Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Drought responses in rice (Oryza sativa L.): An integrated review of morphological, physiological, biochemical, phenological and genetic perspectives

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15392
Submitted
4 May 2026
Published
10-09-2026

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) production is severely affected by drought, which reduces yield, growth and physiological functions in various environments. This review integrates the morphological, physiological, biochemical, phenological and genetic responses of rice to drought, focusing on both common and environment-specific responses. Rice plants respond to water deficit by reducing leaf area and stomatal opening and modifying osmotic potential; roots may deepen or alter their architecture and flowering time may be delayed as an escape mechanism. Biochemically, osmolytes, antioxidants and hormones, especially abscisic acid (ABA), are key players in stress tolerance. Genetic mapping has identified several quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and candidate genes associated with root architecture, osmotic adjustment and flowering time, while transcriptomic studies have revealed the regulatory mechanisms underlying these traits under drought conditions. However, several challenges remain, including the lack of root phenotyping under field conditions, the instability of QTL effects across environments and the limited translation of pot-based findings to field performance. Integrated approaches that involve high-throughput field phenotyping, multi-environment trials to assess genotype × environment interactions and better integration of genomics with physiological traits across a variety of genetic backgrounds will be essential for future advances. These integrated approaches are pivotal in bridging the gap between field performance and the underlying physiological and molecular mechanisms, thereby facilitating the development of drought-resilient rice cultivars.

References

  1. 1. Adzigbe J, Frimpong F, Danquah A, Danquah EY, Asante IK, Abebrese SO, et al. The responses and adaptations of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to drought stress: A review. Climate Smart Agric. 2025;2:100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csag.2025.100080
  2. 2. Ahmad H, Zafar SA, Naeem MK, Shokat S, Inam S, Naveed SA, et al. Impact of pre-anthesis drought stress on physiology, yield-related traits and drought-responsive genes in green super rice. Front Genet. 2022;13:832542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.832542
  3. 3. Ahmad MS, Wu B, Wang H, Kang D. Field screening of rice germplasm (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica) based on days to flowering for drought escape. Plants. 2020;9:609. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050609
  4. 4. Anilkumar C, Sah RP, Beena R, Muhammed Azharudheen TP, Kumar A, Behera S, et al. Conventional and contemporary approaches for drought tolerance rice breeding: Progress and prospects. Plant Breed. 2023;142:418–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.13119
  5. 5. Anusha K, Ajithkumar B, Lincy Davis P, Latha A, Ayyoob KC, Riya KR. Phasic development of rice during the present and future climatic conditions in the central zone of Kerala. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13:26–36. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i31677
  6. 6. Baret F, Madec S, Irfan K, Lopez J, Comar A, Hemmerlé M, et al. Leaf-rolling in maize crops: From leaf scoring to canopy-level measurements for phenotyping. J Exp Bot. 2018;69:2705–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery071
  7. 7. Kumar U, Mishra S, Mahobe P, Kujur VK, Pandey R, Markam R. Drought tolerance in major crops: Physiological traits and breeding strategies. Plant Arch. 2026;26(1):581–90. https://doi.org/10.51470/PLANTARCHIVES.2026.v26.no.1.081
  8. 8. Bordeos A, Henry A, Pocsedio A, Dixit S, Lai MH, Leung H. qDTY introgression to improve the drought tolerance of Taiwanese japonica rice variety Tainan 11. J Crop Improv. 2025;39:291–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2025.2515047
  9. 9. Beena R, Kirubakaran S, Nithya N, et al. Association mapping of drought tolerance and agronomic traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.) landraces. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21:484. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03272-3
  10. 10. Burridge JD, Grondin A, Vadez V. Optimizing crop water use for drought and climate change adaptation requires a multi-scale approach. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:824720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.824720
  11. 11. Busch FA, Ainsworth EA, Amtmann A, Cavanagh AP, Driever SM, Ferguson JN, et al. A guide to photosynthetic gas exchange measurements: Fundamental principles, best practice and potential pitfalls. Plant Cell Environ. 2024;47:3344–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14815
  12. 12. Caine RS, Harrison EL, Sloan J, Flis PM, Fischer S, Khan MS, et al. The influences of stomatal size and density on rice abiotic stress resilience. New Phytol. 2023;237:2180–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18704
  13. 13. Cal AJ, Sanciangco M, Rebolledo MC, Luquet D, Torres RO, McNally KL, et al. Leaf morphology, rather than plant water status, underlies genetic variation of rice leaf rolling under drought. Plant Cell Environ. 2019;42:1532–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13514
  14. 14. Cao H, Yang Q, Yang W, Zhao L. China's three major cereal crops exposed to compound drought and extreme rainfall events. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2025;25:5017–31. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-5017-2025
  15. 15. Chen F, Zhang H, Li H, Lian L, Wei Y, Lin Y, et al. IPA1 improves drought tolerance by activating SNAC1 in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04062-9
  16. 16. Chen X, Xiao D, Qi Y, Shi Z, Bai H, Lu Y, et al. Projected future changes in extreme climate indices affecting rice production in China using a multi-model ensemble of CMIP6 projections. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1595367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1595367
  17. 17. Daryani P, Amirbakhtiar N, Soorni J, Loni F, Darzi Ramandi H, Shobbar ZS. Uncovering the genomic regions associated with yield maintenance in rice under drought stress using an integrated meta-analysis approach. Rice. 2024;17:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-024-00684-1
  18. 18. Dien DC, Mochizuki T, Yamakawa T. Effect of various drought stresses and subsequent recovery on proline, total soluble sugar and starch metabolisms in rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Plant Prod Sci. 2019;22:530–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2019.1647787
  19. 19. Dueñas C, Pagano A, Calvio C, Srikanthan DS, Slamet-Loedin I, Balestrazzi A, et al. Genotype-specific germination behavior induced by sustainable priming techniques in response to water deprivation stress in rice. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1344383. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1344383
  20. 20. Dwiningsih Y, Thomas J, Kumar A, Gupta C, Gill N, Ruiz C, et al. QTLs and candidate loci associated with drought tolerance traits of Kaybonnet × ZHE733 recombinant inbred lines rice population. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:15167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015167
  21. 21. Eweda MA, Jalil S, Rashwan AK, Tsago Y, Hassan U, Jin X. Molecular and physiological characterizations of roots under drought stress in rice: A comprehensive review. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2025;225:110012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110012
  22. 22. Fatma M, Asgher M, Iqbal N, Rasheed F, Sehar Z, Sofo A, et al. Ethylene signaling under stressful environments: Analyzing collaborative knowledge. Plants. 2021;11:2211. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172211
  23. 23. Fernando Y, Adams M, Kuhlmann M, V B Jr. Stomatal and non-stomatal leaf traits for enhanced water use efficiency in rice. Biology. 2025;14:843. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070843
  24. 24. Fonta JE, Giri J, Vejchasarn P, Lynch JP, Brown KM. Spatiotemporal responses of rice root architecture and anatomy to drought. Plant Soil. 2022;479:443–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05527-w
  25. 25. Ghazy MI, El-Naem SA, Hefeina AG, Sallam A, Eltaher S. Genome-wide association study of rice diversity panel reveals new QTLs for tolerance to water deficit under Egyptian conditions. Rice. 2024;17:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-024-00703-1
  26. 26. Giri J, Parida SK, Raghuvanshi S, Tyagi AK. Emerging molecular strategies for improving rice drought tolerance. Curr Genomics. 2021;22:16–25. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389202921999201231205024
  27. 27. Grieco M, Roustan V, Dermendjiev G, Rantala S, Jain A, Leonardelli M, et al. Adjustment of photosynthetic activity to drought and fluctuating light in wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 2020;43:1484–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13756
  28. 28. Griffin AJ, Jungers JM, Bajgain P. Root phenotyping and plant breeding of crops for enhanced ecosystem services. Crop Sci. 2024;65. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21315
  29. 29. Guidi L, Lo Piccolo E, Landi M. Chlorophyll fluorescence, photoinhibition and abiotic stress: Does it make any difference the fact to be a C3 or C4 species? Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00174
  30. 30. Gul RMS, Rauf S, Ortiz R, Khalid MW, Kaya Y. Understanding abscisic acid-mediated stress signaling to affect rice development under stress. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2024;8:1477994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1477994
  31. 31. Haghpanah M, Hashemipetroudi S, Arzani A, Araniti F. Drought tolerance in plants: Physiological and molecular responses. Plants. 2024;13:2962. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13212962
  32. 32. Hassan MA, Dahu N, Hongning T, Qian Z, Yueming Y, Yiru L, et al. Drought stress in rice: Morpho-physiological and molecular responses and marker-assisted breeding. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1215371. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1215371
  33. 33. Huang F, Jing J, Dai C, Qi P. Drought-flood abrupt alternation in the Heilongjiang River Basin under climate change: Spatiotemporal patterns, drivers and projections. Water. 2025;17:3436. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17233436
  34. 34. International Rice Research Institute. The importance of rice. Rice Knowledge Bank. 2024.
  35. 35. Ishimaru T, Sasaki K, Lumanglas PD, Cabral CLU, Ye C, Yoshimoto M, et al. Effect of drought stress on flowering characteristics in rice (Oryza sativa L.): A study using genotypes contrasting in drought tolerance and flower opening time. Plant Prod Sci. 2022;25:359–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2022.2085589
  36. 36. Jarin AS, Islam MM, Rahat A, Ahmed S, Ghosh P, Murata Y. Drought stress tolerance in rice: Physiological and biochemical insights. Int J Plant Biol. 2024;15:692–718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb15030051
  37. 37. Jin Y, Dou W, Wang T, Jin Z, Wu S. An integrated meta-QTL and transcriptome analysis provides candidate genes associated with drought tolerance in rice seedlings. Plants. 2025;14:3645. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14233645
  38. 38. Khan P, Abdelbacki AM, Albaqami M, Jan R, Kim M. Proline promotes drought tolerance in maize. Biology. 2025;14:41. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14010041
  39. 39. Kim H, Jo H, Moon H, Yang Y, Baek K, Song S, et al. New insights into rice phenology: Discovering the effect of insolation on heading response. Physiol Plant. 2025;177. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70132
  40. 40. Kumar A, Dixit S, Ram T, Yadaw RB, Mishra KK, Mandal NP. Breeding high-yielding drought-tolerant rice: Genetic variations and conventional and molecular approaches. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:6265–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru363
  41. 41. Kumar A, Sandhu N, Dixit S, et al. Marker-assisted selection strategy to pyramid two or more QTLs for quantitative trait grain yield under drought. Rice. 2018;11:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-018-0227-0
  42. 42. Kumar P, Salam JL, Tigga K, Kumari P. Ephemeral rice breeding: A viable approach for upland water stress tolerance. Int J Agric Ext Soc Dev. 2024;7:3–7. https://doi.org/10.33545/26180723.2024.v7.i12Sa.1412
  43. 43. Lawas LMF, Shi W, Yoshimoto M, Hasegawa T, Hincha DK, Zuther E, et al. Combined drought and heat stress impact during flowering and grain filling in contrasting rice cultivars grown under field conditions. Field Crops Res. 2018;229:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.09.009
  44. 44. Li X, Chang Y, Ma S, Shen J, Hu H, Xiong L. Genome-wide identification of SNAC1-targeted genes involved in drought response in rice. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00982
  45. 45. Liao Z, Zhang Y, Yu Q, Fang W, Chen M, Li T, et al. Coordination of growth and drought responses by GA-ABA signaling in rice. New Phytol. 2023;240:1149–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19209
  46. 46. Ma Y, Tang M, Wang M, Yu Y, Ruan B. Advances in understanding drought stress responses in rice: Molecular mechanisms of ABA signaling and breeding prospects. Genes. 2024;15:1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15121529
  47. 47. Makhtoum S, Sabouri H, Gholizadeh A, Ahangar L, Katouzi M, Mastinu A. Genomics and physiology of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in Hordeum vulgare L. under drought and salt stresses. Plants. 2023;12:3515. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193515
  48. 48. Melandri G, AbdElgawad H, Floková K, Jamar DC, Asard H, Beemster GTS, et al. Drought tolerance in selected aerobic and upland rice varieties is driven by different metabolic and antioxidative responses. Planta. 2021;254:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-021-03659-4
  49. 49. Melandri G, AbdElgawad H, Riewe D, Hageman JA, Asard H, Beemster GTS, et al. Biomarkers for grain yield stability in rice under drought stress. J Exp Bot. 2019;71:669–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz221
  50. 50. Mishra SS, Behera PK, Kumar V, Lenka SK, Panda D. Physiological characterization and allelic diversity of selected drought-tolerant traditional rice (Oryza sativa L.) landraces of Koraput, India. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2018;24:1035–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-018-0606-4
  51. 51. MomohaIba C, Arloo Centeno C, Kitomi Y, Natividad MA, Quintana MR, Irie K, et al. QTL pyramiding reveals a crucial role of DEEPER ROOTING 1 on root system architecture adapted to drought stress in rice. Plant Root. 2025;19:13–29. https://doi.org/10.3117/plantroot.19.13
  52. 52. Mongiano G, Titone P, Pagnoncelli S, Sacco D, Tamborini L, Pilu R, et al. Phenotypic variability in Italian rice germplasm. Eur J Agron. 2020;120:126131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126131
  53. 53. Muthu V, Abbai R, Nallathambi J, Rahman H, Ramasamy S, Kambale R, et al. Pyramiding QTLs controlling tolerance against drought, salinity and submergence in rice through marker-assisted breeding. PLoS One. 2020;15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227421
  54. 54. Ndikuryayo C, Ndayiragije A, Kilasi N, Kusolwa P. Breeding for rice aroma and drought tolerance: A review. Agronomy. 2022;12:1726. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12071726
  55. 55. Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Samuel C, Fatai A, Magaji U, Kareem I, et al. Drought resistance in rice from conventional to molecular breeding: A review. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143519
  56. 56. Panda D, Mishra SS, Behera PK. Drought tolerance in rice: Focus on recent mechanisms and approaches. Rice Sci. 2021;28:119–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2021.01.002
  57. 57. Panja S, Gupta Dutta A, Dey N. Impact of drought stress on grain filling in rice and its management: A review. Agric Rev. 2024;45:282–89.
  58. 58. Passioura JB. The perils of pot experiments. Funct Plant Biol. 2006;33:1075–79. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP06223
  59. 59. Paul T, Debnath S, Das SP, Natarajan S, Perveen K, Alshaikh NA, et al. Identification of major and stable QTLs conferring drought tolerance in rice RIL populations. Curr Res Biotechnol. 2023;5:100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2023.100125
  60. 60. Qiao M, Hong C, Jiao Y, Hou S, Gao H. Impacts of drought on photosynthesis in major food crops and the related mechanisms of plant responses to drought. Plants. 2024;13:1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131808
  61. 61. Sadhukhan D, Mukherjee T, Sarkar A, Devi ND, Bisarya D, Kumar V, et al. Comprehensive analysis of drought stress responses in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Insights into developmental stage variations from germination to grain filling. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2024;14:141–58. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i74260
  62. 62. Sahebi M, Hanafi MM, Rafii MY, Mahmud TMM, Azizi P, Osman M, et al. Improvement of drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Genetics, genomic tools and the WRKY gene family. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:3158474. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3158474
  63. 63. Sahoo SK, Dash GK, Guhey A, Baig MJ, Barik M, Parida S, et al. Phenological, physiological and yield markers as efficient tools to identify drought-tolerant rice genotypes in eastern India [Preprint]. bioRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.29.122929
  64. 64. Sakoda K, Taniyoshi K, Yamori W, Tanaka Y. Drought stress reduces crop carbon gain due to delayed photosynthetic induction under fluctuating light conditions. Physiol Plant. 2022;174. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13603
  65. 65. Salgotra RK, Chauhan BS. Ecophysiological responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to drought and high temperature. Agronomy. 2023;13:1877. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071877
  66. 66. Salleh MS, Nordin MS, Puteh A, Shahari R, Zainuddin Z, Ab-Ghaffar MB, et al. Drought-induced changes in the flowering capacity, anthesis quality and seed set in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Trop Life Sci Res. 2022;33:11–22.
  67. 67. Seeli FDP, Manoharan M, Ayyenar B, Kambale R, Mohanavel V, Rajagopalan, et al. Genetic improvement of drought tolerance in a mega-rice variety Improved White Ponni through marker-assisted backcross breeding. Agriculture. 2024;14:431. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030431
  68. 68. Shah B, Yadav S, Khadka A, Dahal K, Neupane B, Bhandari S. Drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Impact, performance and recent trends. Selcuk J Agric Food Sci. 2024;38:169–81. https://doi.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2024.016
  69. 69. Silva AP, Alencar AA, Sudré CP, Araújo MD, Lobato AK. Brassinosteroids: Relevant evidence related to mitigation of abiotic and biotic stresses in plants. Agronomy. 2024;14:840. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040840
  70. 70. Singh SK, Katara JL, Parameswaran C, Jagadev PN, Bastia DN, Jeughale K, et al. Assessment of drought tolerance degree (DTD) method as a reliable tool for early-stage screening for drought tolerance in indica rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25:1630. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-07591-7
  71. 71. Subramanian S, Ramamoorthy P, Alagesan S, Amalraj JJ, Muthurajan R, Alagarsamy S, et al. Unraveling the genetic potential of Indian rice germplasm for reproductive stage drought tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1454299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1454299
  72. 72. Sun H, Sun X, Chen J, Deng X, Yong Y, Qin H, et al. Different types of meteorological drought and their impact on agriculture in Central China. J Hydrol. 2023;627:130423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130423
  73. 73. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. Water management for paddy cultivation. TNAU Agritech Expert System. n.d.
  74. 74. Taria S, Arora A, Kumar S, Krishna H, Meena S, Singh B, et al. Validation of stay-green and stem reserve mobilization QTLs: Physiological and gene expression approach. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1541944. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1541944
  75. 75. Tavu LEJ, Redillas MCFR. Oxidative stress in rice (Oryza sativa): Mechanisms, impact and adaptive strategies. Plants. 2025;14:1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14101463
  76. 76. Uga Y, Sugimoto K, Ogawa S, Rane J, Ishitani M, Hara N, et al. Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1097–1102. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2725
  77. 77. Varshney RK, Sinha P, Singh VK, Kumar A, Zhang Q, Bennetzen JL. 5Gs for crop genetic improvement. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2020;56:190–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2019.12.004
  78. 78. Venuprasad R, Dalid CO, Del Valle M, Zhao D, Espiritu M, Sta Cruz MT, et al. Identification and characterization of large-effect quantitative trait loci for grain yield under lowland drought stress in rice using bulk-segregant analysis. Theor Appl Genet. 2009;120:177–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1168-1
  79. 79. Wang X, Fu J, Min Z, Zou D, Liu H, Wang J, et al. Response of rice with overlapping growth stages to water stress by assimilates accumulation and transport and starch synthesis of superior and inferior grains. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:11157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911157
  80. 80. Wang X, Huang J, Peng S, Xiong D. Leaf rolling precedes stomatal closure in rice (Oryza sativa) under drought conditions. J Exp Bot. 2023;74:6650–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erad316
  81. 81. Wang Z, Li G, Sun H, Ma L, Guo Y, Zhao Z, et al. Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and photosynthetic electron transport chain in young apple tree leaves. Biol Open. 2018;7. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.035279
  82. 82. Wei H, Chen C, Ma X, Zhang Y, Han J, Mei H, et al. Comparative analysis of expression profiles of panicle development among tolerant and sensitive rice in response to drought stress. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00437
  83. 83. Xiang Y, Tang N, Du H, Ye H, Xiong L. Characterization of OsbZIP23 as a key player of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family for conferring abscisic acid sensitivity and salinity and drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. 2008;148:1938–52. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.128199
  84. 84. Yadav S, Sandhu N, Majumder RR, Dixit S, Kumar S, Singh SP, et al. Epistatic interactions of major-effect drought QTLs with genetic background loci determine grain yield of rice under drought stress. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2616. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39084-7
  85. 85. Yang X, Wang B, Chen L, Li P, Cao C. The different influences of drought stress at the flowering stage on rice physiological traits, grain yield and quality. Sci Rep. 2019;9:3742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40161-0
  86. 86. Yang X, Wang X, Li Y, Yang L, Hu L, Han Y, et al. Effects of drought stress at the booting stage on leaf physiological characteristics and yield of rice. Plants. 2024;13:3464. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13243464
  87. 87. Yi Y, Hassan MA, Cheng X, Li Y, Liu H, Fang W, et al. QTL mapping and analysis for drought tolerance in rice by genome-wide association study. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1223782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1223782

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.