afr J Agric Res. 2015;10(23):2350–4. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2013.7838
  48. 48. Pandey RK, Maranville JW, Chetima MM. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment II. Shoot growth, nitrogen uptake and water extraction. Agric Water Manag. 2000;46:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00074-3
  49. 49. Nigussie M, Zelleke H. Heterosis and combining ability in a diallel among eight elite maize populations. Afr J Crop Sci. 2001;9:471–9. https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v9i3.27593
  50. 50. Ali Q, Ahsan M, Ali F, Aslam M, Khan NH, Munzoor M, et al. Heritability, heterosis and heterobeltiosis studies for morphological traits of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Adv Life Sci. 2013;1(1):52–63.
  51. 51. Ali Q. Combining ability analysis for various physiological, grain yield and quality traits of Zea mays L. Life Sci J. 2014;11(8s):540–51.
  52. 52. Ali Q, Ali A, Waseem M, Muzaffar A, Ahmad S, Ali S, et al. Correlation analysis for morpho-physiological traits of maize (Zea maysL.). Life Sci J. 2014;11(12s):9–13.
  53. 53. Masood SA, Sofia J, Madiha A, Zain N, Anum J, Ali Q. Genetic association of transcription factors (OsAP2 gene family) to incorporate drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica): An overview. Life Sci J. 2015;12(3s):71–6.
  54. 54. Masood SA, Zain N, Madiha A, Arshad S, Anum J, Samad A, et al. An overview of genetic improvement for drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Life Sci J. 2015;12(3s):63–70.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.