Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Changing pest dynamics and pesticide use in cotton: Challenges and sustainable management

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.16195
Submitted
18 June 2026
Published
31-08-2026

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium spp.) is one of the world’s most important fibre crops, yet its sustainability is increasingly challenged by evolving pest complexes, intensified pesticide use, climate change and climate variability. The evidence indicates current knowledge on pest dynamics, pesticide dependence and ecological interactions in cotton agroecosystems, highlighting the shift from bollworm-dominated pest complexes to the increasing prevalence of secondary pests following the widespread adoption of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton. Although Bt (Cry toxin)-based transgenic cotton technology initially reduced insecticide use against the bollworm complex, primarily lepidopteran species, the emergence of resistance among bollworms and the upsurge of certain sucking pests in recent decades have reinstated insecticide dependence for pest management. This has led to ecological imbalance, non-target toxicity, the decline of pollinator populations and natural enemy communities, biodiversity loss, environmental contamination, accumulation of residues in products and yield challenges, in addition to increased production costs. The review emphasises the critical role of integrated pest management (IPM) strategies that integrate biological control, habitat diversification, resistant cultivars and threshold-based pesticide applications to restore ecological stability. Alternative approaches such as botanical pesticides, nanoformulations and plant volatile-mediated pest regulation are highlighted as promising tools for sustainable pest control. Advances in precision agriculture, including artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based pesticide delivery systems, have the potential to improve pest surveillance and reduce chemical inputs. Supply-chain procurement, certification, traceability and consumer demand can encourage lower-pesticide production, although these mechanisms require fair price incentives to avoid transferring compliance costs to smallholders. Sustainable cotton therefore requires region-specific, climate-resilient, evidence-based IPM supported by extension, market incentives, resistance monitoring and coordinated policy.

References

  1. 1. Voora V, Larrea C, Bermudez S. Global market report: cotton. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development; 2020. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/ssi-global-market-report-cotton.pdf
  2. 2. Zhang Z, Huang J, Yao Y, Peters G, Macdonald B, La Rosa AD, et al. Environmental impacts of cotton and opportunities for improvement. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 2023;4(10):703–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00476-z
  3. 3. Angelova RA. Organic cotton: technological and environmental aspects. In: Proceedings of the XXIII International Scientific Conference FPEPM; 2018. https://e-university.tu-sofia.bg/e-publ/files/3193_Doklad_EMF_2018.pdf
  4. 4. Zhou P, Zhou Y, Dunn J. Environmental impacts of future cotton production in the United States. ChemRxiv. 2025. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-s9q4q
  5. 5. International Cotton Advisory Committee. Global cotton area and production are projected to decline in the 2026/27 season. ICAC; 2026. https://icac.org/global-cotton-area-and-production-are-projected-to-decline-in-the-2026-27-season
  6. 6. Nguyen QV, Wiedemann SG, Simmons A, Clarke SJ. The environmental consequences of a change in Australian cotton lint production. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2021;26(12):2321–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01994-y
  7. 7. Delate K, Heller B, Shade J. Organic cotton production may alleviate the environmental impacts of intensive conventional cotton production. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2021;36(4):405–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170520000356
  8. 8. Habermann L. Impacts of organic cotton production on the livelihoods of farmers: a case study from Central India [Thesis]; 2021. https://diglib.uibk.ac.at/download/pdf/5799966.pdf
  9. 9. Harshitha A, Kumar S, Jain A. A review on organic cotton: various challenges, issues and application for smart agriculture. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART). IEEE; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMART52563.2021.9675301
  10. 10. Mollaee M, Mobli A, Mutti NK, Manalil S, Chauhan BS. Challenges and opportunities in cotton production. In: Jabran K, Chauhan BS, editors. Cotton production. Wiley; 2019. p. 371–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119385523.ch18
  11. 11. Nagaraj S, Rajasekaran R, Palaniappan J, Rangasamy S, Narayanasamy C, Narayanan MB. Emerging technological developments to address pest resistance in Bt cotton. Journal of Cotton Research. 2024;7(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-024-00192-z
  12. 12. Lu Y, Wyckhuys KAG, Yang L, Liu B, Zeng J, Jiang Y, et al. Bt cotton area contraction drives regional pest resurgence, crop loss and pesticide use. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2022;20(2):390–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13721
  13. 13. Vonzun S, Messmer MM, Boller T, Shrivas Y, Patil SS, Riar A. Extent of bollworm and sucking pest damage on modern and traditional cotton species and potential for breeding in organic cotton. Sustainability. 2019;11(22):6353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226353
  14. 14. Subramani T, Ganapathyswamy H, Sampathrajan V, Sundararajan A, Marimuthu M. Effect of simple processing on selected pesticide residues in cottonseed (Gossypium spp.). Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 2022;14(SI):176. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v14iSI.3606
  15. 15. Nagrare V, Fand BB, Kumar R, Naik VCB, Gawande S, Patil S, et al. Pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) management strategy, dissemination and impact assessment in India. Crop Protection. 2023;174:106424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106424
  16. 16. Jones AG, Hoover K, Pearsons K, Tooker JF, Felton GW. Potential impacts of translocation of neonicotinoid insecticides to cotton (Gossypium hirsutum (Malvales: Malvaceae)) extrafloral nectar on parasitoids. Environmental Entomology. 2020;49(1):159–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvz157
  17. 17. Du M, Li M, Li X, Yang H, Li Y. An insecticide application scheme in cotton fields with bi-directional selective effects on bees and pests. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 2022;42(5):3499–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-022-00875-7
  18. 18. Zia SUR, Ashraf I, Hassan G, Riaz A, Tanwir F, Nawaz N, et al. Pesticide usage and its application patterns among cotton growers of the southern Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2021;58(2):739–42. https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/21.1110
  19. 19. Koussé JND, Ilboudo S, Ouédraogo JCRP, Hunsmann M, Ouédraogo GG, Ouédraogo M, et al. Self-reported health effects of pesticides among cotton farmers from the Central-West region in Burkina Faso. Toxicology Reports. 2023;11:273–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2023.09.011
  20. 20. Benjamin M, Rwegasira GM. Abundance and diversity of cotton insect pests under repeatedly cultivated cotton fields of Tanzania. Frontiers in Insect Science. 2024;4:1385653. https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2024.1385653
  21. 21. Khan FZ, Manzoor SA, Gul HT, Ali M, Bashir MA, Akmal M, et al. Drivers of farmers' intention to adopt integrated pest management: a case study of vegetable farmers in Pakistan. Ecosphere. 2021;12(10):e03812. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3812
  22. 22. Munawar A, Zhu Z, Machado RAR, Zhou W. Beyond 'push-pull': unraveling the ecological pleiotropy of plant volatile organic compounds for sustainable crop pest management. Crop Health. 2023;1(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44297-023-00018-5
  23. 23. Lv Q, Chi B, He N, Zhang D, Dai J, Zhang Y, et al. Cotton-based rotation, intercropping, and alternate intercropping increase yields by improving root-shoot relations. Agronomy. 2023;13(2):413. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020413
  24. 24. Nagrare V, Naikwadi B, Fand BB, Naik VCB, Tenguri P, Gokte-Narkhedkar N, et al. Seasonal population trend and relative occurrence of pests and their natural enemies among cotton species and cultivars in India. Journal of Cotton Research. 2025;8(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-025-00214-4
  25. 25. Makawana AI, Leua HN, Patel HF, Patel VK, Patel RB, Makati JP. Cashew tea mosquito bug and its management. Rashtriya Krishi. 2017;12(2):1–3.
  26. 26. Mamatha V, Udikeri S, Channakeshava R, Bhat RS. An update of mirid bug infestation in Bt cotton fields of Haveri and Dharwad districts of Karnataka, India. Journal of Farm Sciences. 2024;37(4):350–4.
  27. 27. Teng D, Liu D, Khashaveh A, Lv B, Sun P, Geng T, et al. Engineering DMNT emission in cotton enhances direct and indirect defense against mirid bugs. Journal of Advanced Research. 2025;71:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2024.05.022
  28. 28. Song H, Dong Z, Li L, Lu Z, Li C, Yu Y, et al. Relationships among the feeding behaviors of a mirid bug on cotton leaves of different ages and plant biochemical substances. Journal of Insect Science. 2021;21(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieab007
  29. 29. Catania R, Bonforte M, Ferreira LMN, Martins GF, Lima MAP, Ricupero M, et al. Insecticides used for controlling cotton mealybug pose a threat to non-target bumble bees. Chemosphere. 2024;368:143742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143742
  30. 30. Cremonez PS, Kheirodin A, Perier JD, Nagaoka MM, Dunn TP, Parkins AJ, et al. Leaf trichome and insecticide interactions relative to Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) management in a cotton-cucurbit strip cropping arrangement. Journal of Economic Entomology. 2026;119(1):584–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaf321
  31. 31. Ali IH, Yükselbaba U. Determination of resistance improving potentials of cotton whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) biotypes against cyantraniliprole. Plant Protection Science. 2025;61(2):191. https://doi.org/10.17221/112/2023-PPS
  32. 32. Nadeem A, Tahir HM, Khan AA, Idrees A, Shahzad MF, Qadir ZA, et al. Response of natural enemies toward selective chemical insecticides used for the integrated management of insect pests in cotton field plots. Agriculture. 2022;12(9):1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091341
  33. 33. Jiang H, Chen J, Zhao C, Tian Y, Zhang Z, Xu H. Sulfoxaflor residues in pollen and nectar of cotton applied through drip irrigation and their potential exposure to Apis mellifera L. Insects. 2020;11(2):114. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11020114
  34. 34. Mahendiran G, Shankarganesh K, Manivannan A, Jose A, Poornima G, Chaithra T, et al. Morphological and molecular characterization and note on the biology of cotton stem weevil, Pempherulus affinis (Faust) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 2025;45(1):257–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-024-01424-0
  35. 35. Santos PJ, Dias AM, Campos KL, Araujo AC, Oliveira AA, Suinaga FA, et al. Planting date of cotton in the Brazilian Cerrado drives boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis Boheman) infestation. Insects. 2023;14(7):599. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14070599
  36. 36. Garcia CV, Tcach M, Simonella MA, Almada MS, Gonzalez J, Lanzavecchia SB, et al. Morphological variability of the cotton boll weevil in the principal cotton-growing region of Argentina. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 2025;173(12):1247–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.70020
  37. 37. Zafar MM, Razzaq A, Farooq MA, Rehman A, Firdous H, Shakeel A, et al. Insect resistance management in Bacillus thuringiensis cotton by MGPS (multiple genes pyramiding and silencing). Journal of Cotton Research. 2020;3(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-020-00074-0
  38. 38. Malanno K, Norbert BKK, Mamadou OB. Abundance of cotton bollworms and their impact on production in cotton-growing areas in Côte d'Ivoire from 2021 to 2024. 2025:2025122341. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202512.2341.v1
  39. 39. Hussain A, Farooq M, Naqvi RZ, Aslam MQ, Siddiqui HA, Amin I, et al. Whole-genome resequencing deciphers new insight into genetic diversity and signatures of resistance in cultivated cotton Gossypium hirsutum. Molecular Biotechnology. 2023;65(1):34–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-022-00527-8
  40. 40. Shad M, Yasmeen A, Azam S, Bakhsh A, Latif A, Shahid N, et al. Enhancing the resilience of transgenic cotton for insect resistance. Molecular Biology Reports. 2022;49(6):5315–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06972-z
  41. 41. Lu Y, Wyckhuys KAG, Wu K. Pest status, bio-ecology, and area-wide management of mirids in East Asia. Annual Review of Entomology. 2024;69(1):393–413. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-121322-015345
  42. 42. Sahu BK, Samal I. Sucking pest complex of cotton and their management: a review. Pharma Innovation. 2020;9(5):29–32.
  43. 43. Ashraf S, Ch KM, Ashraf I, Akbar N. A phenomenological inquiry into farmers' experiences growing cotton in Punjab, Pakistan. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):13846. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62950-y
  44. 44. Dilshod M, Sattorov N, Abdullaeva J, Makhliyo M, Abdirahman S, Kholmatov B, et al. Plant bugs (Heteroptera: Miridae) development and damage to cotton crop in Uzbekistan. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development. 2023;19:329–40. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2023.19.29
  45. 45. Abdel Razik MARAM. Toxicity and side effects of some insecticides applied in cotton fields on Apis mellifera. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2019;26(5):4987–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-04061-6
  46. 46. Malinga L, Laing M. A review of pesticides for the control of some cotton pests. Annals of Agricultural and Crop Sciences. 2024;9(Suppl 1):1148. https://doi.org/10.26420/annagriccropsci.2024.1148
  47. 47. Pereira RM, Neto DA, Amado D, Durigan MR, Franciscatti RA, Mocheti M, et al. Baseline susceptibility and frequency of resistance to diamide insecticides in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) populations in Brazil. Crop Protection. 2020;137:105266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105266
  48. 48. Grace A, Rao GP, Krishnayya P, Manoj V, Rao VS. Insecticide resistance in Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) to diamide and benzoyl phenylurea insecticides. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 2024;44(5):2287–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-024-01318-1
  49. 49. Li Y, Dou YN, An J, Tu X, Lv H, Pan W, et al. Temperature-dependent variations in toxicity of diamide insecticides against three lepidopteran insects. Ecotoxicology. 2020;29(5):607–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-020-02181-9
  50. 50. Mbuji AL, Xue Z, Guo M, Li M, Lv S, Zhang L. Resistance and fitness costs of the Helicoverpa armigera after selection with the tetraniliprole newly developed diamide insecticide. Crop Protection. 2024;179:106622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106622
  51. 51. Zeng X, Pan Y, Song J, Li J, Lv Y, Gao X, et al. Resistance risk assessment of the ryanoid anthranilic diamide insecticide cyantraniliprole in Aphis gossypii Glover. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2021;69(21):5849–57. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c00922
  52. 52. Li R, Cheng S, Chen Z, Guo T, Liang P, Zhen C, et al. Establishment of toxicity and susceptibility baseline of broflanilide for Aphis gossypii Glover. Insects. 2022;13(11):1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13111033
  53. 53. Wazir S, Shad SA. Development of fipronil resistance, fitness cost, cross-resistance to other insecticides, stability, and risk assessment in Oxycarenus hyalinipennis (Costa). Science of the Total Environment. 2022;803:150026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150026
  54. 54. Du L, Zhao L, Elumalai P, Zhu X, Wang L, Zhang K, et al. Effects of sublethal fipronil exposure on cross-generational functional responses and gene expression in Binodoxys communis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2025;32(52):29355–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32211-6
  55. 55. Coelho BS, Leite SA, dos Santos MP, Guedes RNC, Bastos CS, Moreira AA, et al. Risk of control failure to insecticides malathion, profenophos + cypermethrin mixture, and fipronil in boll weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) populations from Bahia, Brazil. Journal of Cotton Research. 2023;6(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-023-00156-9
  56. 56. Hussein HS, Tawfeek ME, Eldesouky SE. Toxicity and biochemical effects of spirotetramat and its binary mixtures with nanosilica against Aphis gossypii Glover, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius and the earthworm, Eisenia fetida. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal. 2022;43(1):107–17. https://doi.org/10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2022.223962
  57. 57. Liu X, Hu X, Wen Z, Tang H, Ma J, Qiu B, et al. Sensitivity monitoring of Bemisia tabaci to two tetramic acid insecticides and baseline susceptibility to spiropidion in China. Crop Protection. 2025;190:107088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.107088
  58. 58. Hopkinson J, Balzer J, Fang C, Walsh T. Insecticide resistance management of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Australian cotton-pyriproxyfen, spirotetramat and buprofezin. Pest Management Science. 2023;79(5):1829–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7361
  59. 59. Ou G, Zhu S, Huang Q, Wei Y, Zhang Z, Cheng D. Mechanism and synergy evaluation of a mixture of croton essential oil and spirodiclofen on Phenacoccus solenopsis (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Crop Protection. 2025;190:107104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.107104
  60. 60. Korra CG, Alemayehu Beyene K, Addis Desta T. Study of Ethiopian genetically modified and organic cotton fiber quality compared with conventional cotton. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2024;10(1):2301144. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2023.2301144
  61. 61. Rao N, Gaur RK, Kumar R, Singh S, Kamboj R. Bioefficacy of insecticides against Thrips palmi in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2022;92(9):1119–23. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i9.118427
  62. 62. Rajabpour A. Evaluation of selected biorational and synthetic chemical insecticides for controlling Phenacoccus solenopsis (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) under field conditions. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. 2025;132(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-01038-1
  63. 63. Moustafa MA, El-Said NA, Hafez SS, El-Hadek MK, Moteleb RI, Ahmed FS. Divergent resistance patterns in Spodoptera littoralis: high spinosyn resistance contrasts with susceptibility to chitin synthesis inhibitors in Egyptian field populations. Crop Protection. 2026;204:107581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2026.107581
  64. 64. Kumar M, Zhang B, Potkule J, Sharma K, Radha, Hano C, et al. Cottonseed oil: extraction, characterization, health benefits, safety profile, and application. Food Analytical Methods. 2023;16(2):266–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-022-02410-3
  65. 65. Cavalaris C, Karamoutis C, Markinos A. Efficacy of cotton harvest aids applications with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and ground-based field sprayers: a case study comparison. Smart Agricultural Technology. 2022;2:100047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100047
  66. 66. Sreenivas A, Ranganath, Wazid, Vijayalakshmi, Shivayogiyappa. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAVs): a novel spraying technique for management of sucking insect pests in cotton ecosystem. Journal of Biosystems Engineering. 2024;49(2):103–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-024-00219-y
  67. 67. Vishnu M, Kannan M, Soundararajan R, Suganthi A, Subramanian A, Senthilkumar M, et al. Nano-bioformulations: emerging trends and potential applications in next generation crop protection. Environmental Science: Nano. 2024;11(7):2831–60. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EN00263F
  68. 68. Luneja RL, Mkindi AG. Advances in botanical-based nanoformulations for sustainable cotton insect pest management in developing countries. Frontiers in Agronomy. 2025;7:1558395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2025.1558395
  69. 69. Darwesh OM, Abdelmaksoud NM, El-Bakry AM. Nano-chitosan as a bio-enhancer for improving insecticide formulations: a study on indoxacarb and methomyl against the cotton leafworm. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules.2024;282:137465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137465
  70. 70. Ibrahim SS, Abou-Elseoud WS, Elbehery HH, Hassan ML. Chitosan-cellulose nanoencapsulation systems for enhancing the insecticidal activity of citronella essential oil against the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis. Industrial Crops and Products. 2022;184:115089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115089
  71. 71. Elabasy A, Shoaib A, Waqas M, Shi Z, Jiang M. Cellulose nanocrystals loaded with thiamethoxam: fabrication, characterization, and evaluation of insecticidal activity against Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Nanomaterials. 2020;10(4):788. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10040788
  72. 72. Heydari M, Amirjani A, Bagheri M, Sharifian I, Sabahi Q. Eco-friendly pesticide based on peppermint oil nanoemulsion: preparation, physicochemical properties, and its aphicidal activity against cotton aphid. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27(6):6667–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07332-y
  73. 73. El-Naby SSA, Abdou MS, Metayi MH, Mahmoud FH, El-Habal NA, Abdel-Megeed A, et al. Development and evaluation of castor oil nanoemulsion on the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) and its adverse effects on the reproductive system of albino rats. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 2024;14(2):2629–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02245-8
  74. 74. Papanikolaou NE, Kalaitzaki A, Karamaouna F, Michaelakis A, Papadimitriou V, Dourtoglou V, et al. Nano-formulation enhances insecticidal activity of natural pyrethrins against Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and retains their harmless effect to non-target predators. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25(11):10243–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8596-2
  75. 75. Shaker A, Zaki A, Abdel-Rahim EF, Khedr M. TiO2 nanoparticles as an effective nanopesticide for cotton leafworm. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal. 2017;19.
  76. 76. Kannan N. An analysis of the climate change effects on pesticide vapor drift from ground-based pesticide applications to cotton. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):9740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36941-4
  77. 77. Sibanda NR, Nkiwane LC, Nyoni AB, Nyathi JA. Pesticide residues in ginned cotton and gin motes: case study of Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Journal of Science and Technology. 2018;13(1):71–8.
  78. 78. Eclou IB, Glèlè Kakaï R. Contamination and pesticide multiresidue analysis in cotton production systems in Benin. Discover Environment. 2024;2(1):54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00087-5
  79. 79. Chawla S, Gor HN, Patel HK, Parmar KD, Patel AR, Shukla V, et al. Validation, residue analysis, and risk assessment of fipronil and flonicamid in cotton (Gossypium sp.) samples and soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25(19):19167–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2126-8
  80. 80. Battu R, Sahoo S, Jyot G. Persistence of acephate and cypermethrin on cotton leaves, cottonseed, lint and soil. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2009;82(1):124–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-008-9541-3
  81. 81. Jasmine RS, Kuttalam S, Stanley J. Harvest time residues of abamectin 1.9 EC in cotton seed, lint and oil. Madras Agricultural Journal. 2023;98(Apr–Jun):1.
  82. 82. Crossan AN, Kennedy IR. Calculation of pesticide degradation in decaying cotton gin trash. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2008;81(4):355–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-008-9414-9
  83. 83. Yadav S, Dutta S. Evaluation of organophosphorus pesticide residue in cotton of Tijara Tehsil, Alwar, Rajasthan. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology. 2019;18(4):1455–8.
  84. 84. Kumari B, Duhan A. Persistence of dicofol residues in cotton lint, seed and soil. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2011;182(1):129–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1863-z
  85. 85. Riar A, Sisodia B, Keller C, Patidar I, Stuerz S, Goldmann E, et al. Long-term economic and yield comparison of organic and conventional cotton-based production systems with wheat and soybean rotations in Central India. European Journal of Agronomy. 2025;171:127814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127814
  86. 86. Mandal S, Basak S, Debnath S, Ghosh D. Organic cotton cultivation in saline soils: a premium pathway for coastal farmers. Journal of Advance Agricultural Research. 2025;1(2):43–9. https://doi.org/10.65525/jaar.v1i2.10
  87. 87. Mehmeti A, Abdelhafez AAM, Ellssel P, Todorovic M, Calabrese G. Performance and sustainability of organic and conventional cotton farming systems in Egypt: an environmental and energy assessment. Sustainability. 2024;16(15):6637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156637
  88. 88. Sodjinou E, Glin LC, Nicolay G, Tovignan S, Hinvi J. Socioeconomic determinants of organic cotton adoption in Benin, West Africa. Agricultural and Food Economics. 2015;3(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-015-0030-9
  89. 89. Abbasi SM. The future of organic colored cotton. Vlakna a Textil. 2019;26(4):13–8.
  90. 90. Singh A, Durot C, Goldmann E. Organic cotton-based farming systems and their role in sustainable development: long-term farming systems comparisons in the tropics (SysCom) India. 2026. https://www.fibl.org/en/shop-en/1862-syscom-cotton
  91. 91. Roy Chowdhury A, Gupta S. An overview of complex threats to bee populations: pesticides, contaminants, and the urgency for research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences. 2026;96:353–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-025-01741-5
  92. 92. Chandrasekar S, Marimuthu M, Saravanan A, Angappan S, Kaithamalai B, Mannu J, et al. Impact of neonicotinoid insecticides on the foraging activity of Apis cerana indica (Fab.) in the cotton ecosystem. Madras Agricultural Journal. 2022;109(4–6):1. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.000616
  93. 93. Chandrasekar S, Marimuthu M, Angappan S, Pernamallur SA, Kaithamalai B, Pagalahalli SS. Effects of neonicotinoid residues in Apis cerana indica bees and bee products: LC-MS/MS analysis and dietary risk assessment in a sunflower field study. Ecotoxicology. 2025;34(4):606–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-025-02857-0
  94. 94. Zhang X, Ouyang F, Su J, Li Z, Yuan Y, Sun Y, et al. Intercropping flowering plants facilitate conservation, movement and biocontrol performance of predators in insecticide-free apple orchard. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2022;340:108157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108157
  95. 95. Paryal P, Otho SA, Nizamani IA, Rind SA, Paryal P, Mangrio N. Performance of different botanicals against pink bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella) on cotton crop under field conditions. Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences. 2025;6(2):119–30. https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2025.06.319
  96. 96. Reddy DS, Chowdary NM. Botanical biopesticide combination concept-a viable option for pest management in organic farming. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control. 2021;31(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00366-w
  97. 97. Bakr RF, Hafez JA, Khamiss OA, Zyaan OH. Biochemical studies on the effect of chitin synthesis inhibitor (flufenoxuron) and SpliNPV on the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis Bosid (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences A, Entomology. 2013;6(2):29–38. https://doi.org/10.21608/eajbsa.2013.13361
  98. 98. El-Sheikh E-SA, Aamir MM. Comparative effectiveness and field persistence of insect growth regulators on a field strain of the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis Boisd. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Crop Protection. 2011;30(6):645–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.02.009
  99. 99. El-Banna HM, El-Sabagh M, Abd El-Kareem SM, Ibrahim SA. Susceptibility of different stages of a field strain of the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) to two bioinsecticides and two insect growth regulator compounds under laboratory conditions. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology. 2020;41:20–7.
  100. 100. de Araújo WA, Fernandes MG, Degrande PE, da Silva Salustino A, Neto DFC, Malaquias JB. Exploring the impact of cover crops in integrated pest management: pest and natural enemies population dynamics in no-tillage cotton production. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 2024;114(4):581–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485324000452
  101. 101. Usha Rani S, Sujeetha T, Annie Sheeba J, Kanjana D, Prakash A, Prasad Y, et al. Climate change and its impact on cotton production: a systematic literature review. Journal of Water and Climate Change. 2025;16(9):2760. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2025.018
  102. 102. Kumari P, Jarpla M, Reddy NA, Sarangi S, Asvitha M. Biological interactions and management strategies for the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a review. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International. 2024;46(11):490–507. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i113071
  103. 103. Alugoju N, Malavath R, Kota S, Thirupathi I, Sravanthi U, Bollaveni SK. IPM-an ecofriendly approach to manage the pink bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella) in Bt cotton of Mancherial district, Telangana state. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. 2022;34(24):269–75. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i242638
  104. 104. Rathwa YH, Bochalya BC. Factors affecting the knowledge and attitude of cotton growers to adopt integrated pest management. Gujarat Journal of Extension Education. 2023;35(1):109–14. https://doi.org/10.56572/gjoee.2023.35.1.0023
  105. 105. Bordini I, Ellsworth PC, Naranjo SE, Fournier A. Novel insecticides and generalist predators support conservation biological control in cotton. Biological Control. 2021;154:104502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104502
  106. 106. Dinesh Kumar G, Manikanda Boopathi N, Geethanjali S, Subramanian A, Somasundaram S, Kannan M, et al. Guarding the cotton fields by refining the resilience against sucking pests: use of cutting-edge breeding and other techniques. Journal of Cotton Research. 2025;8(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-025-00220-6
  107. 107. Huang J, Hao H. Effects of climate change and crop planting structure on the abundance of cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ecology and Evolution. 2020;10(3):1324–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5986
  108. 108. Devi S, Ram P, Rolania K. Effect of intercropping on the parasitoids, Encarsia spp. and Trichogramma spp. in cotton fields, India. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control. 2020;30(1):71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00275-4
  109. 109. Toscano-Miranda R, Toro M, Aguilar J, Caro M, Marulanda A, Trebilcok A. Artificial intelligence and sensing techniques for the management of insect pests and diseases in cotton: a systematic literature review. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2022;160(1–2):16–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185962200017X
  110. 110. Zhu Y, Sun L, Luo Q, Chen H, Yang Y. Spatial optimization of cotton cultivation in Xinjiang: a climate change perspective. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2023;124:103523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103523
  111. 111. Abbas S. Climate change and cotton production: an empirical investigation of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27(23):29580–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09222-0
  112. 112. Mubeen M, Ahmad A, Hammad HM, Awais M, Farid HU, Saleem M, et al. Evaluating the climate change impact on water use efficiency of cotton-wheat in semi-arid conditions using DSSAT model. Journal of Water and Climate Change. 2020;11(4):1661–75. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2019.179
  113. 113. Nadiruzzaman M, Rahman M, Pal U, Croxton S, Rashid MB, Bahadur A, et al. Impact of climate change on cotton production in Bangladesh. Sustainability. 2021;13(2):574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020574
  114. 114. Zinyemba C, Archer E, Rother HA. Climate change, pesticides and health: considering the risks and opportunities of adaptation for Zimbabwean smallholder cotton growers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(1):121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010121
  115. 115. Vyankatrao N. Effect of climate change on growth and productivity of cotton: global scenario. International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis. 2020;12(4):64–80.
  116. 116. Jans Y, von Bloh W, Schaphoff S, Müller C. Global cotton production under climate change: implications for yield and water consumption. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2021;25(4):2027–44. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2027-2021
  117. 117. Skendzic S, Zovko M, Zivkovic IP, Lesic V, Lemic D. The impact of climate change on agricultural insect pests. Insects. 2021;12(5):440. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12050440
  118. 118. Iqbal A, Iqbal M, Alamzeb M, Qiang D, Xiangru W, Huiping G, et al. Climate change and cotton production. In: Improvement of plant production in the era of climate change. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2022. p. 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003286417-5
  119. 119. Karthik K, Nandiganti M, Thangaraj A, Singh S, Mishra P, Rathinam M, et al. Transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to combat weed vagaries: utility of an apical meristem-targeted in planta transformation strategy to introgress a modified CP4-EPSPS gene for glyphosate tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;11:768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00768
  120. 120. Siddiqui HA, Asad S, Naqvi RZ, Asif M, Liu C, Liu X, et al. Development and evaluation of triple gene transgenic cotton lines expressing three genes (Cry1Ac-Cry2Ab-EPSPS) for lepidopteran insect pests and herbicide tolerance. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):18422. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22209-w
  121. 121. Sheri V, Mohan H, Jogam P, Alok A, Rohela GK, Zhang B, et al. CRISPR/Cas genome editing for cotton precision breeding: mechanisms, advances, and prospects. Journal of Cotton Research. 2025;8(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-024-00206-w
  122. 122. Ni M, Ma W, Wang X, Gao M, Dai Y, Wei X, et al. Next-generation transgenic cotton: pyramiding RNAi and Bt counters insect resistance. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2017;15(9):1204–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12709
  123. 123. Mustafa M, Baig MF, Badar HMS, Missen MMS, Kajla NI. An artificial intelligence and IoT based approach for the pink bollworm detection in cotton crop. Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics. 2024.
  124. 124. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. Issues related to production of cotton. Government of India; 2024. Report No.: Rajya Sabha Unstarred Question No. 2891.
  125. 125. Dalmia A, White J, Chaurasia A, Agarwal V, Jain R, Vora D, et al. Pest management in cotton farms: an AI-system case study from the global south. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM; 2020. p. 3119–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403363
  126. 126. Ghate UV. Artificial intelligence and nature-based solutions in agriculture: a Bt cotton pest management case study in India. Qeios. 2024. https://doi.org/10.32388/NFGP2F
  127. 127. Garcia E, Ortega M. AI-driven pest control strategies for sustainable cotton cultivation in developing regions. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data. 2025;22(4).
  128. 128. Azfar S, Nadeem A, Ahsan K, Mehmood A, Almoamari H, Alqahtany SS, et al. IoT-based cotton plant pest detection and smart-response system. Applied Sciences. 2023;13(3):1851. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031851
  129. 129. Yang ZY, Xia WK, Chu HQ, Su WH, Wang RF, Wang H, et al. A comprehensive review of deep learning applications in cotton industry: from field monitoring to smart processing. Plants. 2025;14(10):1481. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14101481
  130. 130. Wang Z, Zhang HW, Dai YQ, Cui K, Wang H, Chee PW, et al. Resource-efficient cotton network: a lightweight deep learning framework for cotton disease and pest classification. Plants. 2025;14(13):2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14132082
  131. 131. Faisal HM, Aqib M, Rehman SU, Mahmood K, Obregon SA, Iglesias RC, et al. Detection of cotton crop diseases using customized deep learning model. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):10766. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94636-4
  132. 132. Shahid MF, Khanzada TJ, Aslam MA, Hussain S, Baowidan SA, Ashari RB, et al. An ensemble deep learning models approach using image analysis for cotton crop classification in AI-enabled smart agriculture. Plant Methods. 2024;20(1):104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-024-01228-w
  133. 133. Li Q, Ma W, Li H, Zhang X, Zhang R, Zhou W, et al. Cotton-YOLO: improved YOLOV7 for rapid detection of foreign fibers in seed cotton. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2024;219:108752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.108752
  134. 134. Khan AT, Jensen SM, Khan AR. Advancing precision agriculture: a comparative analysis of YOLOv8 for multi-class weed detection in cotton cultivation. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture. 2025;15(2):182–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2025.01.013
  135. 135. Xiao S, Fei S, Ye Y, Xu D, Xie Z, Bi K, et al. 3D reconstruction and characterization of cotton bolls in situ based on UAV technology. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2024;209:101–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.01.027
  136. 136. Garofalo SP, Modugno AF, De Carolis G, Sanitate N, Negash Tesemma M, Scarascia-Mugnozza G, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence to predict the water status of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L., 1763) from Sentinel-2 images in the Mediterranean area. Plants. 2024;13(23):3325. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13233325
  137. 137. Aierken N, Yang B, Li Y, Jiang P, Pan G, Li S. A review of unmanned aerial vehicle-based remote sensing and machine learning for cotton crop growth monitoring. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2024;227:109601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109601
  138. 138. Aziz D, Rafiq S, Saini P, Ahad I, Gonal B, Rehman SA, et al. Remote sensing and artificial intelligence: revolutionizing pest management in agriculture. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2025;9:1551460. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1551460
  139. 139. Tlatlaa JS, Tryphone GM, Nassary EK. Unexplored agronomic, socioeconomic and policy domains for sustainable cotton production on small landholdings: a systematic review. Frontiers in Agronomy. 2023;5:1281043. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2023.1281043

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.