Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Assessment of genetic variability and multivariate analysis for yield and quality improvement in an interspecific F₂ population of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under high-temperature stress

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.16246
Submitted
21 June 2026
Published
29-09-2026

Abstract

Heat stress is one of the major abiotic constraints limiting the productivity of tomato, especially at the reproductive stage. An interspecific F2 population developed from the cross PKM 1 × Solanum pimpinellifolium L. was evaluated at the Vegetable Research Station, Palur, Tamil Nadu, India, to identify important traits associated with yield improvement under high temperature conditions. The population was evaluated for yield, physiological and quality traits through analyses of genetic variability, correlation, path coefficient and principal component analysis (PCA). Results indicated considerable genetic variability among the segregants; high heritability along with high genetic advance (GA) revealed the dominance of additive gene action, indicating the efficacy of direct phenotypic selection. The major determinants of fruit yield under heat stress were fruit weight (FW), fruit set percentage (FS), number of clusters per plant (NCP) and number of fruits per plant (NFP), as revealed by correlation and path coefficient analyses. Principal component analysis is an efficient method which revealed extensive genetic diversity and identified promising segregants with superior yield and heat tolerance. These results provide useful selection criteria and genetic resources for developing high-yielding, heat-tolerant tomato varieties adapted to future climate scenarios.

References

  1. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT: crops and livestock products. Rome: FAO; 2024. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL
  2. 2. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. Final estimates of 2022–23 and first advance estimates of 2023–24 of area and production of horticultural crops [Internet]. New Delhi: Press Information Bureau, Government of India; 2024. Press Information Bureau
  3. 3. Khan Q, Wang Y, Xia G, Yang H, Luo Z, Zhang Y. Deleterious effects of heat stress on the tomato, its innate responses and potential preventive strategies in the realm of emerging technologies. Metabolites. 2024;15;14(5):283. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo14050283
  4. 4. Mohammed SP, Natarajan S, Eybishitz A, Jakkula D, Veerasamy R, Prasanthrajan M, et al. Heat stress in tomato plants: current challenges and future directions for sustainable agriculture. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci. 2025;53(5):1283–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2024.2432624
  5. 5. Bashary N, Miller G, Doitsch-Movshovits T, Beery A, Ouyang B, Lieberman-Lazarovich M. New population of Solanum pimpinellifolium backcross inbred lines as a resource for heat stress tolerance in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1386824. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1386824
  6. 6. Du M, Sun C, Deng L, Zhou M, Li J, Du Y, et al. Molecular breeding of tomato: advances and challenges. J Integr Plant Biol. 2025;67(3):669–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13879
  7. 7. Burton GW, DeVane EH. Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) from replicated clonal material. Agron J. 1953;45:478–81. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1953.00021962004500100005x
  8. 8. Subramanian SS, Madhava MP. Genotypic and phenotypic variability in rice. Madras Agric J. 1973;60:1093–6.
  9. 9. Lush JL. Heritability of quantitative characters in farm animals. Hereditas. 1949;35:356–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1949.tb03347.x
  10. 10. Hanson CH, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Biometrical studies of yield in segregating populations of Korean lespedeza. Agron J. 1956;48(6):268–72. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1956.00021962004800060008x
  11. 11. Robinson HF, Comstock RE, Harvey PH. Genetic variances in open pollinated varieties of corn. Genetics. 1955;40(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/40.1.45
  12. 12. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron J. 1955;47:314–8. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x
  13. 13. Weber CR, Moorthy BR. Heritable and nonheritable relationships and variability of oil content and agronomic characters in the F2 generation of soybean crosses. Agron J. 1952;44(4):202–9. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1952.00021962004400040010x
  14. 14. Dewey DR, Lu K. A correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agron J. 1959;51(9):515–8. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100090002x
  15. 15. Akinwale MG, Gregorio G, Nwilene F, Akinyele BO, Ogunbayo SA, Odiyi AC, et al. Comparative performance of lowland hybrids and inbred rice varieties in Nigeria. Int J Plant Breed Genet. 2011;5(3):224–34. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijpbg.2011.224.234
  16. 16. Kumar M, Yadav RK, Yadav RK, Behera TK, Talukdar A. Estimates of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield component traits in thermo tolerant tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes. Int J Agric Sci. 2017;9(2):3640–2.
  17. 17. Verma VK, Pandey A, Jha AK. Genetic parameters, diversity and population structure in tomato based on quantitative traits and microsatellite markers. Indian J Plant Genet Resour. 2021;34(3):437–46. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-1926.2021.00037.1
  18. 18. Saravanan KR, Vishnupriya V, Prakash M, Anandan R. Variability, heritability and genetic advance in tomato genotypes. Indian J Agric Res. 2019;53(1):92–5. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-5030
  19. 19. Prajapati S, Tiwari A, Kadwey S, Jamkar T. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.). Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol. 2015;8(2):245–51. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-732X.2015.00031.5
  20. 20. Kumari K, Akhtar S, Kumari S, Kumar M, Kumari K, Singh NK, et al. Genetic variability and heritability studies in diverse tomato genotypes. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(3):1011–4.
  21. 21. Kerketta A, Bahadur V, Rajesh J. Performance of different tomato genotypes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) for growth, yield and quality traits under Allahabad condition. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;7:1766–9.
  22. 22. Rasheed A, Ilyas M, Khan TN, Mahmood A, Riaz U, Chattha MB, et al. Study of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield-related traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.). Front Genet. 2023;13:1030309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1030309
  23. 23. Zannat A, Hussain MA, Abdullah AH, Hossain MI, Saifullah M, Safhi FA, et al. Exploring genotypic variability and interrelationships among growth, yield and quality characteristics in diverse tomato genotypes. Heliyon. 2023;9(8):18958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18958
  24. 24. Sharma A, Pandey SK, Nair R. Correlation and path co-efficient analysis for yield and its contributing traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J Pharm Innov. 2021;10(3):616–22. https://doi.org/10.22271/tpi.2021.v10.i3i.5837
  25. 25. Maurya RK, Singh AK, Sai A. Correlation and path analysis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) for yield and yield contributing traits. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(3):1684–7. https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2020.v9.i3ab.11555
  26. 26. Uzair M, Kalsoom R, Attia KA, Ali I, Hussain T, Abushady AM, et al. Understanding the role of thermal stress in modulating growth, yield and quality attributes of tomato at two locations. Turk J Agric For. 2025;49(1):153–68. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-011X.3255
  27. 27. Ahmed EAY. Population parameters and path-coefficient analysis of tomato grown under heat stress. Alex Sci Exch J. 2017;38:600–12. https://doi.org/10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2017.4033
  28. 28. Vijayakumar A, Beena R. Characterizing tomato genotypes for high temperature stress adaptation in field conditions. Vegetos. 2026;39(1):397–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-024-01109-6
  29. 29. Kumar SC, Jawadagi RS, Fakrudin B, Hanchinamani CN, Kulkarni MS, Lakshmidevamma TN, et al. Assessment of growth and yield parameters in recombinant inbred line populations of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) through correlation and path analysis. J Hortic Sci. 2023;18(2):295–300. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v18i2.1819
  30. 30. Sharma S, Jindal SK, Patel SA, Sharma A, Chawla N. Genetic association analysis in advance tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) lines for horticultural and yield contributing traits. Trends Hortic. 2024;7(1). https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v7i1.4090
  31. 31. Das SB, Islam MS, Uddin MN, Goswami BK, Abedin SS, Baki MA. Evaluation of the performance of summer tomato lines in Bangladesh conditions. J Bio-Sci. 2023;31(2):13–23. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbs.v31i2.741423
  32. 32. Singh AK, Solankey SS, Akhtar S, Kumari P, Chaurasiya J. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7:4278–85.
  33. 33. Kadyan D, Srivastav P, Kumar J, Singh H. Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Pharma Innov J. 2023;12(8):2325–9.
  34. 34. Ur Rahman S, Basit A, Ara N, Ullah I, Rehman AU. Morpho-physiological responses of tomato genotypes under saline conditions. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2021;73(4):541–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-021-00576-0
  35. 35. Bhattarai S, Harvey JT, Djidonou D, Leskovar DI. Exploring morpho-physiological variation for heat stress tolerance in tomato. Plants (Basel). 2021;10(2):347. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020347
  36. 36. Ghabileh M, Lotfi M, Aliniaeifard S, Ramshini H. Variation in reproductive organ functionality among a population of tomato genotypes reveals the importance of pollen viability and fruit set in response to heat stress. Int J Veg Sci. 2024;30(6):717–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2024.2429118
  37. 37. Vijaylaxmi SK, Rathod V, Evoor S, Kantharaju V, Tatagar MH, Laksmidevamma TN. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2021;10(2):1136–40.
  38. 38. Doddamani MB, Jagadeesha RC, Baby R, Prakash G. Correlation and path analysis for growth, yield and quality traits in F3 population of cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. var. cerasiforme). Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(3):3712–6.
  39. 39. Sunilkumar MK, Vijeth S, Rathod V, Kaushik P. Genetic associations analysis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) involving improved germplasm lines for agronomic and yield contributing traits. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(10):2688–702. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.810.310
  40. 40. Sushma K, Saidaiah P, Reddy KR, Sudini H, Geetha A. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(11):2569–75. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.911.311
  41. 41. Nevani S, Sridevi O. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Pharma Innov J. 2021;10(7):1522–5.
  42. 42. Mishra A, Nandi A. Correlation and path coefficient analysis for quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;7(1):1733–8.
  43. 43. Chernet S, Belew D, Abay F. Performance evaluation and path analysis studies in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) genotypes under Humera, Northern Ethiopia condition. World J Agric Res. 2014;2(6):267–71. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjar-2-6-3
  44. 44. Reddy SB, Thomas B, Ankitha MO, Anand S, Jyothi BA. Association and path coefficient analysis among F2 segregating population of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(18):656–62. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183330
  45. 45. Akhter S, Najnine F. Variability of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) genotypes for higher yield and yield contributing traits. N Am Acad Res. 2022;5(2):48–64.
  46. 46. Patel P, Kumar U. Studies on correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and quality traits in tomato. Pharma Innov J. 2021;10(9):1914–8.
  47. 47. Kumar R, Ram CN, Yadav GC, Deo C, Vimal SC, Bhartiya HD. Studies on correlation and path coefficient analysis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.). Plant Archives. 2014;14(1):443–7.
  48. 48. Rajolli MG, Lingaiah HB, Malashetti IR, Bhat AS, Aravindkumar JS. Correlation and path co-efficient studies in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2017;5(6):913–7. https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.6096
  49. 49. Kumari S, Sharma MK. Genetic variability studies in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Vegetable Science. 2013;40(01):83–6.
  50. 50. Meena OP, Bahadur V. Genetic associations analysis for fruit yield and its contributing traits of indeterminate tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) germplasm under open field condition. J Agric Sci. 2015;7(3):148. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v7n3p148
  51. 51. Sharmin S, Hannan A, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Sagor GH. Genetic association and path coefficient analysis among yield and nutritional traits of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). J Bangladesh Agric Univ. 2019;17(2):187–93. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v17i2.41942
  52. 52. Williams G, Anbuselvam Y. Assessment of genetic divergence through principal component analysis and clustering in tomato germplasm accessions. Environ Ecol. 2023;41(4D):3060–5. https://doi.org/10.60151/envec/YLSS4838
  53. 53. Sinha A, Singh P, Bhardwaj A, Verma RB. Principal component analysis approach for comprehensive screening of tomato germplasm for polyhouse condition. J Exp Agric Int. 2021;43(9):67–72. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2021/v43i930739
  54. 54. Biradar G, Laxman RH, Shivashankara KS, Valiaparambil Sebastin JS. Screening and selection of physio-biochemical traits to detect high temperature tolerance using multivariate analysis in tomato genotypes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Acta Physiol Plant. 2022;44(8):79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-022-03414-6
  55. 55. Haque MS, Husna MT, Uddin MN, Hossain MA, Sarwar AK, Ali OM, et al. Heat stress at early reproductive stage differentially alters several physiological and biochemical traits of three tomato cultivars. Horticulturae. 2021 S;7(10):330. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100330
  56. 56. Dasgan HY, Dere S, Akhoundnejad Y, Arpaci BB. Effects of high-temperature stress during plant cultivation on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit nutrient content. J Food Qual. 2021;2021(1):7994417. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7994417

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.