Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Bridging equity gaps in India’s paddy procurement system: a systematic review

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15092
Submitted
19 April 2026
Published
07-08-2026

Abstract

Ensuring equitable agricultural procurement systems is essential for improving the livelihood security of marginalised farming groups in India. This review examines the extent to which paddy procurement mechanisms address the needs of smallholder, tenant and women farmers. Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA)-guided screening, peer-reviewed articles, policy documents and empirical reports were analysed to identify the key factors influencing participation, including access to procurement centres, awareness of minimum support price (MSP), institutional constraints, land tenure issues and market structures. The findings indicate that, despite the expansion of procurement systems, their reach remains uneven due to structural and institutional barriers. Small and fragmented landholdings, lack of formal tenancy recognition, limited infrastructure and gender-based disparities continue to restrict participation in formal procurement channels. These patterns suggest that access conditions, institutional capacity and awareness levels play a decisive role in shaping participation outcomes rather than policy availability alone. The analysis further highlights that disparities in implementation across regions further influence the effectiveness of procurement systems. Future research should focus on evaluating the performance of digital procurement platforms, examining regional variations in policy implementation and analysing institutional mechanisms that promote the inclusion of marginalised farming groups, thereby strengthening the overall effectiveness and equity of procurement systems.

References

  1. 1. Rao EK. Role of women in agriculture: a micro level study. J Glob Econ. 2006;2(2):107–18.
  2. 2. Prakash D. Rural women, food security and agricultural cooperatives. In: 4th Asian-African International Conference on Women in Agricultural Cooperatives in Asia and Africa; 1999 Aug 24-29; Tokyo, Japan.
  3. 3. Pandey MM. Indian agriculture: an introduction. In: 4th Session of the Technical Committee of APCAEM; 2009; Chiang Rai, Thailand. p. 10–12.
  4. 4. Satyavathi CT, Bharadwaj C, Brahmanand PS. Role of farm women in agriculture. Gend Technol Dev. 2010;14(3):441–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/097185241001400308
  5. 5. Hossain M. Rice supply and demand in Asia: a socio-economic and biophysical analysis. In: Teng PS, Kropff MJ, Ten Berge HFM, Dent JB, Lansigan FP, Van Laar HH, editors. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Systems Approaches for Agricultural Development. Vol 1. Philippines: IRRI; 1997.
  6. 6. Das L, Mondal B, Mishra SK, Sadangi BN. Incremental returns from rice cultivation through gender-sensitive approaches: a vivid illustration. Oryza. 2021;58(3):427–33. https://doi.org/10.35709/ory.2021.58.3.9
  7. 7. Paris R. Women’s roles and needs in changing rural Asia with emphasis on rice-based agriculture. Taipei: Food and Fertilizer Technology Center (FFTC); 2009.
  8. 8. Fabiyi EF, Danladi BB, Akande KE, Mahmood Y. Role of women in agricultural development and their constraints: A case study of Biliri Local Government Area, Gombe State, Nigeria. Pak J Nutr. 2007;6(6):676–80. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2007.676.680
  9. 9. Das L, Mishra SK, Pattanaik S, Panda P, Panda RS. A case study on gender differentiated role analysis in rice farming in a rice intensive ecology. J Community Mobil Sustain Dev. 2022;16(3):707–14
  10. 10. Das L, Jakhar P, Sahu A, Moharana G, Panda RS, Pattanaik S. Identifying and prioritizing the critical gender gap indicators using the SHEET module. Indian J Ext Educ. 2020;56(4):126–32. https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-552X.2020.00047.X
  11. 11. Choruma DJ, Dirwai TL, Mutenje M, Mustafa M, Chimonyo VGP, Jacobs-Mata I, et al. Digitalisation in agriculture: a scoping review of technologies in practice, challenges and opportunities for smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Agric Food Res. 2024;18:101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101286
  12. 12. Herrero M, Thornton PK, Bernués A, Baltenweck I, Vervoort J, van de Steeg J, et al. Exploring future changes in smallholder farming systems by linking socio-economic scenarios with regional and household models. Glob Environ Change. 2014;24:165–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.008
  13. 13. Khan M, Behrendt K, Papadas D, Arnold L. Strategic sustainable development: the role of intermediaries in managing sustainability compliance of a multi-tier crop agri-food supply chain. Sustain Dev. 2025;33:992–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3159
  14. 14. Maindi CN, Nyarindo WN, Ndirangu SN, Isaboke HN. Collective action typologies and their implications for policy targeting: the case of smallholder households from the central region of Kenya. J Agric Food Res. 2024;18:101288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101288
  15. 15. Kreitzman M, Chapman M, Keeley KO, Chan KM. Local knowledge and relational values of midwestern woody perennial polyculture farmers can inform tree-crop policies. People Nat. 2022;4(1):180–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10277
  16. 16. Borter DK, Malik N. Aid effectiveness and Kenya's agricultural policy and strategy-making processes. In: African experience in the application of development aid effectiveness principles: the case of Kenya. Singapore; 2023. p. 129–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8368-9_4
  17. 17. Karatepe ID, Scherrer C. Smallholder challenges of social and economic upgrading in agricultural value chains: a cross-country, cross-crop comparison. Agrar South J Polit Econ. 2024;13(3):317–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/22779760241261445
  18. 18. Acharya Balkrishna AK, Arya V, Sharma G, Srivastava D, Sharma A, Khan N. Situational analysis of government initiatives for the welfare of farmers in India: impact and futuristic insights. Indian J Ecol. 2022;49(3):1023–35.
  19. 19. Andrews N, Anku JH, Akolgo-Azupogo H. Gender, land grabbing and agrarian livelihoods: contradictory gendered outcomes of land transactions in Ghana. J Peasant Stud; 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2025.2451792
  20. 20. Attamah CO, Bosompem M, Von Abubakari F. Impact of the Anchor Borrowers’ Programme on the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in Southeast Nigeria. J Agric Ext. 2025;29(2):22–33. https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v29i2.3
  21. 21. Ahmad I, Islam MR. The fabric of society: understanding community development. In: Building strong communities: ethical approaches to inclusive development. Emerald Publ Ltd; 2024. p. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-174-420241001
  22. 22. Clarkson G, Dorward P, Poskitt S, Stern RD, Nyirongo D, Fara K, et al. Stimulating small-scale farmer innovation and adaptation with participatory integrated climate services for agriculture (PICSA): lessons from implementation in Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean and South Asia. Clim Serv. 2022;26:100298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2022.100298
  23. 23. Cornelissen J, Stephens V, Matthews L. Unlocking the power of diversity for supply chain knowledge: is pluralism in theorizing styles the key? J Supply Chain Manag. 2024;60(3):3–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12328
  24. 24. Khan M, Behrendt K, Arnold L, Papadas D, Sultana A. In the shadows of fields: uncovering the nexus of modern slavery in agricultural societies. Sociol Compass. 2025;19(5):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.70069
  25. 25. Zafar M, Amir RM, Raza HA, Aderinoye-Abdulwahab S, Irshad I, Dolapo TA. Factors affecting livelihood diversification of women of farm families working in textile industries in Faisalabad district, Pakistan. Pertanika J Soc Sci Humanit. 2024;32(3):1095–114. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  26. 26. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  27. 27. Afroz N. Exploring traditional medicine in South Africa: a review of ethnobotanical studies on medicinal plants. Plant Sci Arch. 2022:14–8. https://doi.org/10.51470/PSA.2022.7.3.14
  28. 28. Dorward A, Kydd J. Locked in and locked out: smallholder farmers and the new economy in low-income countries. J Agric Econ. 2002;53(1):61–79.
  29. 29. IFAD. Rural poverty report 2001: the challenge of ending rural poverty. Rome: Int Fund Agric Dev; 2001.
  30. 30. Kherallah M, Kirsten JF. The new institutional economics: applications for agricultural policy research in developing countries. Agrekon. 2001;40(2):110–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2002.9523589
  31. 31. Pingali P, Rosegrant MW. Intensive food systems in Asia: can the degradation problems be reversed? Food Policy. 2001;26(4):277–92.
  32. 32. Barrett CB. Smallholder market participation: concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa. Food Policy. 2008;33(4):299–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.005
  33. 33. Government of India. Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on procurement and milling of paddy for the central pool. New Delhi: Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution; 2015.
  34. 34. Khan MM, Jamal AMM. Market-based price support program: an alternative approach to large-scale food procurement and distribution system. Food Policy. 1997;22(6):475–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(98)00010-4
  35. 35. Government of India. Reforms in decentralized procurement scheme. New Delhi: Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution; 2017.
  36. 36. Sukanya SD. Adequacy of procurement price for paddy farmers in Kerala [dissertation]. Vellayani: College of Agriculture; 2015.
  37. 37. Khan MI. Small, marginal farmers hit by poor paddy procurement in Bihar. Down To Earth; 2020
  38. 38. Subbarao K. Rice price behaviour and public procurement: an analysis of the experience of Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Agric Econ. 1978;33(3):1–20.
  39. 39. Government of India. Report of the High Level Committee on reorienting the role and restructuring of the Food Corporation of India. New Delhi; 2015.
  40. 40. Alam M, Akter S, Begum I. Effectiveness of rice procurement program and determinants of farm-level rice stocks in Bangladesh. Paper presented at: International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference; 2015; Milan, Italy
  41. 41. Peshin R, Sharma R, Gupta V, Ajrawat B, Risam KS. Impact of government intervention in procurement of rice on smallholder farmers in subtropics of Jammu. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2015;28(2):263–70. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2016.00005.7
  42. 42. Peshin R, Sharma R, Dwivedi S, Nanda R, Sharma LK, Kumar R, et al. Impact of government policy intervention in procurement of wheat in Jammu region of Jammu and Kashmir. Indian J Ecol. 2016;43(1):569–73.
  43. 43. Negi DS, Birthal PS, Roy D, Khan MT. Farmers’ choice of market channels and producer prices in India: role of transportation and communication networks. Food Policy. 2018;81:106–21.
  44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.10.008
  45. 44. Mundinamani SM, Kammardi P, Kusuma KD, Mangoji SB. Impact of procurement of agricultural commodities under minimum support price schemes in Karnataka. Indian J Agric Mark. 2017;31(3 Suppl):27–35.
  46. 45. Narayanamoorthy A, Suresh R, Alli P. Public procurement of foodgrains and farm income nexus in India: a macro-level analysis. Indian J Agric Mark. 2017;31(3 Suppl):13–26.
  47. 46. Bora K, Bhattacharya S, Niyati S. Paddy prices and marketing agencies in India: effectiveness of public procurement. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2018;31:157–66. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2018.00031.9
  48. 47. Shahzad MA, Razzaq A, Qing P. Wheat price support policy in Pakistan. J Econ Impact. 2019;1(3):80–86. https://doi.org/10.52223/jei0103192
  49. 48. Kumar R, Gupta K, Kumar NAV. Agriculture in 2022–23: Kharif performance and rabi outlook. RBI Bull. 2022.
  50. 49. Basantaray AK. Is minimum support price effective in India? Evidence from state-wise paddy procurement. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol. 2023;41(1):53–65. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2023/v41i11833
  51. 50. Dev K. Institutional arrangements to enforce minimum support price policy in India: a case study of wheat and paddy production in Punjab. Adv Res. 2023;24(5):60–70. https://doi.org/10.9734/air/2023/v24i5959
  52. 51. Nangraj AN, Solangi T, Manzoor B, Khan NM, Talpur BA, Dahri GN. Impact of procurement policy of wheat on farmers in Khairpur Mir’s, Sindh, Pakistan. J Educ Soc Stud. 2023;4(3):655–63. https://doi.org/10.52223/jess.2023.4325
  53. 52. Saleh TW, Lakitan B, Budianta D, Yamin M, Cahya G, Huanza M. Impact of government purchase price policy of rice for producers and consumers in Indonesia. J Suboptimal Lands. 2024;13(1):52–60. https://doi.org/10.36706/jlso.13.1.1024.654
  54. 53. Aditya KS, Subash SP, Praveen KV, Nithyashree ML, Bhuvana N, Sharma A. Awareness about minimum support price and its impact on diversification decisions of farmers in India. Asia Pac Policy Stud. 2017;4(3):514–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.197
  55. 54. Birthal PS, Negi DS, Roy D, Agarwal S. Farmers’ access to markets and determinants of participation in modern agricultural value chains in India. Food Policy. 2015;55:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.05.005
  56. 55. Rahaman MS, Sarkar MAR, Kabir MJ, Deb L, Rahman MC, Islam MA, et al. Assessing the effectiveness of rice procurement programme and farmers’ profitability in selected areas of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Rice J. 2020;24(1):31–46. https://doi.org/10.3329/brj.v24i1.53238
  57. 56. Wijesooriya WAN, Champika PAJ, Kuruppu IV. Paddy farmers’ channel choice and links to public and private marketing channels in Sri Lanka. Appl Econ Bus. 2020;4(1):60–70. https://doi.org/10.4038/aeb.v4i1.45
  58. 57. Jana SK, Pal BD, Manna S. Participation of farmers in government e-procurement of paddy in West Bengal: application of double hurdle model. Munich Pers RePEc Arch. 2023:184–94.
  59. 58. Sajogyo P. Peranan wanita dalam perkembangan masyarakat desa. Jakarta: Rajawali; 1985.
  60. 59. Andalla T, Listyani R. The role of the spouses of Indonesian migrant workers remaining in the home country in maintaining family resilience. Paradigma. 2018.
  61. 60. Hanani S. Customary land and women's poverty. J Ilm Kajian Gender. 2013;27–43. https://doi.org/10.15548/jk.v3i1.67
  62. 61. Mamonto N, Gosal TAMR, Singkoh F. Community empowerment in supporting the tourism sector as a driver of the economy. J Eksekutif. 2017;1–9.
  63. 62. Saiful S, Miftah AA, Kusnadi D. Village Head Competence in Empowering Village Potential (A Case Study in Muara Madras Village, Jangkat District, Merangin Regency). Undergraduate [thesis]. Jambi: UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi; 2018.
  64. 63. Said D. The role of the wife in building the family economy from the perspective of Islamic law. At-Tawasuth J Ekon Islam. 2020;268–90. https://doi.org/10.30829/ajei.v5i2.8092
  65. 64. Meyer RL, McDowell CM. Nourishing the nation: the embodied labor of women and the production of healthy food in local agro-food systems. Geoforum. 2014;57:164–74.
  66. 65. Hetzer M. Negotiating equal rights in everyday life: expectations and experiences of rural women. J Contemp Cent East Eur. 2022;30(3):353–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/25739638.2022.2133442
  67. 66. Sibarani R, Gulo Y. The subordination of female leadership in Toba Batak culture. Anthropos. 2020: 3–83. https://doi.org/10.24114/antro.v6i1.16636
  68. 67. Bodnár A, Varga Z. Entering their first workplace: women in socialist agriculture. J Contemp Cent East Eur. 2022;30(3):317–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/25739638.2022.2133440
  69. 68. Mokati JTW, Ncube A, Bahta YT. Feminization of agriculture and household food security in Lesotho. J Asian Afr Stud. 2024;59(2):411–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096221111359
  70. 69. Leder-Büttner S. Translocal resource governance and farmer-managed irrigation systems in Nepal. Geoforum. 2024;148:103905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103905
  71. 70. Salahuddin, M Mardin, W Wasariana. The relationship between the level of knowledge and farmers' motivation in wetland rice farming. Bull Penelit Sos Ekon Pertan. 2017;19(36):50–60.
  72. 71. Anbarasan S, Ramesh S. Photosynthesis efficiency: advances and challenges in improving crop yield. Plant Sci Arch. 2022:19–21. https://doi.org/10.51470/PSA.2022.7.3.19
  73. 72. Poulton C, Dorward A, Kydd J. The future of small farms: new directions for services, institutions and intermediation. World Dev. 2010;38(10):1413–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.009
  74. 73. Pretty JN. Regenerating agriculture: policies and practice for sustainability and self-reliance. London: Earthscan; 1995
  75. 74. Mosse D. The modernity of caste and the market economy. Mod Asian Stud. 2020;54(4):1225–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X19000039
  76. 75. Ahmad I, Islam MR. The fabric of society: understanding community development. In: Building strong communities. Emerald Publ Ltd; 2024. p. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-174-420241001
  77. 76. Bhujel RR, Joshi HG. Sustainable agriculture dynamics among smallholder farmers in Sikkim, India. Cogent Soc Sci. 2024;10(1):2350118. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2350118
  78. 77. Filippov M, Ordeshook PC, Shvetsova O. Designing federalism: a theory of self-sustainable federal institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press; 2004. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610875
  79. 78. Guo X, Zhu AL, Zhu X, Z An, Y Xu, M Zhuang et al. Promoting sustainable smallholder farming systems in China. Agric Syst. 2024;219:104035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104035
  80. 79. Ofosu-Ampong K, Wuletawu A, Müller A, Adjei-Nsiah S, Boateng R, Acheampong B. Behaviour change for sustainable agriculture: themes and approaches. Farming Syst. 2024;3(1):100123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farsys.2024.100123
  81. 80. Awad A, Saadaoui Mallek R, Ozturk I. International emigration and economic complexity. J Int Trade Econ Dev. 2025;34(1):102–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2024.2303584
  82. 81. Parot J, Wahlen S, Schryro J, Weckenbrock P. Food justice in community supported agriculture. Agric Human Values. 2024;41(2):685–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10511-w
  83. 82. Lok Sabha. Procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrains. New Delhi: Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution; 2021.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.