Exploring the feasibility of using drones for seeding of rice (Oryza sativa. L.)

Authors

  • K Adithya Department of Agronomy, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu - 620027, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1489-1428
  • T Ramesh Department of Agronomy, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu - 620027, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9869-9515
  • S Rathika Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu - 620027, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7586-7069
  • C Vanniarajan Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu - 620027, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-6412
  • K Raja Department of Nano Technology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu - 641003, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2750-8085

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4826

Keywords:

Drones, Direct seeding, Rice, Seed rate, Yield

Abstract

Rice planters worldwide face increasing challenges such as water scarcity, labor shortages and rising production costs. Traditional rice production techniques are time-consuming, labor-intensive, less economical, and more susceptible to the excessive use of farm inputs. These conditions necessitate an advanced crop establishment technique that offers higher returns with lower input and labor than traditional methods. A field study was performed to assess the viability of employing drones for rice planting compared to alternative establishment methods concerning rice productivity. The treatments consisted of four different seed rates (30, 40, 50, and 60 kg ha?¹) for drone seeding, compared with drum seeding, manual broadcasting, and transplanting. The performance of drone seeding was assessed using various growth and yield parameters. Transplanted rice exhibited significantly higher growth, yield parameters, and grain yield than other methods; however, it was economically inferior to direct seeding methods, either by drum seeder or drones. Direct seeding using a drum seeder at 30 kg ha?¹ and drone seeding at 40 kg ha?¹ produced comparable growth and yield. Notably, drone seeding with a 40 kg ha?¹ seed rate resulted in significantly higher growth, yield parameters, and overall yield than manual broadcasting. This method saved 20 kg ha?¹ of seeds and increased rice yield by 13% compared to manual broadcasting at 60 kg ha?¹. Considering the issues of labor scarcity, timeliness of operation, and cost of establishment, drone seeding at a rate of 40 kg ha?¹ is deemed a more sustainable and forward-looking technique for rice crop establishment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Qi P, Wang Z, Wang C, Xu L, Jia X, Zhang Y, et al. Development of multifunctional unmanned aerial vehicles versus ground seeding and outplanting: What is more effective for improving the growth and quality of rice culture? Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:953753. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.953753

Muthayya S, Sugimoto JD, Montgomery S, Maberly GF. An overview of global rice production, supply, trade and consumption. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1324(1):7-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12540

Tamil Nadu Department of Agriculture. Season and crop report of Tamil Nadu 2022-23 [Internet]. Tamil Nadu: Tamil Nadu Department of Agriculture; c2022 [cited 2024 Sep 18]. areaproductionandyield.pdf (tn.gov.in)

Ghosh N, Singh A, Rajeshwor M, Preeti A. Labour productivity of rice crop in India’s Indo-gangetic plains: A comparison between agriculture in Eastern and Western regions. In: Mitra A, editor. Youth in Indian Labour Market. Singapore: Springer; 2024. p. 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0379-1_10

Chakraborty D, Ladha JK, Rana DS, Jat ML, Gathala MK, Yadav S, et al. A global analysis of alternative tillage and crop establishment practices for economically and environmentally efficient rice production. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9342. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09742-9 .

Rathika S, Ramesh T, Shanmugapriya P. Weed management in direct seeded rice: A review. IJCS. 2020;8(4):925-33. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4f.9723

Nazarov D, Nazarov A, Kulikova E. Drones in agriculture: Analysis of different countries. BIO Web Conf. 2023;67:02029. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20236702029

Dayana K, Ramesh T, Avudaithai S, Sebastian SP, Rathika S. Feasibility of using drone for foliar spraying of nutrients in irrigated greengram. Ecol Environ Conserv. 2022;28:548-53. http://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2022.v28i01s.074

Madhusree S, Ramesh T, Rathika S, Meena S, Raja K. Drone based herbicide application in greengram (Vigna radiata). Indian J Agric Sci. 2024;94(3):329-32. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i3.144541

Borikar GP, Gharat C, Deshmukh SR. Application of drone systems for spraying pesticides in advanced agriculture: A review. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2022;1259(1):012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1259/1/012015 .

Hafeez A, Husain MA, Singh SP, Chauhan A, Khan MT, Kumar N, et al. Implementation of drone technology for farm monitoring and pesticide spraying: A review. Inf Process Agric. 2023;10(2):192-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2022.02.002

Iqbal U, Riaz MZ, Zhao J, Barthelemy J, Perez P. Drones for flood monitoring, mapping and detection: A bibliometric review. Drones. 2023;7(1):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7010032

Castro J, Alcaraz-Segura D, Baltzer JL, Amorós L, Morales-Rueda F, Tabik S. Automated precise seeding with drones and artificial intelligence: a workflow. Restor Ecol. 2024;e14164. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14164

Worakuldumrongdej P, Maneewam T, Ruangwiset A. Rice seed sowing drone for agriculture. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS); 2019 Oct 15-18; Jeju, South Korea. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE; 2019. p. 980-85. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICCAS47443.2019.8971461

Marzuki OF, Teo EYL, Rafie ASM. The mechanism of drone seeding technology: a review. Malays For. 2021;84:349-58.

Vijayakumar S, Nithya N, Saravanane P, Mariadoss A, Subramanian E. Revolutionizing rice farming: Maximizing yield with minimal water to sustain the hungry planet. In: Intech Open; 2023. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112167

Peng S, Garcia FV, Laza RC, Cassman KG. Adjustment for specific leaf weight improves chlorophyll meter's estimate of rice leaf nitrogen concentration. Agronomy Journal. 1993;85(5):987-90. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500050005x

Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1984.

Khare TR, Sharma R, Singh SB. Evaluation of the performance of penoxsulam for weed management in direct-seeded and transplanted rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agric Sci. 2014;84(1):154-57. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i1.37173

Kaur K, Singh G, Aulakh CS. Effect of various crop establishment methods on the crop performance and water use efficiency of rice (Oryza sativa). Crop Res. 2022;57(1&2):15-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.31830/2454-1761.2022.003

Mahato M, Adhikari BB. Effect of planting geometry on growth of rice varieties. Int J Appl Sci Biotechnol. 2017;5(4):423-29. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijasbt.v5i4.18041

Zhao L, Kobayasi K, Hasegawa T, Wang CL, Yoshimoto M, Wan J, Matsui T. Traits responsible for variation in pollination and seed set among six rice cultivars grown in a miniature paddy field with free air at a hot, humid spot in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2010;139(1-2):110-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.07.006

Vijayakumar S, Madireddy H, Bhusarapu SC, Kumar RM, Sundaram RM. Drone application in rice cultivation: Experiences from ICAR-IIRR trials. Indian Farming. 2022;72(12):3-6.

Jiyu L, Yubin L, Zhiyan Z, Shan Z, Cong H, Weixiang Y, et al. Design and test of operation parameters for rice air broadcasting by unmanned aerial vehicle. Int J Agric Biol Eng. 2016;9(5):24-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.3965/j.ijabe.20160905.2248

Sangeetha C, Velayutham A, Thavaprakaash N, Chinnusamy C. Crop establishment and weed management effects on rice productivity and weed dynamics. Indian J Weed Sci. 2015;47(1):6-10.

Veeramani P, Duraisingh R, Subrahmaniyan K. Studies on different planting pattern (using rolling marker) in System of Rice Intensification (SRI) through hybrid rice CORH 3. Int J Res Chem Environ. 2012;2(1):58-61.

Rao T, PK PB, Chandrayudu E. Direct seeding rice with drum seeder is made easy to rice cultivation in North Coastal Andhra Pradesh. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(6):1237-40.

Singh PK, Kumar A, Naresh RK, Sisodi RS, Hota R, Halder N, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicle direct seeding versus ground seeding mechanization services in smallholder farming systems of North West IGP on energy use efficiency and quality of rice culture: A review. Int J Environ Clim Chang. 2023;13(9):2105-21. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i92444

Alton PB. Decadal trends in photosynthetic capacity and leaf area index inferred from satellite remote sensing for global vegetation types. Agric For Meteorol. 2018;250:361-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.11.020

Thawait D, Kar S, Patel AK. Agronomic evaluation of scented rice (Oryza sativa L.) under different planting patterns. J Crop Weed. 2014;10:175-78.

Verma AK. Manipulation of crop geometry, nutrient, weed and water management practices under system of rice intensification (SRI) for maximizing grain yield and profitability of hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.) In: Alfisols. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Raipur: Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya; 2009.

Nandhakumar M. Optimizing crop geometry, age and number of seedlings of rice under system of rice intensification. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Coimbatore: TNAU; 2014.

Awan TH, Ahmad M, Ashraf MM, Ali I. Effect of different transplanting methods on paddy yield and its components at farmer’s field in rice zone of Punjab. J Anim Plant Sci. 2011;21(3):498-502.

Bhagavathi MS, Baradhan G, Kumar SM, Arivudainambi S. Influence of different rice establishment methods and weed management practices on growth and yield of rice. Plant Arch. 2020;20(2):2937-2941.

Daba B, Mekonnen G. Effect of row spacing and frequency of weeding on weed infestation, yield components and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in bench maji zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. Int J Agron. 2022;2022(1):5423576. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5423576

Zhu Haibin, Ma Zhongtao, Xu Dong, Ling Yufei, Wei Haiyan, Gao Hui, et al. Discussion and prospect of unmanned aerial sowing rice high-quality and high-yield "unmanned" cultivation technology system. Chinese Rice. 2021;27(5):5. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.05.002

Zheng X, Lu M, Pang Z, He Z, Xie G. Comparison of different direct seeding methods of early Indica rice. XianDai NongYe KeJi. 2021;5(13):10-3969.

Ramesh T, Rathika S, Elangovan S, Vijayakumar S. Water productivity, economic viability and yield of rice under different rice establishment methods. J Rice Res. 2023;16:99-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.58297/VFVB6889

Ashraf U, Anjum SA, Ehsanullah KI, Tanveer M. Planting geometry-induced alteration in weed infestation, growth and yield of puddled rice. Pak J Weed Sci Res. 2014;20(1):77-89.

Chadhar AR, Nadeem MA, Ali HH, Safdar ME, Raza A, Adnan M, et al. Quantifying the impact of plant spacing and critical weed competition period on fine rice production under the system of rice intensification. Int J Agric Biol. 2020;1142-48.

Lwin CM, Than SM, Phyo A, San CC. Profitability of different rice varieties with different sowing methods in Maubin and Daik U Townships. J Agric Res. 2019;6(1):21-31.

Castro J, Morales-Rueda F, Navarro FB, Löf M, Vacchiano G, Alcaraz-Segura D. Precision restoration: a necessary approach to foster forest recovery in the 21st century. Restor Ecol. 2021;29(7):e13421. https://doi.org/10. 1111/rec.13421

Chantharat M, Maikeansarn V. Application of drone used for rice production in Central Thailand. In: Proceedings of PIM 10th National and 3rd International Conference 2020; 2020:904-10.

Yang W, Peng S, Laza RC, Visperas RM, Dionisio-Sese ML. Grain yield and yield attributes of new plant type and hybrid rice. Crop Sci. 2007;47(4):1393-400. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0457

Bhadru D, Reddy DL, Ramesha MS. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield and yield contributing traits in rice hybrids and their parental lines. Electron J Plant Breed. 2011;2(1):112-16.

Sabesan T, Suresh R, Saravanan K. Genetic variability and correlation for yield and grain quality characters of rice grown in coastal saline low land of Tamil Nadu. Electron J Plant Breed. 2009;1(1):56-59.

Satheeshkumar P, Saravanan K. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int J Curr Res. 2012;4(9):082-85.

Gunasekaran M, Nadarajan N, Netaji SVSRK. Character assosiation and path analysis in inter-racial hybrids in rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Electron J Plant Breed. 2010;1(2):956-60.

Navya GT, Dushyanthakumar BM, Madhuri R, Shubha KN, Gangaprasad S. Studies on morpho-physiological traits associated with drought tolerance in local landraces of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(7):1940-51. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.807.231

Published

19-11-2024

How to Cite

1.
Adithya K, Ramesh T, Rathika S, Vanniarajan C, Raja K. Exploring the feasibility of using drones for seeding of rice (Oryza sativa. L.). Plant Sci. Today [Internet]. 2024 Nov. 19 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];11(sp4). Available from: https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/4826

Most read articles by the same author(s)