Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Interactive effects of plantlet height and hydroponic medium characteristics on growth of acclimatised pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.) plantlets

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15102
Submitted
20 April 2026
Published
15-09-2026

Abstract

The successful establishment of hydroponically acclimatised plantlets produced from pineapple axillary buds requires optimal substrate with water-related properties which regulate moisture availability, aeration, shoot growth and canopy formation. A hydroponic study was conducted to examine the synergistic effect of different levels of plantlet height and inert hydroponic substrates on physical and water-related characteristics of substrate and subsequent plant shoot growth responses and canopy formation. High water-holding capacity (100 %), high porosity (94.93 %), low bulk density (0.120 g/cm3) and substantial expansion volume (99.79 %) was shown by cocopeat, whereas pebbles exhibited a high bulk density (5.373 g/cm3) alongside an enhanced coarse particle distribution (3.556 mm) and pebbles exhibited the highest air capacity (30.30 %). Increased height, leaf production, leaf area and shoot biomass were consistently greater produced by taller pineapple plantlets. Among the hydroponic medium tested, superior growth occurred in cocopeat, which favoured biomass accumulation, whereas pebble medium supported the shoot elongation response due to aeration. Sufficient initial plantlet vigour and properties of substrates such as balanced water retention and aeration indicated significant difference in interaction effects. Principal component analysis (PCA) yielded ten independent components which accounted for 99.8 % of the total variance. Among the first three principal components, PC1 had the highest variability (85.7 %). The correlation analysis revealed a strong and statistically significant positive relationship among most traits whereas leaf area on 60th day exhibited significant negative correlations with almost all traits. Overall, the findings reveal that taller plantlets grown in cocopeat as hydroponic medium are optimum for production of good quality pineapple plantlets.

References

  1. 1. Olagunju YO, Aduloju AO, Akin-Idowu PE, Esuola CO. Acclimatization of tissue culture pineapple plantlet using semi-autotrophic hydroponics technique in comparison with other conventional substrates. J Exp Agric Int. 2021;43(11):61-71–7. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2021/v43i1130757
  2. 2. Barrett GE, Alexander PD, Robinson JS, Bragg NC. Achieving environmentally sustainable growing medium for soilless plant cultivation systems: a review. Sci Hortic. 2016;212:220–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.09.030
  3. 3. Domeño I, Irigoyen I, Muro J. Comparison of traditional and improved methods for estimating the stability of organic growing medium. Sci Hortic. 2011;130(1):335-45–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.07.012
  4. 4. Blok C, Wever G. Coir dust: a viable alternative substrate in soilless culture? Acta Hortic. 2008;779:299–306.
  5. 5. Dannehl D, Suhl J, Ulrichs C, Schmidt U. Evaluation of substitutes for rock wool as growing substrate for hydroponic tomato production. J Appl Bot Food Qual. 2015;88:68–77.
  6. 6. Xiao Y, Niu G, Kozai T. Development and application of photoautotrophic micropropagation plant system. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011;105(2):149-59–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-00–010-90–9863-93–9
  7. 7. Nguyen QT, Xiao Y, Kozai T. Photoautotrophic micropropagation. In: Kozai T, Niu G, Takagaki M, editors. Plant factory: an indoor vertical farming system for efficient quality food production. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020. p. 333-43–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-08–0-12-82–816691-81–8.00023-63–6
  8. 8. Trejo-Téllez LI, Gómez-Merino FC. Nutrient solutions for hydroponic systems. In: Hydroponics: a standard methodology for plant biological researches. 2012;1:1–22.
  9. 9. Ahmed ZF, Alnuaimi AK, Askri A, Tzortzakis N. Evaluation of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) production under hydroponic system: nutrient solution derived from fish waste vs. inorganic nutrient solution. Horticulturae. 2021;7(9):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7090292
  10. 10. Sahoo S, Sahoo D, Sahoo KK. OptimizationOptimisation of an efficient hydroponic cultivation method for high yield of strawberry plants. S Afr J Bot. 2024;167:429–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2024.02.033
  11. 11. Blake GR, Hartge KH. Bulk density and particle density. In: Klute A, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1: Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Madison (WI): American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America; 1986. p. 363-83–82. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c13
  12. 12. Morgan L. Substrate-based hydroponic systems. In: Hydroponics and protected cultivation: a practical guide. Wallingford (UK): CABI; 2021. p. 77-97–99. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789244830.0006
  13. 13. Guerrero-Guerrero EM, Criollo-Escobar H, Chávez G, Vélez JA. Evaluation of physical and chemical variables of organic substrates in a hydroponic system for strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). Rev Cienc Agríc. 2021;38(2):50-60–62. https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.213802.158
  14. 14. Ogwuche TO, Adesanya TA, Diebiru-Ojo EM, Adetoro NA, Olasupo KT, Kumar PL, et al. Influence of growth nutrient and rooting hormone on survival and growth of semi-autotrophic hydroponics (SAH™) cassava plantlets. Poster presented at: GCP21-IVth International Cassava Conference; 2018; Cotonou, Benin.
  15. 15. Chen WT, Yeh YH, Liu TY, Lin TT. An automated and continuous plant weight measurement system for plant factory. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00392
  16. 16. Gopinath PP, Parsad R, Joseph B, Adarsh VS. GRAPES: general RShiny-based analysis platform empowered by statistics-web application for data analysis in agriculture. Indian Phytopathol. 2020;73:645–9.
  17. 17. OriginLab Corporation. OriginPro. Northampton (MA): OriginLab Corporation; 2024.
  18. 18. Abad M, Noguera P, Bures S. National inventory of organic wastes for use as growing medium for ornamental potted plant production: case study in Spain. Bioresour Technol. 2001;77(2):197-27–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-80–8524(00)00152-82–8
  19. 19. Carlile WR, Cattivello C, Zaccheo P. Organic growing medium: constituents and properties. Vadose Zone J. 2015;14(6). https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2014.09.0125
  20. 20. Savvas D, Gruda N. Application of soilless culture technologies in the modern greenhouse industry: a review. Eur J Hortic Sci. 2018;83(5):280-90–93. https://doi.org/10.17660/eJHS.2018/83.5.2
  21. 21. Raviv M, Wallach R, Silber A, Bar-Tal A. Substrates and their analysis. In: Raviv M, Lieth JH, editors. Soilless culture: theory and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. p. 25-15–101.
  22. 22. Gruda N. Do soilless culture systems have an influence on product quality of vegetables? J Appl Bot Food Qual. 2009;82:141–7.
  23. 23. Urrestarazu M. State of the art and new trends of soilless culture in Spain and in emerging countries. In: Acta Hortic. 1013: International Symposium on Growing Medium, Composting and Substrate Analysis. Leuven (Belgium): International Society for Horticultural Science; 2013. p. 305-15–12. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.1013.37
  24. 24. Awang Y, Shaharom AS, Mohamad RB, Selamat A. Chemical and physical characteristics of cocopeat-based medium mixtures and their effects on the growth and development of Celosia cristata. Am J Agric Biol Sci. 2009;4(1):63-73–71. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2009.63.71
  25. 25. Schmilewski G. Growing medium constituents used in the EU in 2013. In: Baumgarten A, et al., editors. Acta Hortic. 1168: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Growing Medium, Composting and Substrate Analysis. Leuven (Belgium): International Society for Horticultural Science; 2017. p. 33-43–46. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1168.12
  26. 26. Fields JS, Owen JS Jr, Altland JE, van Iersel MW, Jackson BE. Soilless substrate hydrology can be engineered to influence plant water status for an ornamental containerized crop grown within optimal water potentials. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2018;143(4):268-88–81. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS04251-11–17
  27. 27. Michel JC. The physical properties of peat: a key factor for modern growing medium. Mires Peat. 2010;6:02. https://doi.org/10.19189/001c.128352
  28. 28. Jackson BE, Wright RD, Gruda N. Container medium pH in a pine tree substrate amended with peatmoss and dolomitic limestone affects plant growth. HortScience. 2009;44(7):1983-73–7. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.44.7.1983
  29. 29. Ab-Rahman NA, Abdul Latif N, Udin EZ, Awal A, Shamsiah A. In vitro regeneration and acclimatization of pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.). Food Res. 2020;4(S5):164-74–72. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.4(S5).010
  30. 30. Aragón C, Carvalho L, González J, Escalona M, Amâncio S. The physiology of ex vitro pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr. var. MD-2) as CAM or C3 is regulated by the environmental conditions. Plant Cell Rep. 2012;31(4):757-67–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-09–011-11–1195-75–7
  31. 31. Batagin AC, Gallon RK, Melo Filho PA. Anatomical and physiological changes during acclimatization of pineapple plantlets. J Plant Physiol. 2009;166(4):1233-43–42.
  32. 32. Poorter H, Niinemets Ü, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytol. 2009;182(3):565-85–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-89–8137.2009.02830.x
  33. 33. Taiz L, Zeiger E, Møller IM, Murphy A. Plant physiology and development. 6th ed. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates Inc.; 2015.
  34. 34. Zhang H, Zhao X, Yang J. Effects of plantlet size on acclimatization and subsequent growth in vitro-raised plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015;123(2):289-99–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-00–020-00–01786-66–6
  35. 35. Rajaseger G, Chan KL, Tan KY, Ramasamy S, Khin MC, Amaladoss A, et al. Hydroponics: current trends in sustainable crop production. Bioinformation. 2023;19(9):925. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630019925
  36. 36. Silva BS, Maia VM, Santos SR, Pegoraro RF, Ferreira EA, Azevedo AM, et al. Technologies for reducing water consumption by pineapples in the semi-arid region. Cienc Rural. 2024;54(9):1-11–12. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-83–8478cr20230271
  37. 37. Kalorizou H, Giannoulis P, Koulopoulos A, Trigka E, Xanthopoulos E, Iliopoulou E, et al. Hydroponic thermal regulation for low-energy winter strawberry production in Mediterranean coastal infrastructures. Horticulturae. 2025;11(11):1383. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11111383
  38. 38. Kaei-Kazzaz, El-Kazzaz AA. Soilless agriculture: a new and advanced method for agriculture development-an introduction. Agric Res Technol. 2017;3(2):555607. https://doi.org/10.19080/ARTOAJ.2017.03.555610
  39. 39. Masud MM. A review of hydroponics and the technologies associated with it. J Plant Sci. 2009;4(2):38-48–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2009.03.017
  40. 40. Zia-Ul-Haq, Ahmad RN, Sial JK, Yasin M, Hanif M. Efficacy of different soilless substrates on tomato under hydroponic system. Int J Biosci. 2018;12(4):399-49–405. https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/12.4.399-49–405
  41. 41. Hamad AM, Taha RM, Mohajer S. In vitro induction and proliferation of adventitious roots in pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) cultivars of Smooth Cayenne and Morris. Aust J Crop Sci. 2013;7(7):1038-48–45.
  42. 42. Miilkii Agrow. What makes hydroponic pineapple towers so efficient? 2025.
  43. 43. Sharma N, Acharya S, Kumar K, Singh N, Chaurasia OP. Hydroponics as an advanced technique for vegetable production: an overview. J Soil Water Conserv. 2018;17(4):364-74–71. https://doi.org/10.5958/2455-75–7145.2018.00056.5
  44. 44. Sambo P, Nicoletto C, Giro A, Pii Y, Valentinuzzi F, Mimmo T, et al. Hydroponic solutions for soilless production systems: issues and opportunities in a smart agriculture perspective. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00923
  45. 45. Tang L, Syed AU, Otho AR, Junejo AR, Tunio MH, Hao L, et al. Intelligent rapid asexual propagation technology-a novel aeroponics propagation approach. Agronomy. 2024;14(10):2289. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102289
  46. 46. Horie M, Takaragawa H, Kawamitsu Y. Crassulacean acid metabolism photosynthesis in pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.) grown under hydroponic culture. Bull Fac Agric Univ Ryukyus. 2019;66:65–70.
  47. 47. Shikata S. Green energy project (6). Agric Hortic. 1983;58(3):383-83–8.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.