Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)

Precision nutrient delivery and ion homeostasis in hydroponic systems: Implications for crop productivity

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14834
Submitted
3 April 2026
Published
23-09-2026 — Updated on 30-09-2026
Versions

Abstract

Hydroponic farming has become an influential method of sustainable production of crops due to the reduction in arable land, shortage of freshwater and climatic changes. The performance of these systems is determined by the accuracy of nutrient delivery and the ion homeostasis in the root zone, which directly control nutrient uptake, plant metabolism and productivity. Competitive ionic interactions, especially among major cations (K+ vs Ca2+ and Mg2+) and anions (NO3- vs SO42 - and PO43- ) and precipitation of micronutrients under high calcium (Ca) or phosphorus (P) levels tend to cause hidden deficiencies, ionic imbalances, unstable pH and electrical conductivity (EC) and result in production losses of 10–20 %. Conversely, positive nutrient interactions with balanced nitrogen-potassium (N-K) and nitrogen-sulphur (N-S) nutritional status, silicon supplementation, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and co-cultivation with algae or legumes have significant positive effects on nutrient absorption, photosynthetic capacity, water use efficiency (WUE) (up to 38 %) and nutrient use efficiency (NUE) (15–42 %). This review examines the underlying mechanisms of these nutrient interactions, their impacts on crop performance and some supporting evidence available in recent studies. It also discusses high-tech methods for precision nutrient control, including optimised ionic ratios (K: Ca: Mg), real-time multi-ion sensors, artificial intelligence (AI)-based corrections, chelated micronutrients, nano-fertilisers, biofertilisers and the integration of hybrid biological systems such as aquaponics. These tools are vital to regulate the homeostasis of ions effectively, reduce the loss of physiological disorders and nutrients and achieve maximum sustainable productivity and quality in hydroponic systems.

References

  1. 1. De Silva PP, De Silva PA. Ipanera: An industry 4.0 based architecture for distributed soil-less food production systems. In: 2016 Manufacturing & Industrial Engineering Symposium (MIES); 2016. p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIES.2016.7780266
  2. 2. Putra PA, Yuliando H. Soilless culture system to support water use efficiency and product quality: A review. Agric Agric Sci Procedia. 2015;3:283–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.01.054
  3. 3. Rosa-Rodríguez RD, Lara-Herrera A, Trejo-Téllez LI, Padilla-Bernal LE, Solis-Sánchez LO, Ortiz-Rodríguez JM. Eficiência no uso de águae fertilizantes em dois sistemas hidropônicos para produção de tomate. Hortic Bras. 2020;38:47–52. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-053620200107
  4. 4. Agrawal RK, Tripathi MP, Verma A, Sharma GL, Khalkho D. Hydroponic systems for cultivation of horticultural crops: A review. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(6):2083–6.
  5. 5. Sowmya RS, Annapure US. Hydroponics: A soilless agriculture for food production. Indian Food Ind Mag. 2017;36(5):27–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2022.2071736
  6. 6. Hussain A, Iqbal K, Aziem S, Mahato P, Negi AK. A review on the science of growing crops without soil (soilless culture)-a novel alternative for growing crops. Int J Agric Crop Sci. 2014;7(11):833.
  7. 7. Sharma N, Acharya S, Kumar K, Singh N, Chaurasia OP. Hydroponics as an advanced technique for vegetable production: An overview. J Soil Water Conserv. 2018;17(4):364–71. https://doi.org/10.5958/2455-7145.2018.00056.5
  8. 8. Son JE, Kim HJ, Ahn TI. Hydroponic systems. In: Kozai T, editor. Plant factory. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2016. p. 213–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801775-3.00017-2
  9. 9. Jones JB. A practical guide for the hydroponic and soilless grower. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2016.
  10. 10. Olfati JA. Design and preparation of nutrient solution used for soilless culture of horticultural crops. In: Soilless culture-use of substrates for the production of quality horticultural crops. IntechOpen; 2015. https://doi.org/10.5772/59478
  11. 11. Wada T. Theory and technology to control the nutrient solution of hydroponics. In: Plant factory using artificial light. Elsevier; 2019. p. 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813973-8.00001-4
  12. 12. Sathyanarayan SR, Warke VG, Mahajan GB, Annapure US. Soil free nutrient availability to plants. J Plant Nutr. 2023;46(5):801–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108908
  13. 13. Fathidarehnijeh E, Nadeem M, Cheema M, Thomas R, Krishnapillai M, Galagedara L. Current perspective on nutrient solution management strategies to improve the nutrient and water use efficiency in hydroponic systems. Can J Plant Sci. 2024;104(2):88–102. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2023-0034
  14. 14. Gunes A, Alpaslan M, Inal A. Critical nutrient concentrations and antagonistic and synergistic relationships among the nutrients of NFT-grown young tomato plants. J Plant Nutr. 1998;21(10):2035–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169809365542
  15. 15. Marschner H, editor. Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press; 2011.
  16. 16. Sambo P, Nicoletto C, Giro A, Pii Y, Valentinuzzi F, Mimmo T, et al. Hydroponic solutions for soilless production systems: Issues and opportunities in a smart agriculture perspective. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00923
  17. 17. Liu X, Chen C, Zhang YH, Tong YX. Effects of nutrient solution recycling on water and nutrient consumption patterns and lettuce growth. Sci Hortic. 2025;341:113976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2025.113976
  18. 18. Vought K, Bayabil HK, Pompeo J, Crawford D, Zhang Y, Correll M, et al. Dynamics of micro and macronutrients in a hydroponic nutrient film technique system under lettuce cultivation. Heliyon. 2024;10(11):e32316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32316
  19. 19. Sanjuan-Delmás D, Josa A, Muñoz P, Gassó S, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X. Applying nutrient dynamics to adjust the nutrient-water balance in hydroponic crops. A case study with open hydroponic tomato crops from Barcelona. Sci Hortic. 2020;261:108908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108908
  20. 20. Nguyen NT, McInturf SA, Mendoza-Cózatl DG. Hydroponics: A versatile system to study nutrient allocation and plant responses to nutrient availability and exposure to toxic elements. J Vis Exp. 2016;(113):54317. https://doi.org/10.3791/54317
  21. 21. Veazie P, Chen H, Hicks K, Holley J, Eylands N, Mattson N, et al. A data-driven approach for generating leaf tissue nutrient interpretation ranges for greenhouse lettuce. HortScience. 2024;59(3):267–77. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI17582-23
  22. 22. Mattson N. Magnesium deficiency of hydroponic and container grown basil. e-Gro Edible Alert. 2018;3(3):2016–4.
  23. 23. Bryson GM, Mills HA, Sasseville DN, Jones JB, Barker AV. Plant analysis handbook III: A guide to sampling, preparation, analysis, interpretation and use of results of agronomic and horticultural crop plant tissue. Micro-Macro Publishing, Incorporated; 2014.
  24. 24. Al Meselmani MA. Nutrient solution for hydroponics. In: Recent research and advances in soilless culture. IntechOpen; 2022. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1016044
  25. 25. Bugbee B. Nutrient management in recirculating hydroponic culture. In: South Pacific Soilless Culture Conference-SPSCC 648; 2003. p. 99–112. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.648.12
  26. 26. Fageria VD. Nutrient interactions in crop plants. J Plant Nutr. 2001;24(8):1269–90. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-100106981
  27. 27. Xie K, Cakmak I, Wang S, Zhang F, Guo S. Synergistic and antagonistic interactions between potassium and magnesium in higher plants. Crop J. 2021;9(2):249–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.10.005
  28. 28. D’Imperio M, Renna M, Cardinali A, Buttaro D, Serio F, Santamaria P. Calcium biofortification and bioaccessibility in soilless “baby leaf” vegetable production. Food Chem. 2016;213:149–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.06.071
  29. 29. Cao W, Sun H, Shao C, Wang Y, Zhu J, Long H, et al. Progress in the study of plant nitrogen and potassium nutrition and their interaction mechanisms. Horticulturae. 2025;11(8):930. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080930
  30. 30. Zhang J, Zhang T, Rui Y. From nanomaterials to nanofertilizers: Applications, ecological risks and prospects for sustainable agriculture. Plants. 2026;15(3):415. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030415
  31. 31. Sarraf M, Bansal R, Shackira AM, Yadav V, Zarbakhsh S, Roychowdhury R, et al. Magnesium-mediated stress adaptation in plants: From physio-biochemical insights to climate-resilient agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2026;17:1715501. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2026.1715501
  32. 32. Bastakoti B, Eneh N, Singh HP. Nanofertilizers: A new era in sustainable agriculture. J Agric Food Res. 2026:102793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2026.102793
  33. 33. Hanif S, Javed R, Cheema M, Kiani MZ, Farooq S, Zia M. Harnessing the potential of zinc oxide nanoparticles and their derivatives as nanofertilizers: Trends and perspectives. Plant Nano Biol. 2024;10:100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plana.2024.100110
  34. 34. Galić L, Vukadinović V, Nikolin I, Lončarić Z. Soil properties and microelement availability in crops for human health: An overview. Crops. 2025;5(4):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/crops5040040
  35. 35. Zuchi S, Cesco S, Astolfi S. High S supply improves Fe accumulation in durum wheat plants grown under Fe limitation. Environ Exp Bot. 2012;77:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.11.001
  36. 36. Rietra RP, Heinen M, Dimkpa CO, Bindraban PS. Effects of nutrient antagonism and synergism on yield and fertilizer use efficiency. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2017;48(16):1895–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2017.1407429
  37. 37. Marastoni L, Sandri M, Pii Y, Valentinuzzi F, Brunetto G, Cesco S, et al. Synergism and antagonisms between nutrients induced by copper toxicity in grapevine rootstocks: Monocropping vs. intercropping. Chemosphere. 2019;214:563–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.127
  38. 38. Currey CJ. Nutrient antagonisms: The potassium-calcium-magnesium relationship. e-Gro Edible Alert. 2021;6(14).
  39. 39. Pii Y, Cesco S, Mimmo T. Shoot ionome to predict the synergism and physiological status. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015;94:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.05.002
  40. 40. Kudirka G, Viršilė A, Sutulienė R, Laužikė K, Samuolienė G. Precise management of hydroponic nutrient solution pH: The effects of minor pH changes and MES buffer molarity on lettuce physiological properties. Horticulturae. 2023;9(7):837. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9070837
  41. 41. Lee JY, Rahman A, Azam H, Kim HS, Kwon MJ. Characterizing nutrient uptake kinetics for efficient crop production during Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme Alef. growth in a closed indoor hydroponic system. PLoS One. 2017;12(5): e0177041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177041
  42. 42. Xaxiri E, Darivakis E, Karavidas I, Ntatsi G, Savvas D. Comparing the nutritional needs of two solanaceae and one cucurbitaceae species grown hydroponically under the same cropping conditions. Plants. 2023;12(20):3642. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12203642
  43. 43. Thapa U, Hansda NN, Kundu S, Giri A, Tamang D, Rahaman AO. Advancements in hydroponic systems: A comprehensive review. Arch Curr Res Int. 2024;24(11):317–28. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2024/v24i11973
  44. 44. D-Andrade L, Escalante-Garcia N, Olvera-Gonzalez E, Orsini F, Pennisi G, de Luna FV, et al. Intercropping lettuce with alfalfa under variable nitrate supply: Effects on growth performance and nutrient dynamics in a vertical hydroponic system. Plants. 2025;14(13):2060. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14132060
  45. 45. Dehghanipoodeh S, Ghobadi C, Baninasab B, Gheysari M, Shiranibidabadi S. Effect of silicon on growth and development of strawberry under water deficit conditions. Hortic Plant J. 2018;4(6):226–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2018.09.004
  46. 46. Bassu S, Eichelsbacher S, Giunta F, Motzo R, Dawid C, Gastl M, et al. Positive impact of hydroponics and artificial light on yield and quality of wheat. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):30768. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16204-0
  47. 47. Aires A. Hydroponic production systems: Impact on nutritional status and bioactive compounds of fresh vegetables. In: Vegetables: Importance of quality vegetables to human health. IntechOpen; 2018. p. 55. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.73011
  48. 48. Plocek G, Rueda Kunz D, Simpson C. Impacts of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Trichoderma spp. on Pac Choi (Brassica rapa var. chinensis) grown in different hydroponic systems. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1438038. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1438038
  49. 49. Lee S, Lee J. Beneficial bacteria and fungi in hydroponic systems: Types and characteristics of hydroponic food production methods. Sci Hortic. 2015;195:206–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.011
  50. 50. Vessey JK. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil. 2003;255(2):571–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037216893
  51. 51. Glick BR. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: Mechanisms and applications. Scientifica. 2012;2012(1):963401. https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401
  52. 52. Ikiz B, Dasgan HY, Gruda NS. Utilizing the power of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on reducing mineral fertilizer, improved yield and nutritional quality of Batavia lettuce in a floating culture. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):1616. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51818-w
  53. 53. Kalozoumis P, Savvas D, Aliferis K, Ntatsi G, Marakis G, Simou E, et al. Impact of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation and grafting on tolerance of tomato to combined water and nutrient stress assessed via metabolomics analysis. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:670236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.670236
  54. 54. Sharma R, Kumar D, Parkirti P, Singh A, Sharma A, Langeh K, et al. Membrane transporters in plants: Key players in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance and nutritional transport. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2025;227:110084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110084
  55. 55. Faizan M, Chen J, Karabulut F, Sharma R, Afzal S, Sharma P, et al. Plant hormones and membrane transporters: Integrating nutrient uptake, ion homeostasis and stress responses through hormonal cross-talk. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1699212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1699212
  56. 56. Schroeder JI, Delhaize E, Frommer WB, Guerinot ML, Harrison MJ, Herrera-Estrella L, et al. Using membrane transporters to improve crops for sustainable food production. Nature. 2013;497(7447):60–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11909
  57. 57. Sestili F, Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Pucci A, Bonini P, Canaguier R, et al. Protein hydrolysate stimulates growth in tomato coupled with N-dependent gene expression involved in N assimilation. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01233
  58. 58. Anwar A, Li Y, He C, Yu X. 24-Epibrassinolide promotes NO3− and NH4+ ion flux rate and NRT1 gene expression in cucumber under suboptimal root zone temperature. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(1):225. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1838-3
  59. 59. Liu C, Muchhal US, Uthappa M, Kononowicz AK, Raghothama KG. Tomato phosphate transporter genes are differentially regulated in plant tissues by phosphorus. Plant Physiol. 1998;116(1):91–9. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.116.1.91
  60. 60. Feng J, Lv W, Xu J, Huang Z, Rui W, Lei X, et al. Overlapping root architecture and gene expression of nitrogen transporters for nitrogen acquisition of tomato plants colonized with isolates of Funneliformis mosseae in hydroponic production. Plants. 2022;11(9):1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091176
  61. 61. Dhal SB, Mahanta S, Moore JM, Kalafatis S. Machine learning-based analysis of nutrient and water uptake in hydroponically grown soybeans. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):24337. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74376-7
  62. 62. Supraja KV, Behera B, Balasubramanian P. Performance evaluation of hydroponic system for co-cultivation of microalgae and tomato plant. J Clean Prod. 2020;272:122823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122823
  63. 63. Aslanidou M, Elvanidi A, Mourantian A, Levizou E, Mente E, Katsoulas N. Nutrients use efficiency in coupled and decoupled aquaponic systems. Horticulturae. 2023;9(10):1077. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101077
  64. 64. Tan X, Zhang X, Yang J, Yang X, Wang Y. Synergistic effect of hydroponic technology of silicon and nutrient solution on wheat growth and wheat aphid management. Pest Manag Sci. 2025;81(9):5950–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.8959
  65. 65. Ali A, Niu G, Masabni J, Ferrante A, Cocetta G. Integrated nutrient management of fruits, vegetables and crops through the use of biostimulants, soilless cultivation and traditional and modern approaches-A mini review. Agriculture. 2024;14(8):1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081330
  66. 66. Yep B, Zheng Y. Aquaponic trends and challenges–A review. J Clean Prod. 2019;228:1586–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.290
  67. 67. Dasgan HY, Yilmaz D, Zikaria K, Ikiz B, Gruda NS. Enhancing the yield, quality and antioxidant content of lettuce through innovative and eco-friendly biofertilizer practices in hydroponics. Horticulturae. 2023;9(12):1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9121274
  68. 68. Zhang Z, Xu M, Fan Y, Zhang L, Wang H. Using microalgae to reduce the use of conventional fertilizers in hydroponics and soil-based cultivation. Sci Total Environ. 2024;912:169424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169424
  69. 69. Houston LL, Dickson RW, Bertucci MB, Roberts TL. Evaluating species-specific replenishment solution effects on plant growth and root zone nutrients with hydroponic arugula (Eruca sativa L.) and basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Horticulturae. 2023;9(4):486. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9040486
  70. 70. Reza MN, Lee KH, Karim MR, Haque MA, Bicamumakuba E, Dey PK, et al. Trends of soil and solution nutrient sensing for open field and hydroponic cultivation in facilitated smart agriculture. Sensors. 2025;25(2):453. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25020453
  71. 71. Hong Y, Lee J, Park S, Kim J, Jang KJ. Next-generation nitrate, ammonium, phosphate and potassium ion monitoring system in closed hydroponics: Review on state-of-the-art sensors and their applications. AgriEngineering. 2024;6(4):4786–811. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6040274
  72. 72. Kashyap B, Kumar R. Sensing methodologies in agriculture for soil moisture and nutrient monitoring. IEEE Access. 2021;9:14095–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052478
  73. 73. Catota-Ocapana P, Minaya-Andino C, Astudillo P, Pichoasamin D. Smart control models used for nutrient management in hydroponic crops: A systematic review. IEEE Access. 2025;13:13070–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3526171
  74. 74. Palmitessa OD, Signore A, Santamaria P. Advancements and future perspectives in nutrient film technique hydroponic system: A comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1504792. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1504792

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.