Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 11 No. sp4 (2024): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - I

Conversion of sugarcane bagasse into cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, and polymer membrane electrolyte and their characterization

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5874
Submitted
16 October 2024
Published
31-12-2024

Abstract

Petroleum-derived products have long been used as raw materials for synthesizing polymers. The diminished petroleum reserves and growing environmental consciousness have prompted a shift toward sustainable alternatives. Biodegradable organic materials derived from agricultural biomass, offer a promising pathway to produce eco-efficient polymers. Cellulose transformation into carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) is a focal point, as CMC's water solubility and polymeric characteristics facilitate diverse applications, particularly in energy storage systems. This research aims to study the variations in chemical treatments on biomass, focusing on sugarcane bagasse as a case study. Chemical and steam explosion pretreatments were applied to the bagasse, leading to enhanced cellulose recovery, with cellulose content increasing from 52.7% to 65.4%, and overall yield improving from 35.3% to 49.1%. SEM and FT-IR analyses revealed significant structural changes. In contrast, XRD analysis indicated a rise in the crystallinity index from 34.8% in untreated bagasse to 70.5% in treated samples, with a reduction in crystallite size. The synthesis of CMC demonstrated a peak degree of substitution (DS) of 0.82 using 25% NaOH, resulting in CMC with improved solubility and flexibility. CMC films prepared with different binding agents, such as glycerol, demonstrated optimal flexibility, conductivity, and mechanical strength, making them suitable for polymer electrolyte applications. Analysis of CMC polymer films highlighted glycerol (15 wt%) as the most effective binding agent, enhancing the film's fold endurance and flexibility. These findings underscore the potential of biomass-derived polymer membranes to replace petroleum-based materials and contribute to sustainable development.

References

  1. Duce RA, Mohnen VA, Zimmerman PR, Grosjean D, Cautreels W, Chatfield R, et al. Organic material in the global troposphere. Rev Geophys. 1983;21(4):921-52. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG021i004p00921
  2. Anuar MR, Abdullah AZ. Challenges in biodiesel industry with regards to feedstock, environmental, social and sustainability issues: A critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;58:208-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.296
  3. Mori R. Replacing all petroleum-based chemical products with natural biomass-based chemical products: a tutorial review. RSC Sustain. 2023;1(2):179-212. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SU00014H
  4. Lynd LR, Beckham GT, Guss AM, Jayakody LN, Karp EM, Maranas C, et al. Toward low-cost biological and hybrid biological/catalytic conversion of cellulosic biomass to fuels. Energy Environ Sci. 2022;15(3):938-90. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE02540F
  5. Rahman MS, Hasan MS, Nitai AS, Nam S, Karmakar AK, Ahsan MS, et al. Recent developments of carboxymethyl cellulose. Polymers. 2021;13(8):1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081345
  6. Lindman B, Medronho B, Alves L, Costa C, Edlund H, Norgren M. The relevance of structural features of cellulose and its interactions to dissolution, regeneration, gelation and plasticization phenomena. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017;19(35):23704-18. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cp02409f
  7. Ye T, Li L, Zhang Y. Recent progress in solid electrolytes for energy storage devices. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;(29):2000077. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202000077
  8. Liew CW, Ramesh S. Electrical, structural, thermal and electrochemical properties of corn starch-based biopolymer electrolytes. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;124:222-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.02.024
  9. Priya DS, Kennedy LJ, Anand GT. Effective conversion of waste banana bract into porous carbon electrode for supercapacitor energy storage applications. Results Surf Interfaces. 2023;10:100096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsurfi.2023.100096
  10. Zhan C, Sharma PR, He H, Sharma SK, McCauley-Pearl A, Wang R, Hsiao BS. Rice husk based nanocellulose scaffolds for highly efficient removal of heavy metal ions from contaminated water. Environ Sci Water Res Technol. 2020;6(11):3080-90. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EW00545B
  11. Yang W, Yang W, Zeng J, Chen Y, Huang Y, Liu J, Peng X. Biopolymer?based gel electrolytes for electrochemical energy Storage: Advances and prospects. Prog Mater Sci. 2023;101264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101264
  12. Sadiq AC, Olasupo A, Ngah WSW, Rahim NY, Suah FBM. A decade development in the application of chitosan-based materials for dye adsorption: A short review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;191:1151-63. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.179.
  13. Telmo C, Lousada J, Moreira N. Proximate analysis, backwards stepwise regression between gross calorific value, ultimate and chemical analysis of wood. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(11):3808-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.021
  14. Yang L, Lu M, Carl S, Mayer JA, Cushman JC, Tian E, Lin H. Biomass characterization of Agave and Opuntia as potential biofuel feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy. 2015;76:43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.03.004
  15. Manisha Reddy B, Subramanian P, Sriramajayam S, Vijayakumary P, Raja K. Extraction of cellulose from banana sheath and its characterization. Pharma Innov J. 2022;SP-11(6):1861-67.https://www.thepharmajournal.com/archives/2022/vol11issue6S/PartX/S-11-6-184-779.pdf
  16. Badiei M, Asim N, Jahim JM, Sopian K. Comparison of chemical pretreatment methods for cellulosic biomass. APCBEE Procedia. 2014;9:170-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.01.030
  17. Mantovan J, Giraldo GA, Marim BM, Kishima JO, Mali S. Valorization of orange bagasse through one-step physical and chemical combined processes to obtain a cellulose?rich material. J Sci Food Agric. 2021;101(6):2362-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10859
  18. Huang CM, Chia PX, Lim CS, Nai JQ, Ding DY, Seow PB, et al. Synthesis and characterisation of carboxymethyl cellulose from various agricultural wastes. Cellul Chem Technol. 2017;51(7-8):665-72. https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT7-8(2017)/p.665-672.pdf
  19. Moussa I, Khiari R, Moussa A, Belgacem MN, Mhenni MF. Preparation and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose with a high degree of substitution from agricultural wastes. Fibers Polym. 2019;20:933-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-019-8665-x
  20. Kimani PK, Kareru PG, Madivoli SE, Kairigo PK, Maina EG, Rechab OS. Comparative study of carboxymethyl cellulose synthesis from selected Kenyan biomass. Chem Sci Int J. 2016;17(4):1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/CSJI/2016/29390
  21. Khattab TA, Dacrory S, Abou-Yousef H, Kamel S. Development of microporous cellulose-based smart xerogel reversible sensor via freeze drying for naked-eye detection of ammonia gas. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;210:196-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.067
  22. Roy S, Kim HJ, Rhim JW. Effect of blended colorants of anthocyanin and shikonin on carboxymethyl cellulose/agar-based smart packaging film. Int J Biol Macromol.2021;183:305-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.04.162
  23. Badry R, El-Nahass MM, Nada N, Elhaes H, Ibrahim MA. Structural and UV-blocking properties of carboxymethyl cellulose sodium/CuO nanocomposite films. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):1123. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28032-1
  24. Mandal A, Chakrabarty D. Studies on mechanical, thermal and barrier properties of carboxymethyl cellulose film highly filled with nanocellulose. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2019;32(7):995-1014. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057187728
  25. Klunklin W, Jantanasakulwong K, Phimolsiripol Y, Leksawasdi N, Seesuriyachan P, Chaiyaso T, et al. Synthesis, characterization and application of carboxymethyl cellulose from asparagus stalk end. Polymers. 2020;13(1):81. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13010081
  26. Rani MS, Hassan NH, Ahmad A, Kaddami H, Mohamed NS. Investigation of biosourced carboxymethyl cellulose-ionic liquid polymer electrolytes for potential application in electrochemical devices. Ionics. 2016;22:1855-64. https://www.thepharmajournal.com/archives/2022/vol11issue6S/PartX/S-11-6-184-779.pdf
  27. Tarabiah AE, Alhadlaq HA, Alaizeri ZM, Ahmed AA, Asnag GM, Ahamed M. Enhanced structural, optical, electrical properties and antibacterial activity of PEO/CMC doped ZnO nanorods for energy storage and food packaging applications. J Polym Res. 2022;29(5):167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-022-03011-8
  28. Demol J, Ho E, Soldenhoff K, Senanayake G. The sulfuric acid bake and leach route for processing of rare earth ores and concentrates: A review. Hydrometallurgy. 2019;188:123-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.05.015
  29. Xu H, Li B, Mu X. Review of alkali-based pretreatment to enhance enzymatic saccharification for lignocellulosic biomass conversion. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2016;55(32):8691-705. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01907
  30. Akhtar N, Gupta K, Goyal D, Goyal A. Recent advances in pretreatment technologies for efficient hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2016;35(2):489-511. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12257
  31. Aslaniyan A, Ghanbari F, Kouhsar JB, Shahraki BK. Comparing the effects of gamma ray and alkaline treatments of sodium hydroxide and calcium oxide on chemical composition, ruminal degradation kinetics and crystallinity degree of soybean straw. Appl Radiat Isot. 2023;191:110524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110524
  32. Neenu KV, Dominic CM, Begum PS, Parameswaranpillai J, Kanoth BP, David DA, et al. Effect of oxalic acid and sulphuric acid hydrolysis on the preparation and properties of pineapple pomace derived cellulose nanofibers and nanopapers. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;209:1745-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.138
  33. Zhang J, Zhang W, Cai Z, Zhang J, Guan D, Ji D, Gao W. Effect of ammonia fiber expansion combined with NaOH pretreatment on the resource efficiency of herbaceous and woody lignocellulosic biomass. ACS Omega. 2022;7(22):18761-69. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c01302
  34. Hoang AT, Nizetic S, Ong HC, Chong CT, Atabani AE. Acid-based lignocellulosic biomass biorefinery for bioenergy production: Advantages, application constraints and perspectives. J Environ Manag. 2021;296:113194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113194
  35. Loow YL, Wu TY, Md Jahim J, Mohammad AW, Teoh WH. Typical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into reducing sugars using dilute acid hydrolysis and alkaline pretreatment. Cellulose. 2016;23:1491-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0936-8
  36. Duque A, Manzanares P, Ballesteros I, Ballesteros M. Steam explosion as lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment. Biomass Fractionation Technol. 2016;1:349-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802323-5.00015-3
  37. Carvalheiro F, Duarte LC, Gírio F, Moniz P. Hydrothermal/liquid hot water pretreatment (autohydrolysis): A multipurpose process for biomass upgrading. Biomass Fractionation Technol. 2016;1:315-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802323-5.00014-1
  38. Saurabh CK, Dungani R, Owolabi AF, Atiqah NS, Zaidon A, Aprilia NS, et al. Effect of hydrolysis treatment on cellulose nano whiskers from oil palm (Elaeis guineesis) fronds: Morphology, chemical, crystallinity and thermal characteristics. BioResources. 2016;11(3):6742-55. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.3.6742-6755
  39. Zoppe JO, Larsson PA, Cusola O. Surface modification of nano cellulosics and functionalities. Lignocellulosics. 2020;1:17-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804077-5.00003-8
  40. Abraham E, Deepa B, Pothan LA, Jacob M, Thomas S, Cvelbar U, Anandjiwala R. Extraction of nanocellulose fibrils from lignocellulosic fibres: A novel approach. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;86(4):1468-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.034
  41. Auxenfans T, Crônier D, Chabbert B, Paës G. Understanding the structural and chemical changes of plant biomass following steam explosion pretreatment. Biotech Biofuels. 2017;10:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0718-z
  42. Shi C, Zhang P, Chen L, Yang P, Zhao J. Effect of a thin ceramic-coating layer on thermal and electrochemical properties of polyethylene separator for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources. 2014;270:547-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.142
  43. Chagas R, Gericke M, Ferreira RB, Heinze T, Ferreira LM. Synthesis and characterization of dicarboxymethyl cellulose. Cellulose. 2020;27:1965-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02952-6
  44. Casaburi A, Rojo ÚM, Cerrutti P, Vázquez A, Foresti ML. Carboxymethyl cellulose with tailored degree of substitution obtained from bacterial cellulose. Food Hydrocoll. 2018;75:147-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.09.002
  45. Cherif E, Moumni H. The properties on a polysaccharide of Sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) in dimethylacetamide+ acetone by conductometric study. Phys Chem Liquids. 2022;60(3):442-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00319104.2021.2012776
  46. Kamthai S, Magaraphan R. Mechanical and barrier properties of spray dried carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) film from bleached bagasse pulp. Indus Crops Prod. 2017;109:753-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.09.040
  47. Sadi A, Ferfera-Harrar H. Cross-linked CMC/gelatin bio-nanocomposite films with organoclay, red cabbage anthocyanins and pistacia leaves extract as active intelligent food packaging: colorimetric pH indication, antimicrobial/antioxidant properties and shrimp spoilage tests. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;242:124964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124964
  48. Basu P, Narendrakumar U, Arunachalam R, Devi S, Manjubala I. Characterization and evaluation of carboxymethyl cellulose-based films for healing of full-thickness wounds in normal and diabetic rats. ACS Omega. 2018;3(10):12622-32. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02015
  49. Shui T, Feng S, Chen G, Li A, Yuan Z, Shui H, et al. Synthesis of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose using bleached crude cellulose fractionated from cornstalk. Biomass Bioenergy. 2017;105:51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.06.016
  50. Esteghlal S, Niakousari M, Hosseini SM. Physical and mechanical properties of gelatin-CMC composite films under the influence of electrostatic interactions. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;114:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.079
  51. Rachtanapun P, Thanakkasaranee S, Auras RA, Chaiwong N, Jantanasakulwong K, Jantrawut P, et al. Morphology, mechanical and water barrier properties of carboxymethyl rice starch films: sodium hydroxide effect. Molecules. 2022;27(2):331. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27020331
  52. Wang F, Wu X, Yuan X, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Fu L, et al. Latest advances in supercapacitors: from new electrode materials to novel device designs. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46(22):6816-54. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CS00205J
  53. Xie P, Yuan W, Liu X, Peng Y, Yin Y, Li Y, Wu Z. Advanced carbon nanomaterials for state-of-the-art flexible supercapacitors. Energy Stor Mater. 2021;36:56-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.12.011

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.