Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Early Access

Exploring the potential of synthetic seeds: Influence of explant, encapsulating agent and matrix, advantages and challenges

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3931
Submitted
17 May 2024
Published
27-12-2024
Versions

Abstract

Synthetic seed can serve as a substitute for conventional seed where conventional seed production is not practical. This method gives a viable solution for propagating plants that are difficult to reproduce through traditional means. Technologies based on synthetic seeds, encapsulating somatic embryos, shoot tissues, or axillary buds in a suitable matrix, demonstrate great influence over plant propagation by helping to accelerate germplasm exchange, increasing genetic preservation, and efficient genetic modification, thus providing the avenue for planting new seeds and accomplishing common goals. This review paper explores the importance of synthetic seeds, the impact of different explants, matrix composition, and encapsulating agents on the quality of synthetic seeds, as well as the benefits and drawbacks of synthetic seeds. Among the various explants used in synthetic seed production, somatic embryos promote genetic stability, shoot buds possess better viability, and axillary buds ensure genotype conservation. Alginate is the prevalent encapsulating agent due to its biocompatibility and cheapness. However, variable germination rates and microbial contamination remained a challenge and we must develop a protocol standardization too. Besides techniques like enhancing the germination rates, stabilizing genes, and having secondary metabolites in the process, the use of cryopreservation technologies and field performance evaluation is also crucially important in the process of creating synthetic seeds. This review discusses current trends in synthetic production research, emphasizing the need for new strategies to address poor germination rates and standardize explants used in synthetic seeds. It examines the factors affecting the production of synthetic seeds, factors affecting seed quality, and potential future developments.

References

  1. Rihan HZ, Kareem F, El-Mahrouk ME, Fuller MP. Artificial seeds (principle, aspects and applications). Agronomy. 2017;7(4):71. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/7/4/71
  2. Murashige T. Plant propagation through tissue cultures. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 1974;25(1):135-66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.25.060174.001031
  3. Kitto SK, Janick J. Polyox as an artificial seed coat for asexual embryos. Horticultural Science. 1982;17(3):488-88.
  4. Redenbaugh K, Paasch BD, Nichol JW, Kossler ME, Viss PR, Walker KA. Somatic seeds: encapsulation of asexual plant embryos. Bio/technology. 1986;4(9):797-801. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0986-797
  5. Pi?tczak E, Wysoki?ska H. Encapsulation of Centaurium erythraea Rafn. – an efficient method for regeneration of transgenic plants. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia s. Botanica. 2013;55(2):37-44. https://doi.org/10.2478/abcsb-2013-0022
  6. Rai MK, Asthana P, Singh SK, Jaiswal VS, Jaiswal U. The encapsulation technology in fruit plants — a review. Biotechnology Advances. 2009;27(6):671-79. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.025
  7. Nikhil A, Shukla S. Production of artificial seeds from nodal region of sweet neem (Murraya koenigii). J Adv Pharma Res Biosci. 2013;1(2):71-74.
  8. Adriani M, Piccioni E, Standardi A. Effect of different treatments on the conversion of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit synthetic seeds to whole plants following encapsulation of in vitro-derived buds. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science. 2000;28(1):59-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2000.9514123
  9. Gantait S, Kundu S, Ali N, Sahu NC. Synthetic seed production of medicinal plants: a review on influence of explants, encapsulation agent and matrix. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2015;37(5):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-015-1847-2
  10. Redenbaugh K, Slade D, Viss P, Fujii JA. Encapsulation of somatic embryos in synthetic seed coats. HortScience. 1987;22(5):803-09. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.22.5.803
  11. Standardi A, Piccioni E. Recent perspectives on synthetic seed technology using nonembryogenic in vitro–derived explants. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 1998;159(6):968-78. https://doi.org/10.1086/314087
  12. Repunte VP, Taya M, Tone S. Conservation of root regeneration potential of cell aggregates from horseradish hairy roots used as artificial seeds. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan. 1996;29(5):874-80. https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.29.874
  13. Gray DJ, Purohit A, Triglano RN. Somatic embryogenesis and development of synthetic seed technology. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 1991;10(1):33-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689109382306
  14. Iqbal MU, Ali A, Rashid HA, Raja NI, Huma NA, Naveed Z, et al. Evaluation of sodium alginate and calcium chloride on development of synthetic seeds. Pak J Bot. 2019;51(5):1569-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.30848/PJB2019-5(36)
  15. Micheli M, Standardi A, Dell'Orco P, Mencuccini M. Preliminary studies on the synthetic seed and encapsulation technologies of vitro-derived olive explants. Acta Horticulturae. 2000;1(1):911-14. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.586.199
  16. Standardi A. Encapsulation: Promising technology for nurseries and plant tissue laboratories. AgroLife Scientific Journal. 2012;1(1):48-54.
  17. Trivedi D, Joshi A. Encapsulation of in vitro nodes of Stereospermum suaveolens DC. for propagation. Research Journal of Biotechnology. 2023;18(2):15-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.25303/1802rjbt15021
  18. Standardi A, Micheli M. Encapsulation of in vitro-derived explants: An innovative tool for nurseries. Lambardi M, Ozudogru EA, Jain SM, editors. Protocols for Micropropagation of Selected Economically-Important Horticultural Plants Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2012. p. 397-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-074-8_31
  19. Nongdam P. Development of synthetic seed technology in plants and its applications: A review. International Journal of Current Science. 2016;6(4):86-101. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:212535904
  20. Timbert R, Barbotin JN, Kersulec A, Bazinet C, Thomas D. Physico-chemical properties of the encapsulation matrix and germination of carrot somatic embryos. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 1995;46(6):573-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260460610
  21. Hegde V, Makeshkumar T, Sheela MN, Chandra CV, Koundinya AV, Anil SR, et al. Production of synthetic seed in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Journal of Root Crops. 2016;42(2):5-9. https://ojs338.isrc.in/index.php/jrc/article/view/407
  22. Aisy AR, Ratnasari E, Dewi SK. Pengaruh penggunaan jenis natrium alginat terhadap enkapsulasi benih sintetik Phalaenopsis sp. Lentera Bio: Berkala Ilmiah Biologi. 2022;11(1):131-38. https://doi.org/10.26740/lenterabio.v11n1.p131-138
  23. Prakash AV, Nair DS, Alex S, Soni KB, Viji MM, Reghunath BR. Calcium alginate encapsulated synthetic seed production in Plumbago rosea L. for germplasm exchange and distribution. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2018;24(1):963-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12298-018-0559-7
  24. Asmah HN, Hasnida HN, Zaimah NN, Noraliza A, Salmi NN. Synthetic seed technology for encapsulation and regrowth of in vitro-derived Acacia hyrid shoot and axillary buds. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10(40):7820-24. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.492
  25. Sharma S, Shahzad A, da Silva JA. Synseed technology—A complete synthesis. Biotechnology Advances. 2013;31(2):186-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.09.007
  26. Hamza EM. Factors affecting synseeds formation and germination of banana cultivar Grande Naine. World Applied Science Journal. 2013;25(10):1390-99. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.25.10.13411
  27. Muslihatin W, Jadid N, Safitri CE, Kuncoro EP. In vitro germination of Moringa oleifera synthetic seed on different composition of medium. Bioscience Research. 2018;15(3):1982-91.
  28. Bekheet SA. A synthetic seed method through encapsulation of in vitro proliferated bulblets of garlic (Allium sativum L.). Arab J Biotech. 2006;9(3):415-26.
  29. Pereira JE, Guedes RD, Costa FH, Schmitz GC. Composição da matriz de encapsulamento na formação e conversão de sementes sintéticas de pimenta-longa. Horticultura Brasileira. 2008;26(1):93-96. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362008000100018
  30. Tadda SA, Kui X, Yang H, Li M, Huang Z, Chen X, Qiu D. The response of vegetable sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas Lam.) nodes to different concentrations of encapsulation agent and MS salts. Agronomy. 2021;12(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010019
  31. Jang BK, Cho JS, Lee CH. Synthetic seed technology development and production studies for storage, transport and industrialization of bracken spores. Plants. 2020;9(9):1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091079
  32. Kaur S. In vitro conservation and exploiting polyembryonate potential of synthetic seeds of Malaxis acuminata D. Don. Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology. 2023;33(1):9-15. https://doi.org/10.3329/ptcb.v33i1.66347
  33. Barroso FD, Milagres CD, Fontes PC, Cecon PR. Magnesium-influenced seed potato development and yield. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2021;44(2):296-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1822404
  34. Tobe K, Li X, Omasa K. Effects of five different salts on seed germination and seedling growth of Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae). Seed Science Research. 2004;14(4):345-53. https://doi.org/10.1079/SSR2004188
  35. Choursiya N, Singh R, Singh P, Singh SK. Development of synthetic seed and its evaluation under controlled conditions. International Journal of Advanced and Innovative Research. 2014;3(9):45-48.
  36. Chandra K, Pandey A, Kumar P. Synthetic seed—Future prospects in crop improvement. Int J Agric Innov Res. 2018;6(1):120-25.
  37. Salaj TE, Matúšová RA, Salaj J. The effect of carbohydrates and polyethylene glycol on somatic embryo maturation in hybrid fir Abies alba × Abies numidica. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia (Series Botanica). 2004;46(1):159-67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027312410957
  38. Heringer AS, Vale EM, Barroso T, Santa-Catarina C, Silveira V. Polyethylene glycol effects on somatic embryogenesis of papaya hybrid UENF/CALIMAN 01 seeds. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology. 2013;25(2):116-24. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2197-00252013000200004
  39. Muslihatin W, Jadid N, Saputro TB, Purwani KI, Himayani CE, Calandry AW. Characteristic of synthetic seeds from two medicinal plants (Moringa oleifera and Camellia sinensis). Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing. 2018 Jun 1;1040(1):012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1040/1/012005
  40. Muslihatin W, Febriawan Z, Nasution AM, Patrialoka SN, Pratama IP, Aisyah PY, et al. Morphological and physiological characteristics of bertoni stem cuttings under 3-indoleacetic acid (IAA) treatment. Agriculture (Pol'nohospodárstvo). 2023;69(4):186-93. https://doi.org/10.2478/agri-2023-0016
  41. Pereira AE, Sandoval-Herrera IE, Zavala-Betancourt SA, Oliveira HC, Ledezma-Pérez AS, Romero J, Fraceto LF. ?-polyglutamic acid/chitosan nanoparticles for the plant growth regulator gibberellic acid: Characterization and evaluation of biological activity. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2017;157(1):1862-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.073
  42. Magray MM, Wani KP, Chatto MA, Ummyiah HM. Synthetic seed technology. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017;6(11):662-74. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.079
  43. Ara H, Jaiswal U, Jaiswal VS. Synthetic seed: Prospects and limitations. Current Science. 2000;78(12):1438-44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24104316
  44. Rojas-Vásquez R, Zuñiga-Umaña JM, Abdelnour-Esquivel A, Hernández-Soto A, Gatica-Arias A. Development of synthetic seeds in Arabica coffee embryos under aseptic and non-aseptic conditions. Vegetos. 2022;35(3):839-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-022-00364-9
  45. Saadat S, Majd A, Naseri L, Iranbakhsh A, Jafari M. Optimization of somatic embryogenesis, synthetic seed production and evaluation of genetic fidelity in Teucrium polium L. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant. 2023;59(4):483-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-023-10360-6
  46. Neelakandan AK, Wang K. Recent progress in the understanding of tissue culture-induced genome level changes in plants and potential applications. Plant Cell Reports. 2012;31(4):597-620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-011-1202-z
  47. Faisal M, Alatar AA, Ahmad N, Anis M, Hegazy AK. Assessment of genetic fidelity in Rauvolfia serpentina plantlets grown from synthetic (encapsulated) seeds following in vitro storage at 4 °C. Molecules. 2012;17(5):5050-61. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17055050
  48. Gantait S, Mukherjee E, Bandyopadhyay P, Bhattacharyya S. M-brigde-and elicitor-assisted enhanced post-storage germination of Rauvolfia serpentina synthetic seeds, their genetic fidelity assessment and reserpine estimation. Industrial Crops and Products. 2022;180(1):114732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114732
  49. Lata H, Chandra S, Techen N, Wang YH, ElSohly MA, Khan IA. Genetic fidelity of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni plants grown from synthetic seeds following in vitro storage. Planta Medica. 2016;82(05):PB23. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1578671
  50. Liu C, He Z, Zhang Y, Hu F, Li M, Liu Q, et al. Synthetic apomixis enables stable transgenerational transmission of heterotic phenotypes in hybrid rice. Plant Communications. 2022;4(2):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100470
  51. Singh A, Dwivedi P. Methyl-jasmonate and salicylic acid as potent elicitors for secondary metabolite production in medicinal plants: A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2018;7(1):750-57.
  52. Dwivedi N, Tiwari A, Singh R, Tripathi IP. Evaluation of plant secondary metabolites composition and antimicrobial activities of Eucalyptus globulus extracts. Int J Curr Microbial App Sci. 2018;7(1):4517-27.
  53. Cardoso JC, Oliveira ME, Cardoso FD. Advances and challenges on the in vitro production of secondary metabolites from medicinal plants. Horticultura Brasileira. 2019;37(2):124-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-053620190201
  54. Nandy S, Das T, Dey A. Role of jasmonic acid and salicylic acid signaling in secondary metabolite production. Aftab T, Yusuf M, editors. Jasmonates and Salicylates Signaling in Plants. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 87-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75805-9_5
  55. Sanyal R, Nandi S, Pandey S, Das T, Kaur P, Konjengbam M, et al. In vitro propagation and secondary metabolite production in Gloriosa superba L. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2022;106(17):5399-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-12094-8
  56. Engelmann F. Plant cryopreservation: progress and prospects. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant. 2004;40(1):427-33. https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2004541
  57. Sevindik B, ?zgü T, Tütüncü ME, Mendi YY. Cryopreservation and synthetic seed production in ornamental flower bulbs (geophytes). Acta Horticulturae. International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS), Leuven, Belgium. 2019; p. 17-28. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1234.3
  58. Gulati R. Strategies for sustaining plant germplasm evaluation and conservation a review. Research Journal of Life Sciences, Bioinformatics, Pharmaceutical and Chemical Sciences. 2018;4(5):313-20. https://doi.org/10.26479/2018.0405.25
  59. ?im?ek Ö, Özbay S, Isak MA. Synthetic seed production and cryopreservation for myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) genotypes. Çukurova Tar?m ve G?da Bilimleri Dergisi. 2024;39(1):126-36. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cutarim/issue/85563/1420329
  60. Siew WL, Kwok MY, Ong YM, Liew HP, Yew BK. Effective use of synthetic seed technology in the regeneration of Dendrobium white fairy orchid. Journal of Ornamental Plants. 2014;4(1):1-7.
  61. Bukhari N, Siddique I, Perveen K, Siddiqui I, Alwahibi M. Synthetic seed production and physio-biochemical studies in Cassia angustifolia Vahl. —a medicinal plant. Acta Biologica Hungarica. 2014;65(3):355-67. https://doi.org/10.1556/ABiol.65.2014.3.11
  62. Arguedas M, Villalobos A, Gómez D, Hernández L, Zevallos BE, Cejas I, et al. Field performance of cryopreserved seed-derived maize plants. CryoLetters. 2018;39(6):366-70. http://www.cryoletters.org/Abstracts/vol_39_6_2018.htm#366
  63. Darshini T and Aruna J. Importance of in vitro methods in the propagation of nutraceutical plants- a mini review. Research and Reviews in Biotechnology and Biosciences. 2023;9(2):23-31. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7932908
  64. Mangena P. Synthetic seeds and their role in agriculture: status and progress in sub-Saharan Africa. Plant Sci Today. 2021;8(3):482-90. https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/1116

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.