Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Cyclic and non-ribosomal microbial metabolites in the biological control of plant pathogens

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15639
Submitted
20 May 2026
Published
30-08-2026

Abstract

Cyclic and non-ribosomal microbial metabolites are important bioactive secondary metabolites with significant potential in sustainable plant disease management. These metabolites are primarily produced by beneficial microorganisms including Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Streptomyces through non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS)-mediated biosynthetic pathways. This narrative review summarises the structural diversity, biosynthesis, mechanisms of action, detection methods and agricultural applications of cyclic and non-ribosomal microbial metabolites in the biological control of plant pathogens. Among these metabolites, surfactins, iturins, fengycins, bacillomycins and amphisins are the most extensively studied compounds due to their broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities. These metabolites exhibit strong inhibitory effects against major phytopathogens including Fusarium, Alternaria, Rhizoctonia and Magnaporthe oryzae, with disease suppression efficiencies ranging from 40 to 90 % under in-vitro and in-planta conditions. Iturin and fengycin have demonstrated 65 to 90 % inhibition against Fusarium species, whereas surfactin- and fengycin-producing strains have been reported to reduce rice blast severity by 40 to 70 %. Their amphiphilic structures enable membrane permeabilisation, pore formation, inhibition of spore germination and disruption of pathogen growth. In addition to direct antimicrobial activity, these metabolites promote biofilm formation, rhizosphere colonisation and induced systemic resistance mediated through jasmonic acid, ethylene and salicylic acid dependent pathways. Despite promising biocontrol potential, challenges related to large-scale production, formulation stability and field-level consistency remain major limitations for commercialisation.

References

  1. 1. Negi M, Sharma S, Sharma U, Kumar P, Sharma U, Sharma K. Aspects of the current and prospective sustainable usage of nano fertilizers in agriculture and their effects on health of the soil: an updated review. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2023;23(1):594–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-01068-4
  2. 2. Akhtar MS, Siddiqui ZA. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in biocontrol of plant diseases and sustainable agriculture. In: Maheshwari DK, editor. Plant growth and health promoting bacteria. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2010. p. 157–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13612-2_7
  3. 3. Maksimov IV, Singh BP, Cherepanova EA, Burkhanova GF, Khairullin RM. Prospects and applications of lipopeptide-producing bacteria for plant protection. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology. 2020;56(1):15–28. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683820010135
  4. 4. Ongena M, Jacques P. Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends in Microbiology. 2008;16(3):115–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.009
  5. 5. Tran C, Cock IE, Chen X, Feng Y. Antimicrobial Bacillus: metabolites and their mode of action. Antibiotics. 2022;11(1):88. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010088
  6. 6. Saiyam D, Dubey A, Malla MA, Kumar A. Lipopeptides from Bacillus: unveiling biotechnological prospects-sources, properties and diverse applications. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2024;55(1):281–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-023-01228-3
  7. 7. Yaraguppi DA, Bagewadi ZK, Patil NR, Mantri N. Iturin: a promising cyclic lipopeptide with diverse applications. Biomolecules. 2023;13(10):1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13101515
  8. 8. Valenzuela Ruiz V, Gándara-Ledezma A, Villarreal-Delgado MF, Villa-Rodríguez ED, Parra-Cota FI, Santoyo G, et al. Regulation, biosynthesis and extraction of Bacillus-derived lipopeptides and its implications in biological control of phytopathogens. Stresses. 2024;4(1):107–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4010007
  9. 9. Silva MD, Medeiros AO, Converti A, Almeida FC, Sarubbo LA. Biosurfactants: promising biomolecules for agricultural applications. Sustainability. 2024;16(1):449. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010449
  10. 10. Kenawy A, Dailin DJ, Abo-Zaid GA, Malek RA, Ambehabati KK, Zakaria KH, et al. Biosynthesis of antibiotics by PGPR and their roles in biocontrol of plant diseases. In: Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable stress management. Vol. 2, Rhizobacteria in biotic stress management. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2019. p. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6536-2_1
  11. 11. Raaijmakers JM, De Bruijn I, De Kock MJ. Cyclic lipopeptide production by plant-associated Pseudomonas spp.: diversity, activity, biosynthesis and regulation. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2006;19(7):699–710. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-19-0699
  12. 12. Roongsawang N, Washio K, Morikawa M. Diversity of nonribosomal peptide synthetases involved in the biosynthesis of lipopeptide biosurfactants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2010;12(1):141–72. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12010141
  13. 13. Peypoux F, Besson F, Michel G, Delcambe L. Structure of bacillomycin D, a new antibiotic of the iturin group. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1981;118(2):323–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb06406.x
  14. 14. Huang Z, Peng Z, Zhang M, Li X, Qiu X. Structure, function and engineering of the nonribosomal peptide synthetase condensation domain. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024;25(21):11774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252111774
  15. 15. Zhang B, Dong C, Shang Q, Han Y, Li P. New insights into membrane-active action in plasma membrane of fungal hyphae by the lipopeptide antibiotic bacillomycin L. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes. 2013;1828(9):2230–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.04.011
  16. 16. Jin P, Wang H, Tan Z, Xuan Z, Dahar GY, Li QX, et al. Antifungal mechanism of bacillomycin D from Bacillus velezensis HN-2 against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2020;163:102–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.11.004
  17. 17. Yuan QS, Yang P, Liu YK, Tabl KM, Guo MW, Zhang JB, et al. Iturin and fengycin lipopeptides inhibit pathogenic Fusarium by targeting multiple components of the cell membrane and their regulative effects in wheat. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2025;67(8):2184–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13933
  18. 18. Markelova N, Chumak A. Antimicrobial activity of Bacillus cyclic lipopeptides and their role in the host adaptive response to changes in environmental conditions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025;26(1):336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26010336
  19. 19. Qiao J, Borriss R, Sun K, Zhang R, Chen X, Liu Y, et al. Research advances in the identification of regulatory mechanisms of surfactin production by Bacillus: a review. Microbial Cell Factories. 2024;23(1):100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-024-02372-7
  20. 20. Qi X, Liu W, He X, Du C. A review on surfactin: molecular regulation of biosynthesis. Archives of Microbiology. 2023;205(9):313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-023-03652-3
  21. 21. Ito K, Adachi M, Matsutani M, Kataoka R, Enomoto G, Kajikawa A, et al. Characterization of the NRPS operon homolog for surfactin A and surfactin C synthesis in Bacillus spp. Archives of Microbiology. 2025;207(7):161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-025-04341-z
  22. 22. Zhou H, Cong B, Tian Y, He Y, Yang H. Characterization of novel cyclic lipopeptides produced by Bacillus sp. SY27F. Process Biochemistry. 2019;83:206–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.05.019
  23. 23. Wang J, Qiu J, Yang X, Yang J, Zhao S, Zhou Q, et al. Identification of lipopeptide Iturin A produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NCPSJ7 and its antifungal activities against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum. Foods. 2022;11(19):2996. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11192996
  24. 24. Yuan Y, Chu D, Fan J, Cui Z, Wang R, Zhang H, et al. Production of antifungal iturins from vegetable straw: a combined chemical-bacterial process. Bioresource Technology. 2023;378:129010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129010
  25. 25. Jiang C, Li Z, Shi Y, Guo D, Pang B, Chen X, et al. Bacillus subtilis inhibits Aspergillus carbonarius by producing iturin A, which disturbs the transport, energy metabolism and osmotic pressure of fungal cells as revealed by transcriptomics analysis. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2020;330:108783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108783
  26. 26. Zhang A, Yang B, Ma Y, Li R, Zhou Z, Luo C, et al. Improving the bacillomycin L production in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens by atmospheric and room-temperature plasma combined with Box-Behnken design. Microbial Cell Factories. 2025;24(1):144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-025-02774-1
  27. 27. Duitman EH, Hamoen LW, Rembold M, Venema G, Seitz H, Saenger W, et al. The mycosubtilin synthetase of Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633: a multifunctional hybrid between a peptide synthetase, an amino transferase and a fatty acid synthase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999;96(23):13294–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.23.13294
  28. 28. Sun J, Liu Y, Lin F, Lu Z, Lu Y. CodY, ComA, DegU and Spo0A controlling lipopeptides biosynthesis in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FMBJ. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2021;131(3):1289–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15092
  29. 29. Wang Y, Zhang C, Liang J, Wu L, Gao W, Jiang J. Iturin A extracted from Bacillus subtilis WL-2 affects Phytophthora infestans via cell structure disruption, oxidative stress and energy supply dysfunction. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;11:536083. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.536083
  30. 30. Vanittanakom N, Loeffler W, Koch U, Jung G. Fengycin: a novel antifungal lipopeptide antibiotic produced by Bacillus subtilis F-29-3. Journal of Antibiotics. 1986;39(7):888–901. https://doi.org/10.7164/antibiotics.39.888
  31. 31. Chen L, Gong B, Wu X, Liu H, Gao X, Li J, et al. Fengycin-producing Bacillus subtilis alleviate strawberry fusarium wilt disease by activating microbial community structure. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2025:106877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2025.106877
  32. 32. Armenova N, Petrova P, Gerginova M, Krumova E, Kaynarov D, Velkova L, et al. Bacillus velezensis R22 inhibits the growth of multiple fungal phytopathogens by producing surfactin and four fengycin homologues. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2024;38(1):2313072. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2024.2313072
  33. 33. Fanaei M, Jurcic K, Emtiazi G. Detection of simultaneous production of kurstakin, fengycin and surfactin lipopeptides in Bacillus mojavensis using a novel gel-based method and MALDI-TOF spectrometry. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2021;37(6):97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-021-03064-9
  34. 34. Xuan Z, Wang Y, Shen Y, Pan X, Wang J, Liu W, et al. Bacillus velezensis HN-2: a potent antiviral agent against pepper veinal mottle virus. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2024;15:1403202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1403202
  35. 35. He P, Cui W, Munir S, He P, Huang R, Li X, et al. Fengycin produced by Bacillus subtilis XF-1 plays a major role in the biocontrol of Chinese cabbage clubroot via direct effect and defense stimulation. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2024;239(10):e30991. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.30991
  36. 36. Zhang L, Sun C. Fengycins, cyclic lipopeptides from marine Bacillus subtilis strains, kill the plant-pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe grisea by inducing reactive oxygen species production and chromatin condensation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2018;84(18):e00445-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00445-18
  37. 37. Deng YJ, Chen Z, Ruan CQ, Xiao RF, Lian HP, Liu B, et al. Antifungal activities of Bacillus velezensis FJAT-52631 and its lipopeptides against anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum acutatum. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2023;63(6):594–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.202200566
  38. 38. Rahman M. Bacillus spp.: a promising biocontrol agent of root, foliar and postharvest diseases of plants. In: Singh HB, Sarma BK, Keswani C, editors. Bacilli and agrobiotechnology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 113–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44409-3_6
  39. 39. Nifakos K, Tsalgatidou PC, Thomloudi EE, Skagia A, Kotopoulis D, Baira E, et al. Genomic analysis and secondary metabolites production of the endophytic Bacillus velezensis Bvel1: a biocontrol agent against Botrytis cinerea causing bunch rot in post-harvest table grapes. Plants. 2021;10(8):1716. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081716
  40. 40. Sørensen D, Nielsen TH, Christophersen C, Soerensen J, Gajhede M. Cyclic lipoundecapeptide amphisin from Pseudomonas sp. strain DSS73. Crystal Structure Communications. 2001;57(9):1123–4. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270101010782
  41. 41. Koch B, Nielsen TH, Sørensen D, Andersen JB, Christophersen C, Molin S, et al. Lipopeptide production in Pseudomonas sp. strain DSS73 is regulated by components of sugar beet seed exudate via the Gac two-component regulatory system. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002;68(9):4509–16. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.9.4509-4516.2002
  42. 42. Ciurko D, Grzywacz A, Hyla K, Kancelista A, Janek T. Antifungal activity and mycotoxin-inhibiting potential of amphisin and rhamnolipids from Pseudomonas strains. Scientific Reports. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-31914-1
  43. 43. De Bruijn I, Raaijmakers JM. Diversity and functional analysis of LuxR-type transcriptional regulators of cyclic lipopeptide biosynthesis in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2009;75(14):4753–61. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00575-09
  44. 44. Riera N, Davyt D, Durán R, Iraola G, Lemanceau P, Bajsa N. An antibiotic produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens CFBP2392 with antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia solani. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2023;14:1286926. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1286926
  45. 45. Sheng J, Qin X, Yang X, Liu Q, Ma Z. The biocontrol roles of cyclic lipopeptide putisolvin produced from Pseudomonas capeferrum HN2-3 on the Phytophthora blight disease in cucumbers. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. 2024;131(2):423–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-00874-5
  46. 46. Gotze S, Herbst-Irmer R, Klapper M, Görls H, Schneider KR, Barnett R, et al. Structure, biosynthesis and biological activity of the cyclic lipopeptide anikasin. ACS Chemical Biology. 2017;12(10):2498–502. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.7b00589
  47. 47. Gu YL, Li JZ, Li Y, Cong S, Wang J, Ma YN, et al. Pseudomonas cyclic lipopeptide medpeptin: biosynthesis and modulation of plant immunity. Engineering. 2023;28:153–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.10.018
  48. 48. Tsuge K, Inoue S, Ano T, Itaya M, Shoda M. Horizontal transfer of iturin A operon, itu, to Bacillus subtilis 168 and conversion into an iturin A producer. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2005;49(11):4641–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.11.4641-4648.2005
  49. 49. Singh S, Nwagwu E, Young L, Kumar P, Shinde PB, Edrada-Ebel R. Targeted isolation of antibiofilm compounds from halophytic endophyte Bacillus velezensis 7NPB-3B using LC-HR-MS-based metabolomics. Microorganisms. 2024;12(2):413. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12020413
  50. 50. Yan G, Zhou L, Xu Y, Xia H, Tian Y, Yu C. Influence of global regulatory factors on fengycin synthesis by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens TF28. Fermentation. 2026;12(2):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12020072
  51. 51. Yakimov MM, Kröger A, Slepak TN, Giuliano L, Timmis KN, Golyshin PN. A putative lichenysin A synthetase operon in Bacillus licheniformis: initial characterization. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Gene Structure and Expression. 1998;1399(2-3):141–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4781(98)00096-7
  52. 52. Qiu Y, Xiao F, Wei X, Wen Z, Chen S. Improvement of lichenysin production in Bacillus licheniformis by replacement of native promoter of lichenysin biosynthesis operon and medium optimization. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2014;98(21):8895–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5978-y
  53. 53. Duitman EH, Wyczawski D, Boven LG, Venema G, Kuipers OP, Hamoen LW. Novel methods for genetic transformation of natural Bacillus subtilis isolates used to study the regulation of the mycosubtilin and surfactin synthetases. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73(11):3490–6. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02751-06
  54. 54. Bugert P, Geider K. Molecular analysis of the ams operon required for exopolysaccharide synthesis of Erwinia amylovora. Molecular Microbiology. 1995;15(5):917–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02361.x
  55. 55. Alsohim AS, Taylor TB, Barrett GA, Gallie J, Zhang XX, Altamirano-Junqueira AE, et al. The biosurfactant viscosin produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 aids spreading motility and plant growth promotion. Environmental Microbiology. 2014;16(7):2267–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12469
  56. 56. Ye L, Hildebrand F, Dingemans J, Ballet S, Laus G, Matthijs S, et al. Draft genome sequence analysis of a Pseudomonas putida W15Oct28 strain with antagonistic activity to Gram-positive and Pseudomonas sp. pathogens. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e110038. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110038
  57. 57. Scholz-Schroeder BK, Hutchison ML, Grgurina I, Gross DC. The contribution of syringopeptin and syringomycin to virulence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae strain B301D on the basis of sypA and syrB1 biosynthesis mutant analysis. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2001;14(3):336–48. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.3.336
  58. 58. Bender CL, Alarcón-Chaidez F, Gross DC. Pseudomonas syringae phytotoxins: mode of action, regulation and biosynthesis by peptide and polyketide synthetases. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 1999;63(2):266–92. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.63.2.266-292.1999
  59. 59. Wang H. Exploration of the secondary metabolites in Aspergillus ustus and their biosynthesis. Philipps-Universität Marburg; 2025.
  60. 60. Zhu H, Wu S, Tang S, Xu J, He Y, Ren Z, et al. Isolation, identification and characterization of biopotential cyclic lipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis strain JN005 and its antifungal activity against rice pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae. Biological Control. 2023;182:105241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2023.105241
  61. 61. Zhao Q, Ali Q, Yuan W, Zhang G, Li H, Zhou L, et al. Role of iturin from Bacillus velezensis DMW1 in suppressing growth and pathogenicity of Plectosphaerella cucumerina in tomato by reshaping the rhizosphere microbial communities. Microbiological Research. 2025;296:128150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2025.128150
  62. 62. Ding N, Dong H, Ongena M. Bacterial cyclic lipopeptides as triggers of plant immunity and systemic resistance against pathogens. Plants. 2025;14(17):2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172644
  63. 63. Sampathkumar A, Aiyanathan KE, Nakkeeran S, Manickam S. Multifaceted Bacillus spp. for the management of cotton bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas citri pv. malvacearum. Biological Control. 2023;177:105111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105111
  64. 64. Ding LN, Li YT, Wu YZ, Li T, Geng R, Cao J, et al. Plant disease resistance-related signalling pathways: recent progress and future prospects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23(24):16200. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416200
  65. 65. Oni FE, Geudens N, Adiobo A, Omoboye OO, Enow EA, Onyeka JT, et al. Biosynthesis and antimicrobial activity of pseudodesmin and viscosinamide cyclic lipopeptides produced by pseudomonads associated with the cocoyam rhizosphere. Microorganisms. 2020;8(7):1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8071079
  66. 66. Isaia HA, Clerici NJ, Brandelli A. Bacillus lipopeptides as versatile antimicrobial weapons: looking toward antiviral activity. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2025;45(8):1559–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2025.2499152
  67. 67. Ghanaim AM, Mahmoud GA, Mohamed HI, Hanafy RS, Zaki LM, Mahmoud M, et al. Bacillus subtilis and chitosan nanoparticles enhance potato virus Y (PVY) tolerance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) via modulation of antioxidants and secondary metabolites. BMC Plant Biology. 2025;25(1):1613. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-07617-0
  68. 68. Beris D, Kotsaridis K, Orfanidou C, Dimopoulou A, Varveri C, Vassilakos N, et al. Elucidating the differential antiviral action of a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium against three genetically distant virus species. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2026;17:1778459. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2026.1778459
  69. 69. Zhang L, Shao L, Wang B, Zhang B, Li Y, Song S, et al. Genome and antimicrobial compounds analysis of Bacillus subtilis M51 as a potential biocontrol agent against Fusarium oxysporum. BMC Genomics. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-12827-3
  70. 70. Harish BN, Nagesha SN, Ramesh BN, Shyamalamma S, Nagaraj MS, Girish HC, et al. Molecular characterization and antifungal activity of lipopeptides produced from Bacillus subtilis against plant fungal pathogen Alternaria alternata. BMC Microbiology. 2023;23(1):179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02922-w
  71. 71. Hazarika DJ, Goswami G, Gautom T, Parveen A, Das P, Barooah M, et al. Lipopeptide mediated biocontrol activity of endophytic Bacillus subtilis against fungal phytopathogens. BMC Microbiology. 2019;19(1):71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1440-8
  72. 72. Hu Y, Yang X, Wu H, Li Q, Xiao G, Wu F, et al. Biocontrol of tobacco bacterial wilt by Bacillus velezensis Y19: insights into chemotaxis, competition and antagonism. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. 2026:103140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2026.103140
  73. 73. Hossain A, Islam Masum MM, Wu X, Abdallah Y, Ogunyemi SO, Wang Y, et al. Screening of Bacillus strains in biocontrol of pathogen Dickeya dadantii causing stem and root rot disease of sweet potato. Biocontrol Science and Technology. 2020;30(11):1180–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2020.1798356
  74. 74. Pal G, Saxena S, Kumar K, Verma A, Kumar D, Shukla P, et al. Seed endophytic bacterium Bacillus velezensis and its lipopeptides acts as elicitors of defense responses against Fusarium verticillioides in maize seedlings. Plant and Soil. 2023;492(1):109–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06152-x
  75. 75. Cho YT, Ting HM, Wang BW, Tsai YC, Wang HY, Yang YL, et al. Integrating genomics and targeted metabolite profiling to elucidate disease-suppression mechanisms of Bacillus velezensis GFB08. Current Research in Microbial Sciences. 2025:100503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100503
  76. 76. Groboillot A, Portet-Koltalo F, Le Derf F, Feuilloley MJ, Orange N, Poc CD. Novel application of cyclolipopeptide amphisin: feasibility study as additive to remediate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contaminated sediments. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2011;12(3):1787–806. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12031787
  77. 77. Gu Y, Ma YN, Wang J, Xia Z, Wei HL. Genomic insights into a plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas koreensis strain with cyclic lipopeptide-mediated antifungal activity. Microbiology Open. 2020;9(9):e1092. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1092
  78. 78. Warrior P, Konduru K, Vasudevan P. Formulation of biological control agents for pest and disease management. In: Biological control of crop diseases. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2002. p. 435–56.
  79. 79. Vidhya CS, Swamy GN, Das A, Noopur K, Vedulla M. Cyclic lipopeptides from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PPL: antifungal mechanisms and their role in controlling pepper and tomato diseases. Microbiology Archives, an International Journal. 2023. https://doi.org/10.51470/MA.2023.5.2.1
  80. 80. Chen W, Wang M, Gong Y, Deng Q, Zheng M, Chen S, et al. The unconventional adverse effects of fungal pretreatment on iturin A fermentation by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CX-20. Microbial Biotechnology. 2021;14(2):587–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13658

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.