Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Effect of weed management practices on growth and yield of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15424
Submitted
6 May 2026
Published
21-09-2026

Abstract

Weed interference is a major constraint to cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) productivity, especially during early crop establishment. A three-year field experiment (2020–23) was conducted at the Tapioca and Castor Research Station, Yethapur, Tamil Nadu, to evaluate the efficacy of eight integrated weed management practices under irrigated conditions in a randomised block design (RBD). Treatments included chemical, mechanical, cultural, manual and physical (mulching) approaches. Significant differences were observed among treatments for weed suppression, crop growth, tuber yield, starch content and economic returns. Black polythene mulch (30 µm) consistently achieved the highest weed control efficiency (WCE) (95.8 %), plant height (254.1 cm), tuber yield (37.4 t ha-1) and starch content (29.7 %). This treatment also recorded the highest net return (₹269200 ha-1) and benefit-cost ratio (B : C) (3.56), with tuber yield exceeding that of the unweeded control by more than threefold. Among non-plastic options, intercropping with sunnhemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) combined with mechanical weeding provided effective weed suppression and a high B : C (2.88). The findings demonstrate that integrating physical mulching and cultural-mechanical methods can enhance weed control, increase cassava yield and improve economic sustainability in irrigated tropical production systems.

References

  1. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2021. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
  2. 2. Njukwe E, Njukwe P, Ndindeng S, Ngome AF, Manyong V, Mbanya J. Cassava production and processing in tropical regions: recent advances. Trop Agric J. 2018;45(2):100–12.
  3. 3. Sundaresan S, Kumar V, Rajkumar R. Advances in cassava productivity in Tamil Nadu, India. Indian J Crop Sci. 2017;9(1):51–8.
  4. 4. Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2022. New Delhi: Government of India; 2022. https://agricoop.nic.in/en/statistics
  5. 5. Obiero J, Wambugu F, Oduor R. Industrial uses and economic importance of Manihot esculenta. J Ind Crops. 2020;34(4):300–9.
  6. 6. Adeyemi AA, Ogunyemi S, Fadina AO. Weed–crop competition and management in Manihot esculenta production. Weed Sci. 2016;64(2):345–52.
  7. 7. Uzozie C, Ibeawuchi II, Ezeh J. Critical weed-free period for Manihot esculenta in Nigeria. Afr J Agric Res. 2018;13(12):1205–13.
  8. 8. Sankaran M, Ramesh S, Perumal R. Effects of weed interference on Manihot esculenta yield and quality. Crop Prot. 2019;26(3):157–63.
  9. 9. Ravindran V, Sivakumar S, Jayaraman J. Cost and labour implications of manual weeding in Manihot esculenta. J Trop Agric. 2017;54(3):200–8.
  10. 10. Edet E, Udoh E, Otitoju G. Comparative studies on weed management strategies for Manihot esculenta. J Agric Sci. 2018;10(5):321–9.
  11. 11. Adewale BV, Ikuenobe CE, Uguru MI. Effect of mulching on weed control, soil properties and yield of Manihot esculenta. Field Crops Res. 2021;272:108275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108275
  12. 12. Nwogbaga AC, Odoemena CS, Wogu MD. Impact of plastic mulch on weed suppression and Manihot esculenta growth. Agric Biol J N Am. 2018;9(2):1–8.
  13. 13. Chikoye D, Manyong VM, Ekeleme F. Characteristics of weed suppression by different cover crops in Manihot esculenta systems. Crop Prot. 2017;103:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.09.007
  14. 14. Olorunmaiye PM, Olorunmaiye KS. Integrated weed management practices for sustainable Manihot esculenta production in Nigeria. J Crop Improv. 2019;33(4):482–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2019.1611877
  15. 15. Uwah DF, Iwo GA, Udoh EI. Effects of cover crops and tillage on weed control and yield of Manihot esculenta. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2022;68(3):382–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2021.1884994
  16. 16. Akanvou L, Agbede TM, Akinola MO. Economic analysis of weed management methods in root crops. J Plant Prot Res. 2019;59(3):389–98. https://doi.org/10.24425/jppr.2019.131262
  17. 17. Sanches MM, Albuquerque JAA, Silva JF, Rocha PRR, Alves JMA, Finoto, et al. Weed management in Manihot esculenta using herbicides: residual effects and crop safety. Planta Daninha. 2017;35:e017167106.
  18. 18. Ayeni AO, Ojeniyi SO. Mechanical and chemical weed control in Manihot esculenta: effects on weed flora and crop yield. Int J Agric Biol. 2019;21(6):1311–17. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.1158
  19. 19. Udensi EU, Ambe-Lamidi AI, Chikoye D. Integrated weed management improves Manihot esculenta yield in humid environments. Weed Sci. 2023;71(1):23–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2022.57
  20. 20. Ekanayake IJ, Lyocks JS. Mulching effects on Manihot esculenta physiology and yield. Exp Agric. 2020;56(2):273–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479720000165
  21. 21. Parwada C, Chirenje LS. Mulch and weed management: effects on soil moisture and crop productivity. Agriculture (Basel). 2021;11(6):510. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060510
  22. 22. Ibeawuchi II, Ofoh MC, Okoli NA. Manihot esculenta branching and yield as affected by weed management. Agron J. 2019;111(4):2021–27. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.09.0601
  23. 23. Okoye BC, Asumugha GN, Okechukwu RU. Influence of weed management on Manihot esculenta vegetative vigour and tuber yield. J Root Crops. 2018;44(1):34–41.
  24. 24. Fermont AM, van Asten PJ, Tittonell P. Improved resource use and Manihot esculenta yield with weed management. Field Crops Res. 2016;190:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.019
  25. 25. Ezike KN, Ezeaku IE. Effect of weed competition on photosynthesis and tuberization in Manihot esculenta. Afr J Agric Res. 2021;16(4):568–76. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2020.15385
  26. 26. Nwosu SC, Okonkwo SN, Ibeawuchi II. Soil moisture conservation under different mulches in Manihot esculenta. Soil Tillage Res. 2022;220:105376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2022.105376
  27. 27. Chikoye D, Udensi EU, Lum A. Biological weed management in Manihot esculenta: alternatives to plastic mulch. Agronomy. 2023;13(2):495. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020495
  28. 28. Ekeleme F, Chikoye D, Udensi EU. Prolonged weed competition and Manihot esculenta yield loss. Weed Technol. 2017;31(4):542–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.41
  29. 29. Adebisi MA, Ogunniyan DJ. Integrated weed management increases Manihot esculenta productivity. J Agric Sci Technol. 2020;22(1):1–13.
  30. 30. Ogundiran MB, Adesina JM. Weed management and starch content in Manihot esculenta storage roots. Food Chem. 2018;257:264–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.030
  31. 31. Iwuafor ENO, Ojeniyi SO. Herbicide timing and tuber bulking in cassava. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2022;68(2):233–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2021.1879071
  32. 32. Umeh VC, Okoye BC. Commercial starch content in cassava under different management. Ind Crops Prod. 2017;108:776–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.07.058
  33. 33. Eze SC, Omodamiro RM, Okoye BC. Factors affecting cassava starch accumulation. J Plant Nutr. 2020;43(5):647–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1702200
  34. 34. Adeosun JO, Olayiwola MO. Economic returns of weed control strategies in cassava. Niger J Weed Sci. 2016;29:87–97.
  35. 35. Umeh VC, Okoye BC. Yield and profitability analysis of cassava weed management. J Agric Econ. 2019;70(2):233–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12345
  36. 36. Okafor LC, Nweke F. Labour requirements in manual and alternative weed controls in cassava. Outlook Agric. 2021;50(3):232–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270211030156
  37. 37. Aniedu C, Omodamiro RM. Labour-saving integrated weed management practices. Int J Agric Res. 2022;17(1):41–49. https://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijar.2022.41.49
  38. 38. Steinmetz Z, Wollmann C, Schaefer M, Buchmann C, David J, Tröger J, et al. Plastic mulching in agriculture: environmental impacts and solutions. Sci Total Environ. 2016;550:690–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.144
  39. 39. Qi Y, Yang X, Pelaez AM. Microplastics in agricultural soils: sources and impacts. Sci Total Environ. 2020;742:140523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140523
  40. 40. Kasirajan S, Ngouajio M. Polythene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: a review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2018;38:2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0477-3
  41. 41. Moreno MM, Moreno A. Biodegradable and organic mulches as alternatives. Agronomy. 2020;10(2):281. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020281
  42. 42. Heap I. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. 2023.
  43. 43. Chauhan BS, Mahajan G. Herbicide resistance: status and management. Crop Prot. 2019;124:104837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.104837
  44. 44. Bajwa AA, Sadia S, Bhowmik PC. Integrated weed management: tools and approaches. Crop Prot. 2020;133:105166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105166
  45. 45. Njukwe E, Hauser S. Mulching strategies for improved cassava yield and weed management. Exp Agric. 2022;58(1):135–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479721000190
  46. 46. Udensi EU, Chikoye D. Sunnhemp and mechanical weeding as alternatives to polythene mulch in cassava. Weed Technol. 2020;34(4):502–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2020.23

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.