Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 11 No. sp4 (2024): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - I

Effect of nano urea on greenhouse gas emissions in transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) ecosystems

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5813
Submitted
14 October 2024
Published
28-12-2024

Abstract

The application of conventional nitrogen fertilizer (urea) to improve rice crop yield has a significant influence on soil methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. An experiment was conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, wetlands farm, during the summer of 2023. A Randomized Block Design (RBD) was used with 8 treatments and 3 replications to evaluate the impact of different nitrogen application strategies on greenhouse gas emissions, specifically methane and nitrous oxide in transplanted rice, including the varying nitrogen levels. The study aimed to improve rice growth and yield through foliar application of nano urea, focusing on the rice variety CO55 with a recommended dose of NPK (150:50:50 NPK kg/ha). The results indicated that applying 75 kg nitrogen/ha (50 % of the recommended dose) as basal through conventional urea, along with 3 nano urea foliar sprays at 20, 40 and 60 days after transplanting (T5), resulted in significantly lower methane and nitrous oxide emissions compared with 100 % of the recommended nitrogen dose i.e. 150 kg nitrogen/ha applied through conventional urea, with 25 % used at basal, active tillering, panicle initiation and heading stage (T1) and 150 kg nitrogen/ha i.e. 100 % recommended dose of nitrogen applied through conventional urea, with 50 % as basal and 2 top dressings of 25 % of the recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) each at active tillering and panicle initiation (T2).

References

  1. Muthayya S, Sugimoto JD, Montgomery S, Maberly GF. An over-view of global rice production, supply, trade and consump-tion. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2014;7-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12540
  2. Seck PA, Diagne A, Mohanty S, Wopereis MC. Crops that feed the world 7: Rice. Food Security. 2012;4:7-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-012-0168-1
  3. Umilsingh N, Vaiyapuri K, Thavaprakaash N, Selvakumar S, Van-itha K. Impact of irrigation and fertigation levels on growth, yield components and yield of aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.) un-der drip system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2023;57(6):774-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-6135
  4. Maraseni TN, Deo RC, Qu J, Gentle P, Neupane PR. An interna-tional comparison of rice consumption behaviours and green-house gas emissions from rice production. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;172:2288-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.182
  5. Muralidharan K, Prasad GSV, Rao CS, Siddiq EA. Genetic gain for yield in rice breeding and rice production in India to meet with the demand from increased human population. Current Sci-ence. 2019;116:544-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.18520/cs/v116/i4/544-560
  6. Upadhyay PK, Dey A, Singh VK, Dwivedi BS, Singh T, GA R, Shukla G. Conjoint application of nano-urea with conventional fertilizers: An energy efficient and environmentally robust ap-proach for sustainable crop production. Plos One. 2023;18(7):e0284009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284009
  7. Mali SC, Raj S, Trivedi R. Nanotechnology a novel approach to enhance crop productivity. Biochemistry and Biophysics Re-ports. 2020;24:100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep. 2020.100821
  8. Ahmed M, Rauf M, Mukhtar Z, Saeed NA. Excessive use of nitrog-enous fertilizers: an unawareness causing serious threats to environment and human health. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017;24:26983-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356017 -0589-7
  9. Benzon HRL, Rubenecia MRU, Ultra Jr, VU, Lee SC. Nano-fertilizer affects the growth, development and chemical proper-ties of rice. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research. 2015;7(1):105-17.
  10. Iqbal MA. Nano-fertilizers for sustainable crop production under changing climate: a global perspective. Sustainable Crop Pro-duction. 2019;8:1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intech open.89089
  11. Shah SA, Shen X, Xie M, Zhu G, Ji Z, Zhou H, et al. . Nickel@ nitro-gen?doped carbon@ MoS2 nanosheets: An efficient electrocata-lyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Small. 2019 Mar;15(9):1804545. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201804545
  12. Dimkpa CO, Fugice J, Singh U, Lewis TD. Development of fertiliz-ers for enhanced nitrogen use efficiency–trends and perspec-tives. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;31(7):139113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139113
  13. Kantwa S, Yadav LR. Nano urea: applications and significance. Just Agriculture. 2022;2:1-6.
  14. Yadav A, Upadhyay A, Kumar R, Prajapati J, Pal S. Nanotechnol-ogy based nano urea to increase agricultural sustainability. Just Agriculture. 2023;3:266-74.
  15. Midde SK, Perumal MS, Murugan G, Sudhagar R, Mattepally VS, Bada MR. Evaluation of nano urea on growth and yield attrib-utes of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Chemical Science Review and Let-ters. 2022;11(42):211-14. https://doi.org/10.37273/chesci.cs205301427
  16. TNAU (Tamil Nadu Agricultural University). Transplanted pud-dled Lowland rice nutrient management [Internet]. Coimba-tore:TNAU Agritech Portal; 2022. [cited 2024August 1]. https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/agriculture/agri_cropproduction_cereals_rice_tranpudlow_mainfield_nutrient_mgmt_inorganic.html
  17. Minamikawa K, Yagi K, Tokida T, Sander BO, Wassmann R. Ap-propriate frequency and time of day to measure methane emis-sions from an irrigated rice paddy in Japan using the manual closed chamber method. Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management. 2012;2(2-3):118-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2012.729988
  18. Bertora C, Peyron M, Pelissetti S, Grignani C, Sacco D. Assess-ment of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes from paddy field by means of static closed chambers maintaining plants within headspace. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2018;(139):e56754. https://doi.org/10.3791/56754
  19. Li C, Ji Q, Fu X, Yu X, Ye Z, Zhang M, Qiu Y. Low-cost detection of methane gas in rice cultivation by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector based on manual injection and split pattern. Molecules. 2022;27(13):3968. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27133968
  20. Tokida T. Increasing measurement throughput of methane emission from rice paddies with a modified closed-chamber method. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology. 2021;77(2);160-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.D-20-00029
  21. Pavelka M, Acosta M, Kiese R, Altimir N, Brümmer C, Crill P, Kutsch W. Standardisation of chamber technique for CO2, N2O and CH4 fluxes measurements from terrestrial ecosystems. In-ternational Agrophysics. 2018;32(4):569-87. https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2017-0045
  22. Loftfield N, Flessa H, Augustin J, Beese F. Automated gas chro-matographic system for rapid analysis of the atmospheric trace gases methane, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide. Journal of Environmental Quality. 1997;26(2);560-64. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1997.00 472425002600020030x
  23. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley and Sons; 1984.
  24. Singh SK, Bharadwaj V, Thakur TC, Pachauri SP, Singh PP, Mish-ra AK. Influence of crop establishment methods on methane emission from rice fields. Current Science. 2009;84.
  25. Mohanty S, Nayak AK, Swain CK, Dhal BR, Kumar A, Kumar U, Behera KK. Impact of integrated nutrient management options on GHG emission, N loss and N use efficiency of low land rice. Soil and Tillage Research. 2020;200:104616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still. 2020.104616
  26. Sarker NC, Rahman S, Borhan MS, Rajasekaran P, Santra S, Oz-can A. Nanoparticles in mitigating gaseous emissions from liq-uid dairy manure stored under anaerobic condition. J Environ Sci. 2019;76:26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.03. 014
  27. KS S. Role of nano-fertilizer on greenhouse gas emission in rice soil ecosystem. Mad Agric J. 2019;106. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ2019.000327
  28. Mohanraj J, Lakshmanan A, Subramanian K. Nano-zeolite amendment to minimize greenhouse gas emission in rice soil. J Environ Nanotechnol 2017;6(3):73-76. https://doi. org/10.13074/jent.2017.09.173272
  29. Smith KA, McTaggart IP, Tsuruta H. Emissions of N2O and NO associated with nitrogen fertilization in intensive agriculture and the potential for mitigation. Soil Use and Management. 2007;13:296-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.1997.tb00601.x
  30. Chandana P, Latha KR, Chinnamuthu CR, Malarvizhi P, Laksh-manan A. Impact of foliar application of nano nitrogen, zinc and copper on yield and nutrient uptake of rice. Int J Plant Soil Sci.2021;33(24):276-82. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.9734/ijpss/2021/v33i2430778

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.