Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Effect of crop geometry and nutrient levels on productivity of transplanted finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) under irrigated conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15534
Submitted
13 May 2026
Published
20-07-2026

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2025–26 at SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, Tamil Nadu, India, to study the effects of crop geometry and nutrient management practices for transplanted finger millet in irrigated conditions. The experiment was laid out in a split plot design with 3 replications. The finger millet variety ATL-1 was transplanted at 21 days after sowing (DAS). Growth, physiological, yield attributes and yield parameters were recorded during the crop period. Among the treatments, 30 × 10 cm spacing combined with split application of 50 % recommended dose of fertilisers (RDF) at basal + 25 % at active tillering + 25 % at flowering recorded superior growth and physiological performance, including higher plant height, dry matter production, tiller count, leaf area index and chlorophyll content. The same treatment also produced higher yield attributes and recorded maximum grain yield (1415 kg ha-1), straw yield (4330 kg ha-1). The study indicated that optimum crop geometry combined with split nutrient application enhanced growth, physiological efficiency and yield of transplanted finger millet under irrigated conditions. The heatmap analysis based on normalised values further confirmed that the M1S3 treatment exhibited the best overall performance across all observed growth, yield attributes and yield parameters.

References

  1. 1. Indiastat. Agricultural data, land use domain. https://www.indiastat.com. Accessed 2025.
  2. 2. Raturi A, Meena H, Badoni A. An agronomic review of finger millet (Eleusine coracana): adaptability, nutritional value and importance for sustainable agriculture. Asian J Adv Agric Res. 2026;26(3):1–9. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaar/2026/v26i3713
  3. 3. Jayawardana SAS, Samarasekera JKRR, Hettiarachchi GHCM, Gooneratne J, Choudhary MI, Jabeen A. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) varieties cultivated in Sri Lanka. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:7744961. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7744961
  4. 4. Gopinath KA, Prabhakar M, Sravan US, Kumar GS, Thirupathi M, Samba Siva G. Potential for yield and soil fertility improvement with integration of organics in nutrient management for finger millet under rainfed Alfisols of Southern India. Front Nutr. 2023;10:1095449. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1095449
  5. 5. Reddy ES, Singh A. Effect of spacing and potassium levels on growth and yield of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.). Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ Sci. 2021;23(2):158–62.
  6. 6. Kumar KN, Shiva KN, Bharathi C. Growth and yield of finger millet as influenced by planting geometry, age of seedlings and manure levels. Biol Forum Int J. 2022;14(4):118–22.
  7. 7. Padmaja M, Awasarmal VB, Kausalye SP, Rajkumar Y. Studies on effect of crop geometry and fertilizer levels on growth and yield of kharif finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn.). Int J Res Agron. 2024;7(12):519–22. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2024.v7.i12g.2204
  8. 8. Pandey SR, Singh AK, Tiwari H, Tiwari A. Effect of age of seedlings and planting geometry on growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2021;10(1):194–97. https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2021.v10.i1c.13306
  9. 9. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1984.
  10. 10. Zhao S, Guo Y, Sheng Q, Shyr Y. Heatmap3: an improved heatmap package with more powerful and convenient features. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15(Suppl 10):P16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-S10-P16
  11. 11. Aliveni A, Latha P, Elamathi S, Ravikesavan R. Effect of crop geometry and nutrient management approaches on yield and quality of transplanted finger millet. Indian J Agric Res. 2025;59(2):234–8. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-6029
  12. 12. Sai Aparna N, Karthikeyan PG. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn.). Mysore J Agric Sci. 2023;57(3):266–75.
  13. 13. Yadava C, Shekhawat K, Rathore SS, Mandi S, Baisya LK, Kumar V. Sustainable nutrient solutions: enhancing finger millet growth and yield through integrated nutrient management. Ann Agric Res. 2025;46(3):269–74.
  14. 14. Natarajan S, Thamizhan P, Parameswari C, Balakrishnan M. Effect of spacing and nutrient sources on system of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) intensification. Indian J Agron. 2019;64(1):98–102. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v64i1.5240
  15. 15. Aravind SAS, Senthil Kumar N, Hemalatha M, Paramasivan M. Impact on soil health under organic nutrient management in transplanted finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2022;34:1399–406. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2231512

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.