Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Approaches to forecast soil nutrient dynamics for precision agriculture and sustainable fertiliser management: A review

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.16160
Submitted
17 June 2026
Published
24-09-2026

Abstract

Predictive modelling of soil nutrient dynamics is an essential tool for promoting sustainable agricultural practices and environmentally responsible farming methods. The statistical and machine learning techniques used to forecast the availability and dynamics of soil nutrients are summarised in this review. The core frameworks for measuring spatio-temporal nutritional variability are established by traditional statistical approaches such as time-series models autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA), multivariate techniques (Principal component analysis (PCA) and factor analysis) and geostatistical tools (kriging). By capturing intricate nonlinear interactions within heterogeneous agroecosystems, machine learning techniques like random forest, support vector machines and ensemble approaches (XGBoost, LightGBM and AdaBoost) provide higher prediction accuracy. Forecasting capabilities are further enhanced by hybrid frameworks [Autoregressive integrated moving average with exogenous variables–artificial neural network. (ARIMAX-ANN)] and deep learning architectures (Convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), ANN). With R2 values above 0.93 and notable decreases in prediction errors, ensemble approaches routinely perform better than traditional linear models. Nevertheless, persistent challenges include data quality limitations, spatial sampling constraints, insufficient environmental covariates and reduced model transferability across diverse pedoclimatic regions. Integrating high-resolution soil properties, climatic variables, terrain attributes and spectral information with advanced modelling architectures remains crucial for enhancing predictive reliability, ultimately supporting precision nutrient management, improved fertiliser efficiency and environmentally responsible agricultural systems.

References

  1. 1. Griffiths BS, Faber J, Bloem J. Applying soil health indicators to encourage sustainable soil use: the transition from scientific study to practical application. Sustainability. 2018;10(9):3021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093021
  2. 2. Bhaduri D, et al. A review on effective soil health bio-indicators for ecosystem restoration and sustainability. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:938481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.938481
  3. 3. Maynard D, Kalra Y, Crumbaugh J. Nitrate and exchangeable ammonium nitrogen. In: Soil sampling and methods of analysis. 1993. p. 25–38.
  4. 4. Gunderson LM. The development and evolution of the Soil Health Nutrient Tool (Aka. Haney Test) after ten years of implementation in a commercial agricultural laboratory. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska-Lincoln; 2023.
  5. 5. Kunito T, Moro H, Mise K, Sawada K, Otsuka S, Nagaoka K, et al. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry as a temporally integrated indicator of nutrient availability in soils. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2024;70(4):246–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2024.2341669
  6. 6. Cui Y, Moorhead DL, Peng S, Sinsabaugh RL. New insights into the patterns of ecoenzymatic stoichiometry in soil and sediment. Soil Biol Biochem. 2023;177:108910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108910
  7. 7. Salam NK, Krishnamoorthi A, Trivedi S, John S, Sinha S, Raj R, et al. Optimizing soil nutrient dynamics: recent insights into soil-plant interactions. 2025 ;8(5):546-54. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2025.v8.i5g.2994
  8. 8. Nowak B, Nesme T, David C, Pellerin S. Nutrient recycling in organic farming is related to diversity in farm types at the local level. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2015;204:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.010
  9. 9. Qi H, Paz-Kagan T, Karnieli A, Jin X, Li S. Evaluating calibration methods for predicting soil available nutrients using hyperspectral VNIR data. Soil Tillage Res. 2018;175:267–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.09.006
  10. 10. Yang X, Xiong J, Du T, Ju X, Gan Y, Li S, et al. Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):198. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44464-9
  11. 11. Jiao X, Liu H, Wang W, Zhu J, Wang H. Estimation of surface soil nutrient content in mountainous citrus orchards based on hyperspectral data. Agriculture. 2024;14(6):873. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14060873
  12. 12. Sun R, Hou C, Cui H. Inversion models for orchard soil nutrient content using near-infrared spectroscopy. Innovative Applications of AI. 2025;2(2):132–44. https://doi.org/10.70695/AA1202502A16
  13. 13. Keshavarzi A, Kaya F, Başayiğit L, Gyasi-Agyei Y, Rodrigo-Comino J, Caballero-Calvo A. Spatial prediction of soil micronutrients using machine learning algorithms integrated with multiple digital covariates. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2023;127(1):137–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10303-y
  14. 14. Rusu M, Filip M, Cara IG, Țopa D, Jităreanu G. Soil nutrient dynamics and farming sustainability under different plum orchard management practices in the pedoclimatical conditions of Moldavian Plateau. Agriculture. 2025;15(5):509. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15050509
  15. 15. Komolafe AA, Olorunfemi IE, Oloruntoba C, Akinluyi FO. Spatial prediction of soil nutrients from soil, topography and environmental attributes in the northern part of Ekiti State, Nigeria. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ. 2021;21:100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100450
  16. 16. Schut AG, Reymann W. Towards a better understanding of soil nutrient dynamics and P and K uptake. Plant Soil. 2023;492(1):687–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06209-x
  17. 17. Song YQ, Zhao X, Su HY, Li B, Hu YM, Cui XS. Predicting spatial variations in soil nutrients with hyperspectral remote sensing at regional scale. Sensors. 2018;18(9):3086. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18093086
  18. 18. Singha C, Swain KC, Sahoo S, Govind A. Prediction of soil nutrients through PLSR and SVMR models by VIs-NIR reflectance spectroscopy. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci. 2023;26(4):901–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2023.10.005
  19. 19. Latha P, Kumaresan P. Deep learning for soil nutrient prediction and strategic crop recommendations: an analytic perspective. Nat Environ Pollut Technol. 2025;24(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.46488/NEPT.2025.v24i01.B4205
  20. 20. Rajarathinam A, Ramji M. Statistical modeling for soil attributes. In: Research and applications towards mathematics and computer science. 2023. p. 85. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/ratmcs/v5/7765A
  21. 21. Vaithiyanathan D, Sudalaimuthu K. Spatio-temporal variability of soil primary macro and micro nutrients-an empirical analysis on Anaimalai block, Coimbatore District, India. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2024;23(3):245–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2023.12.002
  22. 22. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
  23. 23. Xu X, Xiao C, Dong Y, Zhan L, Bi R, Song M, et al. Machine learning algorithms realized soil stoichiometry prediction and its driver identification in intensive agroecosystems across a north-south transect of eastern China. Sci Total Environ. 2024;906:167488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167488
  24. 24. Arumugam T, Kinattinkara S, Vellingiri K, Arumugam M, Rajamani J, Jayaseelan A. Assessment of agricultural soil quality in macro and micronutrient analysis of Kasargod, Kerala, India, using GIS techniques. J Hazard Mater Adv. 2025:100846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100846
  25. 25. Chouksey N, Mishra GC, Singh SK, Singh M, Chouksey R. Forecasting of nitrogen content in the soil by hybrid time series model. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2018;7(7):1634–42. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.707.191
  26. 26. Pratama RP, Fakhurroja H, Bangkit H, Pramesti D. Prediction of NPK fertilizer in chili plants using SARIMA model. In: 2024 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS). IEEE; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS62896.2024.10751445
  27. 27. Chitra Devi A, Maragatham S, Santhi R, Srivastava S, Dey P, Barathkumar S. Multivariate time series models for soil nutrient and yield prediction in site specific integrated nutrient management. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2025;56(12):1889–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2025.2484718
  28. 28. Fernández-Moya J, Alvarado A, Morales M, San Miguel-Ayanz A, Marchamalo-Sacristán M. Using multivariate analysis of soil fertility as a tool for forest fertilization planning. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2014;98(2):155–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9603-3
  29. 29. Theocharopoulos S, Petrakis P, Trikatsoula A. Multivariate analysis of soil grid data as a soil classification and mapping tool: the case study of a homogeneous plain in Vagia, Viotia, Greece. Geoderma. 1997;77(1):63–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00004-9
  30. 30. Gui H, Fan L, Wang D, Yan P, Li X, Pang Y, et al. Variations in soil nutrient dynamics and bacterial communities after the conversion of forests to long-term tea monoculture systems. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:896530. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.896530
  31. 31. Omeke J, Uzoma K, Akpan J. Multivariate analysis of soil productivity indicators in the northern guinea savana agro-ecology of Nigeria. Ukr J Ecol. 2022;12(11):12–22.
  32. 32. Swapna B, Manivannan S, Nandhinidevi R. Prediction of soil reaction (pH) and soil nutrients using multivariate statistics techniques for agricultural crop and soil management. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 2020;29(7s):1900–12.
  33. 33. Castellini M, Stellacci AM, Barca E, Iovino M. Application of multivariate analysis techniques for selecting soil physical quality indicators: a case study in long-term field experiments in Apulia (southern Italy). Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2019;83(3):707–20. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2018.06.0223
  34. 34. Biswas A, Cresswell HP, Chau HW, Rossel RA, Si BC. Separating scale-specific soil spatial variability: a comparison of multi-resolution analysis and empirical mode decomposition. Geoderma. 2013;209:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.003
  35. 35. Goovaerts P. Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science. Geoderma. 2001;103(1-2):3–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00067-2
  36. 36. Boyer D, Wright R, Feldhake C, Bligh D. Soil spatial variability and steep pasture management considerations in an acid soil environment. In: Plant-soil interactions at low pH: proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH, 24-29 June 1990, Beckley, West Virginia, USA. Springer; 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3438-5
  37. 37. John K, Abraham II, Kebonye NM, Agyeman PC, Ayito EO, Kudjo AS. Soil organic carbon prediction with terrain derivatives using geostatistics and sequential Gaussian simulation. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2021;20(6):379–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2021.04.005
  38. 38. Hengl T, Heuvelink GB, Kempen B, Leenaars JG, Walsh MG, Shepherd KD, . Mapping soil properties of Africa at 250 m resolution: random forests significantly improve current predictions. PLoS One. 2015;10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125814
  39. 39. Behera SK, Shukla AK. Spatial distribution of surface soil acidity, electrical conductivity, soil organic carbon content and exchangeable potassium, calcium and magnesium in some cropped acid soils of India. Land Degrad Dev. 2015;26(1):71–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2306
  40. 40. Guan F, Xia M, Tang X, Fan S. Spatial variability of soil nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in Moso bamboo forests in Yong'an City, China. Catena. 2017;150:161–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.017
  41. 41. Clingensmith CM, Grunwald S. Predicting soil properties and interpreting Vis-NIR models from across continental United States. Sensors. 2022;22(9):3187. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093187
  42. 42. Kumar M, Jain D, Saifi Z, Krishnananda SD. Predicting soil macronutrient levels: a machine learning approach models trained on pH, conductivity and average power of acid-base solutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.04138. 2025.
  43. 43. Ließ M, Glaser B, Huwe B. Uncertainty in the spatial prediction of soil texture: comparison of regression tree and random forest models. Geoderma. 2012;170:70–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.10.010
  44. 44. Jeong G, Oeverdieck H, Park SJ, Huwe B, Ließ M. Spatial soil nutrients prediction using three supervised learning methods for assessment of land potentials in complex terrain. Catena. 2017;154:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.02.006
  45. 45. Peng Y, Zhao L, Hu Y, Wang G, Wang L, Liu Z. Prediction of soil nutrient contents using visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 2019;8(10):437. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8100437
  46. 46. Zhang T, Li Y, Wang M. Prediction of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen affected by mine using Vis-NIR spectroscopy coupled with machine learning algorithms in calcareous soils. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):28014. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73761-6
  47. 47. Dash R, Dash DK, Biswal G. Classification of crop based on macronutrients and weather data using machine learning techniques. Results Eng. 2021;9:100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100203
  48. 48. Escorcia-Gutierrez J, Gamarra M, Soto-Diaz R, Pérez M, Madera N, Mansour RF. Intelligent agricultural modelling of soil nutrients and pH classification using ensemble deep learning techniques. Agriculture. 2022;12(7):977. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070977
  49. 49. Venkatanaresh M, Kullayamma I. Deep learning based concurrent excited gated recurrent unit for crop recommendation based on soil and climatic conditions. Multimedia Tools Appl. 2024;83(24):64109–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-18004-y
  50. 50. Liu S, Chen X, Xia X, Jin Y, Wang G, Jia H, et al. Electronic sensing combined with machine learning models for predicting soil nutrient content. Comput Electron Agric. 2024;221:108947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.108947
  51. 51. Qader SH, Utazi CE, Priyatikanto R, Najmaddin P, Hama-Ali EO, Khwarahm NR, et al. Exploring the use of Sentinel-2 datasets and environmental variables to model wheat crop yield in smallholder arid and semi-arid farming systems. Sci Total Environ. 2023;869:161716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161716
  52. 52. Kumar A, Kaur J. Machine learning and deep learning for soil analysis and classification of micro and macro nutrient using IoT. 2024. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4016181/v1
  53. 53. Blesslin Sheeba T, Anand LDV, Manohar G, Selvan S, Wilfred CB, Muthukumar K, et al. Machine learning algorithm for soil analysis and classification of micronutrients in IoT-enabled automated farms. J Nanomater. 2022;2022(1):5343965. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5343965
  54. 54. Kumar M, Saifi Z, Krishnananda SD. Decoding the physiological response of plants to stress using deep learning for forecasting crop loss due to abiotic, biotic and climatic variables. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):8598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35285-3
  55. 55. Byakatonda J, Parida B, Kenabatho PK, Moalafhi D. Influence of climate variability and length of rainy season on crop yields in semiarid Botswana. Agric For Meteorol. 2018;248:130–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.09.016
  56. 56. Padmapriya J, Sasilatha T. Deep learning based multi-labelled soil classification and empirical estimation toward sustainable agriculture. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2023;119:105690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105690
  57. 57. Lee S, Jeong Y, Son S, Lee B. A self-predictable crop yield platform (SCYP) based on crop diseases using deep learning. Sustainability. 2019;11(13):3637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133637
  58. 58. Wankhade SR, Raut AB. Development of a model for estimation of soil parameters using deep learning. Int J Inf Technol. 2024:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01675-z
  59. 59. Dey B, Ferdous J, Ahmed R. Machine learning based recommendation of agricultural and horticultural crop farming in India under the regime of NPK, soil pH and three climatic variables. Heliyon. 2024;10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25112
  60. 60. Aydın Y, Işıkdağ Ü, Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM, Geem ZW. Use of machine learning techniques in soil classification. Sustainability. 2023;15(3):2374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032374
  61. 61. M Aziz M. Determine the pH of soil by using neural network based on soil's colour. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Softw Eng. 2016;6(11):51–4.
  62. 62. Dada BA, Nwulu N, Olukanmi SO. A soil nutrient prediction model for Bezuidenhout Park, Johannesburg, Gauteng Province, South Africa. Johannesburg, Gauteng Province, South Africa; 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4994650
  63. 63. Carbajal-Llosa C, Barja A, Pizarro S. Ensemble machine learning for digital mapping of soil pH and electrical conductivity in the Andean agroecosystem of Peru. Front Soil Sci. 2025;5:1673628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2025.1673628
  64. 64. Jin X, Li S, Zhang W, Zhu J, Sun J. Prediction of soil-available potassium content with visible near-infrared ray spectroscopy of different pretreatment transformations by the boosting algorithms. Appl Sci. 2020;10(4):1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041520
  65. 65. Mohurle S, Gedam S. A study of ARIMA model to safeguard the quality of soil in the drip irrigation system. In: International Conference on Communication and Computational Technologies. Springer; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3485-0_18
  66. 66. Xu S, Niu R. Displacement prediction of Baijiabao landslide based on empirical mode decomposition and long short-term memory neural network in Three Gorges area, China. Comput Geosci. 2018;111:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.10.013
  67. 67. Mishra P, Salman D, Kumari B, Al Khatib AMG, et al. Multi-model forecasting framework for agricultural nutrient dynamics in India: a comparative analysis of ML and hybrid approaches for NPK consumption. Cogent Food Agric. 2025;11(1):2576632. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2025.2576632
  68. 68. Subhash M, Sinha NK, Kumar J, Mohanty M, Sahoo RN, Jayaraman S, et al. Spatial variability of soil physicochemical properties in soybean wheat belts in Vertisols of central India. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):33830. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03540-4
  69. 69. Rakotoson T, Senthilkumar K, Johnson JM, Ibrahim A, Kihara J, Sila A, et al. Estimating nutrient concentrations and uptake in rice grain in sub-Saharan Africa using linear mixed-effects regression. Field Crops Res. 2023;299:108987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108987
  70. 70. Terrat S, Horrigue W, Dequiedt S, Saby NPA, Lelièvre M, Nowak V, et al. Mapping and predictive variations of soil bacterial richness across France. PLoS One. 2017;12(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186766
  71. 71. Schillaci C, Saia S, Lipani A, Perego A, Zaccone C, Acutis M. Validating the regional estimates of changes in soil organic carbon by using the data from paired-sites: the case study of Mediterranean arable lands. Carbon Balance Manag. 2021;16(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00182-7
  72. 72. Li A, Kong L, Peng C, Feng W, Zhang Y, Guo Z. Predicting Cd accumulation in rice and identifying nonlinear effects of soil nutrient elements based on machine learning methods. Sci Total Environ. 2024;912:168721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168721
  73. 73. Guo P, Li T, Gao H, Chen X, Cui Y, Huang Y. Evaluating calibration and spectral variable selection methods for predicting three soil nutrients using Vis-NIR spectroscopy. Remote Sens. 2021;13(19):4000. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13194000
  74. 74. Tavares TR, de Almeida E, Pinheiro Junior CR, Guerrero A, Fiorio PR, Pereira de Carvalho HW. Analysis of total soil nutrient content with X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF): assessing different predictive modeling strategies and auxiliary variables. AgriEngineering. 2023;5(2):680–97. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering5020043
  75. 75. Trontelj ML, Chambers J. Machine learning strategy for soil nutrients prediction using spectroscopic method. Sensors. 2021;21(12):4208. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21124208
  76. 76. Suchithra M, Pai ML. Improving the prediction accuracy of soil nutrient classification by optimizing extreme learning machine parameters. Inf Process Agric. 2020;7(1):72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2019.05.003
  77. 77. Cui Y, Yue Q. Regional soil nutrient content prediction model based on big data. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2555/1/012005
  78. 78. Cheng Z, Meng J, Qiao Y, Wang Y, Dong W, Han Y. Preliminary study of soil available nutrient simulation using a modified WOFOST model and time-series remote sensing observations. Remote Sens. 2018;10(1):64. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10010064
  79. 79. Loiseau T, Arrouays D, Richer-de-Forges AC, Lagacherie P, Ducommun C, Minasny B. Density of soil observations in digital soil mapping: a study in the Mayenne region, France. Geoderma Reg. 2021;24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00358
  80. 80. FAO Global Soil Partnership. Global Soil Laboratory Network (GLOSOLAN): standard operating procedures and best practice manual. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2017.
  81. 81. Mirzaeitalarposhti R, Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi R, Demyan MS. Digital soil texture mapping and spatial transferability of machine learning models using Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and terrain-derived covariates. Remote Sens. 2022;14(23):5909. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14235909
  82. 82. Kasraei B, Heung B, Saurette DD, Schmidt MG, Bulmer CE, Bethel W. Quantile regression as a generic approach for estimating uncertainty of digital soil maps produced from machine-learning. Environ Model Softw. 2021;144:105139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105139
  83. 83. Folorunso O, Ojo O, Busari M, Adebayo M, Joshua A, Folorunso D, et al. Exploring machine learning models for soil nutrient properties prediction: a systematic review. Big Data Cogn Comput. 2023;7(2):113. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020113
  84. 84. Chen X, Zhang H, Wong CUI. Dynamic monitoring and precision fertilization decision system for agricultural soil nutrients using UAV remote sensing and GIS. Agriculture. 2025;15(15):1627. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15151627
  85. 85. Späti K, Huber R, Logar I, Finger R. Data on the stated adoption decisions of Swiss farmers for variable rate nitrogen fertilization technologies. Data Brief. 2022;41:107979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.107979

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.