Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Mitigating subsoil compaction through autonomous modular machinery: A review of soil-machine interactions and sustainable agronomic practices

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.16542
Submitted
4 July 2026
Published
16-09-2026

Abstract

The preservation of soil structural integrity and optimal root development in smallholder agroecosystems is increasingly compromised by conventional, mass-dependent agricultural machinery. This review evaluates the agronomic implications of transitioning from heavy draft power to scale-neutral, autonomous modular swarms within fragmented farming systems (subplots under 2 hectares). Systematic analysis of 40 studies (via Scopus and Web of Science) demonstrates that conventional high-axle-load machinery induces deep subsoil stress cones. These pathways impede essential nutrient uptake, limit water infiltration and ultimately stunt plant physiological development. Conversely, purpose-built, lightweight autonomous platforms confine mechanical load impacts to the topsoil layer. This critical engineering shift preserves subsurface soil porosity, sustains a viable and highly active rhizosphere and prevents long-term structural degradation. Furthermore, the integration of sensor-driven precision navigation facilitates a 15–20 % reduction in basal fertiliser application. This optimises plant nutrient use efficiency while mitigating runoff into surrounding ecosystems. Adopting these systems yields operational efficiencies, including an 8–12 % reduction in overlap and a 6–10 % decrease in fuel consumption.  These effects vary by soil texture, moisture and root architecture, being most pronounced in compaction-prone soils (e.g., Vertisols) susceptible to degradation. While socioeconomic barriers to adoption exist for marginal farmers, the primary agronomic benefit of autonomous swarms lies in their immediate capacity to halt anthropogenic soil compaction. Modular autonomous mechanisation offers a promising agroecological pathway, with potential to help maintain subsoil health, promote root proliferation and secure yields in vulnerable environments.

References

  1. 1. Hazell P, Poulton C, Wiggins S, Dorward A. The future of small farms: trajectories and policy priorities. World Development. 2010;38:1349–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.012
  2. 2. Jayne TS, Chamberlin J, Traub L, Sitko N, Muyanga M, Yeboah FK, et al. Africa’s changing farm size distribution patterns: the rise of medium-scale farms. Agricultural Economics. 2016;47:197–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12308
  3. 3. Lowder SK, Skoet J, Raney T. The number, size and distribution of farms, smallholder farms and family farms worldwide. World Development. 2016;87:16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041
  4. 4. Lowder SK, Sánchez MV, Bertini R. Which farms feed the world and has farmland become more concentrated? World Development. 2021;142:105455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105455
  5. 5. Daum T, Birner R. Agricultural mechanization in Africa: myths, realities and an emerging research agenda. Global Food Security. 2020;26:100393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100393
  6. 6. Van Loon J, Woltering L, Krupnik TJ, Baudron F, Boa M, Govaerts B. Scaling agricultural mechanization services in smallholder farming systems: case studies from sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and Latin America. Agricultural Systems. 2020;180:102792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102792
  7. 7. Aryal JP, Rahut DB, Thapa G, Simtowe F. Mechanisation of small-scale farms in South Asia: empirical evidence derived from farm households survey. Technology in Society. 2021;65:101591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101591
  8. 8. Das A, Usami Y. Downturn in wages in rural India. RAS. 2023;13:4–28. https://doi.org/10.25003/RAS.13.02.0002
  9. 9. Diao X, Hazell P, Thurlow J. The role of agriculture in African development. World Development. 2010;38:1375–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.011
  10. 10. Paudel GP, Kc DB, Rahut DB, Khanal NP, Justice SE, McDonald AJ. Smallholder farmers’ willingness to pay for scale-appropriate farm mechanization: evidence from the mid-hills of Nepal. Technology in Society. 2019;59:101196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101196
  11. 11. Sims B, Kienzle J. Making mechanization accessible to smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Environments. 2016;3:11. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments3020011
  12. 12. Fountas S, Malounas I, Athanasakos L, Avgoustakis I, Espejo-Garcia B. AI-assisted vision for agricultural robots. AgriEngineering. 2022;4:674–94. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering4030043
  13. 13. Lowenberg-DeBoer J, Erickson B. Setting the record straight on precision agriculture adoption. Agronomy Journal. 2019;111:1552–69. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.12.0779
  14. 14. Balafoutis A, Beck B, Fountas S, Vangeyte J, Wal T, Soto I, et al. Precision agriculture technologies positively contributing to GHG emissions mitigation, farm productivity and economics. Sustainability. 2017;9:1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081339
  15. 15. Lagnelöv O, Dhillon S, Larsson G, Nilsson D, Larsolle A, Hansson P-A. Cost analysis of autonomous battery electric field tractors in agriculture. Biosystems Engineering. 2021;204:358–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.02.005
  16. 16. Shockley JM, Dillon CR, Shearer SA. An economic feasibility assessment of autonomous field machinery in grain crop production. Precision Agric. 2019;20:1068–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-019-09638-w
  17. 17. Lowenberg-DeBoer J, Franklin K, Behrendt K, Godwin R. Economics of autonomous equipment for arable farms. Precision Agric. 2021;22:1992–2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09822-x
  18. 18. Batte MT, Ehsani MR. The economics of precision guidance with auto-boom control for farmer-owned agricultural sprayers. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2006;53:28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2006.03.004
  19. 19. Al-Amin AKMA, Lowenberg-DeBoer J, Franklin K, Behrendt K. Economics of field size and shape for autonomous crop machines. Precision Agric. 2023;24:1738–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-023-10016-w
  20. 20. Rajendran M, Ranganathan T. Advancements in paddy transplanter mechanization implications for sustainable agriculture. Sustainable Futures. 2025;10:101235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101235
  21. 21. Emmi L, Fernández R, Gonzalez-de-Santos P, Francia M, Golfarelli M, Vitali G, et al. Exploiting the Internet resources for autonomous robots in agriculture. Agriculture. 2023;13:1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13051005
  22. 22. Revell G, Powell J, Welsh J. Economic potential of autonomous tractor technology in Australian cotton production systems. Australian Farm Business Management Journal. 2020;17:21–40.
  23. 23. Shutske JM, Sandner KJ, Jamieson Z. Risk assessment methods for autonomous agricultural machines: a review of current practices and future needs. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 2023;39:109–20. https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.15281
  24. 24. Elavarasan V, Kannan P, Muthumanickam D, Praneetha S, Prabukumar G. Emerging trends in soil and crop sensing for enhanced data-driven decision making in precision agriculture. Plant Sci Today [Internet]. 2025. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9306
  25. 25. Becerra-Encinales JF, Bernal-Hernandez P, Beltrán-Giraldo JA, Cooman AP, Reyes LH, Cruz JC. Agricultural extension for adopting technological practices in developing countries: a scoping review of barriers and dimensions. Sustainability. 2024;16:3555. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093555
  26. 26. Slaughter DC, Giles D, Downey D. Autonomous robotic weed control systems: a review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2008;61:63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.05.008
  27. 27. Tillett N, Hague T, Grundy A, Dedousis AP. Mechanical within-row weed control for transplanted crops using computer vision. Biosystems Engineering. 2008;99:171–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.09.026
  28. 28. Gabriel A, Gandorfer M. Adoption of digital technologies in agriculture-an inventory in a European small-scale farming region. Precision Agric. 2023;24:68–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09931-1
  29. 29. Keller T, Or D. Farm vehicles approaching weights of sauropods exceed safe mechanical limits for soil functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119:e2117699119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117699119
  30. 30. Berli M, Kulli B, Attinger W, Keller M, Leuenberger J, Flühler H, et al. Compaction of agricultural and forest subsoils by tracked heavy construction machinery. Soil and Tillage Research. 2004;75:37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00160-0
  31. 31. Hamza MA, Anderson WK. Soil compaction in cropping systems. Soil and Tillage Research. 2005;82:121–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.08.009
  32. 32. Pulido Fentanes J, Badiee A, Duckett T, Evans J, Pearson S, Cielniak G. Kriging-based robotic exploration for soil moisture mapping using a cosmic-ray sensor. Journal of Field Robotics. 2020;37:122–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21914
  33. 33. Fuentes-Peñailillo F, Acevedo-Opazo C, Ortega-Farías S, Rivera M, Verdugo-Vásquez N. Spatialized system to monitor vine flowering: towards a methodology based on a low-cost wireless sensor network. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2021;187:106233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106233
  34. 34. Katimbo A, Rudnick DR, Zhang J, Ge Y, DeJonge KC, Franz TE, et al. Evaluation of artificial intelligence algorithms with sensor data assimilation in estimating crop evapotranspiration and crop water stress index for irrigation water management. Smart Agricultural Technology. 2023;4:100176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2023.100176
  35. 35. Daum T. Farm robots: ecological utopia or dystopia? Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2021;36:774–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.002
  36. 36. Binswanger-Mkhize HP, D’Souza A. Structural change and agricultural performance at the state level in India: 1980–2010. Agricultural Economics Research Association (India) [Internet]. 2015;28. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2015.00002.6
  37. 37. Daum T, Adegbola PY, Adegbola C, Daudu C, Issa F, Kamau G, et al. Mechanization, digitalization and rural youth-stakeholder perceptions on three mega-topics for agricultural transformation in four African countries. Global Food Security. 2022;32:100616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100616
  38. 38. Sheahan M, Barrett CB. Ten striking facts about agricultural input use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy. 2017;67:12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.010
  39. 39. Badegaonkar UR, Tamhankar MB, Saha KP, Bargale PC. A business model of custom hiring of agricultural machinery for enhanced farm mechanization in Madhya Pradesh. 2020.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.