Physio-chemical characterization of cumin and coriander growing soils of semi-arid zones of India and its bioprospecting for plant growth promoting rhizobacteria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6218Keywords:
Bacillus, cumin, coriander, Enterobacter, Micrococcus, rhizosphereAbstract
Cumin and coriander are indeed vital spices in Indian cuisine and are predominantly cultivated in the arid zones of India like- Rajasthan and Gujarat. The quality and yield of any crop are strongly influenced by soil characteristics and the environmental conditions of the geographical region. In this study, a field survey was carried out for numerous locations of cumin and coriander growing areas to understand the physicochemical and microbial properties of cumin and coriander growing soils of Rajasthan and Gujarat. A total of 31 soil samples were collected and analysed for electric conductivity (EC), pH, organic carbon (OC), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and total microbial counts. A considerable variation was found in soil pH levels of different soil samples which ranged from pH 6.80 to pH 9.03. The EC was found in the range of 0.56 to 0.99 ms/cm. The organic carbon, available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were found respectively in the range of 0.29 to 0.92 %, 135-382.8 kg/ ha, 6.16-18.25 kg/ha and 261.0 kg/ha to 412.5 kg/ha. Bacteria were isolated from these soils and based on morphological differences total of 54 bacteria were further studied for plant growth-promoting (PGP) characteristics. The isolates were screened to produce catalase, Indole Acetic Acid (IAA), citrate utilization, phosphate and solubilization. Fifty-one showed IAA production, 18 were found to utilize citrate and 44 were capable of degrading carbohydrates. Isolates that showed higher PGP activities were identified, which may be utilized to improve plant growth and boost crop yield.
Downloads
References
Torsvik V, Øvreås L. Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems. Curr Opinion Microbio. 2002;5(3):240–45. http://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-5274(02)00324-7
Mishra BK, Meena KK, Dubey PN, Aishwath OP, Kant K, Sorty AM, Bitla U. Influence on yield and quality of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) grown under semi-arid saline soil, due to application of native phosphate solubilizing rhizobacterial isolates. Ecol Eng. 2016;97:327–33. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.034
Tan S, Jiang L, Liu J, Zeng Z, Xiao Y, Wu X, Niu Y. Rhizosphere microorganisms and soil physicochemical properties of restored wetland plant communities at cutting slash of Populus deltoides in Dongting Lake. Wetlands. 2023;43(5):48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-023-01696-1
Meena MD, Lal G, Meena SS, Lal S, Chaudhary N. Seed spices export from India: prospects and constraints. Int J Seed Spices. 2019;9(2):12–20.
Saxena SN, Mishra BK, Sharma LK. Seventy-five years of research and development in seed spices. In: Handbook of Spices in India: 75 Years of Research and Development. 2023 Oct 11:129–53 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3728-6_3
Mishra P, Padmanaban K, Dhekale BS, Tailor AK. Statistical investigation of production performance of cumin in India. Economic Affairs. 2018;63(2):547–55. http://doi.org/10.30954/0424-2513.2.2018.34
Choudhary S, Mishra BK, Singh R, Sharma R. Bacterial diversity and bio-chemical properties in the rhizosphere soils of cumin and coriander. Trop Ecol. 2021;62:368–76. http://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-021-00155-4
Mayer Z, Sasvári Z, Szentpéteri V, Peth?néRétháti B, Vajna B, Posta K. Effect of long-term cropping systems on the diversity of the soil bacterial communities. Agronomy. 2019;9(12):878. http://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120878
Jain BL, Singh RS, Shyampura RL, Maji AK. Soil site suitability for major crops in arid and semiarid region. NBSS Publication, NBSS and LUP, Nagpur; 2007. https://nbsslup.icar.gov.in
Sharma SS, Rao SS, Singh RS, Sharma RP, Dubey PN. Evaluation of potential cumin growing area in hot arid region of Jaisalmer district. Int J Seed Spices. 2018;8(1):50–55.
Piper CS. Soil and plant analysis. Interscience Pub. Inc, New York. 1950;212.
Sparks DL, Helmke PA, Page AL. Methods of soil analysis: Chemical methods (No. 631.417/S736 V. 3). SSSA; 1996. http://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3
Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci. 1956;25:259–60.
Olsen SR. Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture; 1954. USDA Circular No. 939, Washington, p.1–18.
Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis, pentice hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. 1973;498:151–54
Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37(1):29–38. http://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
Bower CA, Reitemeier RF, Fireman M. Exchangeable cation analysis of saline and alkali soils.
Soil Sci. 1952;73(4):251–62. http://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195204000-00001
Somasegaran P, Hoben HJ. Collecting nodules and isolating rhizobia. In: Handbook for rhizobia: methods in legume-Rhizobium technology. 1994:7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8375-8_1
Hartmann A, Singh M, Klingmüller W. Isolation and characterization of Azospirillum mutants excreting high amounts of indoleacetic acid. Canadian J Microbio. 1983;29(8):916–23. http://doi.org/10.1139/m83-147
Pikovskaya R. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with vital activity of some microbial species. Mikrobiologiya 17: 362–370. Plant Soil. 1948;287:77–84.
Purushottam P, Tyagi C, Tomar A, Kumar R, Dhyani BP, Poonia S. Isolation and biochemical characterization of Rhizobium from root nodules of mungbean (Vigna radiata). Soc Plant Res. 2017;329:505. http://doi.org/10.5958/2229-4473.2017.00061.1
Aneja KR. Experiments in microbiology, plant pathology and biotechnology. 4th edition. New Age International, New Delhi; 2007. p. 275
William S, Feil H, Copeland A. Bacterial genomic DNA isolation using CTAB. Sigma. 2012;50(6876).
Drancourt M, Bollet C, Carlioz A, Martelin R, Gayral JP, Raoult D. 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis of a large collection of environmental and clinical unidentifiable bacterial isolates. J Clini Microbio. 2000 Oct 1;38(10):3623–30. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.38.10.3623-3630.2000
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics. 2003;(1):2–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi0203s00
Miller JO. Soil pH and nutrient avaiability. 2016. http://doi.org/10.13016/M2PN59
Heiniger RW, McBride RG, Clay DE. Using soil electrical conductivity to improve nutrient management. Agronomy Journal. 2003;95(3):508–19. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.5080
Smith JL, Doran JW. Measurement and use of pH and electrical conductivity for soil quality analysis. In: Doran JW, Jones AJ, editors. Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. 1997;49:169–85. http://doi.org/10.2136/SSSASPECPUB49.C10
Soil electrical conductivity, soil quality indicators fact sheet- USDA Natural Resources Conservation; 2011. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-10/Soil%20Electrical%20Conductivity.pdf
Von Tucher S, Hörndl D, Sch midhalter U. Interaction of soil pH and phosphorus efficacy: Long-term effects of P fertilizer and lime applications on wheat, barley and sugar beet. Ambio. 2018;47:41–49. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0970-2
Lambrechts S, Willems A, Tahon G. Uncovering the uncultivated majority in Antarctic soils: toward a synergistic approach. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:242. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00242
Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts global climate change and food security. Science. 2004;304 (5677):1623–27. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097396
Santra P, Kumawat RN, Mertia RS, Mahla HR, Sinha NK. Spatial variation of soil organic carbon stock in a typical agricultural farm of hot arid ecosystem of India. Curr Sci. 2012:1303–09.
Sharma N, Kumar S. Control of regional climate on carbon and nitrogen turnover and their stable isotopic compositions in Indian soils. Geoderma Regional. 2022 Sep 1;30:e00539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2022.e00539
Liu X, Yang T, Wang Q, Huang F, Li L. Dynamics of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks after afforestation in arid and semi-arid regions: A meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Mar 15;618:1658–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.009
Thomas GW, Coleman NT. A chromatographic approach to the leaching of fertilizer salts in soils. Soil Sci Soc Ameri J. 1959;23(2):113–16. http://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1959.03615995002300020010x
Murphy BW. Impact of soil organic matter on soil properties—a review with emphasis on Australian soils. Soil Res. 2015 Sep 11;53(6):605–35. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR14246
Shetta ND, Al-Shaharani TS, Abdel-Aal M. Identification and characterization of Rhizobium associated with woody legume trees grown under Saudi Arabia condition. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 2011;10(3):410–18.
Harpreet KHK, Poonam SPS, Navprabhjot KNK, Gill BS. Phenotypic and biochemical characterization of Bradyrhizobium and Ensifer spp. isolated from soybean rhizosphere. Biosc Discov. 2012;3:40–46. https://doi.org/10.5555/20123131477
Dimkpa C, Weinand T, Asch F. Plant–rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2009;32(12):1682–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02028.x
Kravchenko LV, Azarova TS, Makarova NM, Tikhonovich IA. The effect of tryptophan present in plant root exudates on the phytostimulating activity of rhizobacteria. Microbiology. 2004;73(2):156–58. http://doi.org/10.1023/B:MICI.0000023982.76684.9d
Cardoso P, Alves A, Silveira P, Sá C, Fidalgo C, Freitas R, Figueira E. Bacteria from nodules of wild legume species: Phylogenetic diversity, plant growth promotion abilities and osmotolerance. Sci Total Environ. 2018;645:1094–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.399
Berleth T, Sachs T. Plant morphogenesis: long-distance coordination and local patterning. Curr Opinion Plant Biol. 2001;4(1):57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00136-9
López-Mondéjar R, Tláskal V, da Rocha UN, Baldrian P. Global distribution of carbohydrate utilization potential in the prokaryotic tree of life. Msystems. 2022;7(6):e00829-22. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00829-22
Olanrewaju OS, Glick BR, Babalola OO. Mechanisms of action of plant growth promoting bacteria. World J Microbio Biotech. 2017;33:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-017-2364-9
Yuan F, Yin S, Xu Y, Xiang L, Wang H, Li Z, et al. The richness and diversity of catalases in bacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12:645477. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.645477
Kaushik BD, Saxena AK, Prasanna R. Techniques in Microbiology: A laboratory manual for post graduate students. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India; 2004. p. 36
Dastager SG, Deepa CK, Pandey A. Isolation and characterization of novel plant growth promoting Micrococcus sp NII-0909 and its interaction with cowpea. Plant Phys Biochem. 2010;48(12):987–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.09.006
Dubey A, Kumar A, Khan ML, Payasi DK. Plant growth-promoting and bio-control activity of Micrococcus luteus strain AKAD 3-5 isolated from the soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) rhizosphere. Open Microbio J. 2021;15(1). http://doi.org/10.2174/1874285802115010188
Badawy IH, Hmed AA, Sofy MR, Al-Mokadem AZ. Alleviation of cadmium and nickel toxicity and phyto-stimulation of tomato plant l. by endophytic Micrococcus luteus and Enterobacter cloacae. Plants. 2022;11(15):2018. http://doi.org/10.3390/plants11152018
Zhu Q, Zhou J, Sun M, Li H, Han Y, Lv J, et al. A newly isolated Bacillus megaterium OQ560352 promotes maize growth in saline soils by altering rhizosphere microbial communities and organic phosphorus utilization. Rhizosphere. 2023;27:100746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2023.100746
Porcel R, Zamarreño ÁM, García-Mina JM, Aroca R. Involvement of plant endogenous ABA in Bacillus megaterium PGPR activity in tomato plants. BMC Plant Biology. 2014;14:1–2. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-14-36
Shultana R, Kee Zuan AT, Yusop MR, Saud HM, El-Shehawi AM. Bacillus tequilensis strain ‘UPMRB9’ improves biochemical attributes and nutrient accumulation in different rice varieties under salinity stress. PLoS One. 2021;16(12):e0260869. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260869
Kang SM, Khan AL, Waqas M, Asaf S, Lee KE, Park YG, et al. Integrated phytohormone production by the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus tequilensis SSB07 induced thermotolerance in soybean. J Plant Inter. 2019;14(1):416–23. http://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2019.1640294
Del Carmen MM, Göker M, Rohde M, Spröer C, Schumann P, Busse HJ, et al. Chryseobacterium oleae. an efficient plant growth promoting bacterium in the rooting induction of olive tree (Olea europaea L.) cuttings and emended descriptions of the genus Chryseobacterium, C. daecheongense, C. gambrini, C. gleum, C. joostei, C. jejuense, C. luteum, C. shigense, C. taiwanense, C. ureilyticum and C. vrystaatense. Syst Appli Microbio. 2014;37(5):342–50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2014.04.004
Mun BG, Hussain A, Park YG, Kang SM, Lee IJ, Yun BW. The PGPR Bacillus aryabhattai promotes soybean growth via nutrient and chlorophyll maintenance and the production of butanoic acid. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1341993. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1341993
Deng C, Zhang N, Liang X, Huang T, Li B. Bacillus aryabhattai LAD impacts rhizosphere bacterial community structure and promotes maize plant growth. J Sci Food Agri. 2022;102(14):6650–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12032
Hwang TK, Park YJ, Kim MJ, Park MK, Kim MC, Jung M, et al. Isolation of Bacillus aryabhattai GW320 from the cucumber rhizospheric soil and evaluation of plant growth promoting activity. 2021;54(1):126–39. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2021.54.1.126

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 S Choudhary, R Singh, R Sharma, B K Mishra, Y Ravi, S Kumar, P K Shekhawat, R Kumar, R Gena, M Sharma, R Choudhary, M Saini, V K Kumar, N K Meena, A K Verma

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).