Comparative resistance and yield performance of summer mungbean mutants and varieties as affected by MYMV
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2019.6.4.596Keywords:
mungbean, mutant, Yellow Mosaic Virus, resistanceAbstract
An experiment was conducted in the research field of the Department of Plant Pathology, Patuakhali Science and Technology University during February to April 2013 to select Mungbean Yellow Mosaic Virus (MYMV) resistant mutant/variety under natural epiphytotic condition. The screening was made on the six mungbean genotypes including three advanced mutant lines, MBM-07, MBM-21, MBM-88 and three varieties Bina mung-5, Bina mung-6, Bina mung-8 as check, to evaluate their reaction to MYMV at flowering and pod maturity stages. It was observed that at the flowering stage of MBM-21, MBM-88, and Bina mung-6 were found resistant with percent disease incidence recorded from 0.5, 1.0, and 0.5 percent respectively. At the maturity stage, no genotype were found to be immune and the disease incidence varied from the lowest 0.5 % in MBM-21 to highest 26 % in MBM-7. The mutant MBM-21 and variety Bina mung-6 were found moderately resistant with disease incidence ranging from 1 to 10 %. Among the less MYMV infected mungbean mutants, MBM-21 gave the highest yield (1569 kg ha-1) and the lowest yield was in MBM-07 (1183kg ha-1). The mutants MBM-21 completed by the short duration of 61.67 days as compared to check Bina mung-6 (67.33 days). Out of six summer screened mungbean mutants and varieties, MBM-21 exhibited highest resistance in both flowering and pod maturity stage. Therefore, MBM-21 might be selected as a resistant variety against MYMV after further trail in different Agro-Ecological Zones (AEZ) of Bangladesh.
Downloads
References
2. Khan MRI, Shaikh MAC, Dutta PC. Nutritional quality characters in pulses. Field Crop Abst. 1995; 48(1):37.
3. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). FAO Production year book, Basic Data Unit, Statistics Division, FAO, Rome, Italy. 2002; 51:125-127.
4. Bakr, MA. Check list of pulses disease in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Plant Pathology. 1994; 10(1&2):13-16.
5. Singh BR, Singh M, Yadav MD, Dingar SM. Yield loss in mungbean due to yellow mosaic. Science and Culture 1982; 48(12): 435-436.
6. Dhingra KL, Ghosh DK. Efficiency of white fly vector (Bemisia tabaci) in transmission of mungbean yellow mosaic virus in different source test plant combination. Int J Trop Agric. 1993; 11(2): 149-152.
7. Nariani TK. Yellow Mosaic of Mungbean (Phaseolus aureus). Indian Phytopathol. 1960; 13: 24-29.
8. Jayappa, Ramappa HK, Sab J, Gautam C and Devamani BD. Screening of mungbean genotypes against mungbean yellow mosaic virus disease. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2017; 6(5):1746-1752. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.605.189
9. Singh S, Awasthi LP. Varietal screening of yard bean against mungbean yellow mosaic virus under field conditions. Ann Plant Protect Sci. 2004; 12(1): 225-226.
10. Gill CK. Effect of mungbean yellow mosaic virus on yield components in mungbean cultivar. Insect Environment 1999; 5(3): 112-113.
11. Khattak GSS, Haq MA, Rana SA, Abbas G, Irfan M. Effect of Mungbean Yellow Mosaic Virus (MYMV) on Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Kasetsart J Nat Sci. 2000; 34: 12-16.
12. Iqbal U, Sheikh MI, Rukhsana A, Atif J, Muhammad AF, Ashraf Z. Screening of mungbean germplasm against mungbean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV) Under Field Conditions. Pak J Phytopathology. 2011; 23(1): 48-51.
13. Karim Z, Bakr MA, Hossain MS, Islam MM. Searching MYMV resistant mungbean genotype: A field screening. New perspectives of pulse research in Bangladesh 2007. p. 75-78.
14. Paul CP, Biswas MK, Mandal D, Pal P. Studies on host resistance of mungbean against Mungbean yellow mosaic virus in the agro-ecological condition of lateritic zone of West Bengal. Bioscan 2013; 8(2): 583-587.
15. Shakoor A, Haq MA, Sadiq MS, Sarwar M. 1977. Induction of resistance to yellow mosaic virus in mungbean through induced mutation. Plant Dis. 214: 293-302.
16. Anon. 2009. Annual report Pulses Research Centre. BARI, Joydebpur, Gazipur.
17. Venkateswarlu MS, Rajan, MSS. Influence of season on growth and yield attributes of black gram (Phaseolus mungo). Indian J. Agro. 1991; 36 (supplu.): 119-123.
18. Akter MS. 2011. Effect of Dates of Sowing on Incidence and Severity of Diseases of Mungbean. M.S. Thesis Submitted to the Department of Plant Pathology, BAU, Mymensingh. 65 p.
19. Dharmalingam C, Basu RN. Determining optimum season for the production of quality seeds in mungbean. Madras Agril. J. 1993; 80(12): 684-688.
20. Vohra K, Beniwal SPS. Effect of mungbean yellow mosaic virus on yield and seed quality of mungbean (Vigna mungo L). Seeds Research. 1979; 7(2):168-174.
21. Babu RC, Rathinaswamy R, Srivasan PS, Natarajaratnam N, Sreerangssamy SR. Certain physiological changes in green gram plants infected by mungbean mosaic virus. Madras Agric J. 1984; 71(12): 795-798.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
