Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)

Direct regeneration pathway for the mass propagation of commercial banana cv. Ney Poovan (AB) using immature male flower bud explants

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15069
Submitted
18 April 2026
Published
24-07-2026 — Updated on 31-07-2026
Versions

Abstract

This study developed an efficient, variety-specific in vitro regeneration protocol for the commercially important yet recalcitrant banana cultivar Ney poovan (AB). The investigation aimed to optimise a direct organogenesis system using immature male floral hands as explants and to validate the genetic fidelity and field performance of regenerated plants. Immature male flower buds proved to be a highly effective explant source, offering reduced contamination risk compared to conventional shoot-tip cultures commonly employed for large-scale production of disease-free planting material. Among the growth regulator treatments evaluated, BAP (8 mg L-1) combined with Thidiazuron (TDZ) (0.4 mg L-1) induced the earliest greening response in cv. Ney poovan, with explants exhibiting greening within 23.40 days. The TDZ (0.6 mg L-1) alone was found to be optimal for meristematic clump formation. Maximum shoot proliferation (10.80 shoots per explant) was achieved on medium supplemented with 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP) (5 mg L-1) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (1 mg L-1). Root induction was significantly enhanced by the combined application of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) and α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) (1 mg L-1 each), resulting in rapid rooting within 5.20 days. Field evaluation of regenerated plants demonstrated normal vegetative growth, flowering and yield performance. The regenerated plants produced bunch weights comparable to conventionally propagated suckers, recording an average bunch weight of 14.52 kg. Genetic fidelity assessment using inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) markers revealed very low polymorphism (6.64 %), confirming the high genetic stability and true-to-type nature of the regenerants. The protocol developed in this study provides a reliable, scalable and commercially viable approach for mass propagation of banana cv. Ney poovan banana, facilitating the production of genetically uniform, high-quality planting material for sustainable banana cultivation.

References

  1. 1. Kumar R, Singh RK, Shah A, Srivastava AK, Singh UP, Agarwal A. Banana cultivation and micropropagation in India: addressing challenges and exploring future prospects. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia. 2024;21(4):1383–95. https://doi.org/10.13005/bbra/3311
  2. 2. Singh HP, Uma S, Selvarajan R, Karihaloo JL. Micropropagation for production of quality banana planting material in Asia-Pacific. New Delhi: Asia-Pacific Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology; 2011.
  3. 3. Bhojwani SS, Razdan MK. Plant tissue culture: theory and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-3420(96)80002-4
  4. 4. Strosse H, Van den Houwe I, Panis B, Swennen R. Banana cell and tissue culture: review. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2006;85:1–14.
  5. 5. Cronauer SS, Krikorian AD. Multiplication of Musa from excised stem tips. Ann Bot. 1984;53:321–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086696
  6. 6. Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962;15:473–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
  7. 7. Vuylsteke D. Shoot-tip culture for the propagation, conservation and exchange of Musa germplasm. Ibadan: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture; 1998.
  8. 8. Lakshmanan V, Venkataramareddy SR, Neelwarne B. Molecular analysis of genetic stability in long-term micropropagated shoots of banana using RAPD and ISSR markers. Electron J Biotechnol. 2007;10(1):106–13. https://doi.org/10.2225/vol10-issue1-fulltext-12
  9. 9. Huetteman CA, Preece JE. Thidiazuron: a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1993;33:105–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01983223
  10. 10. Madhulatha P, Anbalagan M, Jayachandran S, Sakthivel N. Influence of liquid pulse treatment with growth regulators on in vitro propagation of banana (Musa spp. AAA). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2004;76:189–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TICU.0000007291.31439.6c
  11. 11. Resmi L, Nair AS. Plantlet production from the male inflorescence tips of Musa acuminata cultivars from South India. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2007;88:333–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-007-9206-7
  12. 12. Kumari A, Sharma L, Yadav Y, Karma A, Singh J, Arya SC. Biotechnological strategies for seed germplasm maintenance and plant genetic resource conservation. In: Advances in seed quality evaluation and improvement. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2025. p. 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-5178-8_15
  13. 13. Venkatachalam L, Sreedhar RV, Bhagyalakshmi N. Genetic analyses of micropropagated and regenerated plants of banana as assessed by RAPD and ISSR markers. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2007;43:267–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-007-9028-7
  14. 14. Rahman MZ, Nasiruddin KM, Amin MA, Islam MN. In vitro response and shoot multiplication of banana cultivars under different concentrations of BAP and NAA. Bangladesh J Agric Res. 2013;38(1):87–98.
  15. 15. Ali A, Sajid A, Naveed NH, Majid A, Saleem A, Khan UA. Initiation, proliferation and development of micropropagation system for mass scale production of banana through meristem culture. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(70):15731–8. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2079
  16. 16. Hazarika BN. Acclimatization of tissue-cultured plants. Curr Sci. 2003;85(12):1704–12.
  17. 17. Kavitha N et al. Development of direct regeneration protocol for mass multiplication of Musa spp. variety Udhayam (Pisang Awak, ABB) using different explants. Sci Hortic. 2021;290:110506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110506
  18. 18. Suman S. Micropropagation and hardening of banana (Musa spp.) plantlets: a review. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(7):2849–57.
  19. 19. Ray T, Dutta I, Saha P, Das S, Roy SC. Genetic stability of three economically important micropropagated banana cultivars of lower Indo-Gangetic plains using RAPD and ISSR markers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2006;85:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-005-9044-4
  20. 20. Robinson JC, Sauco VG. Bananas and plantains. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CAB International; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936587.0000
  21. 21. Ma F, Shan Z, Su H, Han R, Zhou W, Ze M, et al. A robust system for somatic embryogenesis and shoot organogenesis in Begonia grandis subsp. sinensis (A. DC.) Irmsch and genetic fidelity assessment of the regenerants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2026;164(3):89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-026-03403-4
  22. 22. Ghareb HE. Direct regeneration from stem nodal segments of Khaya senegalensis and assessment of genetic stability. Egypt J Desert Res. 2025;75(2):593–618. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejdr.2026.455482.1229
  23. 23. Devi KS, Devi HH, Singh NS, Devi HS. Meta-topolin enhanced in vitro regeneration and genetic fidelity assessment of an endangered orchid, Pelatantheria insectifera using SCOT and ISSR markers. Vegetos. 2025:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-025-01401-z
  24. 24. Dadzie BK, Orchard JE. Routine post-harvest screening of banana/plantain hybrids: criteria and methods. Montpellier: INIBAP; 1997.
  25. 25. Heslop-Harrison JS, Schwarzacher T. Domestication, genomics and the future for banana. Ann Bot. 2007;100:1073–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm191
  26. 26. Bornet B, Branchard M. Nonanchored inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers: reproducible and specific tools for genome fingerprinting. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2001;19:209–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772892
  27. 27. Biswas P, Kumar N. Application of molecular markers for the assessment of genetic fidelity of in vitro raised plants: current status and future prospects. In: Molecular marker techniques: a potential approach of crop improvement. Singapore: Springer; 2023. p. 233–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1612-2_12
  28. 28. Rohela GK, Jogam P, Saini P, Sandhya D, Peddaboina V, Shekhawat MS. Assessing the genetic stability of in vitro raised plants. In: Commercial scale tissue culture for horticulture and plantation crops. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2022. p. 245–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0055-6_11
  29. 29. Majumder S, Igamberdiev AU, Debnath SC. Somaclonal variation and clonal fidelity in commercial micropropagation: challenges and perspectives. Agronomy. 2025;15(6):1489. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15061489
  30. 30. Lalusin AG. Advancements in abaca (Musa textilis Nee.) breeding and biotechnology for ensuring the sustainability of the Philippine abaca. In: Breeding and biotechnology of leaf, fruit and seed fiber crops. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-00407-9_1
  31. 31. Kumari A, Awasthi G, Kumar VB. Assessment of genetic fidelity in micropropagated banana plantlets using DNA extraction and RAPD analysis. Int J Plant Environ. 2025;11(04):789–94.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.