Hydroponic and in vitro screening of wheat varieties for salt-tolerance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.1686Keywords:
Callogenesis, PCA, Salinity, Seedlings growth, Triticum aestivum L, TSTIAbstract
Salt-tolerant wheat cultivars are essential for sustainable wheat production and global food security. The present study aimed to establish a reliable screening protocol as well as successfully isolated the potential salt-tolerant wheat varieties by discerning morpho-physiological parameters with multivariate analysis. Seventeen wheat varieties were evaluated at 0, 12, 15 and 18 dSm-1 salinity levels in a hydroponic culture system at the seedling stage. Moreover, in vitro callusing responses of four selected varieties were determined to clarify the salt tolerance capability at 0, 9, 12 and 15 dSm-1 salt treatments. The seedling growth of most wheat varieties was highly interrupted and reduced by the toxic effects of salinity, however, some varieties such as BARI Gom-32, BARI Gom-33, BARI Gom-31, BARI Gom-30, and BARI Gom-28 showed the lowest reduction under all salinity stress conditions. The total salt tolerance index (TSTI) showed that the cultivar BARI Gom-33 was the most salt-tolerant followed by BARI Gom-32 and BARI Gom-30 whereas BARI Gom-25 was identified as the most sensitive. These results were strongly supported by the principal component analysis (PCA) and Ward’s Methods Euclidean based clustering. In vitro results revealed that the lowest reduction of callus induction was recorded in BARI Gom-33 which might show the greatest tolerance to salinity by improving morpho-physiological characteristics against salt stress. Therefore, the identified genotypes might be employed as donor parents to develop salt-tolerant and high-yielding cultivars in the wheat breeding programme.
Downloads
References
Kausar A, Ashraf M, Gull M, Ghafoor R, Ilyas M, Zafar S et al. Alleviation of salt stress by K2SO4 in two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2016;14(5):137-47. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1405_137147
Mbarki S, Sytar O, Cerda A, Zivcak M, Rastogi A, He X et al. Strategies to mitigate the salt stress effects on photosynthetic apparatus and productivity of crop plants. In: Salinity Responses and Tolerance in Plants, Vol. 1. Springer; 2018. p. 85-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75671-4_4
Pons R, Cornejo M-J, Sanz A. Differential salinity-induced variations in the activity of H+-pumps and Na+/H+ antiporters that are involved in cytoplasm ion homeostasis as a function of genotype and tolerance level in rice cell lines. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2011;49(12):1399-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.09.011
Ali S, Gautam R, Mahajan R, Krishnamurthy S, Sharma S, Singh R et al. Stress indices and selectable traits in SALTOL QTL introgressed rice genotypes for reproductive stage tolerance to sodicity and salinity stresses. Field Crops Research. 2013;154:65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.06.011
FAO. FAO (2009). High Level Expert Forum-How to Feed the World in 2050. Economic and Social Development, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2009. Available from: https://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/35571/icode/
Mickelbart MV, Hasegawa PM, Bailey-Serres J. Genetic mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance that translate to crop yield stability. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2015;16(4):237-51. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3901
Rashid MHO, Islam S, Bari M. In vitro screening for salt stress tolerance of native and exotic potato genotypes by morphological and physiological parameters. Journal of Bio-Science. 2020;28:21-32. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbs.v28i0.44707
Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:651-81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
Shrivastava P, Kumar R. Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2015;22(2):123-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001
Siddiqui MN, Mostofa MG, Akter MM, Srivastava AK, Sayed MA, Hasan MS et al. Impact of salt-induced toxicity on growth and yield-potential of local wheat cultivars: oxidative stress and ion toxicity are among the major determinants of salt-tolerant capacity. Chemosphere. 2017;187:385-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.078
Acquaah G. Principles of plant genetics and breeding Blackwell Pub., Malden, MA. 2007. Available from: https://gtu.ge/Agro-Lib/Principles%20of%20Plant%20Genetics%20and%20Breeding.pdf
DESA U. World population prospects: The 2015 revision, key findings and advance tables. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division working paper no ESA/P/WP. 2015;241. Available from: https://population.un.org/wpp/publications/files/key_findings_wpp_2015.pdf
Shewry PR. Wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2009;60(6):1537-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp058
Hussain B, Khan AS, Ali Z. Genetic variation in wheat germplasm for salinity tolerance atseedling stage: improved statistical inference. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2015;39(2):182-92. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1404-114
Supply C, Brief D. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation (FAO)(2016).Available from: http://www. fao. org/worldfoodsituation/csdb/en.
Jones HD. Wheat transformation: current technology and applications to grain development and composition. Journal of Cereal Science. 2005;41(2):137-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2004.08.009
BARI. BARI, 2010 Wheat Production in Bangladesh: A success story. Available from: http://www.bari.gov.bd/index.php?
Al-Ashkar I, Alderfasi A, Ben Romdhane W, Seleiman MF, El-Said RA, Al-Doss A. Morphological and genetic diversity within salt tolerance detection in eighteen wheat genotypes. Plants. 2020;9(3):287. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9030287
Haque MS, Saha N, Muhammad, Islam M, Islam MdM, Kwon S-J et al. Screening for drought tolerance in wheat genotypes by morphological and SSR markers. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology. 2020;24(1):27-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-020-00036-7
Ashraf M, Foolad MR. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007;59(2):206-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006.
Acosta-Motos JR, Ortuño MF, Bernal-Vicente A, Diaz-Vivancos P, Sanchez-Blanco MJ, Hernandez JA. Plant responses to salt stress: adaptive mechanisms. Agronomy. 2017;7(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7010018
Hasanuzzaman M. Salt Stress Tolerance in Rice and Wheat: Physiological and Molecular Mechanism. 2022. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.10529
Rahneshan Z, Nasibi F, Moghadam AA. Effects of salinity stress on some growth, physiological, biochemical parameters and nutrients in two pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) rootstocks. Journal of Plant Interactions. 2018;13(1):73-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2018.1424355
Negrão S, Schmöckel S, Tester M. Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Annals of Botany. 2017;119(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw191
Munns R, James RA, Läuchli A. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2006;57(5):1025-43. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj100
Munns R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2002;25(2):239-50. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x
Badridze G, Weidner A, Asch F, Börner A. Variation in salt tolerance within a Georgian wheat germplasm collection. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 2009;56(8):1125-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-009-9436-0
Ahmad M, Shahzad A, Iqbal M, Asif M, Hirani AH. Morphological and molecular genetic variation in wheat for salinity tolerance at germination and early seedling stage. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2013;7(1):66-74. Available from: http://www.cropj.com/shahzad_7_1_2013_66_74.pdf
Shahzad A, Ahmad M, Iqbal M, Ahmed I, Ali G. Evaluation of wheat landrace genotypes for salinity tolerance at vegetative stage by using morphological and molecular markers. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2012;11(1):679-92. https://doi.org/10.4238/2012.March.19.2
Rattana K, Bunnag S. Differential salinity tolerance in calli and shoots of 4 rice cultivars. Asian Journal of Crop Science. 2015;7(1):48-60. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2015.48.60
Atabaki N, Nulit R, Kalhori N, Lasumin N, Sahebi M, Abiri R. In vitro selection and development of Malaysian salt tolerant rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. MR263) under salinity. Acta Scientific Agriculture. 2018;2(8):8-17. Available form: https://actascientific.com/ASAG/ASAG-02-0138.php
Haque M, Islam SS, Subramaniam S. Effects of salt and heat pre-treatment factors on efficient regeneration in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). 3 Biotech. 2017;7(1):63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0675-z
Sajid ZA, Aftab F. Plant regeneration from in vitro-selected salt tolerant callus cultures of Solanum tuberosum L. Pak J Bot. 2014;46(4):1507-14. Available from: https://www.pakbs.org/pjbot/PDFs/46(4)/47.pdf
Badawy O, Nasr M, Alhendawi R. Response of sugarcane (Saccharum sp. hybrid) genotypes to embryogenic callus induction and in vitro salt stress. Sugar Tech. 2008;10(3):243-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-008-0043-8
Rashed M, Roy M, Paul S, Haque M. In vitro screening of salt tolerent genotypes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Journal of Horticulture. 2016;3(4):1-8. Available form: https://www.longdom.org/open-access/in-vitro-screening-of-salt-tolerent-genotypes-in-tomato-solanum-lycopersicum-l-14946.html
Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons; 1984. Available form: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Statistical+Procedures+for+Agricultural+Research%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9780471870920
Hasanuzzaman M, Islam MM, Saha NR, Farabi S, Haque MS. In-vitro callogenesis and regeneration from mature embryos of bangladeshi wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. 2021;33 & 34(22). Available form: https://www.ikprress.org/index.php/PCBMB/article/view/6417
Rasel M, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Hossain MA, Sayed MA, Hassan L. Discerning of rice landraces (Oryza sativa L.) for morpho-physiological, antioxidant enzyme activity and molecular markers’ responses to induced salt stress at the seedling stage. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2020;39(1):41-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-09962-5
Läuchli A, Grattan S. Plant growth and development under salinity stress. In: Advances in molecular breeding toward drought and salt tolerant crops. Springer; 2007. p. 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5578-2_1
Ali MN, Yeasmin L, Gantait S, Goswami R, Chakraborty S. Screening of rice landraces for salinity tolerance at seedling stage through morphological and molecular markers. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2014;20(4):411-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-014-0250-6
Datta J, Nag S, Banerjee A, Mondai N. Impact of salt stress on five varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars under laboratory condition. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management. 2009;13(3). https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v13i3.55372
Gungor H, Çikili YA, Dumlupinar Z?. Evaluation of morpho-physiological traits of turkish rice genotypes in response to salt stress under in vitro conditions. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 2019;29(2):556-67.
Latef AA, Hasanuzzaman M, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M. Mitigation of salinity stress by exogenous application of cytokinin in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2021;49(1):12192. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha49112192
Chunthaburee S, Dongsansuk A, Sanitchon J, Pattanagul W, Theerakulpisut P. Physiological and biochemical parameters for evaluation and clustering of rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance at seedling stage. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2016;23(4):467-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.05.013
Rasel M, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Hossain MA, Hassan L, Farzana S, Brestic M. Screening of salt-tolerant rice landraces by seedling stage phenotyping and dissecting biochemical determinants of tolerance mechanism. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2020;1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10235-9
Tabassum R, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Hasanuzzaman M, Sohag AAM, Islam MS, Shafi SSH et al. Screening salt-tolerant rice at the seedling and reproductive stages: an effective and reliable approach. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2021;104629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104629
Munns R, James RA. Screening methods for salinity tolerance: a case study with tetraploid wheat. Plant and Soil. 2003;253(1):201-18. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024553303144
Genc Y, Mcdonald GK, Tester M. Reassessment of tissue Na+ concentration as a criterion for salinity tolerance in bread wheat. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2007;30(11):1486-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01726.x
Kakar N, Jumaa SH, Redoña ED, Warburton ML, Reddy KR. Evaluating rice for salinity using pot-culture provides a systematic tolerance assessment at the seedling stage. Rice. 2019;12(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-019-0317-7
Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Sayed MA, Islam MM, Siddiqui MN, Begum S, Hossain MA. Screening of rice landraces (Oryza sativa L.) for seedling stage salinity tolerance using morpho-physiological and molecular markers. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2018;40(4):70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-018-2645-4
Revathi S, Pillai MA. In vitro callus induction and regeneration in fine grain rice variety basmati 370 by s. revathi and m. arumugam pillai. life sciences leaflets, 63, pp.23-to. Life Sciences Leaflets. 2015;63:23-to. Available from: https://petsd.org/ojs/index.php/lifesciencesleaflets/oai?verb=ListRecords&set=lifesciencesleaflets:RP&metadataPrefix=oai_dc
Htwe NN, Maziah M, Ling HC, Zaman FQ, Zain AM. Responses of some selected Malaysian rice genotypes to callus induction under in vitro salt stress. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10(3):350-62. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajbkr.2011.357.367
Aly M, Sabry S, Abdelfatah O, Elgharbawy H. In vitro screening for the effect of sea water salinity stress on growth and biochemical characteristics of wheat Triticum aestivum L. Intern J Appl Agric Res. 2007;2(1):1-11. Available from: https://www.ripublication.com/Volume/ijaarv2n1.htm
Khaleda L, Ahmed A, Marzan L, Al-Forkan M. Identification of callus induction and plant regeneration responsiveness in presence of NaCl in in vitro culture of some deepwater rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 2007. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2007.36.41
Benderradji L, Brini F, Kellou K, Ykhlef N, Djekoun A, Masmoudi K et al. Callus induction, proliferation and plantlets regeneration of two bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under saline and heat stress conditions. ISRN Agronomy. 2012;2012. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/367851
Zinnah K, Zobayer N, Sikdar SU, Liza LN, Chowdhury MAN, Ashrafuzzaman M. In vitro regeneration and screening for salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int Res J Biol Sci. 2013;2(11):29-36. Available from: https://www.rjpbcs.com/pdf/2015_6(4)/[226].pdf
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 01-10-2022 (2)
- 21-07-2022 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Shahidul Haque, Md. Hasanuzzaman, Md. Tohidur Rahman, Nazmul Islam, Shamsun Nahar Begum, Sabina Yasmin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
