Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Rhizosphere microbiome-mediated modulation of nitrogen use efficiency in Oryza sativa L. under water-deficit stress: Mechanistic insights and agronomic implications

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15088
Submitted
19 April 2026
Published
23-09-2026

Abstract

Water-deficit (WD) stress is one of the most pervasive abiotic constraints limiting irrigated rice (Oryza sativa L.) productivity in the deltaic agroecosystems of peninsular India. The rhizosphere microbiome comprising diazotrophic bacteria, phosphate-solubilising bacteria (PSB) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) represents an underexploited biological resource for improving nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) under combined edaphic and hydric constraints. We conducted a two-factorial pot experiment (completely randomised design, (CRD)) at the Research Farm of the School of Agriculture, SR University, Warangal, Telangana, India (17.98058° N, 79.59429° E; altitude ≈ 260 m above mean sea level (AMSL)), during the 2024 kharif season (June–November 2024), comprising six microbial inoculation treatments (T0, uninoculated control; T1, Bradyrhizobium japonicum; T2, Azospirillum brasilense; T3, PSB consortium; T4, tripartite consortium; T5, tripartite consortium + 75 % recommended dose of nitrogen (N)) crossed with two soil-moisture regimes (100 % field capacity, well-watered (WW); 50 % field capacity, WD. Consortium inoculation (T5) preserved rhizosphere microbial diversity, sustained N-cycling enzyme activities and improved N assimilation enzyme activities and grain yield relative to the uninoculated control under WD stress, with the largest relative gains recorded for NUE and nitrate reductase activity. These agronomic improvements were accompanied by measurable increases in soil urease activity and microbial biomass N. Overall, the results indicate that rhizobacterial consortia can meaningfully buffer rice NUE and yield against water-deficit stress, offering a biologically grounded, field-testable strategy for reducing reliance on synthetic N fertiliser in drought-prone deltaic rice systems, pending confirmation under open-field conditions.

References

  1. 1. Fukagawa NK, Ziska LH. Rice: importance for global nutrition. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2019;65(Suppl):S2–3. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.65.S2
  2. 2. Bouman BAM, Humphreys E, Tuong TP, Barker R. Rice and water. Adv Agron. 2007;92:187–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(04)92004-4
  3. 3. Kumar V, Singh T, Nair S, Tripathi SB. Area, production and yield of rice in India. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(5):1205–9. https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2020.v9.i2g.10885
  4. 4. Mishra V, Singh R. Drought onset and termination in India. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2010;115(D15).
  5. 5. Dey P, Behera B, Mishra S. Drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.): mechanisms, responses and management strategies. Plant Stress. 2021;2:100036.
  6. 6. Panda D, Mishra SS, Behera PK. Drought tolerance in rice: focus on recent mechanisms and approaches. Rice Sci. 2016;23(4):169–74.
  7. 7. Ladha JK, Pathak H, Krupnik TJ, Six J, van Kessel C. Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospects and prospects. Adv Agron. 2005;87:85–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(05)87003-8
  8. 8. Ju XT, Zhang C. Nitrogen cycling and environmental impacts in upland agricultural soils in North China: a review. J Integr Agric. 2017;16(12):2848–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61743-X
  9. 9. Hu Y, Schmidhalter U. Drought and salinity: a comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2005;168(4):541–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200420516
  10. 10. Foyer CH, Noctor G, Hodges M. Respiration and nitrogen assimilation: targeting mitochondria-associated metabolism to enhance nitrogen use efficiency. J Exp Bot. 2011;62(4):1467–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq453
  11. 11. Schimel JP, Schaeffer SM. Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00348
  12. 12. Hinsinger P, Bengough AG, Vetterlein D, Young IM. Rhizosphere: biophysics, biogeochemistry and ecological relevance. Plant Soil. 2009;321(1–2):117–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9885-9
  13. 13. Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, van der Putten WH. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11(11):789–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3109
  14. 14. Dobbelaere S, Vanderleyden J, Okon Y. Plant growth-promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2003;22(2):107–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/713610853
  15. 15. Steenhoudt O, Vanderleyden J. Azospirillum, a free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterium closely associated with grasses. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000;24(4):487–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00552.x
  16. 16. Khan MS, Zaidi A, Wani PA, Oves M. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the remediation of metal contaminated soils. Environ Chem Lett. 2014;7(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-008-0155-0
  17. 17. Richardson AE, Barea JM, McNeill AM, Prigent-Combaret C. Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant Soil. 2009;321(1–2):305–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9895-2
  18. 18. Duca D, Lorv J, Patten CL, Rose D, Glick BR. Indole-3-acetic acid in plant-microbe interactions. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2014;106(1):85–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-013-0095-y
  19. 19. Glick BR. Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol Res. 2014;169(1):30–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.009
  20. 20. Schimel J, Balser TC, Wallenstein M. Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology. 2007;88(6):1386–94. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0219
  21. 21. Vardharajula S, Ali SZ, Grover M, Reddy G, Bandi V. Drought-tolerant plant growth promoting Bacillus spp.: effect on growth, osmolytes, and antioxidant status of maize under drought stress. J Plant Interact. 2011;6(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2010.535178
  22. 22. Gordon SA, Weber RP. Colorimetric estimation of indoleacetic acid. Plant Physiol. 1951;26(1):192–5. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.26.1.192
  23. 23. Schwyn B, Neilands JB. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem. 1987;160(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9
  24. 24. Hardy RWF, Holsten RD, Jackson EK, Burns RC. The acetylene-ethylene assay for N2 fixation: laboratory and field evaluation. Plant Physiol. 1968;43(8):1185–207. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.43.8.1185
  25. 25. Murphy J, Riley JP. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta. 1962;27:31–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5
  26. 26. Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. Assay of urease activity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1972;4(4):479–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(72)90064-8
  27. 27. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem. 1987;19(6):703–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
  28. 28. Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 1985;17(6):837–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0
  29. 29. Jaworski EG. Nitrate reductase assay in intact plant tissues. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1971;43(6):1274–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(71)80010-4
  30. 30. Shapiro BM, Stadtman ER. Glutamine synthetase (Escherichia coli). Methods Enzymol. 1970;17A:910–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(71)17305-3
  31. 31. Singh RP, Srivastava HS. Regulation of glutamate dehydrogenase activity by amino acids in roots of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Physiol Plant. 1986;66(1):61–4.
  32. 32. Lam HM, Peng SSH, Coruzzi GM. Metabolic regulation of the gene encoding glutamine-dependent asparagine synthetase in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1994;106(4):1347–57. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.4.1347
  33. 33. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1–2):248–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
  34. 34. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Gaithersburg (MD): AOAC International; 2005.
  35. 35. Shearer G, Kohl DH. N2-fixation in field settings: estimations based on natural 15N abundance. Funct Plant Biol. 1986;13(6):699–756. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9860699
  36. 36. Hawkesford MJ. Reducing the reliance on nitrogen fertilizer for wheat production. J Cereal Sci. 2011;54(3):387–93.
  37. 37. Wagg C, Bender SF, Widmer F, van der Heijden MGA. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(14):5266–70. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320054111
  38. 38. Delgado-Baquerizo M, Giaramida L, Reich PB, Khachane AN, Hamonts K, Edwards C, et al. Lack of functional redundancy in the relationship between microbial diversity and ecosystem functioning. J Ecol. 2016;104(4):936–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12585
  39. 39. Sandhya V, Ali SZ, Grover M, Reddy G, Venkateswarlu B. Effect of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas spp. on compatible solutes, antioxidant status and plant growth of maize under drought stress. Appl Soil Ecol. 2010;46(2):304–10.
  40. 40. Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18(3):119–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00045-9
  41. 41. Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J. Auxin and plant-microbe interactions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(4). https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001438
  42. 42. Zahir ZA, Arshad M, Frankenberger WT. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: applications and perspectives in agriculture. Adv Agron. 2004;81:97–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(03)81003-9
  43. 43. Tabuchi M, Abiko T, Yamaya T. Assimilation of ammonium ions and reutilization of nitrogen in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot. 2007;58(9):2319–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm016
  44. 44. Kechid M, Desbrosses G, Rokhsi W, Varoquaux F, Djekoun A, Touraine B. The NRT2.5 and NRT2.6 genes are involved in growth promotion of Arabidopsis by the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) strain Phyllobacterium brassicacearum STM196. New Phytol. 2013;198(2):514–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12158
  45. 45. Lea PJ, Miflin BJ. Glutamate synthase and the synthesis of glutamate in plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2003;41(6–7):555–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(03)00060-3
  46. 46. Xu G, Fan X, Miller AJ. Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efficiency. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012;63:153–82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105532
  47. 47. Jin CW, Ye YQ, Zheng SJ. An underground tale: contribution of microbial activity to plant iron acquisition via ecological processes. Ann Bot. 2014;113(1):7–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct249
  48. 48. Lemanceau P, Expert D, Gaymard F, Bakker PAHM, Briat JF. Role of iron in plant-microbe interactions. Adv Bot Res. 2009;51:491–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(09)51012-9
  49. 49. Ladha JK, Reddy PM. The quest for nitrogen fixation in rice: a summary of recent accomplishments and future challenges. Los Baños (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute; 2000. p. 1–17.
  50. 50. Yanni YG, Dazzo FB, Squartini A, Zanardo M, Zidan MI, Elsadany AEY. Assessment of the natural endophytic association between Rhizobium leguminosarum and rice roots in the Nile delta. Plant Soil. 2016;407(1–2):367–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2895-0
  51. 51. Alalwani AK, Sekhi YS, Kamis A, Al-Dulaimy AFZ, Almohammedi OHM, Al-Taey DKA. Physiological activities of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants: a review. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2025;1487(1):012063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1487/1/012063

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.