Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Safety of some biopesticides towards ladybird beetles and rove beetle on cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6516
Submitted
3 December 2024
Published
10-04-2025
Versions

Abstract

Field trials were conducted at the Agricultural Research Station, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, SOADU, Binjhagiri, Khurdha, during the rainy season of 2022 and winter of 2022-23 to evaluate the safety of five biopesticides on predators in cowpea crops. Four species of ladybird beetles and one species of rove beetle (Paederus fuscipes Curtis) were observed. Among the ladybird beetles, Coccinella repanda Thunberg was the predominant species, accounting 43.84% of the total population, followed by Cheilomenes sexmaculata Fab. (31.51%), Micraspis discolour Fab. (15.07%) and Brumoides suturalis Fab. (9.59%). The treatments included Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (16000 i.u./ mg) at 1.0 Kg/ha, Beauveria bassiana (108 cfu/g) at 2.5 Kg/ha, Metarrhizium anisopliae (108 spores/g) at 2.5 Kg/ha, Lecanicillium lecani (108 cfu/g) at 2.5L/ha, azadirachtin (300 ppm) at 2.5 L/ha, chlorantraniliprole (18.5% active ingredient) at 0.25 L/ha (chemical check) and an untreated control. All the biopesticides proved to be safe for ladybird beetles and the rove beetle. B. thuringiensis var. kurstaki was the safest, recording only 3.94% and 3.40% reductions in ladybird population five days after application during the rainy season of 2022 and winter of 2022-23, respectively. It was followed by B. bassiana (6.35% and 4.45% reduction), M. anisopliae (8.97% and 7.33% reduction), L. lecani (10.28% and 8.90% reduction) and azadirachtin (19.04% and 26.96% reduction). A similar trend was observed in rove beetle, with respective reduction of 5.07% and 3.79%, 5.67% and 4.92%, 6.87% and 6.06%, 7.76% and 6.82% and 17.31% and 26.14%.

References

  1. Degri MM, Maina YT, Richard BI. Effect of plant extracts on post flowering insect pests and grain yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in Maidugur, semi-arid zone of Nigeria. J Biol, Agric Healthcare. 2012;2(3):46-56.
  2. Bittenbender HC. Handling and storage of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) as a leaf vegetable. Trop Agric. 1990;69:197-200.
  3. Singh SR, Emden HV. Insect pests of grain legumes. Annu Rev Ento. 1979;24(1):255-78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.24.010179.001351
  4. Chhangani G, Mahla MK, Swaminathan R, Kumayat K, Choudhary RS, Vikram. Diversity of natural enemies associated with insect pests of cowpea in Southern Rajasthan. Pharma Innov J. 2021;SP-10(12):788-90.
  5. Agale SV, Rangarao GV, Ambhure KG, Gopalakrishnan S, Wani SP. Effect of selected bio-pesticides on natural enemies in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) crop. J Ento Zool Std. 2019;7(2):91-95.
  6. Singh TR. Bio-efficacy of some novel insecticides in controlling insect and mite pests of capsicum. M Sc [Thesis] Odisa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar; 2017
  7. Rangaswamy R. A textbook of agricultural statistics. New Age International, New Delhi; 1995. p. 269-79
  8. Wagner T, Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. Wettability and contaminability of insect wings as a function of their surface sculptures. Acta Zoologica. 1996;77(3):213-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.1996.tb01265.x
  9. Fiuza LM. Receptores de Bacillus thuringiensis em insetos. Biotecnologia Ciência e Desenvolvimento. 2004;32:84-89.
  10. Bajya DR, Ranjith M, Raza SK. Evaluation of Beauveria bassiana against chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera and its safety to natural enemies. Indian J Agric Sci. 2015;85(3):378-81. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i3.47122
  11. Sahu N, Mandal SMA. Safety of cyazypyr and microbial pesticides against ladybird beetles and spiders in capsicum. J Ento Zool Std. 2020;8(2):491-93.
  12. Khan AA. Bio-efficacy of botanical pesticides against mealy cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae L.) and bio-safety against its natural enemies in cruciferous vegetable ecosystem of Kashmir. J Ento Zool Std. 2021;9(2):1332-36.
  13. Praveenkumar C, Kandibane M. Bioefficacy of botanical extracts against black gram borer pests and safety to their natural enemies. Biological Forum – An Int J. 2022;14(4a):01-06.
  14. Singh S, Das B, Devi HL, Sunani SK, Suklabaidya A, Majumder P. Evaluation of biorational pesticides against Bemisia tabaci Gennadius and Amrasca biguttula Ishida and its impact on natural enemies population in cowpea ecosystem. Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect. 2022;55(1):63-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2021.1994268
  15. Thakar PK, Patel JR, Rabari PH. Bio-efficacy of pesticides against aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch in cowpea and its effect on natural enemies. J Ento Res. 2023;47(1):126-34. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4576.2023.00022.1
  16. Cloyd RA, Herrick NJ. Effects of pesticides on the survival of rove beetle (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) and insidious flower bug (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) adults. J Econ Ento. 2018;111(1):78-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tox280
  17. Guo M, Wang Z, Cai W, Hua H, Zhao J. Safety assessment of transgenic Cry2Aa rice to a generalist predator, Paederus fuscipes Curtis (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2020;200:110719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110719

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.