Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Evaluation of potassium fractions and fixation capacity in inceptisol of Tamil Nadu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15705
Submitted
26 May 2026
Published
01-09-2026

Abstract

Potassium (K) plays an important role in maintaining plant health by regulating stomatal movement, enhancing water retention and activating enzymes. It is an essential macronutrient whose availability depends on the distribution and transformation of different K fractions in soil. Although soils contain substantial quantities of K, only a small proportion is readily available for plant uptake. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate K fractions, K fixation capacity and their interrelationships in a soil belonging to the inceptisol order. Surface soil samples were collected from SRM College of Agricultural Science, Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India. An incubation experiment was conducted using a factorial completely randomised design (FCRD) with three replications. A total of seven treatments were evaluated, comprising a distilled-water control, five potassium chloride (KCl) application levels (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 mg K kg-1 soil) and an absolute control (no water). Soil samples were collected at 0, 10 ,20 ,30 ,40 and 50 days after incubation (DAI). Potassium fractions were determined using water extraction for water-soluble K, neutral 1 N NH₄OAc extraction for exchangeable K, boiling HNO₃ extraction for non- exchangeable K and acid digestion for total K. Potassium levels, incubation periods and acid digestion for total K. Potassium levels, incubation periods and their interactions significantly influenced K fractions (p < 0.001). Available K increased from 69.31–759.93 mg K kg-1 soil, while water-soluble K ranged from 92.30–292.33 mg K kg-1 soil. Non-exchangeable K varied from 68.60–109.60 mg K kg-1 soil, indicating the formation of reserve K pools following K application. The highest available K concentration was observed under the 100 mg K kg-1 treatment. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that K levels, incubation period and their interaction significantly influenced all K fractions (p < 0.001). Correlation analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between available K and non -exchangeable K (r = 0.69), suggesting that the non-exchangeable pool acts as a buffer or reserve K fraction for maintaining K availability. Potassium fixation capacity showed negative correlations with total K (r = -0.27) and non-exchangeable K (r = -0.17). X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis confirmed the presence of clay minerals contributing to K fixation and release dynamics. Principal component analysis (PCA) explained 74.4 % of the total variation, distinguishing dynamic K pools from relatively stable K forms. The findings highlight the dynamic equilibrium among K fractions in inceptisol soil order and emphasise the importance of balanced K management for sustaining soil fertility and crop productivity.

References

  1. 1. Helmke PA, Sparks DL. Potassium, rubidium and cesium. In: Sparks DL, editor. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3: Chemical Methods. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America; 2000. p. 551–74. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c19
  2. 2. Sparks DL. Environmental Soil Chemistry. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012656446-4/50001-3
  3. 3. Usherwood NR. The role of potassium in crop quality. In: Munson RD, editor. Potassium in Agriculture. Madison (WI): ASA-CSSA-SSSA; 1985. p. 489–513. https://doi.org/10.2134/1985.potassium.c21
  4. 4. Pettigrew WT. Potassium influences on yield and quality production for maize, wheat, soybean and cotton. Physiol Plant. 2008;133(4):670–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01073.x
  5. 5. Zörb C, Senbayram M, Peiter E. Potassium in agriculture—Status and perspectives. J Plant Physiol. 2014;171(9):656–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.08.008
  6. 6. Sparks DL. Bioavailability of soil potassium. In: Sumner ME, editor. Handbook of Soil Science. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2000.
  7. 7. Srinivasarao C, Rupar TR, Subba Rao A. Potassium availability and fixation in Indian soils. Indian J Fert. 2014;10(9):44–53.
  8. 8. Datta SC, Sastry TG. Potassium threshold levels in relation to potassium release and reserve in soils. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2005;53(3):268–75.
  9. 9. Havlin JL, Tisdale SL, Nelson WL, Beaton JD. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers: An Introduction to Nutrient Management. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2014.
  10. 10. Brady NC, Weil RR. The Nature and Properties of Soils. 15th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2017.
  11. 11. Kaur R. Potassium dynamics in soils and its availability to plants. Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(4):2345–50.
  12. 12. Sparks DL, Huang PM. Physical chemistry of soil potassium. In: Munson RD, editor. Potassium in Agriculture. Madison (WI): ASA-CSSA-SSSA; 1985. p. 201–76. https://doi.org/10.2134/1985.potassium.c9
  13. 13. Dhaliwal SS, Naresh RK, Mandal A, Singh R, Dhaliwal MK. Dynamics and transformations of potassium in soils under different nutrient management practices: A review. Agronomy. 2021;11(4):757.
  14. 14. Panda R, Patra SK, Sengupta S. Assessment of the potassium supplying capacity of coastal Entisols and Inceptisols under intensive cropping and fertilization. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2022;53(21):2878–91. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2094943
  15. 15. Römheld V, Kirkby EA. Research on potassium in agriculture: Needs and prospects. Plant Soil. 2010;335:155–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0520-1
  16. 16. Mengel K, Kirkby EA. Principles of Plant Nutrition. 5th ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1009-2
  17. 17. Beckett PHT. Studies on soil potassium. I. Confirmation of the ratio law: Measurement of potassium potential. J Soil Sci. 1964;15(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1964.tb00239.x
  18. 18. Wood LK, DeTurk EE. The absorption of potassium in soils in non-replaceable forms. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc. 1941;6:152–61. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1941.036159950005000C0026x
  19. 19. Pratt PF. Potassium. In: Black CA, Evans DD, White JL, Ensminger LE, Clark FE, editors. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison (WI): American Society of Agronomy; 1965. p. 1019–30.
  20. 20. Jackson ML. Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India; 1973.
  21. 21. Volk GW. The nature of potash fixation in soils. Soil Sci. 1945;59(2):163–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194502000-00006
  22. 22. Wakeel A, Ishfaq M. Potassium dynamics in soils. In: Wakeel A, Ishfaq M, editors. Potash Use and Dynamics in Agriculture. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6883-8_2
  23. 23. Olaniyan FT, Alori ET, Adekiya AO, Ayorinde BB, Daramola FY, Osemwegie OO, et al. The use of soil microbial potassium solubilizers in potassium nutrient availability in soil and its dynamics. Ann Microbiol. 2022;72:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13213-022-01701-8
  24. 24. Dotaniya CK, Lakaria BL, Sharma Y, Meena BP, Wanjari RH, Shirale AO, et al. Potassium fractions in black soil mediated by integrated nutrient management modules under maize–chickpea cropping sequence. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0292221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292221
  25. 25. Das D, Sahoo J, Raza MB, Barman M, Das R. Ongoing soil potassium depletion under intensive cropping in India and probable mitigation strategies: A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2022;42:4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00728-6
  26. 26. Yahaya SM, Mahmud AA, Abdullahi M, Haruna A. Recent advances in the chemistry of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium as fertilizers in soil: A review. Pedosphere. 2023;33(3):385–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedsph.2022.07.012
  27. 27. Deb P. Potassium dynamics under different soil orders in India: A review. Ecol Environ Conserv. 2023;29(Suppl):S373–82.
  28. 28. Anila AS, Joseph B, Rani B, Gladis R, Gopinath PP. Potassium fractions and release from mineral sources of potassium as influenced by potassium-solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus sporothermodurans). Curr J Appl Sci Technol. 2022;41(27):21–31. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2022/v41i2731784
  29. 29. Linquist BA, Campbell JC, Southard RJ. Assessment of potassium soil balances and availability in high-yielding rice systems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2022;122(3):255–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-022-10200-w
  30. 30. Wang Y, Zhang X, Chen X, Zhang F. Soil potassium cycling and its controlling factors in agroecosystems. Geoderma. 2021;404:115287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115287
  31. 31. Samantray J, Anand A, Dash B, Ghosh MK, Behera AK. Silicate minerals: Potential source of potash—A review. Miner Eng. 2022;179:107463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107463
  32. 32. Bilias F, Kotsangeli E, Ipsilantis I, Barbayiannis N. Cation exchange resins for predicting available K on K-deficient soils. Land. 2022;11:2146. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122146
  33. 33. Wakabayashi S, Eguchi T, Nakao A, Azuma K, Fujimura S, Kubo K, et al. Effectiveness of non-exchangeable potassium quantified by mild tetraphenyl-boron extraction in estimating radiocesium transfer to soybean in Fukushima. Sci Total Environ. 2022;820:153119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153119
  34. 34. Gudadhe NN, Das A, Thanki JD, Patel MC. Twenty-eight years long chemical fertilization effects on soil potassium status under rice–wheat–green gram cropping sequence. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2023;69(11):2121–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2022.2140143
  35. 35. Shirazi MP, Enjavinezhad SM, Moosavi AA. Chemical fractions of potassium in arid-region calcareous soils: The impact of microclimates and physiographic variability. PLoS One. 2024;19:e0314239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314239
  36. 36. Ferrando MG, Barbazán MM. Extractable potassium as affected by soil moisture conditions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2022;53(21):2867–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2094942
  37. 37. Sidhu SK, Zotarelli L, Sharma LK. A review of potassium significance and management approaches in potato production under sandy soils. J Sustain Agric Environ. 2024;3:e12106. https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12106
  38. 38. Bhat MA, Tomar D, Grewal KS, Sahoo J, Dar EA. Non-exchangeable potassium release and supplying power of soils of Haryana, Northwest India. J Plant Nutr. 2023;46(17):4140–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2023.2221683
  39. 39. Raut AR, Wahane MR, Khobragade NH, Thorat SB, Rajemahadik VA, Dodake SB. Impact of NPK fertilizer levels on soil properties and potassium fractions in lateritic soil of coastal Maharashtra. J Indian Soc Coast Agric Res. 2024;42(2):122–8. https://doi.org/10.54894/JISCAR.42.2.2024.147091
  40. 40. Ghosh S, Banerjee S, Mukherjee A, Bhattacharyya P. Appraise potassium chemistry and distribution patterns in tailing soil, India: Through quantity-intensity relations and multi-model statistical methods. Chemosphere. 2023;335:139184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139184
  41. 41. Okoli NA, Echereobia CO, Ahukaemere CM, Chris-Emenyonu C, Osisi AF, Obinna N et al. Chemical fractionation and bioavailability of potassium as affected by digestate in a degraded Ultisol under maize cultivation. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2023;69(14):3139–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2023.2210062
  42. 42. Awgchew H, Beyene S, Kifilu A. Potassium adsorption capacity and desorption kinetics in soils of Qenberenaweti sub-watershed, central highlands of Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2024;10:e31336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31336
  43. 43. Rani K. Assessing the availability of potassium and its quantity–intensity relations under long-term conservation agriculture-based cereal systems in North-West India. Soil Tillage Res. 2023;228:105644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.105644
  44. 44. Hinsinger P, Herrmann L, Lesueur D,Robin A,Trap J,Waithaisong K et al. Rhizosphere processes and root traits determining the acquisition of soil potassium. In: Improving Potassium Recommendations for Agricultural Crops. Springer; 2021. p. 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59197-7_4
  45. 45. Liu J, Shu A, Song W, Shi W, Li M, Zhang W, et al. Long-term organic fertilizer substitution increases rice yield by improving soil properties and regulating soil bacteria. Geoderma. 2021;404:115287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115287
  46. 46. Das D, Barman M. Potassium status and availability in three Indian soils as determined by 60 extractions with 1 M CaCl₂. Clays Clay Miner. 2025;73:e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/cmn.2025.6
  47. 47. Zhang Y, Wang J, Shen J, Zhang F. Potassium dynamics in agricultural soils: Current understanding and future perspectives. Geoderma. 2021;401:115327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115166
  48. 48. Sparks DL. Potassium dynamics in soils. In: Stewart BA, editor. Advances in Soil Science. Vol. 6. New York (NY): Springer; 1987. p. 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4682-4_1
  49. 49. Gurav PP, Ray SK, Datta SC, Choudhari PL, Hartmann C. Role of clay cation exchange capacity, location of charge and clay mineralogy on potassium availability in Indian Vertisols. Clays Clay Miner. 2024;72:e3. https://doi.org/10.1017/cmn.2024.6
  50. 50. Wang M, Rengel Z, Shen J. Potassium use efficiency in crop production: Current status and future challenges. Plant Soil. 2023;486:1–20.
  51. 51. Aramrak S, Chittamart N, Wisawapipat W, Rattanapichaia W, Phun-Iam M, Aramrak A. Dynamics of soil aggregate stability as induced by potassium in a soil–plant system. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2021;67(4):371–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2021.1939151
  52. 52. Ahlersmeyer A, Clay D, Kovács P, Osterloh K, Rekabdarkolaee HM, Clark J. Relationships among soil test potassium forms influenced by clay mineralogy. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2025;89(1):e70015. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70015

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.