Plant Extracts: Potential Alternative Treatment for Bovine Mastitis Causing Pathogen Staphylococcus aureus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2674Keywords:
Bovine mastitis, Ethnoveterinary medicine, Plant extracts, Staphylococcus aureusAbstract
Bovine mastitis is a significant disease affecting dairy herds worldwide. Mastitis can be characterized by physical, chemical, and bacteriological changes in milk and various pathological changes in the glandular tissues. This disease can invariably affect the health status of cattle and eventually have a direct economic impact on the dairy industry. Mastitis can be caused by the interaction of pathogens and their environment, and one of the disease-causing pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus, remains the leading cause of mastitis. Treatment is directed towards the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials. However, with the threat of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, alternative treatments are being explored. The use of plants with ethnoveterinary origins can be promising in the search for novel therapeutic regimens. This review focuses on various studies using plant extracts as a possible alternative treatment for this specific bovine-causing pathogen, Staphylococcus aureus. Several studies that were conducted will serve as preliminary data in the development of alternative treatments for bovine mastitis.
Downloads
References
Radotis O, Gay C, Hinchkliff K. Veterinary medicine: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, sheep, pigs, goats and horses. ELBS & Baillier Tindall; 2000.
Albenzio M, Taibi I, Musco A, Sevi A. Prevalence and etiology of subclinical mastitis in intensively managed flocks and related changes in the yield and quality of milk. Small Ruminant Research. 2002 [cited 2022 June 1];219-26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00022-6
Contreras G, Rodiguez J. Mastitis: Comparative etiology and epidemiology. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 2011 [cited 2022 December 3];339-56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-011-9234-0
Gera S, Guha A. Assessment of acute phase proteins and nitric oxide as indicator of subclinical mastitis in Holstein × Haryana cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2011 [cited 2022 December 3];1029-31. Available from: https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/11326
Francoz D, Wellemans V, Dupre J, Roy J, Labelle F, Lacasse P, Dufour S. Invited review: A systematic review and qualitative analysis of treatments other than conventional antimicrobials for clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2017 [cited 2023 January 5];7751-70. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12512
Sender S, Pawlik A, Korwin K. Current concepts on the impact of coagulase-negativeStaphylococci causing bovine mastitis as a threat to human and animal health – A review. Animal Science Paper and Reports. 2017 [cited 2023 January 5];123-35. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:26552200
Notebaert S, Meyer R. Mouse models to study the pathogenesis and control of bovine mastitis. Veterinary Quarterly. 2006 [cited 2023 January 5];2-13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2006.9695201
Wall R, Powell A, Paape M, Kerr D, Bannerman D, Pursel V, Hawk H. Genetically enhanced cows resist intramammary Staphylococcus aureus infection. Nature Biotechnology. 2005 [cited 2023 January 5];445-51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1078
Misra N, Wines T, Knopp C, Hernan R, Bond L, Mitchell B, JK T. Immunogenicity of a Staphylococcus aureus-cholera toxin A2/B vaccine for bovine mastitis. Vaccine. 2018 [cited 2023 January 6];3513-21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.067
Saglam A, Sahin M, Celik E, Celebi O, Akca D, Otlu S. The role of Staphylococci in subclinical mastitis of cows and lytic phage isolation against to Staphylococcus aureus. Veterinary World. 2017 [cited 2023 January 6];1481-85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2017.1481-1485
Khan IH, Javaid A. Identification of biologically important compounds in neem leaves through GC-MS analysis. Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021 [cited 2023 January 3];14(3): 359-66.
Javaid A, Chaudhury FA, Khan IH, Ferdosi MFH. Potential health-related phytoconstituents in leaves of Chenopodium quinoa. Advancements in Life Sciences. 2022 [cited 2023 January 3];9(4):574-78.
Zschocke S, Rabe T, Taylor J, Jager A, JV S. Plant part substitution-A way to conserve endangered medicinal plants. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2000 [cited 2023 January 5];281-92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00186-0
Asika P, Van Averbeeke W, Sonandi A. Use of herbal remedies by small scale farmers to treat livestock diseases in central Easter Cape Province, South Africa. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association. 2000 [cited 2023 January7];87-91. https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v71i2.685
Razavi S, Zarrini G, Molavi G, Ghasemi G. Bioactivity of Malva Sylvestri L., a medicinal Plant from Iran. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 2011 [cited 2023 January 3];574-79. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586856/
Esteves P, Sato A, Esquibel M, Buzzi F, Meira A, Filho V. Antinociceptive activity of Malva sylvestris L.. Latin American Journal of Pharmacy. 2009 [cited 2023 January 3];454-56.
Zohra SF, Meriem B, Samira S, Muneer A. Phytochemical screening and identification of some compounds from Mallow. Journal of Natural Products and Plant Resources. 2012 [cited 2023 January 5];512-16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.212
Mousavi SM, Hashemi SA, Zarei M, Bahrani S, Savardashtaki A, Esmaeili H, Ramavadi B. Data on cytotoxic and antibacterial activity of synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles using Malva sylvestris. Data in Brief. 2019 [cited 2023 Januay 3];1-10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104929
Venkateshwa R. The chemical constituents and biological studies of Chloroxylon swietenia. Indian Drugs. 2008 [cited 2023 January 1];5-15.
Manandhar S, Luitel S, Dahal RK. In vitro antimicrobial activity of some medicinal plants against human pathogenic bacteria. Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2019 [cited 2023 January 1];1-5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2F2019/2F1895340
Goyal P, Chauhan A, Kaushik P. Laboratory evaluation of crude extracts of Cinnamomum tamala for potential antibacterial activity. Electronic Journal of Biology. 2009 [cited 2023 January 1];75-79. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12691/jfnr-7-1-1
Hassan W, Kazmi SN, Riaz A, Zaman B. Antimicrobial activity of Cinnamomum tamala leaves. Journal of Nutritional Disorders & Therapy. 2016 [cited 2023 January 1];1-5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-016-0381-7
Mishra A, Singh B, Pandey A. In vitro-antibacterial activity and phytochemical profiles of Cinnamomum tamala (Tejpat) leaf extracts and oils. Reviews in Infection. 2010 [cited 2023 January 2];134-39.
Khameneh B, Iranshahy M, Soheili V, Bazzaz B. Review on plant antimicrobials: A mechanistic viewpoint. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. 2019 [cited 2023 Januar 5];1-28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0559-6
Xie Y, Yang W, Tang FC. Antibacterial activities of flavonoids: Structure-activity relationship and mechanism. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2015 [cited 2023 January 8];132-49. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867321666140916113443
Lamxay V, de Boer H, Bjork L. Traditions and plant use during pregnancy, childbirth and post partum recovery by the Kry ethnic group in Lao PDR. J Ethnobiology. 2011 [cited 2023 January 1];1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-7-14
Wenqian Y, Yuk H. Antimicrobial efficacy of Syzygium antisepticum plant extract against Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus and its application potential with cooked chicken. Food Microbiology. 2018 [cited 2023 January 9];176-84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2017.12.002
Saddiqe Z, Naeem I, Maimoona A. A review of the antibacterial activity of Hypericum perforatum L. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2010 [cited 2022 December 30];511-21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.07.034
Reichling J, Weseler A, Saller R. A current review of the antimicrobial activity of Hypericum perforatum L. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2001 [cited 2022 December 15];S116-18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-15514
Dadgar T, Asmar M, Saifi A, Bayat H, Ghaemi E. Antibacterial activity of certain medicinal plants against methicillin resistant and methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 2006 [cited 2023 January 2];861. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2006.861.866
Okmen G, Balpinar N. Biological activities of Hypericum perforatum L. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines. 2017 [cited 2023 January 1];213-18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2006.861.866
Saeed HM, Ferdosi MFH, Khan IH, Javaid A, Sultan MW. Antibacterial activity and GC-MS analysis of white flowers extract of Nerium oleander L. International Journal of Biology and Biotechnology. 2023 [cited 2023 March 3];20(1):163-68.
Saeed HM, Ferdosi MFH, Javaid A, Khan IH, Sattar T. Antibacterial activity and phytochemical profile of flower extract of pink oleander. International Journal of Biology and Biotechnology. 2023 [cited 2023 May 19];20(2):353-58.
Wilkie ED, Michael PO, Oluduro AO, Alao J. Antibacterial potential of Annona muricata (Linn.) leaf extract: A promising natural source for novel antibacterial therapies. South Asian Journal of Research in Microbilogy. 2023 [cited 2023 August 1];34-44. Available from https://doi.org/10.9734/sajrm/2023/v1
Wasihun Y, Habteweld HA, Ayenew K. Antibacterial activity and phytochemical components of leaf extract of Calpurnia aurea. Scientific reports. 2023 [cited 2023 July 1]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36837-3
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 13-01-2024 (2)
- 27-12-2023 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 April Corazon G. Abon, Claro N. Mingala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
