Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Unravelling the combined abiotic stress responses of wheat under heat and drought conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15136
Submitted
21 April 2026
Published
02-09-2026

Abstract

Most of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growing areas of the world experience environmental stresses including drought (moisture stress) and high temperature (heat stress) that adversely affect crop growth, development and yield. Water-deficit often combined with high temperature stress is the main abiotic factor limiting crop growth and development. The present investigation was performed to study the effect on yield and physiological and biochemical traits of different wheat genotypes under individual heat stress (HS) and drought stress (DS) and combined stress (HS + DS) conditions. Distinct from prior studies which predominantly utilised pot experiments, this investigation offers valuable insights derived from field conditions, thereby providing a more accurate assessment of crop performance under HS + DS. The field experiment conducted in plant phenotyping facility, a total of 60 experimental plots was maintained, comprising 5 genotypes, 4 treatments and 3 replications. Grain yield declined by 31.9 % under HS, 61.6 % under DS and 66.6 % under HS + DS relative to the control. Both individual and (HS + DS) stresses also impaired physiological functioning. The HS + DS treatment induced more pronounced damaging effects on root architecture as well than either stress alone, with reductions of 42.8 % in root volume, 27.8 % in root surface area and 32 % in total root length compared with the control. Overall, HS + DS was more damaging than the individual stress, however, the interaction effect might be due to cross adaptation effect. The genotype DBW-14 exhibited a high grain yield (270 g plot-1) under HS, DS and HS + DS conditions, indicating robust cross-adaptation mechanisms. Although genotype 11 HPYT433 demonstrated superior tolerance based on root parameters and relative water content (RWC), DBW-14 significantly outperformed all other evaluated genotypes in grain yield and overall physiological stability under the    HS + DS treatment. Consequently, DBW-14 serves as a promising donor line for breeding climate-resilient cultivars.

References

  1. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT statistical database. Rome: FAO; 2025.
  2. 2. India Production Data Analysis. Agricultural production statistics 2024–25. New Delhi: IPDA; 2025.
  3. 3. Directorate of Economics and Statistics. Agricultural statistics at a glance 2021. New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India; 2021.
  4. 4. Pandey GC, Singh RK, Kumar R. Importance of wheat in global food and nutritional security. Int J Agric Sci. 2019;11(2):45–50. https://doi:10.15740/HAS/IJAS/11.2/45-50
  5. 5. Reynolds MP, Saint Pierre C, Saad ASI, Vargas M, Condon AG. Evaluating potential genetic gains in wheat associated with stress-adaptive traits. Crop Sci. 2007;47(S3):S172–89. https://doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0022IPBS
  6. 6. Prasad PVV, Pisipati SR, Ristic Z, Bukovnik U, Fritz AK. Impact of nighttime temperature on physiology and growth of spring wheat. Crop Sci. 2008;48(6):2372–80. https://doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.12.0717
  7. 7. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev. 2009;29(1):185–212. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021
  8. 8. Shah NH, Paulsen GM. Interaction of drought and high temperature on photosynthesis and grain-filling of wheat. Plant Soil. 2003;257(1):219–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026237816578
  9. 9. De Smet I. Root development under drought stress. Plant Physiol. 2012;160(1):7–15.
  10. 10. Al-Khatib K, Paulsen GM. Photosynthesis and productivity during high-temperature stress of wheat genotypes. Crop Sci. 1990;30:1127–32. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000050034x
  11. 11. Chen X, Zhu Y, Ding Y, Pan R, Shen W, Yu X. The relationship between characteristics of root morphology and grain filling in wheat under drought stress. PeerJ. 2021;9:e12015. https://doi:10.7717/peerj.12015
  12. 12. Jain N, Singh GP, Yadav R, Kumar A, Sharma S. Root trait characteristics and genotypic response in wheat under different water regimes. Cereal Res Commun. 2014;42(3):426–38. https://doi:10.1556/CRC.42.2014.3.6
  13. 13. Batts GR, Morison JIL, Ellis RH, Hadley P, Wheeler TR. Effects of CO₂ and temperature on growth and yield of crops of winter wheat over four seasons. Eur J Agron. 1997;7(1–3):43–52. https://doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(97)00006-7
  14. 14. Farooq M, Hussain M, Siddique KHM. Drought stress in wheat during flowering and grain-filling periods. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2014;33(4):331–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2014.875291
  15. 15. Siddique MRB, Hamid A, Islam MS. Drought stress effects on photosynthetic rate and leaf gas exchange of wheat. Bot Bull Acad Sin. 1999;40:141–45.
  16. 16. Sangtarash MH, Qaderi MM, Chinnappa CC, Reid DM. Differential sensitivity of canola (Brassica napus) seedlings to ultraviolet-B radiation, water stress and abscisic acid. Environ Exp Bot. 2009;66(2):212–19. https://doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.03.004
  17. 17. Ros LD, Bollina V, Soolanayakanahally P, Elferjani R, Kulkarni M, Vaid N, et al. Multi-omics atlas of combinatorial abiotic stress responses in wheat. Plant J. 2023;116:1118–35. https://doi:10.1111/tpj.16332
  18. 18. Lama S, Leiva F, Vallenback P, Chawade A, Kuktaite R. Impacts of heat, drought and combined heat–drought stress on yield, phenotypic traits and gluten protein traits: capturing stability of spring wheat in excessive environments. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1179701. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1179701
  19. 19. Prasad PVV, Pisipati SR, Momčilović I, Ristic Z. Independent and combined effects of high temperature and drought stress during grain filling on plant yield and chloroplast EF-Tu expression in spring wheat. J Agron Crop Sci. 2008;194(6):430–41. https://doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00331.x
  20. 20. Qaseem MF, Qureshi R, Shaheen H. Effects of pre-anthesis drought, heat and their combination on growth, yield and physiology of diverse wheat genotypes varying in sensitivity. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6955. https://doi:10.1038/s41598-019-43477-z
  21. 21. Harding SA, Guikema JA, Paulsen GM. Photosynthetic decline from high temperature stress during maturation of wheat: I. Interaction with senescence processes. Plant Physiol. 1990;92:648–53. https://doi:10.1104/pp.92.3.648
  22. 22. Sattar A, Sher A, Ijaz M, Ul-Allah S, Rizwan MS, Hussain M, et al. Terminal drought and heat stress alter physiological and biochemical attributes in flag leaf of bread wheat. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0232974. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232974
  23. 23. Nicolas ME, Gleadow RM, Dalling MJ. Effects of post-anthesis drought on cell division and starch accumulation in developing wheat grains. Aust J Plant Physiol. 1984;11(5):449–58. https://doi:10.1071/PP984044
  24. 24. Shashi M, Sukumar T, Sheel Y, Kousalya S, Sudhir K, Viswanathan C. Effect of combined drought and high temperature stress on wheat: insights into grain yield and quality dynamics. Indian J Agric Sci. 2025;95(7):805–11. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i7.154184
  25. 25. Ayeneh A, Van Ginkel M, Reynolds MP, Ammar K. Comparison of leaf, spike, peduncle and canopy temperature depression in wheat under heat stress. Field Crops Res. 2002;79(2–3):173–84. https://doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00142-7
  26. 26. Anwar K, Joshi R, Dhankher OP, Pareek SL, Pareek A. Elucidating the response of crop plants towards individual, combined and sequentially occurring abiotic stresses. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:6119. https://doi:10.3390/ijms22116119

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.