Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Standardization of pulsing and holding treatments to improve the vase life of godetia (Clarkia amoena)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5427
Submitted
1 October 2024
Published
12-07-2025
Versions

Abstract

The influence of different pulsing and holding solutions was assessed during 2020-2021 in the Department of Floriculture and Landscape Architecture at Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan. The spikes of Godetia (Clarkia amoena), harvested at the bud opening stage, were placed in pulsing solutions consisting of different combinations of sucrose (4 %). The cut stems placed in pulsing solution including sucrose (4 %) + 8-hydroquinoline citrate (300 mg/L) + benzyl adenine (15 mg/L) for 6 hr exhibited a longer vase life (14.20 days), larger floret (6.27 cm), earlier floret opening (3.87 days) and ultimately better overall presentability (87.91 score out of 100) of godetia cut flowers. In this respect, holding solutions were also used in various combinations, including sucrose (2 %), 8-hydroquinoline citrate (100 and 200 mg/L) and benzyl adenine (5, 10 and 15 mg/L), along with three de-leafing treatments. Among all these treatments, holding solution of sucrose (2 %) + 8-hydroquinoline citrate (100 mg/L) + benzyl adenine (10 mg/L) was found to be the best in terms of longevity (15.33 days), flower diameter (6.43 cm) and good overall presentability (88.37 score out of 100) of godetia cut flowers. Moreover, after 15 cm from the top, the de-leafed cut stems were found best, with the longest vase life (14.31 days) and better presentability (87.12 score out of 100) of godetia cut flowers. This study demonstrates that optimized pulsing and holding solutions can significantly extend the vase life and quality of godetia cut flowers, benefiting florists, exporters, and retailers by reducing post-harvest losses and increasing commercial value.

References

  1. 1. Anonymous. Clarkia amoena. International Plant Names Index (ipni.org); 2024
  2. 2. Young-Mathews A. Plant fact sheet for farewell to spring (Clarkia amoena). USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Corvallis, Oregon. 2012;2.
  3. 3. Darras A. An overview of the dynamic role of specialty cut flowers in the international cut flower market. Horticulturae, 2021;7(3):51–60. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7030051
  4. 4. Anonymous. https://www.gminsights.com/industryanalysis/cutflowermarket?form=MG0AV3&form=MG0AV3; 2024
  5. 5. Pavolova H, Bakalar T, Kysela K, Klimek M, Hajduova Z, Zawada M. The analysis of investment inti industries based on portfolio managers. Acta Montanistica Slovaca. 2021;26(1):161–70. https://doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v26i1.14
  6. 6. Arief ZM. De-leafing and silver thiosulphate pulse treatment prolongs the vase life of cut stalks of Clarkia amoena. J Plant Sci Res. 2016;3:162.
  7. 7. Kumar A, Baweja HS, Dilta BS, Baweja PK. Studies on alternative holding solutions for improving vase life of cut carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Int J Chem. 2020;8(5):2593–96. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i5aj.
  8. 10708
  9. 8. Serek M, Reid MS. Anti-ethylene treatments for potted Christmas cactus efficacy of inhibitors of ethylene action and biosynthesis. HortSci. 1993;28(2):1180–81. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.28.12.1180
  10. 9. Anderson RG. Clarkia. In V. Ball (ed.), Ball Red Book. 16th ed. Ball Publishing. 1998; pp. 426–32
  11. 10. Nguyen TK, Lim JH. Do eco-friendly floral preservative solutions prolong vase life better than chemical solutions? Horticulturae. 2021;7(10):415. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100415
  12. 11. Okagbue HI, Oguntunde PE, Obasi ECM, Akhmetshin EM. Trends and usage pattern of SPSS and Minimtabl software in scientific research. J Physc Conf Ser. 2020;1734. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1734/1/012017
  13. 12. Mendiburum FD, Simon R. Agricolae-ten years of an open-source statistical tool for experiments in breeding, agriculture and biology. PeerJ. 2015;17:1–17. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1404v1
  14. 13. Hussen S, Yassin H. Review on the impact of different vase solutions on the postharvest life of rose flower. Int J Agric Res Rev. 2013;1(2):13–17. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2133.3528
  15. 14. Nowak J, Rudnicki RM. Postharvest handling and storage of cut flowers, florist greens and potted plants. Timber Press. Oregon, USA; 1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0425-5
  16. 15. Vilas R, Karhana PK, Meena KR, Singh S. Effect of biocides {AgNO3, Al2 (SO4)3, 8-HQC and Sucrose} on the post-harvest life of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2017;5(5):1599–602. https://doi.org/10.187
  17. 82/2320-7051.5851
  18. 16. Adamczyk D, Skutnik E, Rabiza-Swider J, Rochala J. Postharvest performance of forced cut lilacs as affected by hot water scalding and preservatives. Acta Hortic. 2015;1060:341–46. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1060.51
  19. 17. Jain R, Kumar P, Swaroop K, Pinder R. Standardization of pulsing treatments for improving the vase life of Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandifloras L.). Chem Sci RevLett. 2017;6:484–88.
  20. 18. Waithaka K, Reid MS, Dodge MS. Cold storage and flower keeping quality of cut tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2001;76:271–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2001.11511362
  21. 19. Han SS. Role of sugar in the vase solution on postharvest flower and leaf quality of oriental lily ‘Stargazer’. Hort Sci. 2003;38:412–16. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.38.3.412
  22. 20. Sharma N, Bala M. Effect of different holding solutions on post-harvest keeping quality of chrysanthemum cut stems. Agric Res. 2020;57(3):379–84. https://doi.org/10.5958/2395-146X.2020.00056.3
  23. 21. Sosnowski J, Truba M, Vasileva V. The impact of auxin and cytokinin on the growth and development of selected crops. Agri. 2023;13(3):724. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030724
  24. 22. Qureshi A. Gupta YC, Dhiman SR, Kashyap B, Gupta RK, Kaushal M. Effect of different preservative solutions on postharvest life of cut rose (Rosa hybrids L.) cv. “Blush”. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(11):98–104. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.811.012
  25. 23. Kitamuna Y, Ueno S. Inhibition of transpiration from the inflorescence extends the vase life of cut hydrangea flowers. Hort J. 2015;84:156–60. https://doi.org/10.2503/hortj.MI-016
  26. 24. Ichimura K, Korenaga M. Improvement of vase life and petal color expression in several cultivars of cut eustoma flowers by sucrose with 8-hydroxyquinoline sulfate. Bulletin of the National Research Institute of Vegetables, Ornamental Plants and Tea, Japan. 1998;13:31–39.
  27. 25. Spricigo PC, Pilon L, Trento JP, Demoura MR, Bonfim KS, Mitsuyuki MC, et al. Nano-chitosan as an antimicrobial agent in preservative solutions for cut flowers. J Chem Tech Biotech. 2021;96(8):2168–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6766
  28. 26. Skutnik E, Lukaszewska A, Swider JR. Effects of postharvest treatments with nanosilver on senescence of cut Lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinn.) flowers. Agron. 2021;11:215. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy110
  29. 20215
  30. 27. Van Doorn WG. Is the onset of senescence in leaf cells of intact plants due to low or high sugar levels. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(8):1963–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern076
  31. 28. Yeat CS, Szydlik M, Lukaszewska AJ. The effect of postharvest treatments on flower quality and vase life of cut alstromeria cv. ‘Dancing Queen’. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res. 2012;20:147–60. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10290-012-0024-6
  32. 29. Zhao W, Zhao H, Wang H, He Y. Research progress on the relationship between leaf senescence and quality, yield and stress resistance in horticultural plants. Frontiers Plant Sci. 2022;13:1044500. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.
  33. 1044500
  34. 30. Anjum MA, Farrukh N, Farik S, Shazia A. Effect of some chemicals on keeping quality and vase life of tuberose (Polainthes tuberosa L.) cut flowers. J Res. 2001;12(1):1–7.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.