Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Assessment of breeding potential of crosses involving different numbers of parents for green fruit yield in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.16015
Submitted
11 June 2026
Published
10-09-2026

Abstract

Cultivars derived from bi-parental crosses not only have a limited genetic base but also often lack the desired combination of traits, making them genetically vulnerable. Our hypothesis postulates that cultivars derived from populations of multiple parents are more likely to have greater trait means, genetic variability and thus a broader genetic base. To validate this hypothesis, the breeding potential of nine segregating populations derived from crosses with different numbers of parents of unequal population size ranging from 56 to 270 was field-tested for green fruit yield per plant during the rabi-summer season of 2020–21 at the experimental fields of the Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru. The breeding potential of these nine segregating F2 populations was evaluated based on the mean values of quantitative traits, absolute range, standardised range (SR), transgressive segregation index (TSI) and the usefulness criterion (UC). Recognising that different statistical parameters can identify different populations with good breeding potential, UC served as an objective measure to identify populations with greater breeding potential. In particular, the segregating population resulting from a three-way cross hybrid (Gouribidanur (GB) × CMS 7B) × CMS 8B) showed increased estimates for trait means (379.24 g), SR (5.22), TSI (30.74) and UC (50906.4) for green fruit yield per plant. This segregating population could be advanced for the isolation of advanced breeding lines. In light of this study, the optimal number of parental lines required to generate potential segregating populations in future chilli breeding programme would be set at three.

References

  1. 1. Arimboor, Natarajan RB, Menon KR, Chandrasekhar LP, Moorkoth V. Red pepper (Capsicum annuum) carotenoids as a source of natural food colors: Analysis and stability—a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52(3):1258–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1260-7
  2. 2. Kaur J, Jindal SK, Dhaliwal MS, Meena OP. Improving fruit traits in chilli pepper through heterosis breeding. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2017;49(1):26–43.
  3. 3. Bandillo N, Raghavan C, Muyco PA, Sevilla MA, Lobina IT, Dilla-Ermita CJ, et al. Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in rice: Progress and potential for genetics research and breeding. Rice. 2013;6(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-8433-6-11
  4. 4. Ullah A, Tong Z, Kamran M, Ansari U, Chen X, Xu H, et al. MAGIC populations: a next-generation framework for dissecting complex quantitative traits and accelerating molecular breeding in crops. Front Plant Sci. 2026;17:1867756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2026.1867756
  5. 5. Domínguez M, Colombo D, Filippi C, Ben Guerrero E, Dillcheneider A, Corro Molas A, et al. Building MAGIC populations: novel resources for sunflower trait improvement. Oil Crop Sci. 2025;10(2):131–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocsci.2025.05.001
  6. 6. Anilkumar C, Mohan Rao A, Ramesh S. Breeding potential of crosses derived from parents differing in fruiting habit traits in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2021;68(1):45–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-020-01002-6
  7. 7. Bernardo R. Breeding for quantitative traits in plants. 3rd ed. Stemma Press; 2020.
  8. 8. Koide Y, Sakaguchi S, Uchiyama T, Ota Y, Ezuka A, Nagano AJ, et al. Genetic properties responsible for the transgressive segregation of days to heading in rice. G3 (Bethesda). 2019;9(5):1655–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.201011
  9. 9. Shivakumar MS, Ramesh S, Byregowda M, Rao AM, Gangappa E. Genetics of quantitative traits in dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet) var. lignosus. Mysore J Agric Sci. 2016;50(3):555–68.
  10. 10. Suresh MS, Chandrakant SR, Keerthi CM. Breeding potential of crosses in dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet var. lignosus). Environ Ecol. 2017;35(1):33–8.
  11. 11. Bernardo R. Multiparental populations in line development: Genetic gain, diversity and practical limitations. Crop Sci. 2021;61(6):413950. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20632
  12. 12. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron J. 1955;47(7):314–8. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x
  13. 13. Levene H. Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin I, editor. Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1960. p. 278–92.
  14. 14. Schnell FW, Utz HF. F1-Leistung und Elternwahl in der Züchtung von Selbstbefruchtern. In: Bericht über die Arbeitstagung der Vereinigung österreichischer Pflanzenzüchter; 1975; BAL Gumpenstein, Gumpenstein, Austria. p. 243–8.
  15. 15. Dudley JW. Theory for transfer of alleles. Crop Sci. 1982;22(4):631–37. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200030049x
  16. 16. Dudley JW. A method of identifying lines for use in improving parents of a single cross. Crop Sci. 1984;24(2):355–57. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400020034x
  17. 17. Melchinger AE. Expectation of means and variances of testcrosses produced from F2 and backcross individuals and their selfed progenies. Heredity. 1987;59(1):105–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1987.101
  18. 18. Bernardo R. Parental selection, number of breeding populations and size of each population in inbred development. Theor Appl Genet. 2003;107(7):1252–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1375-0
  19. 19. Allier A, Moreau L, Charcosset A, Teyssèdre S, Lehermeier C. Usefulness criterion and post-selection parental contributions in multiparental crosses: Application to polygenic trait introgression. G3 (Bethesda). 2019;9(5):1469–79. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400129
  20. 20. Lehermeier C, Teyssèdre S, Schön CC. Genetic gain increases by applying the usefulness criterion with improved variance prediction in selection of crosses. Genetics. 2017;207(4):1651–61. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.117.300403
  21. 21. Millicent AO, Martin O, Patrick OO, Isaac DO, Amandin R, Cynthia O, et al. Establishment of an early selection method (criteria) for breeding in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). J Plant Breed Crop Sci. 2020;12(2):106–30. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPBCS2020.0907
  22. 22. Ongom PO, Fatokun C, Togola A, Oyebode OG, Ahmad MS, Jockson ID, et al. Genetic worth of multiple sets of cowpea breeding lines destined for advanced yield testing. Euphytica. 2021;217(2):30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02763-y
  23. 23. Tabanao DA, Bernardo R. Genetic variation in maize breeding populations with different numbers of parents. Crop Sci. 2005;45(6):2301–06. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.00050
  24. 24. da Silva Viana J, DoVale JC, Fritsche-Neto R. Optimizing progeny size and number of crosses under genomic selection: insights into additive and epistatic contributions to long-term genetic gain. Theor Appl Genet. 2026;139(2):53. doi:10.1007/s00122-026-05164-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05164-2
  25. 25. Dai T, Hong X, Jiang F, Ijaz B, Shaw RK, Yin X, et al. A multi-parent population approach to reveal the genetic basis of plant height in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25(1):1321. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-07393-x
  26. 26. Mackay IJ, Cockram JC, Howell P, Powell W. Understanding the classics: The unifying concepts of transgressive segregation, inbreeding depression and heterosis and their central relevance for crop breeding. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021;19(1):26–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13367
  27. 27. Chandana BR, Ramesh S. Assessment of breeding potential of horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) crosses based on transgressive segregation index and usefulness criterion. Mysore J Agric Sci. 2021;55(4):91–9. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-369047/v1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.