Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Comparative study of phytochemical properties and antioxidant potential of Plagiochasma appendiculatum Lehm. & Lindenb. and Riccia aravalliensis Pande & Udar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11842
Submitted
18 September 2025
Published
18-03-2026

Abstract

Plants have long served as an important source of medicinal agents and bioactive compounds. This has led to using numerous medicinal plants with therapeutic properties due to their valuable bioactive compounds. Bryophytes, a group of non-vascular plants, have been reported to exhibit diverse therapeutic activities, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer and antidiabetic effects. Plagiochasma appendiculatum Lehm. & Lindenb. and Riccia aravalliensis Pandé & Udar, 2 tropical bryophyte species, were examined for their phytochemical composition and antioxidant activity. Qualitative phytochemical screening revealed the presence of various bioactive compounds in both species, with some variations across different solvent extracts. Quantitative analysis showed that P. appendiculatum generally had higher total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) compared to R. aravalliensis. Ethanol extracts demonstrated the highest TPC and TFC for both species. Antioxidant assays using 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and nitric oxide scavenging methods indicated that P. appendiculatum possessed stronger antioxidant potential than R. aravalliensis, with ethanol extracts exhibiting the highest antioxidant activity, followed by methanol and chloroform extracts. These findings suggest that both bryophyte species, particularly P. appendiculatum, are rich sources of phenolic and flavonoid compounds with significant antioxidant potential. The results highlight the potential of these non-vascular plants as valuable sources of natural antioxidants and bioactive compounds, warranting further research to isolate and characterise specific bioactive molecules and elucidate their therapeutic potential in managing oxidative stress-related conditions. This study contributes to the growing evidence supporting the medicinal value of bryophytes and their potential applications in ethnomedicine and drug discovery.

References

  1. 1. Shaw AJ, Goffinet B. Bryophyta biology. Cambridge: Syndicate of the University of Cambridge; 2000. p. 153–69. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2001.1376
  2. 2. Pandey S, Alam A. Peat moss: A hyper-sorbent for oil spill cleanup – a review. Plant Sci Today. 2019;6(4):416–9. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2019.6.4.586
  3. 3. Xie CF, Lou HX. Secondary metabolites in bryophytes: An ecological aspect. Chem Biodivers. 2009;6(3):303–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.200700450
  4. 4. Benek A, Turu D, Bozyel ME, Simsek Ö, Canlı K. The secondary metabolites of bryophytes and their therapeutic applications. In: Secondary metabolites and their applications in various diseases. Hershey: IGI Global Scientific Publishing; 2025. p. 557–88. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9112-9.ch014
  5. 5. Heinrichs J, Anton H, Gradstein SR, Mues R. Systematics of Plagiochila sect. Glaucescentes Carl (Hepaticae) from tropical America: a morphological and chemotaxonomical approach. Plant Syst Evol. 2000;220(1–2):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985374
  6. 6. Novakovic M, Ludwiczuk A, Bukvicki D, Asakawa Y. Phytochemicals from bryophytes: structures and biological activity. J Serb Chem Soc. 2021;86(12):1139–75. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC211027100N
  7. 7. Gril E, Spicher F, Vanderpoorten A, Gallet-Moron E, Brasseur B, Le Roux V, et al. The affinity of vascular plants and bryophytes to forest microclimate buffering. J Ecol. 2025;113(1):22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14425
  8. 8. Chetia T, Roy H, Boruah T. A narrative review on the ecological significance of bryophytes with a focus on its ethnobotanical utilization. S Afr J Bot. 2025;179:147–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2025.02.020
  9. 9. Shen C, Li H, Shu L, Huang WZ, Zhu RL. Ancient large-scale gene duplications and diversification in bryophytes illuminate the plant terrestrialization. New Phytol. 2025;245(5):2292–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20221
  10. 10. Ahmed D, Khan MM, Saeed R. Comparative analysis of phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant and antibacterial potential of methanolic, hexanic and aqueous extracts from Adiantum caudatum leaves. Antioxidants (Basel). 2015;4(2):394–409. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox4020394
  11. 11. Shraim AM, Ahmed TA, Rahman MM, Hijji YM. Determination of total flavonoid content by aluminium chloride assay: a critical evaluation. LWT. 2021;150:111932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111932
  12. 12. Do QD, Angkawijaya AE, Tran-Nguyen PL, Huynh LH, Soetaredjo FE, Ismadji S, et al. Effect of extraction solvent on total phenol content, total flavonoid content and antioxidant activity of Limnophila aromatica. J Food Drug Anal. 2014;22(3):296–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2013.11.001
  13. 13. Jayachandra K, Maheswaran A, Murali M. In vitro evaluation of nitric oxide scavenging activity of methanolic and aqueous extract of Syzygium cumini Linn. bark (Myrtaceae). Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2012;3(2):615–9. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232
  14. 14. Medini F, Fellah H, Ksouri R, Abdelly C. Total phenolic, flavonoid and tannin contents and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of organic extracts of shoots of Limonium delicatulum. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2014;8(3):216–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2014.01.003
  15. 15. Petkova N, Ivanov I, Vrancheva R. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of bryophytes: a review. Plants. 2023;12(4):845. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040845
  16. 16. Sabovljević M, Vujičić M, Sabovljević A. Bryophytes as a potential source of natural antioxidants. Phytochem Rev. 2020;19:993–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-020-09665-5
  17. 17. Nastić N, Boroja T, Mihailović V. Antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of bryophytes. S Afr J Bot. 2020;128:204–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2019.10.019
  18. 18. Singh M, Rawat A, Pant G. Antioxidant potential of selected liverworts from Western Himalaya. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2019;9(6):89–95. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2019.90613
  19. 19. Bhattarai HD, Paudel B, Lee YK, Yim JH. Antioxidant activity of marine and terrestrial bryophytes. Nat Prod Commun. 2021;16(3):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X21991751
  20. 20. Asakawa Y, Ludwiczuk A, Nagashima F. Chemical constituents of bryophytes: bio- and chemical diversity. Phytochemistry. 2019;160:34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2018.12.012

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.