Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Influence of sowing windows and genotypes on phenology, thermal indices and yield of chia (Salvia hispanica L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15014
Submitted
15 April 2026
Published
22-07-2026

Abstract

The sowing window and genotype selection play a vital role in optimising the growth, phenology and productivity of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) under semi-arid conditions. A field experiment was conducted during the kharif-rabi seasons of 2023 and 2024 at M block, All India Coordinated Research Network (AICRN) on potential crops, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bengaluru, using 14 treatment combinations arranged in a factorial randomised complete block design (FRCBD) with three replications. Two genotypes (black and white chia) were evaluated across seven sowing windows from the 2nd fortnight (FN) of July to the 2nd FN of October. Black chia recorded significantly higher seed yield (SY) (1217.441 kg ha-1) along with improved seed yield per plant (SYP) (15.614 g), number of inflorescences (NS) per plant (23.098) and inflorescence length (SL) (18.699 cm). Among sowing windows, the 1st FN of August sowing recorded a higher SY (1325.915 kg ha-1), SYP (17.013 g), NS (24.722 plant-1) and SL (20.324 cm). Early sowing extended crop duration, with the 2nd FN of July requiring 132.01 days to reach physiological maturity, whereas delayed sowing during the 2nd FN of October shortened crop duration to 98.27 days, indicating accelerated phenological progression under comparatively lower temperature and shorter photoperiod. The research results indicate that cultivation of black chia during 1st FN of August is the most suitable strategy for achieving higher productivity under the semi-arid conditions of Bangalore.

References

  1. 1. Jamboonsri W, Phillips TD, Geneve RL, Cahill JP, Hildebrand DF. Extending the range of an ancient crop, Salvia hispanica L.—a new ω-3 source. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2012;59:171–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-011-9673-x
  2. 2. Ayerza R, Coates W. Influence of environment on growing period and yield, protein, oil and α-linolenic content of three chia (Salvia hispanica L.) selections. Ind Crops Prod. 2009;30:321–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.03.009
  3. 3. Ayerza R, Coates W. Ground chia seed and chia oil effects on plasma lipids and fatty acids in the rat. Nutr Res. 2005;25:995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2005.09.011
  4. 4. Ixtaina VY, Nolasco SM, Tomás MC. Physical properties of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) seeds. Ind Crops Prod. 2008;28:286–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.03.009
  5. 5. Capitani MI, Spotorno V, Nolasco SM, Tomás MC. Physicochemical and functional characterization of by-products from chia (Salvia hispanica L.) seeds of Argentina. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2012;45:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.07.012
  6. 6. Ullah R, Nadeem M, Khalique A, Imran M, Mehmood S, Javid A, et al. Nutritional and therapeutic perspectives of chia (Salvia hispanica L.): a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2016;53:1750–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1967-0
  7. 7. Grimes SJ, Phillips TD, Hahn V, Capezzone F, Graeff-Hönninger S. Growth, yield performance and quality parameters of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) cultivars grown in southwestern Germany. Agriculture. 2019;9(10):229. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9100229
  8. 8. Bochicchio R, Phillips TD, Lovelli S, Labella R, Galgano F, Di Marisco A, et al. Agronomic performance and seed quality of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) grown in Mediterranean environments. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;77:104–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.019
  9. 9. Brandan CP, Curti RN, Acreche MM. Sowing date effects on phenology and yield components of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) under contrasting thermo-photoperiod conditions. Ind Crops Prod. 2020;150:112373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112373
  10. 10. Hatfield JL, Prueger JH. Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim Extrem. 2015;10:4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
  11. 11. Lobell DB, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science. 2011;333:616–20. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204531
  12. 12. Prasad PVV, Pisipati SR, Ristic Z, Bukovnik U, Fritz AK. Impact of nighttime temperature on physiology and growth of spring wheat. Crop Sci. 2008;48:2372–80. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.12.0717
  13. 13. Jagadish SVK, Bahuguna RN, Djanaguiraman M, Gamuyao R, Prasad PVV, Craufurd PQ. Implications of high temperature and elevated CO₂ on flowering time in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:512. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00512
  14. 14. Baginsky C, Arenas J, Escobar H, Garrido M, Valero N, Tello D, et al. Growth and yield responses of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) to different irrigation regimes in Mediterranean environments. Ind Crops Prod. 2016;90:204–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.06.011
  15. 15. Benetoli da Silva TR, Secco D, Benetoli da Silva MA, Santos RF. Influence of sowing period and environmental conditions on growth and oil yield of chia (Salvia hispanica L.). J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants. 2020;17:100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2020.100251
  16. 16. Farooq M, Gogoi N, Barthakur S, Baroowa B, Bharadwaj N, Alghamdi SS, et al. Drought stress in grain legumes during reproduction and grain filling. J Agron Crop Sci. 2017;203(2):81–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12169
  17. 17. Harisha CB, Boraiah KM, Basavaraj PS, Halli HM, Singh RN, Rane J, et al. Optimizing sowing time and weather conditions for enhanced growth and seed yield of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) in semi-arid regions. PeerJ. 2025;13:e19210. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19210
  18. 18. Attia A, Mohamed E, Abdelhamid M, El-Sayed S. Influence of sowing date and thermal conditions on growth and productivity of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) under arid environments. Agronomy. 2023;13:1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051124
  19. 19. Guttedar A, Hunje R, Badiger B, Sharma Y. Effect of dates of sowing on seed yield and quality of chia (Salvia hispanica L.). Pharma Innov J. 2023;12(11):1857–61.
  20. 20. Gopinath PP, Parsad R, Joseph B, Adarsh VS. GrapesAgri1: Collection of Shiny Apps for Data Analysis in Agriculture. J Open Source Softw. 2021;6(63):3437. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03437
  21. 21. Nihalani AL. Assessment of yield of pigeonpea in relation to heat units [MSc thesis]. Anand: Gujarat Agricultural University; 1989.
  22. 22. Monteith JL. Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977;281:277–94. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1977.0140
  23. 23. Sastry PSN, Chakravarty NVK, Rajput RP. Suggested index for characterization of crop response to thermal environment. Int J Ecol Environ Sci. 1985;11:25–30.
  24. 24. Saha R, Ghosh PK. Relationship between growth and yield of toria (Brassica rapa var. napus) with thermal indices under residue management and sowing practices in hill ecosystem of north-eastern India. Indian J Agric Sci. 2012;82(8):686–91. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i8.23054
  25. 25. Lavand PS. Crop-weather relationship in summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.) [MSc thesis]. Junagadh: Junagadh Agricultural University; 2012.
  26. 26. Curti RN, Acreche MM. Developmental responses of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) to variations in thermo-photoperiod: impact on subcomponents of grain yield. Crop Pasture Sci. 2020;71:183–9. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP19218

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.