Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Long-term nutrient management reshapes soil carbon fractions and biological fertility: Evidence from a 43-year semi-arid Vertisol experiment

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15338
Submitted
30 April 2026
Published
07-09-2026

Abstract

Improving soil carbon quality and biological fertility through long-term nutrient management is essential for sustaining productivity, reducing input dependence and enhancing climate resilience in rainfed Vertisols. This study evaluated the effects of nine treatments including control, inorganic fertilisation (50 % RDF, 100 % RDF, RDF + Zn), organic amendments [farmyard manure (FYM) (50 % NFYM, sole FYM), crop residues (CR) (50 % NCR)] and integrated nutrient management (INMFYM, INMCR) on soil carbon pools, oxidisable carbon fractions, carbon management indices (CMI) and enzyme activities in a permanent manurial experiment. Soil organic carbon (SOC) ranged from 5.66 (control) to 11.19 g kg-1 (INMFYM), both in the cotton phase. Inorganic treatments enhanced soil inorganic carbon (SIC), suggesting an inverse relationship with organic inputs. Sole FYM enriched the very labile fraction, whereas INM enhanced the labile and less labile fractions and non-labile carbon was highest under RDF + Zn. CMI ranged from 136.7–307.1 and was highest under sole FYM. The 50 % NFYM recorded higher permanganate oxidisable carbon (POXC) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) than 100 % RDF despite lower SOC, highlighting the importance of substrate quality. Enzyme activities were consistently lower in the cotton phase. Structural equation modelling indicated that SOC was associated with dehydrogenase activity indirectly through MBC, which mediated 86.5 % of this effect, whereas POXC was the primary driver of β-glucosidase (BGA) and cellulase activities (CA). These findings demonstrate that biological fertility in dryland Vertisols is governed by active, biologically accessible carbon pools rather than total SOC and that sustained organic and integrated inputs are essential for enhancing carbon quality and microbial enzyme function.

References

  1. 1. Lehmann J, Hansel CM, Kaiser C, Kleber M, Maher K, Manzoni S, et al. Persistence of soil organic carbon caused by functional complexity. Nat Geosci. 2020;13(8):529–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0612-3
  2. 2. Lal R. Soil organic matter and water retention. Agron J. 2020;112(5):3265–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20282
  3. 3. Masto RE, Chhonkar PK, Singh D, Patra AK. Alternative soil quality indices for evaluating the effect of intensive cropping, fertilisation and manuring for 31 years in the semi-arid soils of India. Environ Monit Assess. 2008;136(1):419–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9697-z
  4. 4. Sukumaran S, Purakayastha T, Sarkar B, Chakrabarti B, Bandyopadhyay K, Kumar D, et al. Assessment of carbon carrying capacities of Alfisols and Vertisols under long-term manuring and fertilization. Soil Tillage Res. 2024;238:105994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.105994
  5. 5. Raza S, Irshad A, Margenot A, Zamanian K, Li N, Ullah S, et al. Inorganic carbon is overlooked in global soil carbon research: a bibliometric analysis. Geoderma. 2024;443:116831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116831
  6. 6. Chan K, Bowman A, Oates A. Oxidizible organic carbon fractions and soil quality changes in an oxic paleustalf under different pasture leys. Soil Sci. 2001;166(1):61–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-200101000-00009
  7. 7. Culman SW, Snapp SS, Freeman MA, Schipanski ME, Beniston J, Lal R, et al. Permanganate oxidizable carbon reflects a processed soil fraction that is sensitive to management. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2012;76(2):494–504. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2011.0286
  8. 8. Marzouk SH, Kwaslema DR, Omar MM, Mohamed SH. Harnessing the power of soil microbes: their dual impact in integrated nutrient management and mediating climate stress for sustainable rice crop production: a systematic review. Heliyon. 2025;11(1):e41158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41158
  9. 9. Blair GJ, Lefroy RD, Lisle L. Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems. Aust J Agric Res. 1995;46(7):1459–66. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9951459
  10. 10. Xu CY, Du C, Jian JS, Hou L, Wang ZK, Wang Q, et al. The interplay of labile organic carbon, enzyme activities and microbial communities of two forest soils across seasons. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5002. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84217-6
  11. 11. Zhang L, Chen X, Xu Y, Jin M, Ye X, Gao H, et al. Soil labile organic carbon fractions and soil enzyme activities after 10 years of continuous fertilization and wheat residue incorporation. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):11318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68163-3
  12. 12. Daunoras J, Kačergius A, Gudiukaitė R. Role of soil microbiota enzymes in soil health and activity changes depending on climate change and the type of soil ecosystem. Biology (Basel). 2024;13(2):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13020085
  13. 13. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  14. 14. Piper C. Soil and plant analysis. Soil Sci. 1943;56(1):68. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194307000-00013
  15. 15. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem. 1987;19(6):703–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
  16. 16. Anderson TH, Domsch KH. Ratios of microbial biomass carbon to total organic carbon in arable soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1989;21(4):471–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(89)90117-X
  17. 17. Weil RR, Islam KR, Stine MA, Gruver JB, Samson-Liebig SE. Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: a simplified method for laboratory and field use. Am J Altern Agric. 2003;18(1):3–17. https://doi.org/10.1079/AJAA200228
  18. 18. Chichester F, Chaison R. Analysis of carbon in calcareous soils using a two-temperature dry combustion infrared instrumental procedure. Soil Sci. 1992;153(3):237–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199203000-00007
  19. 19. Eivazi F, Tabatabai M. Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1988;20(5):601–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(88)90141-1
  20. 20. Casida LE Jr, Klein DA, Santoro T. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci. 1964;98(6):371–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004
  21. 21. Schinner F, Von Mersi W. Xylanase-, CM-cellulase- and invertase activity in soil: an improved method. Soil Biol Biochem. 1990;22(4):511–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(90)90187-5
  22. 22. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1984.
  23. 23. Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  24. 24. Ramteke P, Gabhane V, Kadu P, Kharche V, Jadhao S, Turkhede A, et al. Long-term nutrient management effects on organic carbon fractions and carbon sequestration in Typic Haplusterts soils of Central India. Soil Use Manag. 2024;40(1):e12950. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12950
  25. 25. Rai AK, Basak N, Dixit AK, Rai SK, Das SK, Singh J, et al. Changes in soil microbial biomass and organic C pools improve the sustainability of perennial grass and legume system under organic nutrient management. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1173986. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1173986
  26. 26. Liu W, Yang Z, Ye Q, Peng Z, Zhu S, Chen H, et al. Positive effects of organic amendments on soil microbes and their functionality in agro-ecosystems. Plants (Basel). 2023;12(22):3790. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12223790
  27. 27. Preeti, Sheoran S, Prakash D, Ankit, Todarmal, Rani S, et al. Soil carbon, micronutrients and microbiological dynamics under cash crop-based cropping systems in semi-arid National Capital Region of India. Sci Rep. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35142-z
  28. 28. Pilli K, Dash B, Sahu B, M J, Sridhar D. Soil inorganic carbon in dry lands: an unsung player in climate change mitigation. In: Enhancing resilience of dryland agriculture under changing climate: interdisciplinary and convergence approaches. Singapore: Springer; 2023. p. 247–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9159-2_14
  29. 29. Zhou J, Shao G, Li L, Yang X, Zamanian K, Alharbi SA, et al. The over-estimation of long-term mineral fertilizer on CO₂ release from soil carbonates. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2025;392:109737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109737
  30. 30. Kim AR, Lee CR, Ku HH. Effects of soil chemical properties on inorganic and organic carbon contents in organic, calcareous and reclaimed-tidal soils. Korean J Soil Sci Fert. 2025;58(1):14–26. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2025.58.1.014
  31. 31. Naorem A, Jayaraman S, Dalal RC, Patra A, Rao CS, Lal R. Soil inorganic carbon as a potential sink in carbon storage in dryland soils: a review. Agriculture (Basel). 2022;12(8):1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081256
  32. 32. Gabhane V, Ramteke P, Chary GR, Patode R, Ganvir M, Chorey A, et al. Effects of long-term nutrient management in semi-arid Vertisols on soil quality and crop productivity in a cotton-greengram intercropping system. Field Crops Res. 2023;303:109115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109115
  33. 33. Zhang Z, Yan J, Han X, Zou W, Chen X, Lu X, et al. Labile organic carbon fractions drive soil microbial communities after long-term fertilization. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2021;32:e01867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01867
  34. 34. Zhou Z, Zhang S, Jiang N, Xiu W, Zhao J, Yang D. Effects of organic fertilizer incorporation practices on crops yield, soil quality and soil fauna feeding activity in the wheat-maize rotation system. Front Environ Sci. 2022;10:1058071. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1058071
  35. 35. Datta S, Mazumdar SP, Majumdar B, Alam N, Chattopadhyay L, Ghosh S, et al. Impact of integrated nutrient management on soil microbiome diversity and health in rice based cropping system: insights from long-term agricultural practices. Rhizosphere. 2025;33:101048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2025.101048
  36. 36. Woodings FS, Margenot AJ. Revisiting the permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) assay assumptions: POXC is lignin sensitive. Agric Environ Lett. 2023;8(1):e20108. https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20108
  37. 37. Li T, Zhang Y, Bei S, Li X, Reinsch S, Zhang H, et al. Contrasting impacts of manure and inorganic fertilizer applications for nine years on soil organic carbon and its labile fractions in bulk soil and soil aggregates. Catena. 2020;194:104739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104739
  38. 38. Aher SB, Lakaria BL. Impact of organic and inorganic nutrient management on soil carbon fractions and indices under soybean-wheat cropping in a Vertisol. Soil Use Manag. 2025;41(4):e70149. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.70149
  39. 39. Lv H, Ji C, Ding J, Yu L, Cai H. High levels of zinc affect nitrogen and phosphorus transformation in rice rhizosphere soil by modifying microbial communities. Plants (Basel). 2022;11(17):2271. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172271
  40. 40. Zhang M, Han J, Jiao J, Han J, Zhao X, Hu K, et al. Soil carbon management index under different land use systems and soil types of Sanjiang Plain in Northeast China. Agronomy (Basel). 2023;13(10):2533. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13102533
  41. 41. Ghosh T, Sharma S, Walia S. Soil enzymes stoichiometry and microbial metabolic limitation under diverse nutrient management practices in rice-wheat cropping system: insight from a 40-year long-term field experiment. Total Environ Microbiol. 2025:100030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.temicr.2025.100030
  42. 42. Li Y, Liu X, Lu J, Feng H, Chen J, Yang Q, et al. Soil extracellular enzymes, soil carbon and nitrogen storage under straw return: a data synthesis. Ind Crops Prod. 2025;228:120884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.120884
  43. 43. Kumari M, Sheoran S, Prakash D, Yadav DB, Yadav PK, Jat MK. Long-term application of organic manures and chemical fertilizers improve the organic carbon and microbiological properties of soil under pearl millet-wheat cropping system in North-Western India. Heliyon. 2024;10(3):e25333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25333
  44. 44. Genova G, Borruso L, Signorini M, Mitterer M, Niedrist G, Cesco S, et al. Analyzing soil enzymes to assess soil quality parameters in long-term copper accumulation through a machine learning approach. Appl Soil Ecol. 2024;195:105261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105261
  45. 45. Qu Q, Wang Z, Gan Q, Liu R, Xu H. Impact of drought on soil microbial biomass and extracellular enzyme activity. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1221288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1221288
  46. 46. Sinsabaugh RL, Follstad Shah JJ. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and ecological theory. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2012;43(1):313–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-071112-124414
  47. 47. Jing Y, Wenhao Y, Fan W, Biqing Z, Shihe X. Driving factors of soluble organic nitrogen dynamics in paddy soils: structure equation modeling analysis. Pedosphere. 2020;30(6):801–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(18)60032-3
  48. 48. Jin Z, Ping L, Wong M. Systematic relationship between soil properties and organic carbon mineralization based on structural equation modeling analysis. J Clean Prod. 2020;277:123338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123338
  49. 49. Tang J, Zhao J, Qin Z, Chen L, Song X, Ke Q, et al. Structural equation model was used to evaluate the effects of soil chemical environment, fertility and enzyme activity on eucalyptus biomass. R Soc Open Sci. 2023;10(4):221570. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221570
  50. 50. Liu YM, Cao WQ, Chen XX, Yu BG, Lang M, Chen XP, et al. The responses of soil enzyme activities, microbial biomass and microbial community structure to nine years of varied zinc application rates. Sci Total Environ. 2020;737:140245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140245

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.